Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    68
  • comments
    776
  • views
    17,017


27 Comments


Recommended Comments



Pro tip for driving in any big city. Always. Always check for some VIP (Pffft, important my ass, muckety muck)  in the area or a big event. Never willy nilly just go out and drive. Because you will stew in a 5 block radius for 2 hours. Take the train, or plan around the event.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

This is truth. Always check for events in NYC if you're planning to drive in the city. But the crap that blows traffic down in manhattan is typically in mid-town. You can usually go around it by taking one of the parkways at the east and west sides of the city. Unless your destination is in midtown. Then your screwed... Take the subway. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

38 minute delay during morning rush hour. Man, when the L train shutdown happens, gonna be hell.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/broken-train-triggers-chaotic-morning-rush-hour-commute-article-1.3511043

 

And allegedly no safety checks before opening second avenue subway.

http://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/transit/2017/09/20/second-avenue-subway-reportedly-opened-with-thousands-outstanding-defects-mta-nyc.html

Share this comment


Link to comment

Just back from Italy.  We traveled via train from Naples to Rome's Termini Station.  150 miles in a little over an hour.  Got off the train, walked over to the express train to the airport, which took about 35 minutes.  The entire trip was less than 2 hours and cost $40 per person.

Yes, they have pop-up strikes that can throw a wrench into one's travel machinery but my experience has always been great.   

Share this comment


Link to comment
Quote

Put it all together and Clewlow and Mishra’s research suggests that cities have to strengthen and improve transit service in response to the growth of ride-hailing. They recommend dedicating street space to high-occupancy vehicles like buses and adopting policies like congestion pricing to counteract the rising traffic caused by ride-hailing services in central cities.

Ride-hailing services can be a helpful addition to transportation systems, curbing car ownership, reducing drunk driving, and complementing transit networks. But if cities and transit agencies don’t take action to improve the quality of bus and rail service, Uber and Lyft can end up doing more harm than good, clogging streets and cannibalizing transit.

http://usa.streetsblog.org/2017/10/13/uber-and-lyft-are-cannibalizing-transit-in-major-american-cities/

Screen Shot 2017-10-13 at 8.37.38 PM.png

Share this comment


Link to comment

I also read somewhere that the average yellow cab deadheads 7-8 miles to find a fare compared to Uber/Lyft/etc, which deadheads 12-13. You'd think it would be less because you would pick the next fare closest to you. Need to look into that.

Quote

The results suggest that ride-hailing draws people away from public transit. And the authors, Regina Clewlow and Gouri Shankar Mishra, estimate that 49 percent to 61 percent of ride-hailing trips either wouldn’t have been made at all if these apps didn’t exist, or would have been made by foot, biking or transit. All of those trips, in other words, added cars to the road that otherwise wouldn’t have been there.

That picture implies that Uber and the like could make traffic worse. And let’s further assume that many of those trips additionally require drivers to cruise around waiting for rides, and to “deadhead” occasionally after the rides are over (to return to, say, the airport with an empty back seat).

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/16/upshot/is-uber-helping-or-hurting-mass-transit.html

America, short term thinking abounds.

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 1.57.03 PM.png

Share this comment


Link to comment

 

Quote
The misreading of what is occurring in America isn’t confined to driving. While spending money to build roads is seen as a public investment, critics characterize public transportation as a wasteful welfare subsidy. The pervasive myth that public transportation riders are subsidized and that people who drive pay the full cost of their trips has never been less true than it is today. Many drivers indignantly believe that by filling their tanks with gas and paying for registration and insurance, they’ve paid more than their fair share. But recent data show that drivers don’t pay the full cost of the roads they drive on, and they’ve never paid less. A 2015 study by US Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) found that from 1947 to 2012, American taxpayers as a whole paid $1 trillion more to sustain the road network than people who drive paid in gasoline taxes, tolls, and other user fees. In 2012, $69 billion in highway spending came from general tax revenues, driver taxes and tolls pay for only about half of the cost to build and maintain the physical infrastructure needed to drive. The remainder is paid for with general tax revenues including 10 percent from municipal bonds issued to pay for new projects.
 
Roads are expensive to build in the first place, but they require on-going maintenance, repair and rehabilitation during their lifetimes. So who pays for roads? Everybody does, no matter how much they drive. PIRG estimated that accounting for these costs, every American household pays more than $1,100 in addition to whatever they pay in direct transportation costs to drive - even if they don’t drive at all. And that money subsidizes an inequitable use of roads. Governments spend more general tax revenue on highways than on transit, walking and biking combined. So people who walk, bike or take public transit are effectively subsidizing the least efficient transportation mode at the expense of their own way of getting around.
 
Streetfight: Handbook for an Urban Revolution
Janette Sadik-Khan,‎ Seth Solomonow

Share this comment


Link to comment

Great experiences this past week on both the London Underground and the Paris Metro.  The Tube was newer and (being all in English) very easy to follow.  The Metro was a little older in spots (one of the trains actually had a manual door release) but still very easy to navigate.

Interesting tidbit about Underground; they make you pay a 5 pound deposit for your “Oyster” card but oddly, when we went to turn it back in, the machine refunded us the 5 plus the 3 and change we had on the card ... but didn’t actually take the cards back.  Not sure what the deposit was for?

Share this comment


Link to comment

The Oyster card is awesome, so flexible although Londoners will still complain about it. In comparison, the standard NY Metrocard is so much less so. Like comparing a smartphone to a flip phone. You can't check or refill balance via app. You lose it tough luck.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Another feature of the Oyster card NY has yet to implement.

Quote

“... With the [new] technology, if you in fact swipe through enough times in a month you could automatically be given the 30-day benefit,” said David Jones, president and CEO of the Community Service Society of New York and MTA board member. “The backend of this technology is sophisticated enough that it can tally how many times you are using the system.”

This policy is called fare capping. Cubic Transportation Systems, the company replacing the MetroCard, already has implemented such a feature in London, where it operates Transport for London’s fare system. On the Underground, Transport for London offers daily and weekly capping. So riders no longer have to decide if a daily or weekly pass would be most cost-effective for them. They can pay per ride until they reach the daily or weekly capping rates, at which point they could then continue riding the system for free.

https://www.amny.com/transit/mta-metrocard-fare-1.14945261

Share this comment


Link to comment

Cities are struggling to find funding because of the high cost of repairing the infrastructure.  They require a lot of state and federal grants to rebuild roadways. In terms of public transportation, it is pretty much up to the states and cities to build it.

If you are not in a urban area then getting access to public transportation will be tough. Europe has a big advantage due to their population density.

http://blog.midwestind.com/cost-of-building-road/

Quote

Nonetheless, here are the daunting numbers: constructing a two-lane, undivided road in a rural locale will set you back somewhere between $2 and $3 million per mile — in urban areas, that number jumps to between $3 and $5 million. In a rural area, you can essentially build a road wherever you please (local zoning and property laws abiding), but in a city, you have to avoid the surrounding firmament and infrastructure and comply with strict construction codes.

And if you want wider roads, the costs understandably go up: for the production of a 4-lane highway, the cost per mile will run between $4 and $6 million in rural or suburban areas, and between $8 to $10 million in urban areas. For a 6 lane interstate highway, you’re looking at $7 million for a rural mile of road, and $11 million-plus in an urban locale.

The biggest driver of cost is curb and gutter systems.

Quote

As I mentioned, it’s much less expensive to maintain existing roadways. To mill and resurface a 4-lane road, it costs an average of $1.25 million per mile. Then, if you want to expand said road from four lanes to six, you can expect to pay roughly $4 million.

 It looks like it cost about 1/4 the full rebuild cost to maintain the road (mil and repave)

The USA could do a lot for public transportation. A lot of cities are doing that with being more bike friendly. There has been a big push for this over the past decade. Being the home of the automobile, I can see how we are more tuned towards driving cars versus taking public transportation.

Share this comment


Link to comment

In Vancouver, 50% of trips are by foot, bike, or transit. This video shows how they did it.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2016/12/9/13897078/walkable-vancouver-video

I bought my folding bike to Toronto during a family visit. Riding in Toronto compared to New York is much less stressful, it was interesting seeing the King Street experiment, the protected bike lanes are decent, could be more. Would love to ride in Vancouver.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • I totally agree. I spent a lot of time on drivers that I had trouble controlling. They gave me some extra length when I hit them right, but I found myself out of the fairway a lot. Then I found my latest gamer and it wasn't cheap, an 8.5 degree Titleist 913D2 but the amount of confidence that I have when I step up to the tee is a great feeling. I literally know I'm going to hit the fairway with it. It's aging now and I am getting older too and the loss of distance is concerning, so following this post is great insight into the replacement process which will become eventual for me.    
    • It was a short 125 yard par 3 slightly up hill.  A well struck pitching wedge, but you can't see the bottom of the flag so didn't see it land.  I thought I'd gone too long, but my friend thought it was close.  Turns out he was right! I wish I'd taken some pictures from ground level, so I had a better chance of determining whether any part of the ball was underground.  Wasn't 100% sure of the rules at the time and didn't want to hold up the group behind by taking too long. It seems by the strict letter of the law that, as I don't think any of the ball was under the surface it isn't a hole in one.  But that just seems wrong as it was over half way in to the hole and clearly leaning in to the hole.  My friend gently centred the flag and it dropped in the hole. I'm just glad it wasn't my first hole in one as I would be really gutted right now!
    • I fully understand It may seem like from my post that I'm some kind of macho distance guy ... I've certainly seen my fair share of rolled eyes from other golfers around distances ... or from a nasty slice/hook etc ... something I'm working on as a 15HC player (as where the 3w is coming in with much more fairways hit these days) ... personal I think if you can constantly hit the ball cleanly with controlled power then why wouldn't you ... many times the difference between a 110mph drive and 118mph is an emotional factor, the actual distance isn't much at the end(Plus accurately is far better in lower controlled swing)   ...but sometimes after a 3-4 putt blowing a birdie etc, the tension releases makes me swing harder on the next tee..or maybe Bunker 260 out and I really want to pass it ...  I'm sure many Golfers are the same and hit the ball down there with a normal feeling swing. -----example-- where I was pissed at distance off the club....  last hole game very close to my best round 2nd shot PAR4...153 yards out to an ever slightly elevated green usually hit a PW full swing to around that distance.. Now the ball was in the first cut rough 10-15mph headwind so thought to take the 9 out full swing and it came off the face perfect high slight draw ... yes here we go >>>> down it came landed behind green ran up a gravel pathway onto some rough easy 15-20yards further than I expected ...Gutted 4 more shots to close out the hole..cost us the match and outright second place for the day
    • Thanks to all for sharing. I probably will find and join a league (hoping there are weekend leagues, great idea btw to meet other golfers). I will keep encouraging my friends and family to learn golf, joining a golf group at social media will help too. And, yep, playing alone occasionally could be nice.   
    • I do believe that some golfers "want it" more than others simply by putting more hours and effort into becoming great.  From what I've read about Hogan, I'd have to say that he wanted it more than others.  I'd say the same thing about Bryson.  And, of course, Tiger.  This is true in all fields, not just golf, and to me it's as plain as day.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Antneye
      Antneye
      (51 years old)
    2. CapM
      CapM
      (54 years old)
    3. Cardsfan
      Cardsfan
      (27 years old)
    4. Mr Golf Addict
      Mr Golf Addict
      (15 years old)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...