Bought a New Car (Mazda CX-5 Signature)

[colin007]

Was gonna be getting a Pilot for the wife but you've given me something to think about

[billchao]

26 minutes ago, iacas said:

Got these. I hate license plates that just sit against the car. They can rattle, they can scratch the paint… etc.

Two-pack for $12. Put the other one on my wife’s Tiguan. Installation was easy.

I never understood why people put on plates without frames of some kind.

4 minutes ago, colin007 said:

Was gonna be getting a Pilot for the wife but you've given me something to think about

The Mazda CX-5 is smaller than a Honda Pilot. The CX-9 is a better comparison size-wise.

[iacas]

33 minutes ago, billchao said:

I never understood why people put on plates without frames of some kind.

I took off the dealer plate/frame. It was just one of those cheap plastic ones, of course.

I hadn’t thought of silicone frames, but it makes total sense. It drains, too.

[colin007]

16 hours ago, billchao said:

I never understood why people put on plates without frames of some kind.

The Mazda CX-5 is smaller than a Honda Pilot. The CX-9 is a better comparison size-wise.

Good info thanks - she wants fast and the Pilot is faster

[boogielicious]

10 minutes ago, colin007 said:

Good info thanks - she wants fast and the Pilot is faster

But does it go vrrrrrrrrooooooom!?

[billchao]

3 minutes ago, colin007 said:

Good info thanks - she wants fast and the Pilot is faster

Some people say the current CX-9 is underpowered. It uses the same 2.5L turbocharged I4 (227HP on regular, 310 lb ft of torque) that the CX-5 Signature does, except it’s 600lbs heavier.

FWIW, my 2014 CX-9 has a naturally aspirated 3.7L V6 (274HP, 270 lb ft of torque) and it’s actually something like 0.4s slower from 0-60 than the new one. I’ve never felt it was underpowered. The enjoyment of driving a Mazda isn’t about its straight line speed. I test drove a Honda Pilot back in 2014 and it handled like a shoe box. Still does, from everything I’ve read about them.

[iacas]

43 minutes ago, billchao said:

Some people say the current CX-9 is underpowered. It uses the same 2.5L turbocharged I4 (227HP on regular, 310 lb ft of torque) that the CX-5 Signature does, except it’s 600lbs heavier.

FWIW, my 2014 CX-9 has a naturally aspirated 3.7L V6 (274HP, 270 lb ft of torque) and it’s actually something like 0.4s slower from 0-60 than the new one. I’ve never felt it was underpowered. The enjoyment of driving a Mazda isn’t about its straight line speed. I test drove a Honda Pilot back in 2014 and it handled like a shoe box. Still does, from everything I’ve read about them.

Yes, this.

The Pilot (and even the CR-V) suck to drive. They're not "driving" cars. The CR-V uses a CVT, too, which is 💩.

The Mazdas don't use CVTs. They're fun to drive. My CX-5 is great fun. More than my wife's Tiguan, too.

[colin007]

Honestly, anything with a center of gravity higher than what I'm used to (lowered sedans) is gonna feel like a shoebox to me. The wife just wants straight line acceleration, she doesn't care about handling. I don't get it.

[billchao]

30 minutes ago, colin007 said:

Honestly, anything with a center of gravity higher than what I'm used to (lowered sedans) is gonna feel like a shoebox to me. The wife just wants straight line acceleration, she doesn't care about handling. I don't get it.

Test drive. Seriously. It’s night and day. Mazda SUVs feel smaller than they are.

[colin007]

On 2/3/2021 at 7:25 PM, billchao said:

Test drive. Seriously. It’s night and day. Mazda SUVs feel smaller than they are.

I'll suggest to the wife that she try one out, she might like it even if it's slower. It's guaranteed to feel like a fat bloated boat for me though (as would the Pilot)

[iacas]

Tell her it's a Turbo!

[JuliWooli]

On 1/31/2021 at 11:20 PM, iacas said:

a CX-5 Signature

 

I leased a CX-5 diesel in January 2020, the burgundy colour. It's my second one, my last one was manual and white. Great car! Costs € 550 p.m. on a 5 year lease and I have about 10G to pay at the end if I go that long. I only have one bit photo...

 

[iacas]

What's the mileage like on the diesel model?

[Shindig]

Great choice in car.  I bought a gunmetal (I think that's what the color is called) CX-5 back in June.  It's my third Mazda, this one replacing a 2006 Mazda 3.

[tristanhilton85]

On 2/2/2021 at 1:31 PM, iacas said:

Yes, this.

The Pilot (and even the CR-V) suck to drive. They're not "driving" cars. The CR-V uses a CVT, too, which is 💩.

The Mazdas don't use CVTs. They're fun to drive. My CX-5 is great fun. More than my wife's Tiguan, too.

Yes. CVTs suck.

Wife had a Sentra that the CVT went out on just over 1.5 years ago (and just outside of the warranty period). We ended up replacing it with a Hyundai Tucson.

This past October, I decided to trade in my car as well and we purchased a second Tucson. I've been super happy with them. 

The Mazda is really nice though, and was high up on my list as well. Nice choice.

[JuliWooli]

7 hours ago, iacas said:

What's the mileage like on the diesel model?

750 km with a full tank of 50 Litres, 15km per litre x 4 = 60km to the gallon. I think the math is correct

[saevel25]

5 hours ago, JuliWooli said:

750 km with a full tank of 50 Litres, 15km per litre x 4 = 60km to the gallon. I think the math is correct

Miles please 😛 

9 hours ago, tristanhilton85 said:

Yes. CVTs suck.

Wife had a Sentra that the CVT went out on just over 1.5 years ago (and just outside of the warranty period). We ended up replacing it with a Hyundai Tucson.

Wasn't this pushed as the type of transmission that would be in every car? I didn't know that they had these big issues. 

 

[billchao]

10 hours ago, tristanhilton85 said:

Yes. CVTs suck.

Wife had a Sentra that the CVT went out on just over 1.5 years ago (and just outside of the warranty period).

To be fair, Nissan’s CVT is bad. I’m not saying I like CVTs, but your wife ended up with the worst possible one.

1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Miles please 😛

~35 mpg. Google is your friend 😜