Jump to content
IGNORED

Assumed Lost Ball in Water Hazard


Sarge
Note: This thread is 1109 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

A situation occurred today that we never experienced before.  One of the fellows that I was playing with, hit a low approach shot (approx. 185 yds out) to a green that had water along the left side. He was on the left side of fairway, while myself and another player were on the right side. We didn't see his shot (one of the dis-advantages of playing ready golf), and he himself lost site of it inflight. He couldn't find it anywhere on/around the greed, so he assumed it went in the lateral water hazard. He took a penalty shoot, dropped another ball where he guessed it went in, and played that ball several times more. When he got near the hole, he discovered his original ball was in the hole!!!!

The other player said since he declared his first ball lost, took a penalty stoke and played the second one several times more, that the original ball was no longer in play, and the eagle did not count! Was this the correct ruling? If so, seems to be a cruel rule.

Hope someone can shed more light on this situation, thanks

Sarge

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

The ball is holed.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

As Bill says, once the original is holed, the hole is over for that player.  Anything else that the player does is immaterial, for the most part.  I think its possible that the player could do something to get the General Penalty, such as giving advice, assuming his opponent still has a chance to tie.  If the opponent cannot tie, the hole is over.  Check rule 6.5.

  • Informative 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Be aware that this player had no idea that his ball was in the hole so he had no clue where it was. He was searching for it on the green. For this reason he was mistaken in assuming it was in the water.

You can only assume that the ball was in the penalty area or (water hazard) if you are virtually certain it is. Pretty much meaning you saw it going in. In the description of events, the player was not at all certain, he just took a guess. Not the same thing.

The important thing here is that the ball was holed. Finding the ball in the hole is not the same as finding it 20 yards further up than you thought it was.

The ball was holed and it is an eagle. The hole is finished once the ball is in the hole.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


We battle something different but related. Our 8th tee has a pond that is hidden from the tee. If you've never played there, you'd never know it was there. It is only a few yards off the fairway so it is extremely common to have balls go in there.

image.png

The argument begins on where to drop. The line I drew here has the ball going in just right of the oak tree there. It is a very common line. However, once the ball goes in there because we couldn't see it go in, we are forced to use the drop area. Recently they have put the drop area almost at the start of the water. It now becomes an impossible shot to the green because of the trees. A drive 5 yards off the fairway is an immediate best case double.

image.png

If you drop on that corner where the ball went in you can get at most pin positions. Seems the rules are very punishing here because we could not verify where it went in.

P.S. I HATE THIS HOLE. (phew, there I feel better after getting that off my chest)

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, mchepp said:

 

If you drop on that corner where the ball went in you can get at most pin positions. Seems the rules are very punishing here because we could not verify where it went in.

 

That's better than playing three off the tee which is really what should be happening. The club is being generous by letting people drop from a drop zone.

They probably started doing that to get around what some would think is a grey area in the rule and its interpretation.

The question that should be asked every time is. "How do you know it didn't bounce off one of the trees somewhere else in the rough and are you sure it isn't under a leaf somewhere?"

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 minutes ago, Shorty said:

That's better than playing three off the tee which is really what should be happening. The club is being generous by letting people drop from a drop zone.

They probably started doing that to get around what some would think is a grey area in the rule and its interpretation.

The question that should be asked every time is. "How do you know it didn't bounce off one of the trees somewhere else in the rough and are you sure it isn't under a leaf somewhere?"

Interesting. So if there is no drop area we would need to re-tee?

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, mchepp said:

Interesting. So if there is no drop area we would need to re-tee?

Absolutely, unless you see the ball going into the water. "Virtual certainty" implies that the ball couldn't possibly be anywhere else. I see lots of trees and rough in your photos.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


12 hours ago, mchepp said:

Interesting. So if there is no drop area we would need to re-tee?

Not necessarily. Providing you have virtual certainty that the the ball is in the penalty area.

It depends on the colour of the markings. See Rule 17.1d https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=fr&section=rule&rulenum=17

Yellow - you could go 'Back on the Line'. ie estimate the point where the ball last crossed into the margin of the penalty area. Take a line from the hole, through that point back as far as you wish within 1 cl of the line.

Red - as above or  'Lateral Relief' within 2cl of that point not nearer the hole

Edited by Rulesman
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
3 minutes ago, Rulesman said:

Not necessarily. It depends on the colour of the markings. See Rule 17.1d https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=fr&section=rule&rulenum=17

Yellow - you could go 'Back on the Line'. ie estimate the point where the ball last crossed into the margin of the penalty area. Take a line from the hole, through that point back as far as you wish within 1 cl of the line.

Red - as above or  'Lateral Relief' within 2cl of that point not nearer the hole

I think that @mchepp was considering a hole where you can't see exactly where the ball ends up.  @Shorty has suggested the player wouldn't be likely to be Virtually Certain that the ball ended up in the Penalty Area, it could be lost among the trees and rough along that side of the hole, and based on what I see from the photo I agree with him.  In that case, you would have to take stroke and distance relief.  Without Virtual Certainty, use of a drop area wouldn't be acceptable.

But we're a long ways off from the original topic, that of a ball holed without the player's knowledge.  Which brings me to an issue I mentioned earlier.  Even though the player has completed the hole, could he still lose the hole by getting the General Penalty for something like advice?  I'm assuming the Player is in for 2, as an example, and his Opponent is getting ready to hit his second shot, so the hole has not yet been decided.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

Which brings me to an issue I mentioned earlier.  Even though the player has completed the hole, could he still lose the hole by getting the General Penalty for something like advice?  I'm assuming the Player is in for 2, as an example, and his Opponent is getting ready to hit his second shot, so the hole has not yet been decided.

Yes. General Penalty. Loss of Hole.

 

Edited by Rulesman
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1109 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I honestly believe if they play longer tees by 300-400 yards, closer to or over 7,000 yards, more rough, tougher greens, women's golf will become much more gripping.  BTW, if it weren't for Scottie killing it right now, men's golf isn't exactly compelling.
    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...