Jump to content
Note: This thread is 1549 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hi,

recently I've played two rounds on normal greens (as good as they get where I live) and two on slow greens (just topdressed and aereated).
On the two rounds on "good" greens, I putted terribly. 35 putts and 3-putts each of the rounds. Both length and direction were off.
On the "bad" greens, I had 29-30 putts and no 3-putts. 

Now, is this just me or a "law of nature"?
 


To me, it's just about what I'm used to.

My old home course had the slowest greens in town. I putted ok on them, but looked stupid anytime I played somewhere else.

The new home is closer to average and the putter is traveling better. Unfortunately everything else has gone to hell.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My question.. What was the difference in your lengths of putts.    On the days you had 35 putts did you have more GIR and longer putts?  On the days you had 29-30 putts were your misses just off of the green so your initial putts were closer to the hole?

I play many different courses and see all different green speeds.   It makes a big difference to take the time to get the green speed down before you play.    

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@dennyjones

That's a very good and valid question, and I did have very good GIRs the rounds I putted badly.

But it doesn't account for the bad putting. Only two of the six 3-putts could be explained by being far from the pin (or difficult pin position). And I did have some long putts the rounds I putted well (in spite of bad GIRs - my long game was really off those rounds).


  • Moderator

I generally putt better on slower greens - maybe the faster greens highlight our flaws and so, as you put it, it’s the “law of nature” that we putt better on slower greens. For those who are better with the flat stick, I would guess it’s the opposite as faster greens afford a smaller stroke with less opportunity for technical mistakes?

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to I'm Only Putting Well on Slow Greens…
  • Administrator

Counting putts is not the best way to know if you putted well or poorly.

  • Like 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
25 minutes ago, iacas said:

Counting putts is not the best way to know if you putted well or poorly.

Obviously the goal is to make the putts, but I definitely recommend understand that statement...the results are always a reflection of the process/execution.  
 

With that, what criteria do you use? How do you tell tour team to evaluate their own putting?

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
31 minutes ago, woodzie264 said:

With that, what criteria do you use? How do you tell tour team to evaluate their own putting?

SG:Putting.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Something most people don't take into account when playing on faster/slower greens is the amount of break that a given similar putt has. Faster greens have a lower friction coefficient, so gravity gets to play its role a little (sometimes a lot) more than normal. If you find yourself missing low-side on fast greens, this tip could save you loads. If it's a distance thing, you just have to work on it pre-round and should be ok.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
9 hours ago, iacas said:

SG:Putting.

that’s makes total sense in competitive play with others, and I can see where that is a better indicator of putting performance. 

But what about the recreational golfer? I think that’s why the OP (and I think a lot of us) assume it comes down to number of putts...which I guess is SG putting against par

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 hours ago, woodzie264 said:

But what about the recreational golfer? I think that’s why the OP (and I think a lot of us) assume it comes down to number of putts...which I guess is SG putting against par

The same.

Again, a guy who has 32 putts from an average first putt distance of 40' likely putted better than a guy who took 28 putts from an average first putt distance of 15'.

You can use PGA Tour-level SG:Putting data to figure out how well you putted, especially if you're comparing one round of yours to another round of yours.

And all you have to note is: the distance of your first putt and how many putts it took to complete the hole.

Or use this:


Use this tool to calculate the strokes gained metric for any round of golf. Track your putting improvement.

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
23 minutes ago, iacas said:

The same.

Again, a guy who has 32 putts from an average first putt distance of 40' likely putted better than a guy who took 28 putts from an average first putt distance of 15'.

You can use PGA Tour-level SG:Putting data to figure out how well you putted, especially if you're comparing one round of yours to another round of yours.

And all you have to note is: the distance of your first putt and how many putts it took to complete the hole.

Or use this:


Use this tool to calculate the strokes gained metric for any round of golf. Track your...

 

thank you sir! That’s cool

 

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1549 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,255 6/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Lazarus Irons....top notch and way cheaper than the big brands.
    • I know you guys were discussing this like a year ago. But, ironically I just had this discussion with my brother-in-law. We literally just did one of these. I'd always used the "Slow-Cook, Rest, and Sear" Method. But my bother-in-law was convinced the "5-Min/lb, 500 degree" method was the way. So, we gave it a go. I have to say it came out great.  I have a 25 year old, electric oven, GE brand... Not sure if that matters, but it came out great. ... Of course we stressed that nobody was to open the oven.   I don't make these all that often so, I'm not sure if I can fully recommend one method or the other, because without doing a Pepsi Challenge, I'd say both ways come out great. 👍😁👍
    • Wordle 1,255 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,255 5/6 ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟨🟩🟩🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...