Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, JPitts said:

Looks like LAB golf is going to be sticking around for quite some time. Lots of tour players using it now, and none of them are paid to play it. Pretty cool to see a small company doing so well in a really tough market to get into (as far as tour use goes). Wishing them all the best and am excited to see what they come out with next. 

I don't think anyone ever predicted that they'd go out of business. So… just more intellectually dishonest/gaslighting type comments? Okay.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 hours ago, iacas said:

I don't think anyone ever predicted that they'd go out of business. So… just more intellectually dishonest/gaslighting type comments? Okay.

Nope, no gaslighting or dishonesty at all in the post. It was nothing more than a post highlighting a small company having great success and pointing out that they appear to be here to stay. I do know that a couple years ago it was hit or miss if they were going to be sticking around. If the post caused you to doubt your own perceptions, experiences, or understanding of events, then that was strictly coincidental. 

  • Like 1

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, JPitts said:

Nope, no gaslighting or dishonesty at all in the post. It was nothing more than a post highlighting a small company having great success and pointing out that they appear to be here to stay. I do know that a couple years ago it was hit or miss if they were going to be sticking around. If the post caused you to doubt your own perceptions, experiences, or understanding of events, then that was strictly coincidental. 

Your post did no such thing, because as we've pointed out to you several times, your perception of what's said by others does not often align with reality.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, JPitts said:

It was nothing more than a post highlighting a small company having great success and pointing out that they appear to be here to stay

Nobody in this topic has stated otherwise.

4 hours ago, JPitts said:

 I do know that a couple years ago it was hit or miss if they were going to be sticking around. 

Based on what facts? Do you have insight into their finances? Or at the very least a news article or something that supports your claim?

But again, nobody on here (that I've seen) has argued that they wouldn't be sticking around.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
19 hours ago, klineka said:

But again, nobody on here (that I've seen) has argued that they wouldn't be sticking around.

We have though, especially me, indicated that it’s one of the ugliest putters we’ve ever seen. 😉

  • Funny 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

54 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

We have though, especially me, indicated that it’s one of the ugliest putters we’ve ever seen. 😉

Season 5 Nbc GIF by The Office

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
(edited)

Is the old thread talking about the marketing claims still around?  I tried to search but couldn't find it. 

 

I've been bombarded by instagram ads from these guys and my resolve is weakening, lol.

 

 

Edit: nevermind.  Found it under "Directed Force" and not "LAB"   

Edited by dsc123

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, dsc123 said:

Edit: nevermind.  Found it under "Directed Force" and not "LAB"   

Yep.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...

These ugly putters are getting wins on all major tours now. Being talked about by most online golf forums as well as printed golf publications. Only time will tell where this company will go, but the current trajectory is promising and I believe they have more wins on tour now than Edel putters and definitely more than Axis One. (Just trying to pick another small market putter to compare)

  • Like 1

  • Administrator

What’s your point?

You continue to peddle this BS that we've predicted the company would go away, when all we've ever really said is that the putter is kind of ugly to some people, and that the science on the original (topic linked to below) is bull. Yet you continue to make up this straw man and argue against it.

You started this very topic with a bullshit statement/strawman and have continued ever since.

On 8/16/2023 at 6:38 PM, iacas said:

I don't think anyone ever predicted that they'd go out of business. So… just more intellectually dishonest/gaslighting type comments? Okay.

You're still doing it. Here's the original topic, too, which gets into the BS around the torques in putting.

On 10/12/2023 at 5:57 PM, iacas said:
  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've read through a lot of the responses concerning LAB putters and realize many of you on this forum discount the no Torque that LAB is famous for. I recently purchased a DF2.1 and like most people who first see it that say "no way I would use something looks like that". I was one of those until I started doing the research watching many videos of more people with more golf knowledge than me and all you saw was good comments about how easy it is to use. I've only been able to use for a couple of rounds before the cold set in but will say that those were 2 of my best putting rounds this year. 3-10 footers felt almost automatic as long as my read was correct. The more I read about this putter the more sense it made in that you don't have to worry about manipulating your stroke to keep it square, you just grip the putter lightly and let the putter keep the stroke square. The only thing to blame on a missed putt now is my read and speed. Give one a try I don't think you will be disappointed. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

WITB

Driver-TM Stealth+,3 wood-Tour Edge E722,5Wood-Callaway Rogue, Hybrids-Tour Edge EXS220 & Sub70-949X

Irons-Sub70 699V2, Wedges-Sub70-JB, Putter-LAB Directed Force, Ball-Maxfli Tour S


17 minutes ago, tschott said:

I've read through a lot of the responses concerning LAB putters and realize many of you on this forum discount the no Torque that LAB is famous for. I recently purchased a DF2.1 and like most people who first see it that say "no way I would use something looks like that". I was one of those until I started doing the research watching many videos of more people with more golf knowledge than me and all you saw was good comments about how easy it is to use. I've only been able to use for a couple of rounds before the cold set in but will say that those were 2 of my best putting rounds this year. 3-10 footers felt almost automatic as long as my read was correct. The more I read about this putter the more sense it made in that you don't have to worry about manipulating your stroke to keep it square, you just grip the putter lightly and let the putter keep the stroke square. The only thing to blame on a missed putt now is my read and speed. Give one a try I don't think you will be disappointed. 

@JPitts sending along reinforcements now?

You do not have to manipulate a stroke with other putters to keep them square either.-Glad you like it tho.

  • Funny 1

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Glad you like your putter @tschott, but I don’t manipulate my stroke with my blade putter. It’s not necessary. The torque on a putter head moving slow is negligible. It’s basic physics. A firm grip can easily control it with any putter head.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 hours ago, tschott said:

I've read through a lot of the responses concerning LAB putters and realize many of you on this forum discount the no Torque that LAB is famous for. I recently purchased a DF2.1 and like most people who first see it that say "no way I would use something looks like that". I was one of those until I started doing the research watching many videos of more people with more golf knowledge than me and all you saw was good comments about how easy it is to use. I've only been able to use for a couple of rounds before the cold set in but will say that those were 2 of my best putting rounds this year. 3-10 footers felt almost automatic as long as my read was correct. The more I read about this putter the more sense it made in that you don't have to worry about manipulating your stroke to keep it square, you just grip the putter lightly and let the putter keep the stroke square. The only thing to blame on a missed putt now is my read and speed. Give one a try I don't think you will be disappointed. 

I've tried them a couple of times. "Meh". Personally, I don't have a problem with they way they look. I liked Star Wars, Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica growing up. Having a putter that looks like a space ship is totally fine with me. ... Now might be a good time to mention that I also like to play golf with an orange and yellow Srixon divide. ... So, there's that. 

I didn't have that eureka moment whenever I've tried them. Truthfully, I've always had a "Meh" moment. 

I will give them credit for trying to tell a different story. A lot of golf equipment sales seems to be trying to find a way to market some kind of technology. The technology needs to be innovative enough to tell a good story, it also has to be reasonably believable (Sorry, Hammer.) And it has to be presented in a way that makes golfers believe it will help them. I give LAB credit for coming up with some of those things. I also think they were the first ones I can remember who would do a lie angle fitting remotely using a photograph with a plumb line in the picture. So, I give them credit for that too. 

I'm glad you like your putter. For me, the technology always kind of left me underwhelmed, and testing a few out in person has left me underwhelmed. 

...  I do like that you can get one in blue... Because everything's better if you can get it in blue. 👍😁👍

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, boogielicious said:

It’s basic physics. A firm grip can easily control it with any putter head.

Where by “firm” you mean “enough to not drop the putter mid-stroke.” 😀

1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

Because everything's better if you can get it in blue. 👍😁👍

Balls.

  • Funny 4

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 minutes ago, iacas said:

Balls.

Okay, perhaps not EVERYTHING.  ... 🥶🥶

  • Funny 3

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 hours ago, boogielicious said:

Glad you like your putter @tschott, but I don’t manipulate my stroke with my blade putter. It’s not necessary. The torque on a putter head moving slow is negligible. It’s basic physics. A firm grip can easily control it with any putter head.

Probably used the wrong word when I said manipulate. Always nice to hear other people's comments on topics. Hopefully once the greens speed up my feeling will be the same as I'm selling most of my putters. Merry Christmas everyone

  • Thumbs Up 1

WITB

Driver-TM Stealth+,3 wood-Tour Edge E722,5Wood-Callaway Rogue, Hybrids-Tour Edge EXS220 & Sub70-949X

Irons-Sub70 699V2, Wedges-Sub70-JB, Putter-LAB Directed Force, Ball-Maxfli Tour S


I bought a Mezz max. I’ve played 3 rounds with it and putting has been a few stokes better each round from my previous putter. I didn’t get fitted but I’ve had a putter fitting before so I kinda know what fits my stroke. Not sure if it’s the press grip, weight or what but definitely like the putter. As for as keeping the putter square during the stroke, I think that’s more the user than the putter. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • You are not wrong. The shaft and the head together both contribute to the performance of the club. I'd also suggest that they contribute in different amounts depending upon whether we are comparing a driver, an iron or a wedge. (We could argue all day about how much is the head and how much is the shaft... and I would enjoy the argument.) Having said that, in order for a youtuber or anyone else for that matter to completely optimize the club and then hit it in comparison to another completely optimized club is all but impossible. Just one of the many reasons why all club tests should be taken with a generous pinch of salt.  Not only that but even in robot testing there are variables that are outside the areas of control. I've personally been lucky enough to witness robot testing first had. It's fascinating how non-repeatable the results can be. Let me elaborate. With an 7 or 8 iron the robot can land balls over and over again in an area the size of a kiddie pool. However, when the testers moved away from a 7 or 8 iron, the results got less and less precise. Interestingly it didn't matter if they went up or down the bag. With the robot hitting short pitches and even chips, relatively, more variation than full short iron shots. Similarly, long drives with the robot created more variation as well. This is without the effects of wind, variations in the surface and texture of where the ball lands etc...  In addition, this doesn't take into account possible bias, either consciously or unconsciously of the tester. The testers I got to witness (these happened to by Taylormade guys, but I'm sure it doesn't matter), confessed that they could influence the results if they wanted to. They could take two clubs and make either of them "win" with robot testing if they wanted to. They made to the point to illustrate that in their job they had to constantly make sure they were fighting bias and/or putting in double checks, but never-the-less when I now read about any testing saying X club is 7 yards longer, I think back to their statement.  So, if it's that difficult to get really good results out of a robot imagine how difficult it is to get quantifiable results out of a human swinging a club.  Here's a fun test to try. Hit your driver 10 times on a launch monitor and gather the data (You can do 20 or 30 swings it doesn't matter). Now group the data into 2 sets, the odd numbered swings and the even numbered swings. Look at your two data sets. I guarantee that one data set will look "better" than the other. Even though, it's the same person swinging the same club on the same day. But if you just happened to be testing a driver against your driver on that day, Even if you gather your data by switching back and forth between the two drivers you may get misleading results. I've done this test a few times in my life and it's interesting to see how the "odd numbered me" or the "even numbered me" always produces different results, sometimes one will win by a large margin.  In summary, I too enjoy watching reviews of the new clubs that come out, especially drivers. But it is information not data. 
    • Wordle 1,312 4/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟦🟦🟦 ⬛🟦🟦🟦⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧  
    • Something I’ve been thinking about. I watch a lot of club tests, retired and get up way too early, and there’s something I think in my opinion might be being done wrong. They might pick several drivers, could be something different, and use the same shaft so things will be equal. In my mind a shaft might be good in one club and not in another. Learned the hard way, had my best ever driver at the time, G410, and kept hearing about how great the G425 MAX was. Since I sometimes have trouble finding senior shafts we traded heads and the 410 shaft never seemed to work out in the 425 head for me. Wasn’t as straight or as long so I have moved on. Don’t think everyone was wrong about the G425, just think that combination maybe didn’t work for me.  
    • Day 366 - Fullswings, making sure my hips face the target more. 
    • Day 187: freezing cold and a tad unmotivated, but got in some mirror work. Working on backswing stuff. Tried out a few new things that I think might improve my mirror work.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...