Jump to content
Note: This thread is 1711 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I thought this was kind of fun.  How many can you name?

image.png.67c8e3e43b09bd961b24594ed3501de8.png

  • Thumbs Up 1

Matt          My Swing

 

 :ping: G425 Max Driver

Sub 70 3 wood, 3 hybrid and 5-p 639CB

Edison wedges 51, 55, 59

Sub 70 004 Mallet

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hmm...1) Player.  2) Daly.  3) Nicklaus.  4) Irwin.  5) Hogan.  6) Woods.  7) Scott.  10) Snedecker.  11) Palmer.  12) Ballesteros.  14) Stewart.  15) Webb.  16) Rose.  

8, 9, and 13 failed to activate any circuitry.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

Could #8 be Jordan Speith?  The "chicken wing" follow through gives him away.

10 minutes ago, Piz said:

Hmm...1) Player.  2) Daly.  3) Nicklaus.  4) Irwin.  5) Hogan.  6) Woods.  7) Scott.  10) Snedecker.  11) Palmer.  12) Ballesteros.  14) Stewart.  15) Webb.  16) Rose.  

8, 9, and 13 failed to activate any circuitry.

13 could be Woods, as well.

Edited by Double Mocha Man

1) Player

2) Daly

3) Jack

4) Irwin

5) Hogan

6) Adam Scott (broom stick putter)

7) ??

8 ) Spieth

9) DJ???

10) FIGJAM

11) Arnie

12) Seve

13) Eldrick

14) Payne

15) Charley Hull (often wears a visor and hair in a bun)

16) Martin Kymer??? (USO trophy)


40 minutes ago, Piz said:

Hmm...1) Player.  2) Daly.  3) Nicklaus.  4) Irwin.  5) Hogan.  6) Woods.  7) Scott.  10) Snedecker.  11) Palmer.  12) Ballesteros.  14) Stewart.  15) Webb.  16) Rose.  

8, 9, and 13 failed to activate any circuitry.

I don't think 6 is woods, that putter doesnt look like one he would use. Also 7 looks like Rory to me.

8 is probably spieth, i think 13 is Tiger

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

42 minutes ago, Piz said:

Hmm...1) Player.  2) Daly.  3) Nicklaus.  4) Irwin.  5) Hogan.  6) Woods.  7) Scott.  10) Snedecker.  11) Palmer.  12) Ballesteros.  14) Stewart.  15) Webb.  16) Rose.  

8, 9, and 13 failed to activate any circuitry.

I’m thinking 7 is Els and 10 is Phil...  13 looks Tigerish...

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, David in FL said:

I’m thinking 7 is Els and 10 is Phil...  13 looks Tigerish...

Good call on #10.  Visor and floppy hair.  Correct face thickness.  And Phil definitely needed to be on this list.


(edited)
Spoiler

image.png.69315ae52a1dd9461b7ebd74c4dfdeee.png

I didn't get 9,12,15,16.  

 

 

2 hours ago, Mr22putt said:

1) Player

2) Daly

3) Jack

4) Irwin

5) Hogan

6) Adam Scott (broom stick putter)

7) ??

8 ) Spieth

9) DJ???

10) FIGJAM

11) Arnie

12) Seve

13) Eldrick

14) Payne

15) Charley Hull (often wears a visor and hair in a bun)

16) Martin Kymer??? (USO trophy)

impressed you got 15, 16.

Edited by Wanzo

Matt          My Swing

 

 :ping: G425 Max Driver

Sub 70 3 wood, 3 hybrid and 5-p 639CB

Edison wedges 51, 55, 59

Sub 70 004 Mallet

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1711 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Meh, it's a tournament over in Hawaii to start the year off. Why do we need ball busters every tournament. You think in the past that every tournament was this hellish test? Heck no.  Go look at the aerial of Kapalua, its a wide open course.  Holes next to each other. Little to no water hazards. Bermuda grass, so maybe it can't be this thick nasty grass you see at Oakmont, Bethpage, etc.. Ever go play in Florida, Bermuda doesn't get too crazy. I am sure they could make it a bit tougher.  There are plenty of tournaments that test the golfers. The issue is, there are so many great golfers now, if one catches fire there is nothing you can do. What if a golfer hits 75% of the fairways, 75% of the greens, and has a hot putting week? Just on fire. You will come here and complain it is too easy? Look at the 2014 US open at No. 2. Martin Keymer won by 8 shots, -9 to -1. Only three players ended up under par for the week. Too easy?     
    • Yes, you do need a member login.  I did it without specifying phone#, age, or gender.
    • I'm quoting myself, only because I want to link up to the relevant information from the Rules.  These are the current rules, but I don't think the 2016 version differed very much.  First is Rule 16.1, for relief form Abnormal Course Conditions.  A cart path is an Immoveable Obstruction, one of the four ACCs.   Others have quoted the provision that you can't take relief for an unreasonable stance or type of swing, it sounds like relief was appropriate in this case.  The Reference Point is the Nearest Point of Complete Relief, and a diagram is provided.  So we refer to the Definition of the Nearest Point of Complete Relief.  The NPCR allows relief from the cart path, for the type of swing the Player would have made if the cart path had not been there.  Specifically, the Definition says: "The nearest point of complete relief relates solely to the particular condition from which relief is being taken and may be in a location where there is interference by something else" So there might be interference from a tree or bush, a clear swing isn't guaranteed.  I'll go back to Clarification 16.1/1, which says that Relief from an ACC might result in better conditions, or worse conditions.  However, the NPCR for a ball in the General Area MUST be in the General Area (Rule 16.1b), its not in a Bunker of a Penalty Area.  That's not to say you might not have to stand in a Bunker or Penalty Area, just that the Ball won't be in it. You can find all of these on the Rules of Golf app on your phone, or on the USGA's webpage: https://www.usga.org/rules/rules-and-clarifications/rules-and-clarifications.html#section=rules&itemNum=19&subItemNum=1
    • Maybe they wouldnt be tearing them up if shots that  miss the green or fairway were penalized with deep rough
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...