Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1348 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

think Young is going to get the Heisman, because he had a game winning drive against Auburn, then trashed Georgia. 

This. The talking heads actually had Young having to play against Georgia as a potential Heisman killer. He pulled it off and did the opposite. Gotta give him credit for that. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well OSU is getting the other OSU's defensive coordinator. 

Might turn out well. B12 OSU's total defense was 278 yards per game in a conference that averaged 400-420 yards per game. 

In 2018, he was hired as DC at B12 OSU. 

Scoring Defense by year - 32, 26, 23, 17. So, they just kept getting better year by year, good sign. 

We'll see. From what I heard, he is pretty aggressive, and likes to show multiple looks. I am a fan versus our vanilla defense we have been going with the past two years. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

From what I heard, he is pretty aggressive, and likes to show multiple looks.

I like to see defenses play this way even if it is Ohio.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

I like to see defenses play this way even if it is Ohio.

Like, you have to now. Teams are getting too good at scheming people open if you just play base defense. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The B10 West needs to fire all their coaches, lol.. 

 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So what are your thoughts on Alabama/Cincinnati @saevel25? I think if Alabama shows up like they did against Georgia it’ll be a massacre. Maybe then the committee will think twice about boosting up an ‘outlier’ team that has one good win.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

So what are your thoughts on Alabama/Cincinnati @saevel25? I think if Alabama shows up like they did against Georgia it’ll be a massacre. Maybe then the committee will think twice about boosting up an ‘outlier’ team that has one good win.

I think Cincy is a good team. I am a fan of mixing metrics with recruiting. Also, there are matchups as well. 

From a metric standpoint...

Cincy's defense is good. Like Top-10 good. They will have two NFL guys at DB. Their QB is one of those ones you hate to face. Scrappy, makes the key big play (with legs or throwing it). 

If Cincy can slow the game down, they have a legit shot in the 4th quarter. SP+ has Bama by 3 points on a neutral field. I know we have been crapping on Cincy for their schedule. Really, when you break down strength of schedule. An elite team would average just under 1-loss on Cincy's schedule (.85). Lets say Georgia's schedule, an elite team would average just shy of 2-losss. (1.9-ish). 

Cincy did what an elite team should have done versus their schedule, have no losses. Georgia did what they should have done, have 2-losses or less. 

A good team would average 2-losses versus Cincy's schedule, and an average team would average 5-losses. Their SOS was middle of the road. You consider an average team being 6-6. There are X amount of wins available. Someone is going 1-11, and someone else is going 11-1. Average should be around 6-6. 

For me, Cincy deserved to be there, because they did what an elite team should have done, go undefeated against that schedule. 

Here is a table showing the +/- over expected elite teams versus your schedule...

Team Wins Losses ELS +/-
Alabama 11 1 2.6 1.6
Georgia 11 1 2.0 1.0
Michigan 12 1 1.8 0.8
Cincinnati 12 0 0.8 0.8
Notre Dame 11 1 1.3 0.3
Ole Miss 9 2 2.1 0.1
Michigan State 9 2 1.9 -0.1
Ohio State 10 2 1.7 -0.4
Louisiana 11 1 0.6 -0.4

Basically, our college football playoff selection played out. Anyone near zero or above played like an elite team. The top 4 did it the best. 

If I had to pick the game... It will be strength of Alabama's offense versus strength of Cincy's defense. 

Do not look past Cincy's offense. Top 15 in passing average and passer rating. Top 10 in rushing average. Its just they slow the game down, ranked 83rd in total # of plays run. The biggest X-Factor is the athletes. There are times when a less athletic defense can hold down a very athletic offense. Think OSU (b12) versus OU. OU clearly had more talent on offense, and OSU (b12) held them to 9 points only in the 2nd half. 

If i had to pick a score... I will go on the wild side... Cincy 33-30 over Alabama. Last second FG to win. Cincy holds onto the ball, and keeps the explosive plays to a minimum. 

Georgia V Michigan. Talk about a game were teams are going to try to see who can win the trenches. It will come down to if Michigan can convert on some key third and long plays through the air. If Michigan gets any sort of running game going, like 4-5 yard average. They have a good shot at beating Georgia. I just think Georgia's defense is built precisely to take on these sorts of offenses. 

I will say Georgia 31 Michigan 24. 

I have Georgia facing Cincy in the national championship. 

I will go with Ohio versus the World!!!! Cincy 28, Georgia 21. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
54 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I think Cincy is a good team. I am a fan of mixing metrics with recruiting. Also, there are matchups as well. 

From a metric standpoint...

Cincy's defense is good. Like Top-10 good. They will have two NFL guys at DB. Their QB is one of those ones you hate to face. Scrappy, makes the key big play (with legs or throwing it). 

If Cincy can slow the game down, they have a legit shot in the 4th quarter. SP+ has Bama by 3 points on a neutral field. I know we have been crapping on Cincy for their schedule. Really, when you break down strength of schedule. An elite team would average just under 1-loss on Cincy's schedule (.85). Lets say Georgia's schedule, an elite team would average just shy of 2-losss. (1.9-ish). 

Cincy did what an elite team should have done versus their schedule, have no losses. Georgia did what they should have done, have 2-losses or less. 

A good team would average 2-losses versus Cincy's schedule, and an average team would average 5-losses. Their SOS was middle of the road. You consider an average team being 6-6. There are X amount of wins available. Someone is going 1-11, and someone else is going 11-1. Average should be around 6-6. 

For me, Cincy deserved to be there, because they did what an elite team should have done, go undefeated against that schedule. 

Here is a table showing the +/- over expected elite teams versus your schedule...

Team Wins Losses ELS +/-
Alabama 11 1 2.6 1.6
Georgia 11 1 2.0 1.0
Michigan 12 1 1.8 0.8
Cincinnati 12 0 0.8 0.8
Notre Dame 11 1 1.3 0.3
Ole Miss 9 2 2.1 0.1
Michigan State 9 2 1.9 -0.1
Ohio State 10 2 1.7 -0.4
Louisiana 11 1 0.6 -0.4

Basically, our college football playoff selection played out. Anyone near zero or above played like an elite team. The top 4 did it the best. 

If I had to pick the game... It will be strength of Alabama's offense versus strength of Cincy's defense. 

Do not look past Cincy's offense. Top 15 in passing average and passer rating. Top 10 in rushing average. Its just they slow the game down, ranked 83rd in total # of plays run. The biggest X-Factor is the athletes. There are times when a less athletic defense can hold down a very athletic offense. Think OSU (b12) versus OU. OU clearly had more talent on offense, and OSU (b12) held them to 9 points only in the 2nd half. 

If i had to pick a score... I will go on the wild side... Cincy 33-30 over Alabama. Last second FG to win. Cincy holds onto the ball, and keeps the explosive plays to a minimum. 

Georgia V Michigan. Talk about a game were teams are going to try to see who can win the trenches. It will come down to if Michigan can convert on some key third and long plays through the air. If Michigan gets any sort of running game going, like 4-5 yard average. They have a good shot at beating Georgia. I just think Georgia's defense is built precisely to take on these sorts of offenses. 

I will say Georgia 31 Michigan 24. 

I have Georgia facing Cincy in the national championship. 

I will go with Ohio versus the World!!!! Cincy 28, Georgia 21. 

 

I get the metrics. But they’re so hypothetical. ‘What a ‘good’ team would do with their schedule’ is such a hypothetical realm I just can’t see it playing out. Those metrics that Cincy generated were against poor teams. Period. Boise States QB from several years looked phenomenal. But he was throwing to wide open receivers with no pass rushing to speak of. Needless to say he rode the bench in Detroit and I think faded out. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

I get the metrics. But they’re so hypothetical. ‘What a ‘good’ team would do with their schedule’ is such a hypothetical realm I just can’t see it playing out. Those metrics that Cincy generated were against poor teams. Period. Boise States QB from several years looked phenomenal. But he was throwing to wide open receivers with no pass rushing to speak of. Needless to say he rode the bench in Detroit and I think faded out. 

I don’t think so.

if you have 20+ years of data. It says, teams in the top 3% of teams will have x amount of wins versus y schedule. It gives you a sense of what went down. I get it, specific teams can be above or below that win mark. You could have a top-5 team with 3-4 losses. You can have a 20th ranked team with no losses per the metrics. It’s really hard to say this team should beat this team by x amount.

except maybe Vegas, but it’s more manipulating what people think should happen. 
 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I don’t think so.

if you have 20+ years of data. It says, teams in the top 3% of teams will have x amount of wins versus y schedule. It gives you a sense of what went down. I get it, specific teams can be above or below that win mark. You could have a top-5 team with 3-4 losses. You can have a 20th ranked team with no losses per the metrics. It’s really hard to say this team should beat this team by x amount.

except maybe Vegas, but it’s more manipulating what people think should happen. 
 

I just don’t think what Cincinnati did this year is worthy of being in the CFP. Especially when look at what the other teams actually did. Not what the metrics say, what actually happened. What if Cincy had OhioSt’s last four games? Hell even OSU’s? Hey Michigan, what did you do to get here? Well…we beat OhioSt. Alabama? We beat Georgia. Cincy? Well…we beat ND three months ago and rode the unranked for the rest. Just doesn’t sit right to me.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I will say Georgia 31 Michigan 24. 

I have Georgia facing Cincy in the national championship. 

Cincy 28, Georgia 21. 

@saevel25 You know, they'll now be posting your predictions in the Alabama, Michigan and Georgia locker rooms as motivation!


Posted
1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

I just don’t think what Cincinnati did this year is worthy of being in the CFP. Especially when look at what the other teams actually did. Not what the metrics say, what actually happened. What if Cincy had OhioSt’s last four games? Hell even OSU’s? Hey Michigan, what did you do to get here? Well…we beat OhioSt. Alabama? We beat Georgia. Cincy? Well…we beat ND three months ago and rode the unranked for the rest. Just doesn’t sit right to me.

Who belongs in that 4th spot if not Cincinnati?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

Who belongs in that 4th spot if not Cincinnati?

Exactly. 

the only other 1 loss team is ND, who lost to Cincy. I don’t think you can put in a 2 loss team.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Exactly. 

the only other 1 loss team is ND, who lost to Cincy. I don’t think you can put in a 2 loss team.

Well it’s true that’s a conundrum. But would Cincinnati be undefeated had they played OnioSt’s schedule? Would OhioSt be a two loss team if they played Cincy’s schedule? I may have considered a two loss team this year due to Cincinnati being a bit of a mystery. Maybe I’ll eat some crow and Cincy will put up a game against Alabama. I doubt it though. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
23 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

But would Cincinnati be undefeated had they played OnioSt’s schedule?

Cincy probably has 1 or 2 losses. I think Cincy would be favored over everyone except Michigan. 

24 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Would OhioSt be a two loss team if they played Cincy’s schedule? I may have considered a two loss team this year due to Cincinnati being a bit of a mystery. Maybe I’ll eat some crow and Cincy will put up a game against Alabama. I doubt it though. 

I just think Cincy deserves a shot. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Cincy probably has 1 or 2 losses. I think Cincy would be favored over everyone except Michigan. 

I just think Cincy deserves a shot. 

Well at least it’s something different for a change. I can live with that. Not looking forward to a Alabama/Georgia rematch.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Cincy probably has 1 or 2 losses. I think Cincy would be favored over everyone except Michigan. 

I just think Cincy deserves a shot. 

Yeah I agree.  I think the committee tends to agree with vinsk and would normally have no issue whatsoever excluding the G5 teams if/ when they can, and they were about 8” away from being able to do that were it not for one good Baylor tackle. 🙂

Cincinnati has done everything asked of them - they earned their shot.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think this might be the best catch I've ever seen. I understand OBJ had some stupid one-handed catch over his head. At least he was in position to have leverage to catch the ball. 

This catch that JSN made through a defender, is absurd. I do not understand how the ball just doesn't bounce off his hand. I do wish there was one more camera angle to this to show it better...

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1348 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.