Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3025 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This exchange is from another thread, but I didn't want to hijack that thread, so I started another. I've seen these claims, but never followed through on the discussion. I'm sure it's old news to most here, but I just joined recently and I promise I'll share my follow up thoughts and quit harping on these points thereafter:

OP: The things I read about GI irons that gives me pause are b) the jacked up lofts, c) harsher feel (forged vs cast?)

Response: b) Lower CoG with traditional lofts cause the ball to launch too high with too much spin, affecting trajectory and control. If the ball is hit too high with too much spin, you can actually lose distance.

c) I'm not sure where you get this from. All clubs feel harsh when they aren't hit from the sweetspot and GI irons are designed to effectively increase the size of the sweetspot, making them "softer" over a wider area on the face. Most people complain about GI irons not giving enough feedback because they mask the feel of mishits to some degree.

The whole forged vs cast thing is old school nonsense. I've read articles that say most people doing blind tests couldn't tell the two apart.

Follow up: b) I keep reading lower CoG has increased launch angles so the lower lofts are necessary to compensate. However, my old (forged CB) 7-iron has a loft of 35° and I hit it 150 yards. Most modern GI 7-irons have lofts from 30°-31° and hit about 160 yards for me. BUT the modern 8-iron in that same set has a loft of 34.5° and I hit it about 150 yards. So it sure looks to me like they've just stamped a 7-iron with an 8 to make players think they hit longer. Makes it hard to believe there's any real distance in the modern sets when the same loft goes the same distance as my old clubs.

c) IME there can be a marked difference between the feel of clubs, and that's important to me, more than added distance. There are some clubs that feel awful to me even when I hit them dead center. I am sure it's not just forged vs cast, but I sure wish I could identify which GI clubs still have some of that soft feel and which have that harsh, loud feel no matter how well you it it.

Edited by Midpack
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

The GI 7I launches at about the same angle as the MB 7I. To do that with a lower CG they have to reduce the loft.

Low CG = high launch, lower spin, often more distance given the launch angle.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 hours ago, iacas said:

The GI 7I launches at about the same angle as the MB 7I. To do that with a lower CG they have to reduce the loft.

Any indication that SGI clubs have very low lofts to account for the fact that many high HDCP players tend to flip their iron shots?

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
On 8/20/2017 at 0:41 PM, Midpack said:

I keep reading lower CoG has increased launch angles so the lower lofts are necessary to compensate. However, my old (forged CB) 7-iron has a loft of 35° and I hit it 150 yards. Most modern GI 7-irons have lofts from 30°-31° and hit about 160 yards for me. BUT the modern 8-iron in that same set has a loft of 34.5° and I hit it about 150 yards. So it sure looks to me like they've just stamped a 7-iron with an 8 to make players think they hit longer. Makes it hard to believe there's any real distance in the modern sets when the same loft goes the same distance as my old clubs.

As @iacas stated, the 7 irons launch at the same angle despite the GI irons having stronger lofts and going farther. This allows you to hit one less club as your 150 club which has the added advantage of being easier to hit because you are hitting a higher club. Balls launched more vertically tend to move less laterally.

On 8/20/2017 at 0:41 PM, Midpack said:

IME there can be a marked difference between the feel of clubs, and that's important to me, more than added distance. There are some clubs that feel awful to me even when I hit them dead center. I am sure it's not just forged vs cast, but I sure wish I could identify which GI clubs still have some of that soft feel and which have that harsh, loud feel no matter how well you it it.

Feel is subjective and shaft plays a part, too. You'd have to demo a bunch of combinations and get an idea of what you like, or better yet, get a good fitting so you can find what you like and what performs best for your game.


Honestly @Midpack I don't know you or your game and I certainly don't have a vested interest in whether or not you purchase new clubs. If you don't want to play GI irons, that's fine. I know a number of players who use 20+ year old clubs. 

But you've made a number of posts about this subject and I think you're kind of limiting yourself with these preconceptions about modern club design and GI clubs. Is there a lot of marketing hype? Sure. There's also real advancement being made.

BTW those claims that X golfer increased 20 yards by changing to new equipment? They're based off of fitting players into new clubs who were using old equipment that's poorly fit for them.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Yes, I'm very sorry, probably shouldn't have started the thread but in considering new clubs I can't get past my old 7-iron plays the same distance as a modern 8-iron and the lofts are the same. Of course a modern 7-iron with 4-5 deg less loft than mine hits longer (without a change in CoG), that's no surprise. But I'll keep my opinion to myself, and maybe buy new GI clubs and see for myself. I'm just afraid of spending $900-1200 only to find I might as well of kept my old forged CB's. I don't mind spending money at all, but I hate just wasting it...

Edited by Midpack
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The questions to ask might be...What game and what improvement?  If you are comfortable, and familiar, with your current trajectories; learning a new set of numbers may not seem particularly useful.  There is a lot to be said for knowing what to expect.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
37 minutes ago, Midpack said:

I can't get past my old 7-iron plays the same distance as a modern 8-iron and the lofts are the same. Of course a modern 7-iron with 4-5 deg less loft than mine hits longer (without a change in CoG), that's no surprise.

There's a lot more to distance than static loft and there's a lot more to trajectory than distance.

How high are you hitting it? Spin rate? Descent angle? What kind of ball speed losses do you get on off center hits?

37 minutes ago, Midpack said:

But I'll keep my opinion to myself, and maybe buy new GI clubs and see for myself. I'm just afraid of spending $900-1200 only to find I might as well of kept my old forged CB's. I don't mind spending money at all, but I hate just wasting it...

I wouldnt recommend spending $900 on clubs just to test them. Get a good fitting, even if you have to pay for one. Demo clubs. Maybe you'll like new GI clubs. Maybe you're just as well off with your old CBs. Maybe you'll fit into MB. Who knows? Better than buying a set to try out.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Piz said:

The questions to ask might be...What game and what improvement?  If you are comfortable, and familiar, with your current trajectories; learning a new set of numbers may not seem particularly useful.  There is a lot to be said for knowing what to expect.

I'm comfortable with my distances. I hit irons higher than anyone I know, so hitting higher (as many say low CoG GI irons apparently offer) would probably be an issue for me at least on windy days. The only reason I'm looking is I don't hit the center of the face like I used to, and may never again, so GI sounds like it might fit my current/future game better than my old 385 MPF irons.

Edited by Midpack
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sounds like higher MOI is what you are after.  That can be found in a longer blade.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 hours ago, billchao said:

BTW those claims that X golfer increased 20 yards by changing to new equipment? They're based off of fitting players into new clubs who were using old equipment that's poorly fit for them.

Yup.  The Pings I'm ordering, I hit the 7-iron on a monitor 150.  My 6, same loft, I say I hit it 135-140, but if my target is 140 out and is the middle of the green, I'm probably missing short if I hit my 6.

BTW, Midpack -- as Piz says, longer blades can be more forgiving if that's what you're looking for. Maltby MMB-17s might be something to look into.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I just watched Rick Shiels review on the new 718 AP1 irons. Yes the launch angles are the same between players irons and GI irons. The CG is definitely lower and to the rear in GI irons. It's not much more than a few millimeters vertically. But it does make a difference.

For instance, the AP1 PW is 43° and AP2 is 46° both launch about the same. Spin a little higher with the AP2. Peak height higher with the AP1. Descent angle higher with the AP1.

@Midpack It doesn't matter the static loft of the number or letter stamped on the bottom of the club. Knowing how far you hit that club. If you want to compare apples to apples, compare two clubs of similar loft when testing. So if the store or fitting center has 7-irons in GI clubs to test, take your 6-iron to test against it.

Irons are much more forgiving than they were at the start of the 21st Century. And the golf balls have gotten better as well. Longer blade length might help you out.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

@Midpack It doesn't matter the static loft of the number or letter stamped on the bottom of the club. Knowing how far you hit that club. If you want to compare apples to apples, compare two clubs of similar loft when testing. So if the store or fitting center has 7-irons in GI clubs to test, take your 6-iron to test against it.

Irons are much more forgiving than they were at the start of the 21st Century. And the golf balls have gotten better as well. Longer blade length might help you out.

That's exactly what I've done, compare my 6-iron to the 7-iron for the new set where lofts are similar. And lengths are about the same, that's my point. Unfortunately hitting on a launch monitor doesn't give me a good sense of how they'll play on a course. For example if I hit even higher, or run longer (less spin) that would be unwelcome.  Or if somehow dispersion is worse, though that seems highly unlikely.

But I'll probably bite the bullet and buy Mizuno JPX900 Forged or Hot Metals. Though two of the Titleist 718's might be appealing too.

Thanks for your patience.

Edited by Midpack
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3025 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.