Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Stableford Strategy


Note: This thread is 2732 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have my annual society day soon ,and , unlike our monthly outings, this one will be Stableford. I am familiar with Stableford but normally play it in very relaxed games where I'm not really as focused on the points as just playing good golf. 

I was wondering  about how to best maximise the potential of stableford (with handicaps). Obviously the main difference is that disaster holes are penalised no more than a hole that doesn't get any points (given I have  shot on most holes, that's triple bogey), but I rarely see any practical ways to make the difference count , since a double bogey would just as penal under either format on most holes. 

If i have a putt or chip for double bogey, then I'll not worry about it going past. Also, if I have an approach where, perhaps due to penalties, I have only 3 shots left for a point, then I'll cease worrying about hitting into hazards. I don't really change my strategy otherwise, certainly not off the tee, although it may make sense to do so. 

Interested to hear any thoughts & tips as to how to maximise this format. 



 


  • Moderator
Posted
2 minutes ago, Moxley said:

I have my annual society day soon ,and , unlike our monthly outings, this one will be Stableford. I am familiar with Stableford but normally play it in very relaxed games where I'm not really as focused on the points as just playing good golf. 

I was wondering  about how to best maximise the potential of stableford (with handicaps). Obviously the main difference is that disaster holes are penalised no more than a hole that doesn't get any points (given I have  shot on most holes, that's triple bogey), but I rarely see any practical ways to make the difference count , since a double bogey would just as penal under either format on most holes. 

If i have a putt or chip for double bogey, then I'll not worry about it going past. Also, if I have an approach where, perhaps due to penalties, I have only 3 shots left for a point, then I'll cease worrying about hitting into hazards. I don't really change my strategy otherwise, certainly not off the tee, although it may make sense to do so. 

Interested to hear any thoughts & tips as to how to maximise this format. 



 

I am assuming you are applying your course handicap to the scorecard. For Stableford, I focus on putting myself in position to get points. If I have a good drive, obviously I am looking for par or net birdie if that applies.

For bad drives, I focus on getting myself into position for no less than a bogey or net par if that applies. This means no 'hero' shots after a bad tee shot, but getting the ball back into the fairway as far down as possible to give myself a good approach shot. I know this strategy should apply at all times, even in stroke play, but it is crucial in Stableford.

Also, if you know your shot zones, use them! Avoid penalty areas and bunkers. 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Essentially, unless you’re near a border where nothing changes (like bogey is 1 point but anything higher is 0), play your normal game. Too many people get tricked into trying to do something special or different.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I wouldn't think you played any differently. Try using as few strokes as possible. The exception might be putts or chips where you get one point if it drains. There's nothing to lose on using ten more shots, so make sure you don't hit it short.

Sit down and write down how many extra strokes you are given on every hole. You might get two strokes on one par four and one on the next. Again, this mostly matters when you need to hole the next stroke to get a point. For instance if you got a long uphill putt for one point that you most likely won't make. Normally you might avoid hitting past the hole to get an uphill putt next. With Stableford there's no risk and you don't want to leave it short.

The biggest difference with Stableford is that you can't get less than zero points on any hole. 

Edited by Zeph

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Our mens night is a stableford using handicap.

Trying to shoot no worse than bogey appears to be the strategy. 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes, Stableford is slightly skewed in favor of mid/high HCPs who tend to make one of more triple bogey or worse in a round. 

I don't know if there is a Stableford 'strategy' that would be diff from normal round but since you are a 14, please know that nGIRs are very acceptable. And when you do get one, the sole purpose for the next shot should be to get anywhere you can putt from. 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Fair enough, consensus seems to be mostly play your normal game. 

 

1 hour ago, GolfLug said:

Yes, Stableford is slightly skewed in favor of mid/high HCPs who tend to make one of more triple bogey or worse in a round. 

 

 

On the whole I think it's a slight equaliser, although I think it's more skewed towards younger players / bigger hitters than it is just on handicap. The sort of player whose card has both birdies and 8+'s.


Posted
On 9/13/2018 at 5:22 AM, iacas said:

Essentially, unless you’re near a border where nothing changes (like bogey is 1 point but anything higher is 0), play your normal game. Too many people get tricked into trying to do something special or different.

Would the strategy be much different for modified stableford seen at the Barracuda?

2 hours ago, Moxley said:

Fair enough, consensus seems to be mostly play your normal game. 

 

 

On the whole I think it's a slight equaliser, although I think it's more skewed towards younger players / bigger hitters than it is just on handicap. The sort of player whose card has both birdies and 8+'s.

Looking at my game, I think I'd be a better Stableford player than stroke.

Saw this from mygolfspy, but compared to my handicap, I have more pars but more triple/quad bogeys than the average 20 HI.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

 

2 hours ago, Moxley said:

The sort of player whose card has both birdies and 8+'s.

Yeah, anybody can come and kill it every now and then. But how likely/frequent is that type of mix on the same card? Not very, IMO. If it is frequent enough, they would have an accordingly higher quota. 

In the long run, it's still an equitable system.

40 minutes ago, cutchemist42 said:

Looking at my game, I think I'd be a better Stableford player than stroke.

Saw this from mygolfspy, but compared to my handicap, I have more pars but more triple/quad bogeys than the average 20 HI.

I'm not sure that's a given. Unlike HCP where only the top 50% of the last 20 rounds count, every score counts in your running Stableford quota. 

Right now my Sunday league Stableford quota is 3 strokes/points worse cuz all my scores are counted towards the running average of the last 5 rounds. I actually like that it is a more current (in my league, last 5 rounds only) representation of the state of one's game. But based on yesterday's round it will jump a couple for the next round. Obviously my HCP's won't change as much that quickly. 

  • Informative 1

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2732 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • This is an awesome breakdown. most of the bigger tournaments usually have one wave with the advantage, Thank you for the breakdown. If it is soft then it will be a lower final score
    • Over the past 15 years, the winning score has ranged from -10 to -20. Mostly around -13.  Here is Thursday and Friday weather. Saturday and Sunday weather. I think the course will play soft. Plenty of sky cover, lots of rain on Thursday. Fairways and greens will probably stay soft throughout the week.  In terms of tee times, I think Thursday morning and Friday afternoon have the biggest advantage. I bolded the big group of each set.  Most beneficial with the weather Round 1: No. 1 tee, Round 2: No. 10 tee 7:40 a.m., 12:30 p.m.: Mark Hubbard, Thorbjørn Olesen, Mac Meissner 7:52 a.m., 12:42 p.m.: Bud Cauley, Vince Whaley, Chandler Phillips 8:04 a.m., 12:54 p.m.: Emiliano Grillo, Christiaan Bezuidenhout, Max Greyserman 8:16 a.m., 1:06 p.m.: Kevin Yu, Cam Davis, Gary Woodland 8:28 a.m., 1:18 p.m.: Ricky Castillo, Ryan Gerard, Patrick Cantlay 8:40 a.m., 1:30 p.m.: Adam Schenk, Garrick Higgo, Matt McCarty 8:52 a.m., 1:42 p.m.: Brian Harman, Maverick McNealy, Davis Riley 9:04 a.m., 1:54 p.m.: Sami Valimaki, Lucas Glover, Matt Fitzpatrick 9:16 a.m., 2:06 p.m.: Michael Brennan, Harris English, J.T. Poston 9:28 a.m., 2:18 p.m.: Haotong Li, Zecheng Dou, Jordan Smith Round 1: No. 10 tee, Round 2: No. 1 tee 7:40 a.m., 12:30 p.m.: Mackenzie Hughes, Eric Cole, Rico Hoey 7:52 a.m., 12:42 p.m.: Max Homa, Daniel Berger, Michael Thorbjornsen 8:04 a.m., 12:54 p.m.: Rasmus Højgaard, Danny Walker, Kristoffer Reitan 8:16 a.m., 1:06 p.m.: Jhonattan Vegas, Taylor Pendrith, Alex Noren 8:28 a.m., 1:18 p.m.: Akshay Bhatia, Brooks Koepka, Tony Finau 8:40 a.m., 1:30 p.m.: Collin Morikawa, Ludvig Åberg, Si Woo Kim 8:52 a.m., 1:42 p.m.: Scottie Scheffler, Tommy Fleetwood, Justin Thomas 9:04 a.m., 1:54 p.m.: Viktor Hovland, Russell Henley, Robert MacIntyre 9:16 a.m., 2:06 p.m.: Aldrich Potgieter, Jake Knapp, Sungjae Im 9:28 a.m., 2:18 p.m.: Patton Kizzire, Seamus Power, Johnny Keefer Most hurt by the weather Round 1: No. 1 tee, Round 2: No. 10 tee 12:30 p.m., 7:40 a.m.: Lee Hodges, Andrew Putnam, Sam Stevens 12:42 p.m., 7:52 a.m.: Erik van Rooyen, Keith Mitchell, Michael Kim 12:54 p.m., 8:04 a.m.: Taylor Moore, Joel Dahmen, Ryo Hisatsune 1:06 p.m., 8:16 a.m.: Jacob Bridgeman, Ben Griffin, Adam Scott 1:18 p.m., 8:28 a.m.: J.J. Spaun, Sepp Straka, Shane Lowry 1:30 p.m., 8:40 a.m.: Sahith Theegala, Rickie Fowler, Jordan Spieth 1:42 p.m., 8:52 a.m.: Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy, Hideki Matsuyama 1:54 p.m., 9:04 a.m.: Chris Gotterup, Justin Rose, Min Woo Lee 2:06 p.m., 9:16 a.m.: Brian Campbell, Karl Vilips, Aaron Rai 2:18 p.m., 9:28 a.m.: Matti Schmid, Max McGreevy, Takumi Kanaya 2:30 p.m., 9:40 a.m.: Zach Bauchou, Sudarshan Yellamaraju, A.J. Ewart Round 1: No. 10 tee, Round 2: No. 1 tee 12:30 p.m., 7:40 a.m.: Tom Hoge, Denny McCarthy, Nicolai Højgaard 12:42 p.m., 7:52 a.m.: Patrick Rodgers, Kevin Roy, Marco Penge 12:54 p.m., 8:04 a.m.: Chad Ramey, Alex Smalley, Pierceson Coody 1:06 p.m., 8:16 a.m.: Kurt Kitayama, Harry Hall, Stephan Jaeger 1:18 p.m., 8:28 a.m.: Keegan Bradley, Ryan Fox, Chris Kirk 1:30 p.m., 8:40 a.m.: Andrew Novak, Nick Taylor, Wyndham Clark 1:42 p.m., 8:52 a.m.: Steven Fisk, William Mouw, Joe Highsmith 1:54 p.m., 9:04 a.m.: Cameron Young, Davis Thompson, Sam Burns 2:06 p.m., 9:16 a.m.: Nico Echavarria, Jason Day, Corey Conners 2:18 p.m., 9:28 a.m.: Matthieu Pavon, S.H. Kim, Austin Smotherman  
    • Things that I am or have worked on... 1.    Trail Elbow - Check 2.    Hip Turn - Check 3.    Rolled Inside - Check 4.    Wide Takeaway - Check 5.    Sway and Tilt - Nope, but I did a hip turn and tilt 🤣 I am giving myself 4.5/5 for my long backswing.  Great post! 
    • We have a very difficult but mostly showy course this week. Lets see what they got. This course offers so many chances to get into trouble it is really a mental minefield. I am excited to see who can handle it and who cant. Last year we got a foreshadowing of JJ and Rory, I am excited for this year Who do people have winning? what will the winning score be? I am thinking 12 or 13 under
    • Wordle 1,726 6/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.