Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2307 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/8/2019 at 10:21 AM, David in FL said:

ESC only affects the score that you post for handicap purposes.  It has no impact whatsoever on the actual score for your round.

 As an example, in a stroke play event, if I were to actually take a 7 on a par-4, that’s my score on the scorecard.  But my ESC maximum for handicap reporting is no more than double bogey on any given hole, so a 6 is what gets counted for that hole afterwards instead of the 7.  It has no impact at all on the competition.

It’s actually designed to help eliminate cheating by those who might otherwise inflate their score on holes they had already lost to artificially inflate their handicap...

Gah!  I have been thinking about this all week.  It is the word "inflate" that I am hung up on.  Are you saying that to post a higher handicap than what is "truly representative of your ability" aka score augmented by ESC makes it higher than is accurate?  Am I to understand that ESC is expected to prevent people from posting a handicap that is too high?  Is that for competition purposes, like sandbagging?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
37 minutes ago, Cantankerish said:

Gah!  I have been thinking about this all week.  It is the word "inflate" that I am hung up on.  Are you saying that to post a higher handicap than what is "truly representative of your ability" aka score augmented by ESC makes it higher than is accurate?  Am I to understand that ESC is expected to prevent people from posting a handicap that is too high?  Is that for competition purposes, like sandbagging?

Exactly

If someone is posting scores higher than their ESC maximum, then their handicap index will be incrementally higher than it should be.  In a competition, they will receive more strokes than they should be entitled to.  

Even if unintentional, they’re sandbagging.

  • Thumbs Up 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Club championship. Scored every bleeding, awful, stinking, poorly-conceived, dirt-eating, wayward stroke.

I'd list more adjectives but I'm very tired and not thinking quite right.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, mcanadiens said:

Club championship. Scored every bleeding, awful, stinking, poorly-conceived, dirt-eating, wayward stroke.

I'd list more adjectives but I'm very tired and not thinking quite right.

Indeed, my club championship was this weekend.  I managed nothing worse than a 6 today (the last day), but the first two rounds saw a pair of sevens and an eight. :-( 

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 hours ago, David in FL said:

Exactly

If someone is posting scores higher than their ESC maximum, then their handicap index will be incrementally higher than it should be.  In a competition, they will receive more strokes than they should be entitled to.  

Even if unintentional, they’re sandbagging.

Yeah, okay.  That makes sense.

I am not participating in anything like that.  And I am certainly not intentionally taking extra strokes.  I think for me it makes better sense to simply log each hole according to the actual strokes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Cantankerish said:

 I think for me it makes better sense to simply log each hole according to the actual strokes.

 Your handicap index is simply a measure of relative performance/potential.  But if everyone doesn’t use it within the confines of the system, then the number means nothing.  

It’s no different than those who post scores while taking mulligans and rolling the ball.  If that’s how they want to play the game, it doesn’t bother me at all, but they might as well not even maintain a handicap, because it’s not an accurate reflection of their ability relative to anyone else’s...

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I hear you.  I gotcha.  If I were to use ESC in my world, I would be the person not using the correct system.  My mates would be well within reason to accuse me of fluffing my number, and they would be correct.  If it bothers you, just subtract a few to account for the blow up holes or simply ignore the number I have.  But you can't ignore my cool Don Knotts pic.  The man was a Cassanova.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, Cantankerish said:

But you can't ignore my cool Don Knotts pic.  The man was a Cassanova.

Well, that’s a different kind of scoring. ;-)

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

2019 Rule: “Maximum Score” will be a new, additional form of stroke play:

 A player’s score for each hole is capped at a maximum set by the Committee, which may be fixed (such as 6, 8, 10, etc.), related to par (such as two times par or triple bogey), or related to the player’s handicap (such as net double bogey).

 A player who does not complete a hole (often referred to informally as “picking up”) will not be disqualified, but simply gets the maximum score for the hole.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2307 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.