Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1775 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Could someone please explain offset to me.

I have always played Ping irons..Eye2+, i3 Oversized, G15. I bought a set of Titleist 714 AP1 irons that I cannot hit the ball out of  my shadow with. They are a nice looking club to my eye, but all I do is keep hitting behind the ball and dig up the turf. I’m going to sell them and go back to Ping, but I’m trying to figure out why these clubs are so different. I’m not a long ball hitter, but I at least I could hit the ball into the air with my G15’s. I think for next year I’m going to buy a set of G410’s. Confidence?

Edited by CharlieB

  • Administrator
Posted

I don't think offset is why you keep hitting it fat.

Offset makes a club look more open than it is, so it helps people who slice by having them set up with the face closed. It marginally helps move the CG back a bit, too.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm assuming you bought the 714s used? Have you checked shaft length and lie compared to your Pings?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes, they are both standard, but my Pings are -1” and the lie angle is yellow dot, or 1.5* upright. I just played 9 holes this morning with the Pings and has 8 bogey’s and one triple bogey for a 47.

The other thing with the AP1’s is they are standard flex and the Pings are senior flex. I guess the Pings just fit me better?


Posted

Offset does a few different things.

It moves the CG of the club farther back. This will cause the club head to move farther forward in an attempt to align the cg and the handle of the club. The result is a little more loft, though it's really small. Could also cause a touch more toe closure but this would be even smaller than the loft change but would result in less slice.

The CG moved back can also give the iron a bit more gear effect so that toe hits draw back a bit compared to a club with the CG more forward.

It also in theory puts the hands slightly more ahead of the face compared to no offset. This tiny distance could in theory allow extra time to rotate the face closed and not slice it.

More offset clubs also generally fall closed at set up based on the offset in conjunction with the sole design, and this desire to naturally sit closed will also promote more draw or less slice.

That is how offset is meant to work. Of course none of that explains why you were hitting the Titleist's fat specifically, but most likely some combination of the way the club looks, sits, or maybe other variable like weight or length is causing the issues.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Posted
  On 9/2/2020 at 9:18 PM, Adam C said:

It also in theory puts the hands slightly more ahead of the face compared to no offset. This tiny distance could in theory allow extra time to rotate the face closed and not slice it.

Expand  

And this is why offset is progressive meaning there is more offset in a 3 iron than in a pitching wedge which theoretically gives the golfer just a little more time to get the face square. Take an old Ping Eye 3 iron and compare it to an old Titleist blade and you will see the difference clearly as the blade is often referred to a butterknife with good reason. Historically, I can tell you that for the average golfer Ping came in and saved them from butterknives and started a revolution in golf club design. Many more designs followed with increased offset including TA 845s, Titleist DCIs and other players clubs as well as a slew of game improvement clubs. Here is a pic of Rickie's butterknife and it gives me the shakes too. Below this picture is arguably the ugliest club ever made, The Cleveland VAS+. 

Rickie Fowler reveals new "BUTTER KNIFE" irons, Rory McIlroy reacts... |  GolfMagic

VAS+Irons. The Clubs That Have It All.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


  • Moderator
Posted
  On 9/2/2020 at 12:48 PM, CharlieB said:

Could someone please explain offset to me.

I have always played Ping irons..Eye2+, i3 Oversized, G15. I bought a set of Titleist 714 AP1 irons that I cannot hit the ball out of  my shadow with. They are a nice looking club to my eye, but all I do is keep hitting behind the ball and dig up the turf. I’m going to sell them and go back to Ping, but I’m trying to figure out why these clubs are so different. I’m not a long ball hitter, but I at least I could hit the ball into the air with my G15’s. I think for next year I’m going to buy a set of G410’s. Confidence?

Expand  

I found the AP1 to be very light. I had the 716 and they had a XP90 shaft with a swing weight of D0. Not sure if this could be the issue, but when I switched to a heavier shaft, I had better contact.

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Don't have much of a clue about club tech ...but...is the grip/shaft/blade length a touch longer, causing it to bottom out sooner, digging in behind the ball, all other setup being equal. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 9/2/2020 at 9:18 PM, Adam C said:

Of course none of that explains why you were hitting the Titleist's fat specifically, but most likely some combination of the way the club looks, sits, or maybe other variable like weight or length is causing the issues.

Expand  

Or the most important factor

 

  On 9/3/2020 at 12:42 PM, uitar9 said:

Don't have much of a clue about club tech ...but...is the grip/shaft/blade length a touch longer, causing it to bottom out sooner, digging in behind the ball, all other setup being equal. 

Expand  

...the person's swing.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Actually the Titleist specification reads the club is a D1 swing weight. Anyhow, I put them on Craigslist for sale today. 

l‘ll play my Pings for the rest of this year. I would like to thank AdamC for all of his input through this.

Edited by CharlieB

Note: This thread is 1775 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Depends on my lie and the green I am working with. If I want to fly and stop, my 58* If I am looking for it to run a bit, my 54* And on occasion if the lie and green call for it, punch and run with my 7i
    • I did the RTJ trail, we just did Grand National and Capitol Hill. We were trying to minimize travel time. It gave us 5 courses to play. You pare playing 3 of the 5 we played.  If I had to pick, I would play the Lakes over the Links at Grand National. Links felt too penal on approach shots. If you can't get height or spin, it felt like every ball that hit the center of the green ran off the back. A lot of the greens require force carry, no running it up. It just wasn't that fun to play.   Judge - Really good course, some really cool holes and terrain.   Senator - Really fun open course. They call it link style, I can't remember how much you can play the ball down, but it has the aesthetic appeal.   
    • I do that at the range; I just have been going through a half-assed pre-shot routine. 😇 I just kind of waltz up to the ball and hit it. I catch myself just going through the motions of aiming. Once I started aligning my club to an intermediate target, I felt like I was aligned way open to the target but just trusted it. Like, if the club was aimed at the flag in the middle of the green, then my body was aligned left of the green or more (assuming something like a 100+ yard shot). I think I was more concerned with where my feet were lined up and not the clubface.  A question on alignment then.  So, the ball is like what, 3-FT away from the toe target line. So, does that mean if my toe line is aimed at the flag, the club is aimed 3-ft right? Does the perception of the green looking smaller in the distance impact that in terms of how we hit the shot? I feel like the geometry should work that the ball is actually aimed 3-FT right.    
    • Wordle 1,486 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,486 6/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ 🟩🟩⬜🟩⬜ 🟩🟩⬜🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...