Jump to content
IGNORED

TaylorMade Introduces RocketBallz Driver, Fairway Woods and Rescues!


mvmac
Note: This thread is 4379 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

This Wednesday I was able to attend a TaylorMade media day event yesterday at the La Costa Resort.  Want to thank all the great TMAG staffers (Christa, Michael, Dave and Mike) for having me and sharing this exciting line of prodcuts.  I was even able to play a round with Tom Kroll, the global product lines manager for woods.

For more on all of TaylorMade's New line of products, check out these links:

R11S Thread

RocketBallz Irons and RocketBallz Max Irons

Penta TP5 Golf Balls

RocketBallz Driver

I have to admit I still thought the name RocketBallz was a joke even before I was given the presentation yesterday.  But there i s a much larger story to it.  It was based off testing TMAG tour staffer Dustin Johnson's experience with the prototype.  “I brought the prototype out to some players and Dustin Johnson was the first one to test it,” said Todd Chew, Tour Product Specialist.  “He's unbelievably long, as we all know, but he was just blown away by how far the Rescue was going. Dustin said a couple of times,'It‟s like a rocket.' When the prototype returned from initial field testing, Taylormade's engineers took the creative liberty to etch the name, “ RocketBallz ,” into both the CAD model and the sole of the prototype clubhead. “I never thought RocketBallz would actually show up on the prototype,” said Todd Beach, Senior Director of Product Engineering, Metalwoods.  "Typically, it's got an MW label and a number on there, whatever our number is. When the prototype came back, I was like, 'What are you guys doing?'  I can‟t believe you put that on there. There‟s no way we‟re going to call the product that." The marketing department decided to keep the name, never has a product name come from the R&D; department.

RBZ Speed_Driver_3_4.jpg

TMAG is calling this line the hottest name in golf and feel they couldn't have called it anything else.  They are boasting HUGE distance gains, they can legally claim 17 yards increased distance with the fairway wood.  Dustin Johnson was hitting it 330!

The driver will come in 2 models, RocketBallz and RocketBallz Tour.  The great feature of both drivers it that they are tunable at $299.  Something TMAG thought was important since they place so much emphasis on the golfer being fitter for correct equipment.

RBZ Speed_Driver_Address.jpg

Design Features for the RocketBallz Driver:

- White Crown, PVD black face for improved alignment, elimination of glare, and  because the white color, the 460cc RBZ driver appear slightly (2%) larger, which when compared to the size of the ball, TMAG feels, adds confidence builder when teeing off.

- Shallower profile than the R11S for higher launch

- More draw bias than R11S

- Flight Control Technology (FCT) which allows the golfer to easily adjust the performance angles (face angle, loft and lie) of the RBZ driver to one of 8 settings via the FCT sleeve. These settings allow a range of launch conditions that promote up to 60 yards of side-to-side trajectory adjustment.

- a modern, aerodynamically shaped clubhead outfitted with a lightweight, 50-gram shaft. This shaft is 1/2" shorter than the Burner 2.0.  Golfers were complaining about the 2.0 shaft being too long and sacrificing accuracy.  They made an adjustment, went shorter, 46", with the length without giving up distance.

- CG further apart and closer to the face for more ball speed.

- Inverted Cone design for optimal ball speed.

The Tour version is a little different:

-more compact looking

-deeper face

-1/4" shorter

RBZ Speed_Driver_Toe.jpg

Quote:

We’re setting a new standard in the driver category as speed, adjust ability and Tour-validated performance have never been so affordable,‖ said executive vice president Sean Toulon. ―The name RocketBallz is obviously polarizing and helps capture the distance performance story but golfers cannot overlook the power of tuning these new products. Never before have we had so many fitting options in a single driver franchise; there’s a RocketBallz driver out there for everyone.

RBZ Speed_Driver_Face.jpg

My Take

I enjoyed hitting the Tour driver in the 9* head.  Testing it against the R11S it went slightly further and both were longer than my R11.  Again I was able to test the same shaft in all 3 heads.  The look is for those who like the Superfast 2.0 or PING drivers.  I think it's better looking than the 2.0 which I didn't like at all.  More compact gives it a stealthy, bullet like appeal.  Ball flight was lower than the R11 and for me had a tighter dispersion.  The white crown works with the bits of lime and it's fun to yell "RocketBallz!" after a good driver.  Best driver out there at $299, no question.

TOUR Driver face, notice the deeper profile

RBZ Tour_Driver_Face.jpg

Availability and Pricing

The RocketBallz driver will be offered in two models to cater to a wide range of players. The RBZ driver is available in three lofts – 9.5°, 10.5° and HL (high-launch), while the RBZ Tour comes in 9° and 10.5°. The standard RBZ SuperFast Matrix Ozik XCON 5 shaft comes in four shaft flexes – S, R, M and L. The RBZ Tour model comes equipped with a Matrix Ozik XCon 6, 55-gram shaft in X, S and R flexes, with the option of 25 additional shaft choices.

Both RocketBallz drivers will sell at $299 and are available at retail on Feb. 3, 2012.

RocketBallz Fairway Metals and Rescues

These will be huge in 2012.  TMAG rolled out a carpet during the presentation to illustrate how far 17 yards was.  That is about the average distance increase they are seeing and what they can legally claim.  Sean Toulon calls it the "Most incredible machine ever created".

RBZ Speed_Fwy_3_4.jpg

So how did they make the fairway wood so much hotter?  They found a way to push the limits of COR (coefficient of restitution) to the limit.  Something that has never been done before in steel fairway woods.  Here's what TMAG did

- Deeper face, for a larger trampoline.

-  improved sole geometry and a “Speed Pocket” to improve overall head and face flexibility

- CG moved forward and below the center axis.  Previous fairway woods have the CG too low and back with a majority of golfers hit too low off the far, producing low launching and high spinning shots.  Promotes a higher launch angle and lower spin-rate, better distance

The incorporation of deeper face, low-and-forward CG and RocketBallz technology has allowed us to create the first steel fairway that reaches USGA/R&A; speed limits.

RBZ Speed_Fwy_Address.jpg

Quote:

“The RocketBallz fairway woods and Rescues represent a game-changing breakthrough in performance comparable to few products in the history of our industry,” said Sean Toulon, Executive Vice President of TaylorMade. “To hold a RocketBallz metalwood in your hands is to possess confidence, power, speed and distance potential that will regularly and quite literally redefine the long game for golfers.”

TMAG compared their RockerBallz 3 wood to another company that has a pocket on the sole.  TMAG was able to increase the COR from .77 to .81 by making the face deeper, moving the CG while the other competitor club went from .74 to .76

More spring like effect, more distance.

RBZ Speed_Fwy_Toe.jpg

My Take

Even though there are all these great design features the club looks really pleasing to the eye at address.  Similar to the Burner 2.0 but with improved symmetry.  Really frames the ball well, looks easy to hit off a fairway lie or a tee.  I personally saw distance increases, not exactly sure how much but watched other golfers get on a launch monitor and see some major distance jumps, some were 20 yards farther!  RocketBallz is the real deal and you could hear players from the media day yelling "RocketBallz!" throughout the course.

RBZ Speed_Rescue_3_4.jpg

The RocketBallz Rescue is just as impressive, TMAG claims it's 10 yards farther.  Very similar attributes to the fairway metal, looks great and launches.  There will also be a Tour version of both the fairway and Rescue RBZ clubs.  Characteristics are a smaller address appearance, a slightly open face angle, a toe- weighted CG, and both are equipped with a heavier, stiffer, tour-grade shaft.

Unlike the RBZ driver, the RBZ fairway and Rescue are not adjustable

RBZ Speed_Rescue_Address.jpg

Pricing and Availability

The RocketBallz fairways’ lightweight shaft and grip are critical to the overall weight of just 315 grams. The RocketBallz fairway woods come standard with a Matrix Ozik XCon 5 50-gram graphite shaft in four flexes (S, R, M, L). It will be offered in three lofts for right-handed golfers (Lofts: RH: 3-15°, 3HL-17°, 5-19°, 7-21°, 9-24°) and three for left-handed golfers (LH: 3-15°, 5-18°, 7-21°).

The RocketBallz Tour fairway woods come standard with a Matrix Ozik RUL 70 75-gram graphite shaft in three flexes (X, S, R). It will be offered in three lofts for right-handed golfers only (Lofts: RH: 13°, 14.5°, 18°). Additionally, a selection of 25 custom TP shafts will be available for upgrade.

RBZ Speed_Rescue_Toe.jpg

The RocketBallz Rescues come standard with a 65-gram graphite shaft in four flexes (S, R, M, L). It will be offered in four lofts for right-handed golfers only (Lofts: 3-19°, 4-21°, 5-24°, 6-27°).

The RocketBallz Tour Rescues come standard with an 85-gram graphite shaft in three flexes (X, S, R). It will be offered in four lofts for right-handed golfers only (Lofts: 2-16.5°, 3-18.5°, 4-21.5°). Additionally, a selection of 5 custom TP shafts will be available for purchase.

All of the RocketBallz fairway woods and RocketBallz Rescues are available on February 3, 2012 with the individual product pricing listed below.

RocketBallz Fairway Woods: $229 RocketBallz Tour Fairway Woods: $229 RocketBallz Fairways with TP shaft upgrade: $32

RocketBallz Rescues: $179 RocketBallz Tour Rescues: $179 RocketBallz Rescues with TP shaft upgrade: $229

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Great Review - I still think the name is a joke when I hear it...

|Callaway I-MIX FT-9  - Driver | Callaway Diablo Octane - 3 Wood | Callaway Diablo Edge Tour [3H & 4H] - Hybrids | Callaway X-forged 2009 - Irons | Callaway JAWS [52, 56, 60] - Wedges | SC Studio Style Newport 2 / Laguna 1.5 / Kombi-S - Putter |
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Not sure what the fuss is about, technically, with the "super hot" 3 wood and its stated 0.81 COR? Tom Wishon has had 0.83 COR fairways for sale since 2004, they were called the 515GRT. These also had a deeper face (36 mm) and were made from a carpenter steel alloy, so TM is blowing smoke about "never been done before in steel fairway woods." In fact, Wishon subsequently got a step further down the road and figured out how to get 0.83 COR out of a smaller trampoline area, allowing them to shallow the face out to 32 mm and preserve the lower profile most people like in a fairway. I've got one of those 2nd generation clubs (949MC)  in my bag and if the RBZ is 17 yards longer I'll eat my Official TWGT Fan Club badge.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Great writeup mvmac - very envious that you got to hit them. I am in the market for a new 3 wood and was looking at the superfast 2.0 so can't wait to get my hands ob one of these. From what you say it looks like it will be worth the wait. Roll on Feb.

In my mizuno.gif Neo Cart Bag or rife.gif Staff Bag on clicgear.gif 2.0 Trolley
 Driver: R11 10.5* |  3W: CB4 15* | adams.gif Hybrid: Idea Pro (20* & 23*)
bridgestone.gif Irons: J36 Cavity Back (5-PW) | vokey.gif Wedges: S.M Oil Cans: 52.08, 56.08 & 60.04
rife.gif Putter: 2-bar Hybrid Blade | bridgestone.gif Ball: B330-RX  Ball: Pro V1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator


Originally Posted by the19thhole

Great writeup mvmac - very envious that you got to hit them. I am in the market for a new 3 wood and was looking at the superfast 2.0 so can't wait to get my hands ob one of these. From what you say it looks like it will be worth the wait. Roll on Feb.



yeah definitely wait for Feb

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator


Originally Posted by Maverick

hmm..very wary of the name and marketing..I predict it will go the same way as Callaway C4 driver.


Don't think so.  The problem with the C4 is that is performed poorly and sounded worse.  The RockerBallz are good stuff

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by mattshaver

everyone should check out the video of dustin johnson hitting the RBZ 3W. his last shot in the video is like 330, 300 carry or something silly like that. jaw, meet floor.



It's impressive and all....but give him another 3 wood with same strength loft etc - and it'll probably go as far.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Kieran123

It's impressive and all....but give him another 3 wood with same strength loft etc - and it'll probably go as far.


Maybe he could, but Sean O'Hair in his fitting hit his original R11 3W 282y total and the Rocketballz 3W 306y total - that's insane off the deck and said himself he's never hit a 3W 300+. That's a big improvement.

In my mizuno.gif Neo Cart Bag or rife.gif Staff Bag on clicgear.gif 2.0 Trolley
 Driver: R11 10.5* |  3W: CB4 15* | adams.gif Hybrid: Idea Pro (20* & 23*)
bridgestone.gif Irons: J36 Cavity Back (5-PW) | vokey.gif Wedges: S.M Oil Cans: 52.08, 56.08 & 60.04
rife.gif Putter: 2-bar Hybrid Blade | bridgestone.gif Ball: B330-RX  Ball: Pro V1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Kieran123

It's impressive and all....but give him another 3 wood with same strength loft etc - and it'll probably go as far.



sure, i guess i wasn't really commenting so much on how awesome the club is, but that i think it's crazy to hit a 3W that far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by the19thhole

Maybe he could, but Sean O'Hair in his fitting hit his original R11 3W 282y total and the Rocketballz 3W 306y total - that's insane off the deck and said himself he's never hit a 3W 300+. That's a big improvement.


Same lofts?

Anyway, the guy is sponsored by TMAG....not like he's gonna say it's just the same as any other 3 wood...they pay him

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Kieran123

Same lofts?

Anyway, the guy is sponsored by TMAG....not like he's gonna say it's just the same as any other 3 wood...they pay him


I agree it could have been a stronger 3W. He never said it was better (same), just that he'd never hit a 3W 300+ off the deck. Maybe I'm just buying into the hype, but being in the market for a new 3W I'm going wait and try it out.

In my mizuno.gif Neo Cart Bag or rife.gif Staff Bag on clicgear.gif 2.0 Trolley
 Driver: R11 10.5* |  3W: CB4 15* | adams.gif Hybrid: Idea Pro (20* & 23*)
bridgestone.gif Irons: J36 Cavity Back (5-PW) | vokey.gif Wedges: S.M Oil Cans: 52.08, 56.08 & 60.04
rife.gif Putter: 2-bar Hybrid Blade | bridgestone.gif Ball: B330-RX  Ball: Pro V1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yep! These look awesome....I'm a huge taylormade guy, so i may be biased, but i have the burner 3 wood in my bag now and its my favourite club to hit.  This new club makes we want to take out my favourite club

Watch DJ just destroy this club

Tiger90

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4379 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Feel free to read or not, this is more of a benchmark post for me but I wouldn't mind questions and feedback either. In the words of Arnold Palmer, "Swing your swing". So much easier said than done. Videos to come soon (to the probable horror of most of you here lol), but man: this took along time. Hogan wasn't kidding when he said the secret was in the dirt. Can't say I'm not happy about it though. So here was my situation: My first (and only) post here was back in 2019 about trying to game a new 3-wood to replace my old 2008 Taylormade Burner (which I loved but only carried 208 yards with a stupid-high spin rate).  At that time I had been golfing for about 8 years., I was hitting four 80-ball buckets per day (320 total, I'm a psycho) and playing two rounds per week. I was using a "Width Swing" (probably my 15th try at a 'better' swing) from a book and videos called "The L.A.W.S of Golf" by Jim Suttie, TJ Tomasi and Mike Adams. Since I had hardly any flexibility back then at 49 (still don't lol), I had to get my clubhead depth from the width dimension, meaning dropping back my right foot, flaring my feet, and swinging around my body. This took a ton of work, but I got down from a 15 handicap to an 8 by using it, so I was pretty ecstatic. The problem? My lower back hated it, and I mean bad. Really bad. Like pull-out-in-the-middle-of-a-Houston-Amateur-Golf-Tour-tournament bad. Soooo...while playing some of my best golf, I just figured my golf days were over, especially after the Rona hit the next year in 2020 and shut everything down. I figured I would simply be a golf fan for the rest of my life, and that my days of playing (painfully) were done Fast forward three years. I *really* missed playing golf. I started watching (hold your nose) videos of Moe Norman's swing on YouTube and then that led down the rabbit hole of watching videos of Matt Kuchar and Craig Stadler and Bryson DeChambeau and videos by Kirk Junge and Todd Graves...you get the idea. This went on for weeks...and this is how we always get sucked back in, right? Single plane was supposedly the cure for lower back pain because the extension and torque could be mitigated to a degree that might make a golf swing tolerable for someone with lower back issues. I really missed playing the game, so last fall I thought to myself: "Self, you have nothing to lose. Get your clubs out of the trunk (they'd been sitting in there for three years).  Hold your arms straight and look like an idiot at the PGA Superstore in one of the swing bays trying this single plane swing and at least you'll be the only one who has to witness it." I tried it...and it went horribly wrong. I couldn't even get the ball in the air, I was topping everything at first. Then when I tried Moe Norman's famous 'vertical drop' as he called it, I fatted the mat every time. This went on for the hour I was in there. I left there tired, frustrated and about to say 'screw it'. But when I got to my car and went to get in the seat, I noticed something: Even after about a hundred swings, my back was totally fine. I thought maybe it was because I had injured it all those years ago with a rotary swing and now it had healed. Hmmmm...maybe that was it. After a couple days at home, and more video-watching of Moe and Moe alone, I went back to the hitting bay to see if I could find some sort of workable single plane swing based on what I had watched and taken notes on. This session went much better. Pretty straight ball flight (my miss was a slight cut), and no pulls or hooks (my old misses were the dreaded two-way misses, block or pull-hook). I had kinda-sorta figured out the 'vertical drop' deal, but it was too hard to time it consistently. When I did get the timing right, the ball went dead straight. HOWEVER...I was hitting with a 7-iron the whole time and my normal 148-yard shot now only traveled 134. 14 yards is a lot to give up...but I chalked it up to my swinging slower to get the timing down. Plus, I had no idea how the longer clubs would do or if I could even hit, say, a 3-wood with this swing. After another hundred shots or so, I called it a session and went home. So far, all I hit was a 7-iron with this 'swing' of mine. I had completely forgot about my back and didn't think about it until that evening and realized it felt fine. I thought to myself: "Even if you never get your normal distance back...wouldn't it be fun to just play golf again?" Then I thought to myself: "Self, it would be fun to be back on the golf course again." BUT...I was determined not to make a fool of myself out there, so I kept going back to the hitting bay. This third time I went back, I brought in only my Taylormade Burner 7 wood, thinking the shaft length is short enough that I can make contact with the ball, but it's a fairway wood, so I'll see if this swing can handle that. I hit it great...and straight...but the distance was, alas, like the 7-iron...just not there. "You're hitting it *really* straight though", I sad to myself, as if saying that would console a Recon Marine veteran who's ethos is that manly men do manly things...and a 165 yard 7-wood for me is about the furthest thing from 'manly' there can be on a golf course. Ego... I was torn between my love of playing the game on one hand, and on the other hand going out to the course with a swing that would be mocked, ridiculed and laughed at...but would look passable and understandable if I was 75 years old (I'm 54). Decisions decisions... I went back to the drawing board at home and thought "There's got to be some sort of compromise to this swing...some kind of combination of swings...something I can build that would get my old distance back but not destroy the lower lumbar of my spine." In the past 13 years, I had tried it *all*. Conventional swing, modern swing, stack and tilt (my back still hurts when I think of that one), rotary swing (hello shanks), the peak performance golf swing (don't ever fat one while trying that swing, you might break your wrists), 3/4 hold-off swing (great for wedges, not so much a driver), hand-and-arm swing...and on and on. Soooo...I went back to thinking about the width swing I had learned in the L.A.W.S of golf book and videos I had studied, and how I could implement the width element of that swing without destroying my back. It was the only swing technique I ever tried that got me comfortable distance and consistent impact and ball flight while swinging around say 85% or thereabouts. Hmmmm... What if I could combine it with a single plane swing? I know, I know...it sounds loony tunes. But I had already plunked down the $149 for a year's worth of unlimited hitting bay time at the PGA Superstore (commitment, right?), so I figured I had nothing to lose by attempting what would appear to be  moronic and ridiculous-looking setups and stances and swings in a hitting bay all by myself. The results have been nothing less than astounding to me. Setup (after four months of this on an actual driving range and getting *really* strange looks) is as follows (I'll have pics and video soon for whoever can bear to watch it): Grip: Left hand *slightly* strong, right hand neutral (this is to keep the ball from hooking off the planet). Alignment: All irons straight off the nose (I'll explain why in a bit), fairway woods of my left cheek, driver off my left nipple. Posture: *Slightly* hunched over with rounded shoulders (this is to give me room for my arms to come under my chest in the back swing). Foot Position: Left foot flared, right foot flared and dropped back about 12 inches (this gives me room to rotate my thoracic spine and gives the club depth in the width dimension, since I don't have Bubbas Watson's flexibility). Shoulders stay square with the target line. Hands stay high and in line with the lead forearm a la Moe Norman. Slight spine tilt away from the target. Backswing is in and up at a 45 degree angle if looking from behind. I only swing back until my lead forearm is parallel to the ground. I tuck the left elbow on the downswing and let it rip. The reason I play all my irons off my nose? Wait for it... All my irons... 7 iron to Sand Wedge... are single length irons. So I'm using a rotational swing...on a single plane...with single length irons (based off my 7 iron). Never hit my irons better in my life - and hitting just as far now as I was when I started golfing 13 years ago. Also - driver and fairway woods are stupid-easy for me to hit now. My misses are mostly a high cut now, and that only happens when I slide my left hip because I get fast at the top. As long as I keep my lower body quiet until my hands drop (they don't have far to drop, either), then I get a pretty dang straight ball flight. Pull hooks and block are now a thing of the past. Anyhoo, here's the setup of my clubs. I have about a 94 mph driver swing speed. Driver: Ping G410 9 degree cranked up to 10.5 degrees, Alta CB R flex carry is 235-ish  3-wood: Ping G 410 13.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is around 215 5-wood: Ping G-410 17.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 202 7-wood 2008 Taylormade Burner, 21 degrees, stock REAX S flex 49 grams, carry is 192 9-wood Ping G410 23.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 182 6 hybrid Ping G425 31 degrees Alta CB R flex 70 grams, stated loft, flat setting, carry is 158  Irons: are all custom fit Sterling single-length irons by Wishon Golf. 7 146 yds 8 135 yds 9 125 yds PW 110 GW 98 SW 83 Putter: Custom Edel blade I had made in 2012 after golfing for a year and I can't hit the broad side of a barn with it. REALLY interested in getting fitted for a L.A.B DF 3 with a forearm grip...stroked a L.A.B. DF 2.1 at the PGA Superstore they had on the 'pre-owned' rack and it was $519 wuuuuut!!! So that's only 13 clubs...but I am looking on eBay to fill that gap where the 5 hybrid should be, would be a perfect 170 yd club right there I think. Before doing to the single length clubs, I had Ping irons 7-PW and four Vokeys in 48, 52, 56 and 60 in the bag and the single length clubs were gathering dust in the closet for the last 5 years. However, after actually playing a few rounds and seeing where the numbers were adding up, it was missed greens from 150 and in. So, I wanted to take the variable length mid and short irons out the the equation to keep my setup simpler. Gotta say, it worked like a charm.  Same setup as a 7-iron for all my scoring clubs and it keeps everything repeatable. Yes, it feels weird looking down at a wedge with 7-iron length, but I got used to it. The ball goes the same distances as my Ping irons and Vokey wedges used to but flies *way* higher and lands super soft. Also, if I want to chip or pitch with them I just choke down a little, as the swing weight difference won't matter much for those shots. I haven't actually kept score yet, as I haven't even gotten around to really working on my short game or putting at all. Right now, I'm just scoring fairways and greens hit or missed, approaches hit or missed and how many pars per round I can make. So far my best since this 'comeback' started is 8 pars, 1 birdie (almost had a hole-in-one lol), two bogies and seven 'others' (fats, thins, skulled chips across the green and tears may have been involved). I hit 3 of the Par 4 greens in regulation and hit 10 of 14 fairways. The ones I missed were not off the fairway by much and I finished the round with the same Pro V1X I started with - albeit a little scuffed up. Anyway, that's the story and after years of struggle I finally found something that works *for me*. I'll try to get some pics of setup and possibly video if anyone's interested and has a strong stomach haha. I'm gonna start reading the Dave Pelz short game and putting bibles this week, I'm sure that will be an adventure haha! Thanks for the space to write this.
    • Day 125 - Played 18. Ball striking is still off. Way off. 
    • Day 28: Wind really aggravated my allergies today, so attempted some full swing work outdoors but was kind of miserable. Moved indoors for some putting and mirror work. 
    • Also, the drop was legit: PGA Tour Fargo Championship 2024: Xander Schauffele controversial drop video, ruling, leaderboard, Jason Day, highlights ‘Most ridiculous thing I’ve seen’: Golf fans fume at US star‘s unbelievably lucky break The rules don't exist only to punish golfers.
    • Day 304: did a stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...