Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Totacs37

5 wood vs hybrid

10 posts in this topic

Hello all, I'm slowly up grading my woods. I already picked up a Cobra bio cell driver ( I'm loving this driver!) and saving my pennies for a 3 wood. As far as replacing my 5 wood Im not sure what way to go, standard wood or replace it with a hybrid. I'm leaning towards the hybrid with the thinking that it would give my a few more options of use. Am I on the right track? Has anyone else made a similar move? Any feed back will be helpful.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

What is "right" for one person may be totally wrong for the next.  But for what it is worth, I am a fan of the 4w rather than the 3 unless you use the 3 a lot off the tee as a driver replacement.  The 4 is, for me, easier to hit from various fairway and "friendly rough" lies than a 3 and goes nearly as far.  Then the jump down to a 3h (or in my case a 7w) doesn't leave as big a gap.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Totacs37 you just have to go to a store or demo say and figure out which one you like better. Some players like hybrids, some like 5 woods.

Also be sure to use the search function on the site, we have a few threads like this already

http://thesandtrap.com/newsearch?search=5+wood+hybrid

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I suppose I am rather unconventional here, but I carry a 5w as well as 3 and 4 hybrids. Demoing is the way to go for sure.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of courses you play, region, conditions and all that should weigh heavily in your decision IMO. Here because it's dry and hot in the summer the rough is often long and shaggy. When I used a hybrid I found it easy to completely slide the head under the ball or pop it up so the bigger head of a fairway worked better for me. Hitting from perfect lies similar lofted and length clubs performed the same, I have no shape, look preference. Other than some hybrids can have a lot of offset. Because of that the fairway works better for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Check out a 4w. I absolutely love mine. I always struggled hitting my 3w off the deck but have no problem with the 4w.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My set came with a 5W and 4h. I use the 5W off the deck and on tee shots where there's a dogleg I need to avoid getting through. If I were making a new set from scratch, I would still go with a 5w over a 3h because I don't like hitting hybrid on tee shots, while my 4h is plenty of distance for scrubby lies. Regardless, it's the least used club in my bag by far.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Check out a 4w. I absolutely love mine. I always struggled hitting my 3w off the deck but have no problem with the 4w.

Totacs, definitely try out a 4W. Also, since you already have a Cobra driver, consider the low-profile Baffler TRail fairway woods from a year or two ago.

TRail and TRail Plus came in the following lofts: 3W = 16* / 5W = 18* / 7W =20*. The faces on low-profile FWs are not very "tall", and really help golfers who have trouble getting normal FWs airborne. You can find them here and there for under $100 each.

Also, if you can find a Ping K15 FWs, these were low profile also, with lofts of 3w = 16* / 5W = 19* / 7W = 22*.

K15s and TRails are decent clubs to try out if you can find them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hello all,

I'm slowly up grading my woods. I already picked up a Cobra bio cell driver ( I'm loving this driver!) and saving my pennies for a 3 wood. As far as replacing my 5 wood Im not sure what way to go, standard wood or replace it with a hybrid. I'm leaning towards the hybrid with the thinking that it would give my a few more options of use.

Am I on the right track?

Has anyone else made a similar move?

Any feed back will be helpful.

If money isn't an issue check out the Callaway X2 Hot 4w (17*).  Its very easy to hit off the ground and has a bit taller of a face so you can get it through the rough fairly easy.  Also it looks good :-) .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If money isn't an issue check out the Callaway X2 Hot 4w (17*).  Its very easy to hit off the ground and has a bit taller of a face so you can get it through the rough fairly easy.  Also it looks good .

Or even the Xhot fairways, those are great as well. Can get some good deals at Callaway pre-owned or here

http://www.globalgolf.com/?utm_source=thesandtrap&utm;_medium=banner&utm;_campaign=sponsor-logo

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • My Swing (b101)
      It's just feeling a little bit more natural than it used to and I'm not stepping on the course with 5 or more swing thoughts, which is nice! I don't think it'll take much work getting back to making progress and I'm definitely seeing that some of the changes I've made have stuck - ball flight is really high compared to what I'm used to and the ball turns right to left about 50% of the time and stays straight for 30%. It's the 20% of rubbish, either duck hooks or generally wayward tee shots that I want to clear up, which is going to be this morning's target on the range. I didn't end up hitting the range yesterday - a mate texted to ask to play a round, so I went for that. What was obvious is that the little 9 hole course, where I don't need anything above a 4 iron, has been great for my iron play, but that the 3 wood, driver and course management need a bit of a refresher course. Shot an 86 with a ridiculous 7 penalty strokes (4 on one tough par 3), which says it all really as I don't normally take any! It is a tight track though and there is OB all over the place, but no excuse for the few 'head off' moments which prevented me scoring well. It was match play as well so I guess that's part of it... In short summary: Driving/3 wood - pretty poor and I'm just not comfortable over the ball with those clubs. On a longer course, I'd have struggled. Long irons - good, bar that atrocity of a par 3, where I think I'll just aim way left next time and take the safe miss. Both of those were actually really nice strikes, but went dead straight rather than drawing like I had expected. Still, my fault entirely for aiming towards the trouble  Mid-short irons - mostly pretty good actually. Put 6/14 approaches from outside 100 yards to (3/4 from within 100) inside 15 yards and bar two long bunker shots, the rest were manageable. Putting - really pleased again; I probably only made one that I wouldn't have expected (birdie on 13), but there's a lot of break on the greens and I thought it was pretty decent for a first time out in a while. http://www.gamegolf.com/player/benpage101/round/930037 Overall, pretty close to where I'd want it to be, but a better decision on 6, some better drives and a bit more luck on odd holes (like 16) and it'd have been a great round. I'd take that for the first time in ages. Should be able to post some video this afternoon.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      And also, "speculation" is what the thread is all about! Sure, I'm placing the Tour guys on a pedestal but they DESERVE it. Yes "Golf is Hard", but those guys are GOOD. Low 60s are very much a possibility in any tournament they tee it up in, let alone on a public course that was designed with the average golfer in mind. Let's give credit where credit is due! If all the players from 75-125 on the money list decided to go out and play a new course (of "moderate difficulty" for amateurs) every week for the next 2 months, course records would be getting smashed all over the place. They might shoot the odd 70 or 72, but you darn well bet there would be a lot of 63's and 64's in there too. Regardless of poor course conditions, lack of course knowledge or anything like that, they are gonna make birdies in droves and they are going to go low!
    • The this math does not compute thread
      I was at a garage sale with my son who was like 10 years old at the time. The seller had a box full of cheap toys with a handwritten sign on the box that read "$1 each, or 2 for $3".  I nudged my son and pointed to the sign with my eyes (because the seller was standing right there). He glanced down at the sign and immediately grinned and shook his head in disbelief. And don't get me going on auctions. People will pay more for used crap than they know they would if purchased brand new, simply because they get caught up in a bidding war. The best part is listening to them try and justify it afterwards.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      The odds of him shooting -32 would be slim, but not impossible. Those guys absolutely demolish a handful of the easier courses (ie. Kapalua, the old rotation for the Las Vegas Invitational, the old rotation for the Bob Hope, TPC Scottsdale before they toughened it up,  North Course at Torrey, etc.) and scores of ~ -30 haven't been terribly uncommon at some events. But I think the PGA Tour and the Web.Com Tour seem to be trying to get away from insanely low numbers and are moving tournaments away from some of the old venues that can't keep up with how far  they hit the ball now, and renovating other courses to beef them up. I recall the Tour players voted to eliminate the TPC Stadium course at PGA West in the late 80's from tournanent play because they thought it was "too hard" and this year when they used it again it seemed to be quite playable for them. In fact, they seemed to have no issues making their way around the course at all. That speaks to the quality and depth of the fields nowadays.  That being said - no, I wouldn't expect a -32 total. But it definitely wouldn't shock me either.  On a side note, I would be really interested to see this type of experiment revisited. This thread has fuelled some great speculation and debate, so thank you guys for playing along!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries