Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6252 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Who did the best in the draft?

    • Bills
      0
    • Dolphins
      4
    • Patriots
      1
    • Jets
      1
    • Ravens
      0
    • Bengals
      0
    • Browns
      0
    • Steelers
      1
    • Texans
      0
    • Colts
      0
    • Jaguars
      0
    • Titans
      0
    • Broncos
      1
    • Chiefs
      8
    • Raiders
      0
    • Chargers
      1
    • Cowboys
      1
    • Eagles
      0
    • Giants
      1
    • Redskins
      0
    • Bears
      0
    • Lions
      1
    • Vikings
      0
    • Saints
      0
    • Packers
      0
    • Falcons
      1
    • Panthers
      0
    • Saints
      0
    • Buccaneers
      0
    • Cardinals
      0
    • Rams
      0
    • 49ers
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted
I think the chiefs did the best. They got defenders with all 3 picks in the 1st and 2 rounds. 2 linemen to which is what they needed the most. I was thinking they were going to go for a qb 1st or 2nd round but they stayed with the defense which was probably best.

Posted
The Chiefs did the best....they had a s-pile of picks to work with and did very well with them.

I'm still quite undecided on how the Steelers did.....I do like their first two picks though.....I just hope they work out.

Posted

i voted dolphins. the got jake long, a stud OT, two decent backs and a promising qb to work with. hopefully they have a better season. im not a dolphin fan, its more out of pity

go Bolts!

Sticks
driver- X460 tour 9.5 Aldila NVS 75
irons- X-forged 3-PW TT BlackGold stiff
wedges- x-tour vintage 52, 56, 60
hybrid- FT-hybrid #2 17* putter- Sophia 33" "If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough."_Mario Andretti

Posted
I picked the Steelers only because their first two picks were absolute steals for where they went. Mendenhall was projected much earlier than 23 and Limas Sweed was also late first round to early second as a projection. Great steals IMO. If they could only address the O-line. KC had an awesome draft also.

Driver: Cobra S2 9.5 Fubuki 73 Stiff | Wood: Titleist 909H 17 Aldila Voodoo Stiff | Irons: Titleist ZB 3-5, ZM 6-PW DG S300 | Wedges: Titleist Vokey SMTC 50.08, 54.11, 60.04 DG S200 | Putter: Scotty Cameron Fastback 1.5 33" | Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
Have you seen a team suck more than the Bears??? Why didn't they get a QB!!!!Yes, the excuse is talent wasn't the thing this year for such position, but when you have talent like Orton and Grossman home, you definetely know that's not something the Bears care about.

Sincerely, I was expecting them to have a 3rd pick in a QB, and I guess things would work much better.

Well, I'll have to sit down and watch another disappointing seasson and hope we get one of the first 5 picks next year (Angelo might draft a kicker then, but I hope he's fired before that lol)

Posted
Did anyone else think that the trade the Panthers made was really dumb. They traded there 1st round draft pick next year and i think 2 other picks to move up. that just seemed dumb to me. anyone else agree or eas it a good move because i don't follow college football the way i should.

Posted
  xamilo said:
Have you seen a team suck more than the Bears??? Why didn't they get a QB!!!!Yes, the excuse is talent wasn't the thing this year for such position, but when you have talent like Orton and Grossman home, you definetely know that's not something the Bears care about.

Actually I have seen a team suck far worse than the Bears. The Lions. Yes the Bears had a bad season. They did lose to the Lions twice in 07. However, they were in the Superbowl in 2006. The Lions have taken sucking to a new level. Matt Millen is 31-81 in 7 seasons as GM. That is 50 games under .500. I am relatively sure no other GM in NFL history has come close to that.

That said, I think I like the Lion's draft this year. It lacks sex appeal, but it looks to be solid. They actually went in and filled some needs. OT, MLB, DE, RB, DT and Kick Return. Unfortunately for them, the two guys they had highest on their board were Harvey who Jacksonville moved up to take and the cheating ass Patriots took Mayo. The best fit for them was Cherilus the big Right Tackle. The line has been the worst in football for a long time, thus the 31-81 record. They finally used a high pick to address it. They went this year with mostly guys who had very good careers, not just guys that had a great combine or pro day. Since they are the Lions, I will hold off on my optimism as they are likely to rip out my heart and show it to me before they stomp it into the ground.
Driver: 9.5° 905R Stiff Aldila NV 65
3 Wood: 15.° Pro Trajectory 906F4 Stiff Aldila VS Proto Blue
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H Stiff Dynamic Gold S400
Hybrid: 21.0° Edge C.F.T. Ti Stiff Aldila NVS
Irons: 775cb 4-GW w/S300 Sand Wedge: Vokey 58° Puttter: Laguna Mid-Slant Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1Bag: Li...

Posted
of course the chiefs had the best draft..... they had the most picks this past draft...


watch out for them Vikings in the NFC North..... looking pretty dangerous...

In my bag:
Driver: R9 TP Rombax Stiff
3 Wood: R9 TP 85g Stiff
3 hybrid: X
4-SW: X-20 Uniflex

SteelLW: Forged Chrome

Putter: White Hot XG #1


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
  itzzzberny said:
of course the chiefs had the best draft..... they had the most picks this past draft...

the vikings would be incredible if they had somebody who could make a receiver NOT have to work for every ball.....Seriously, i don't think a Vikings receiver had an easy catch last year

driver- R580XD 9.5*
3 wood- m/speed
hybrid- cft ti 4h
irons- fp 4-gap
wedges- 54* and RAC satin 56* 12 bounceputter- 1/2 Craz-Eballs- DT Carry, e5, anything found thats is good shapeshoes-adidashome course - nothing - uh oh. perhaps pleasant view againschool...


Posted
  Eore said:
the vikings would be incredible if they had somebody who could make a receiver NOT have to work for every ball.....Seriously, i don't think a Vikings receiver had an easy catch last year

The Vikings are the only team that got a true ProBowl player with their first round pick. Granted they traded the pick to get him, but I hate the idea of having to face Jared Allen twice a year.

Driver: 9.5° 905R Stiff Aldila NV 65
3 Wood: 15.° Pro Trajectory 906F4 Stiff Aldila VS Proto Blue
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H Stiff Dynamic Gold S400
Hybrid: 21.0° Edge C.F.T. Ti Stiff Aldila NVS
Irons: 775cb 4-GW w/S300 Sand Wedge: Vokey 58° Puttter: Laguna Mid-Slant Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1Bag: Li...

Posted
the vikes traded a couple WR's. they picked up john david booty. not the best QB but i think he will sufice. all the vikes need are some recivers and its a done deal.

In my bag:
Driver: R9 TP Rombax Stiff
3 Wood: R9 TP 85g Stiff
3 hybrid: X
4-SW: X-20 Uniflex

SteelLW: Forged Chrome

Putter: White Hot XG #1


Posted
Well, the Falcons just dropped a Brinks truck on Matt Ryan, so he damn well better be the next Peyton Manning and not the next Ryan Leaf. :|

Posted
  ettsn said:
Well, the Falcons just dropped a Brinks truck on Matt Ryan, so he damn well better be the next Peyton Manning and not the next Ryan Leaf. :|

isn't that ashame what he got, I mean even at BC he threw alot of INT's and personally speaking other then maybe Flacco of the Ravens this seasons QB class was weak imho, so he was the best by default if you ask me and not worth it, I think he finishes somewhere in between Manning and Leaf...say like a Jake Plummer type

Posted
  itzzzberny said:
the vikes traded a couple WR's. they picked up john david booty. not the best QB but i think he will sufice. all the vikes need are some recivers and its a done deal.

yeah but Booty did run a NFL style Offense at USC and they were/are a huge National Program.....he could very well be the best QB in this class.....when all is said and done

Posted
That said, USC tends to turn out system players more than pure NFL types like Miami or Ohio State do. That's my worry with Sam Baker at LT (although I liked the pick).

Posted
rams and cheifs

in my bag
driver: r9 with Fujikura Motore 65g stiff shaft
3w-5w: Sz with stock shafts (aldila hm) stiff
irons(3-pw): s59 stiff
wedges: 52deg. rac satin vokey spin milled 56deg. putter: xg9ball: b330rx


Note: This thread is 6252 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Of course. I was just exaggerating for fun.  At the start of Hogan's era it is estimated that roughly half a million Americans played golf. By the end of his era, about 3.5 million.  During Tiger's era roughly 19 million at the start and nearly 30 million by the end of it.  To look at it another way during Hogan's era less than 0.5% of all high schools had a golf team. Compared to nearly half of all high schools during Tiger's era. If you really want to see a big difference more than 25 times as many Junior High Schools had golf teams during Tiger's era than did High Schools during Hogan's era.  And this says nothing of international competition. Up until 1974 the British used a different golf ball than did the Americans. It wasn't until 1990 that the Brits officially outlawed their "small ball". It wasn't until the 1960's that Americans really started to play in Europe at all. Very few Americans played The Open from the 1930's until the 1960's. The travel sucked and the prize money wasn't worth the trip. Remember air travel to Europe wasn't really a thing until at least the mid-1950's. Before that you would spend 2 weeks at sea.  It is simply not arguable that Hogan faced any where near as stiff of competition as did Tiger. In golf, yes, you play against the course, but the lowest score wins. It's much easier to win if far FAR fewer players are playing.  Personally, I'd suggest that the competition was way better vs Tiger than vs Jack. But at least that's a discussion. I'm sorry but arguing for Hogan's era it's no contest. Tiger definitively and definitely and by every measure faced tougher competition than did Hogan. 
    • I watch Bryson and Phil.... on YouTube. Does that count? 🙃
    • Hilarious. Completely ridiculous hyperbole. 
    • Day 282 - 2025-07-09 Work before lessons and a GEARS guy. Playing in an hour too.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...