Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
17 minutes ago, iacas said:

And because it was Jordan we now have this convoluted unnecessary rule for the PGA Tour.

Yeah, if this was Russell Henley (just picked some random guy from the US Open leaderboard) or another less well-known player, nothing would have changed.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
37 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Yeah, if this was Russell Henley (just picked some random guy from the US Open leaderboard) or another less well-known player, nothing would have changed.  

Probably not, no.

At least nobody here is suggesting, as they are somewhere else, that the PGA Tour have "official scorers" like in the NBA. 😛 

Freaking idiots.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
58 minutes ago, iacas said:

No math is required, Vishal. Just have to count your scores and write down the correct number. Pretty basic shit.

 And yet mistakes happen. What's wrong in giving them the opportunity to correct it on principle? They are not absolved of their responsibility to get it right.

1 hour ago, iacas said:

I disagree.

All good. Jordan's incidence might have been a high profile conduit. It falls within USGA/RA rules. I agree this is high profile pandering but what's the problem? If this is about getting the scoring information correct at the end of the day then I am okay. They have resources and a billion reasons ($$$) to make this work so let them have it. 

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Like I said, I can't wait for the first pro to realize he goofed at 16:00.

Lol. Fair enough. We will see.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is one rule I am glad they modified as personally, in professional events, each player keeping their own and partner(s) score is an archaic rule especially with all the official(s) following each group.


  • Moderator
Posted
7 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

And yet mistakes happen. What's wrong in giving them the opportunity to correct it on principle? They are not absolved of their responsibility to get it right.

The player had plenty of time to correct any mistake under the previous procedures too, this just closes the door a little later.  But its simply not necessary, we see players reporting 400 scores or more each week on the Tour, many times that if we look at women's tours and play around the world, and this kind of thing happens once or twice a year.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, jolter1 said:

This is one rule I am glad they modified as personally, in professional events, each player keeping their own and partner(s) score is an archaic rule especially with all the official(s) following each group.

Noooo! They are still responsible for keeping the scores!!!! Nothing in this change absolves them from it.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

And yet mistakes happen. What's wrong in giving them the opportunity to correct it on principle? They are not absolved of their responsibility to get it right.

Correcting a mistake without penalty does absolve them of responsibility. If you know someone is going to just correct your score, why not just write what ever down and fix it at the end. They get 15 minutes, and get no penalty for it. 

9 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

If this is about getting the scoring information correct at the end of the day then I am okay. They have resources and a billion reasons ($$$) to make this work so let them have it. 

No, it's about golfers complaining that they shouldn't be penalized for making mistakes. It isn't like he didn't shoot that bogie. But signing for a lower score should have consequences. 

6 minutes ago, jolter1 said:

This is one rule I am glad they modified as personally, in professional events, each player keeping their own and partner(s) score is an archaic rule especially with all the official(s) following each group.

I am not sure that is correct. 

Here is a list of associated tours... 

Korn Ferry Tour
PGA Tour Americas
PGA Tour Canada
PGA Tour Champions
PGA Tour China
PGA Tour Latinoamérica

If this rule covers all these tours, do they have the resources of the main PGA tour events to do so? Maybe only the televised events? 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

 and this kind of thing happens once or twice a year.  

Obviously it's once too many for them. 

5 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Correcting a mistake without penalty does absolve them of responsibility. 

'Correcting' being the operative word. They are not getting away with it.

8 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

If you know someone is going to just correct your score, why not just write what ever down and fix it at the end.They get 15 minutes, and get no penalty for it.

And why on earth would anyone on a pro tour try that BS?

9 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

 They get 15 minutes, and get no penalty for it. 

 But signing for a lower score should have consequences. 

Where in this change does it say they won't get DQed for signing off (albeit  after allowing 15 minutes extra for whatever brain fart reason) on the wrong score?

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

Where in this change does it say they won't get DQed for signing off (albeit  after allowing 15 minutes extra for whatever brain fart reason) on the wrong score?

Unless the player just say F-it, and leaves the course, not correcting signing for a lower score, then there will be no DQ's. This rule, if the PGA Tour players correct the score with in 15 minutes, negates the DQ. 

Maybe going back to how the committee is allowed to modify the process for processing the scores. 

image.png

In the USGA rulebook, the rules say that once the scorecard is returned to the committee, the player must not change the scorecard. So, does their new procedure violate this?

Quote

he Tour announced a 15-minute window “to correct an error on his scorecard, even if he has left the scoring area.”

  • If a scorecard is validated in the scoring system and the player has left the scoring area, he may return to correct an error within 15 minutes of validation.
  • If a player has left the scoring area and an error is identified before the scorecard is validated in the scoring system, he may return to correct the error within 15 minutes of the error being identified by the scoring official.
  • If a player is in the scoring area when the 15 minutes expires, his scorecard is returned when he leaves the scoring area.

So, is the PGA Tour rules stating the card is not considered "returned" to the committee until after it is validated, and no 15-minute window is granted? 

Edited by saevel25

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Matt, all of the above requirements to certify the scores and steps of any changes still stand. A DQ is very much in effect for not meeting any of them after the 15 extra minutes to use an honest eraser (EDIT: with the marker's agreement) if necessary.  

Edited by GolfLug

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
4 hours ago, GolfLug said:

When does the 15 minute clock start? When they enter the 'scoring area' or when they turn in the scorecard? 

Right when you sit on the toilet. 

  • Funny 2

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

In the USGA rulebook, the rules say that once the scorecard is returned to the committee, the player must not change the scorecard. So, does their new procedure violate this?

Quote

he Tour announced a 15-minute window “to correct an error on his scorecard, even if he has left the scoring area.”

  • If a scorecard is validated in the scoring system and the player has left the scoring area, he may return to correct an error within 15 minutes of validation.
  • If a player has left the scoring area and an error is identified before the scorecard is validated in the scoring system, he may return to correct the error within 15 minutes of the error being identified by the scoring official.
  • If a player is in the scoring area when the 15 minutes expires, his scorecard is returned when he leaves the scoring area.
Expand  

So, is the PGA Tour rules stating the card is not considered "returned" to the committee until after it is validated, and no 15-minute window is granted? 

As I understand it, the score is considered "returned" when the 15 minute period has elapsed AND the player has left the scoring area.  That's the way I read the abbreviated explanation you quoted, but I haven't read the complete official wording.   I don't know the details of the "scoring system" or what it means by the score being "validated".  As you and I both know, its the detailed wording of the rule that matters, not the press release summarizing the changes.  This complication is one reason I'd resist making the change, rules in general should be as simple as possible, and this change makes it much more complicated in my mind.

 

2 hours ago, GolfLug said:
2 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

 and this kind of thing happens once or twice a year.  

Obviously it's once too many for them. 

That it happened to a "star" is what made it important to them.  If it happens to a nobody, there would be no change.  Or if it happened to a "villain", think Patrick Reed before he left for LIV, nobody would care.  Its not "who often", its "who".  

  • Thumbs Up 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
7 hours ago, GolfLug said:

And yet mistakes happen. What's wrong in giving them the opportunity to correct it on principle? They are not absolved of their responsibility to get it right.

They have five hours and as much time as they need in the scoring area to get it right.

7 hours ago, GolfLug said:

I agree this is high profile pandering but what's the problem?

It's unnecessary and complicates things.

7 hours ago, GolfLug said:

If this is about getting the scoring information correct at the end of the day then I am okay.

Again, they've had plenty of time to get things right. This just further delays the cutoff point because Spieth had to poop.

7 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

The player had plenty of time to correct any mistake under the previous procedures too, this just closes the door a little later.  But its simply not necessary, we see players reporting 400 scores or more each week on the Tour, many times that if we look at women's tours and play around the world, and this kind of thing happens once or twice a year.

Yep.

And like I said, what are they going to do when a Tour player finds a mistake and comes back after 15:30?

Unnecessary and adds complications.

7 hours ago, saevel25 said:

If this rule covers all these tours, do they have the resources of the main PGA tour events to do so? Maybe only the televised events? 

Yeah, when does a player get the 15 minutes and when do they not? Is it uniform across all events on all associated Tours, or just some (most?) PGA Tour events?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I guess I have a different view on things having worked in a field all my adult life where singular mistakes are run up the flag pole and correction via overreaction is the norm. Partly to guarantee a non-repeat and partly to appease an overbearing and entitled customer base.

Obviously the PGAT powers to be are a bit jumpier these days with LIV weakening their spines. 

I do agree that this complicates things. Typically it means more job creation somehow. Heh. So there's that. 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
31 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

I guess I have a different view on things having worked in a field all my adult life where singular mistakes are run up the flag pole and correction via overreaction is the norm. Partly to guarantee a non-repeat and partly to appease an overbearing and entitled customer base.

A player is solely responsible for their score, and when they turn their card in, it's akin to signing a contract. Comparing it to a business and an organizational structure with several levels is a non-starter. The buck stops with the player certifying their score as correct.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, iacas said:

A player is solely responsible for their score, and when they turn their card in, it's akin to signing a contract.

Then I am a even more convinced that all must be done to get it right. And please, I've posted more than once that the players were, are and will continue to be responsible and nothing here changes that. Why are folks continuing to remind me as if I've said otherwise?

48 minutes ago, iacas said:

 Comparing it to a business and an organizational structure with several levels is a non-starter.

Professional golf is not a business? Sorry bossman, Imma have to think about that for a bit. And do none of you agree that this has somewhat to do about the business angle to it? Pandering to the talent. Bit more complex than it had to be but the greater integrity is intact from what I see.They have the right and the means. 

48 minutes ago, iacas said:

The buck stops with the player certifying their score as correct.

Yes...Please... Yes! 

Not sure why y'all think that they haven't thought about all of this, and yet they decided this had to be done. Y'all see the downside and I am seeing both sides and I can see why they did it. They can handle whatever will ensue. And god help the ass clown whose poop won't give a shit about finding home in 15 minutes. We will see what happens then.

Edited by GolfLug

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 6/18/2024 at 10:29 PM, saevel25 said:

Yea, I can see that being read as, here are your options. 

Ive seen text like this, including but not limited to... To make sure people know that these are not the only options. 

If options include, implies here are just two examples, then fine. 

If the USGA/R&A had intended to restrict the options they would have used the word 'only' or some other limiting expression.

  • Like 1

  • Administrator
Posted
8 hours ago, GolfLug said:

Then I am a even more convinced that all must be done to get it right. And please, I've posted more than once that the players were, are and will continue to be responsible and nothing here changes that. Why are folks continuing to remind me as if I've said otherwise?

Professional golf is not a business? Sorry bossman, Imma have to think about that for a bit. And do none of you agree that this has somewhat to do about the business angle to it? Pandering to the talent. Bit more complex than it had to be but the greater integrity is intact from what I see.They have the right and the means. 

Yes...Please... Yes! 

Not sure why y'all think that they haven't thought about all of this, and yet they decided this had to be done. Y'all see the downside and I am seeing both sides and I can see why they did it. They can handle whatever will ensue. And god help the ass clown whose poop won't give a shit about finding home in 15 minutes. We will see what happens then.

Vishal, a player’s score is not an idea to run up the corporate flagpole.

It’s simpler if there sign their card and turn it in.

Again I’ll ask you: what do you think will happen if Jordan has to poop again and it takes him 15:30 to do so when her returned to correct an error?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.