Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    22
  • comments
    60
  • views
    4,761

You don't really need 14 clubs to break 100 (or 90 for that matter)

onthehunt526

1,204 views

I realize this entry is coming from an 80s shooter and not a pro, but it's based on personal experience. I figured that you would appreciate it. 

It is my belief that most high-handicappers carry too many clubs, mostly clubs that they struggle with. Since golf is hard and simplifying it is impossible, We will simplify what we can namely what you carry in your bag.

With the vast forgiveness of the newer drivers, Driver will be in the bag and obviously a putter. So now we figure out the rest. You higher handicappers should ask this question: Can I consistently hit a 3-wood from the fairway? I know I can't so I carry a 4-wood. But for most, the need is for more loft. When I was struggling, I had a 5-wood in the bag, it might be a 7-wood for others. 

Next what is the longest iron you hit consistently? For higher handicaps this is probably about a 7-iron, it could be a 6-iron but for this demo we will say 7-iron. So basically your iron set will be 7-iron- pitching wedge.

Next I would only play one hybrid something between the loft of your fairway wood and longest iron like a 5-hybrid.

Finally wedges, now if you struggle to break 100, you really only need one extra wedge a sand wedge, if you are in the 90s a gap wedge and sand wedge are fine, and practice with your 6-iron because you'll add that when you can consistently hit it.

So in conclusion, a Driver, lofted fairway wood, 5-hybrid, 7-PW, SW, putter is plenty to break 100. Add a gap wedge at high 90s and a 6-iron at consistently lower than 95.



9 Comments


Recommended Comments

If you consistently shoot in the 80s you're better than most people. This forum is not representative of the average hacker out there just screwing around. Maybe 1/3 of the people I see are not playing "serious" golf. They're mostly drinking beer, guffawing and grabbing each other's buns. To your point I think when I broke 90 I was playing with 12 clubs, although I hit every single one of them during that round.

Usually I carry 13 clubs since I added a LW last summer. It's easy to estimate the gaps with the shorter clubs. I find myself wanting to add options on the longer end of the bag. But really what I'm looking for is consistency. I want to find a lineup I can rely on.

I swear I've seen some people at the exec course near my house playing with 6 or 7 clubs. Some of those were playing in pajamas and some had no teeth. One (1) guy told me he wanted to combine golf and fishing into a new game.

Some of the better high school players will play a round using only one (1) club and a putter. They say it's a lot of fun. 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Last round I played, I forgot my 8- and 6-iron (was practicing inside and left them in an umbrella stand- duh). I don't even carry a 3-wood yet. At the end of the round, I wondered if I should just remove all even-numbered clubs and just choke up or swing slightly slower, when needed. A 20-ish yard gap between clubs is probably smaller than the variance of how the distances I hit the ball with my swing anyway!

But yes, I agree that for beginners who are struggling to break 100, they might just drastically simplify and use clubs they can control. Keep it in play with the shot that advances it as far as possible in a relatively safe manner. Once you get a few rounds under 100 (or whatever threshold), then you can add in complexity.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I normally play with 12 clubs, and of those 12 I might use 6 or 8 on my home course, while scoring in the lower 80s. I agree you don't need 14 clubs to break 90.

I can break 90 just using my 7 wood. I shot an 85 in a one club charity tourney once. 

I consider my golf clubs as just tools to be used as needed. Taking care of, and knowing how to use the right tool, for the job at hand, is one of the signs of a craftsman. The better the golfer, the better the (golf) craftsman they are.....so to speak 

I think a lot new golfers would do well to start out with fewer clubs than 14. My thought is that it might be easier to learn how use 7 clubs instead of 14. Obviously which 7 clubs to use for new golfer would be the tougher, individual decision. Then again, with all the user friendly hybrids out there, it might be easier to play a short set.  

Share this comment


Link to comment

A non-golfing friend once asked me if golfers really needed "all those clubs."  I told him no - not for any one particular round - but the wind varies enough to make it awfully convenient to have additional options.  

Share this comment


Link to comment

I've had people tell me that I should play with fewer drums than typically use. Why? If I were a painter, would I want to limit the number colors that I can paint with? I often leave my 16" floor tom at home because the stage is too small, but otherwise, why not have that extra sound to play. Is it hurting anything to have an extra club or two? No. It might not be helping much.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Unless one is dropping clubs for the lower weight when one carries or to save money by not purchasing 14 clubs, why not carry 14?  It doesn't hurt my game to have a club and not use it for a round.  

Share this comment


Link to comment

I usually shoot around 85.  I carry 14 clubs, but I have noticed lately I almost never use my 3-wood and 5-wood.  I suppose I could carry 12 clubs.  Of course, playing from the forward tees, I don't need fairway woods very much if at all. 

When I was growing up, my brother was a scratch golfer and he and his friends did the 1-club stunt, playing a round for money with just one club.   I think he used a 3-iron.

I guess there's "good enough to play with fewer clubs" and there's "bad enough to play with fewer clubs."  I think I'm in between.  I need at least 12 clubs. 

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

I don't believe I have ever played nor witnessed with foursomes where "bun grabbing" is an activity.  Maybe a missed opportunity from my single days.  Sets for beginners used to consist of two wooded clubs and a 3, 5, 7, and 9 along with a putter.  It seemed that one could play quite well once the game was in your regular routine. It has been said that, other than the weight, it is okay to carry 14,  Cannot argue with that. I know that each club where I have been a member, my bag would eventually change a wee bit to reflect the clubs that I needed to play and the ones that were never played, were removed. I have played games with one or three clubs and a putter. Fun.  And If one concentrates with enough intensity, one could play like that constantly.  But if there are variations or experimentations to do, you want to have all you weapons.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • Agreed. It depends what you value, how you derive worth. If you take the economic concept of utils (a unit of happiness/joy/satisfaction) - and having PXG provides you with 3x more utils than a $1000 set of clubs (plus spending the remaining 2k on other things) then it is worth it . Utils don't only come from 'better golf' or 'lower scores'. For me - I derive very few utils from cars, I just don't get it. My wife and I drive a basic, very high value car. I get my utils from reliability, value for money, that is says something about me (frugal, sensible). My best friend loves cars, and gets his utils from european styling, luxury etc. My pushbike costs about 6x what he does. We are both better off me having a cheap car and an expensive bike and him vice versa. This is why you can't argue with what other people value - it is deeply subjective, not rational.
    • I have been super busy renovating a house I recently bought, so I haven't been following golf closely, and I'm very late to the party on this one.  My opinions have probably already been stated many times because they seem fairly standard and obvious to me, but I'll chime in anyway. First, I'm very surprised at the level of animosity against Phil.  Talk about "What have you done for me lately?," here's a guy who has spent the last 25+ years doing his best to be as gracious to fans as he could, probably the best since Arnie, and yet he has one brain fart and the knives are out.  I know all about FIGJAM and Phony Phil, but you HAVE to be phony to be nice to the galleries, because they are full of idiots.  Don't get me wrong, I'm one of them, and most of us are respectful of the players and the game, but even if it's only 10% that are loud and obnoxious, that's thousands at any one event, and the fact they are the loudest and pushiest triples their impact.  Seriously, if he smiles and chats and signs autographs for an hour when he'd rather be relaxing somewhere, I guess technically that's phony, but in a good way, so what's wrong with it?  I mean, how many people would actually prefer to hang around a bunch of half-drunk morons than go home to their wives? I'm also aware that there are many people who have nothing against Phil, but still think he should have been DQd.  And I'm one of them.  I like him, I like the way he tries to be fan friendly, and I don't care about his personal life -- and even if I did, I haven't heard much bad about him, other than his ego, as if being arguably the second best golfer of his generation, especially when that generation (IMO) includes the GOAT, shouldn't inflate his ego. But when I say he should have been DQd, I mean in a perfect world, which this obviously isn't, because golf rules are often stupid.  In this situation, the rule was properly applied, so he didn't get DQd, but the rule is wrong.  Lots of the rules are wrong.   Up to a couple of years ago, you could get DQd for signing an incorrect score card, even when you had no idea it was incorrect.  The USGA and R&A thought that deserved a DQ, but deliberately hitting a moving ball didn't.  It's crazy. People say he gained an advantage from his action.  Well, duh.  I've seen guys who hit a poor approach, got an absolutely dead lie, but then got a free drop because a TV cable was nearby.  Then they got another free drop because the bleachers were in the way.  Then they got another free drop because of a sprinkler head.  And by the time they were done, they went from being in the rough in a horrible lie to being on the fringe, or even on the green.  Talk about gaining an advantage. And the rules official was directing them every step of the way.  I repeat, it's crazy. This is a golden opportunity for them to change the rule.  Deliberately hit a moving ball, DQ.  Very simple.
    • The player can choose to call his ball unplayable in any circumstance.  He is the only judge of this.  In the case you mention here he was taking one of the water hazard options, rather than an unplayable lie.  One could decide his ball sitting right next to the hole is unplayable, and go back to where he hit previously, at the cost a stroke.  Of course, he could be rightfully called a sandbagger, at that point!
    • Yes.  I welcome the challenge.  I'll pick appropriate tees and do my best.  I am going to play a Pete Dye course on my birthday this year, although it isn't necessarily among the toughest of his courses (and it'll be my fourth time playing that particular course). 
    • Day 20 - 50 practice chip shots (stance, swing, target), then a half hour of putting, then a small bucket at the range (30-35 balls, an hour) working on half swings, punch shots, and my old priority piece (I have a new evolvr lesson in, but I don't want to work on it until Saturday because I'm playing tomorrow & Friday)... and of course some drives and full wedges.  I finished up with another 15 minutes of putting. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. magnolia
      magnolia
      (26 years old)
    2. masoshe21
      masoshe21
      (22 years old)
    3. mp33man
      mp33man
      (32 years old)
×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...