Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5240 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I like Chamblee! Or maybe I just like his name...

Feherty however should have his own show. Put him and Micheal Collins on the same show and It will be comedy gold.

Posted
Yep.

okay, I rest my case. That was a good article.

I must be missing something if a lot of you guys like him, i probably just need to watch more of him to grow a liking.
Sticks
driver- X460 tour 9.5 Aldila NVS 75
irons- X-forged 3-PW TT BlackGold stiff
wedges- x-tour vintage 52, 56, 60
hybrid- FT-hybrid #2 17* putter- Sophia 33" "If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough."_Mario Andretti

  • 2 years later...
Posted

I think Brandel Chamblle is a jealous person especially towards Tiger Woods,Brandel is a one time winner on tour over 15 years of playing profesionally and his big moment of having the lead on the first round of the Masters,bottom line the guy is a douche bag and is jealous and people that are jealous, never are happy and unsuccessful and thats a Brandel Chamblee man his name resembles douche bag.


Posted
I think Brandel Chamblle is a jealous person especially towards Tiger Woods,Brandel is a one time winner on tour over 15 years of playing profesionally and his big moment of having the lead on the first round of the Masters,bottom line the guy is a douche bag and is jealous and people that are jealous, never are happy and unsuccessful and thats a Brandel Chamblee man his name resembles douche bag.

This post almost sounds like you don't like the guy. Having won a PGA Tour tournament may not sound like a big deal but it does put him into an elite status in the golfing world (just playing PGA Tour golf does actually) especially compared to the opinions on this forum. The one thing I do respect is that he hasn't wavered about his stance on Tiger like some have lately.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted


Originally Posted by x-forged

John Hawkins from the 19th hole annoys me. Other then that, the others are bearable, some more then others..



John is entertaining to listen to on the 19th hole, I think. That said, he seems like a real ass in person. I had a media pass all week to the Ryder Cup in Louisville and rode the media shuttle to the course from the parking area and again back to the parking area at the end of the day. I sat right next to John one day on the way back to get my vehicle and he went on and on and on about how shitty the parking and shuttle service was for this event. It was the worst he's ever experienced he said. (I'm paraphrasing here, but that's basically it). He didn't shut up the whole ride.

It really wasn't difficult to understand; the bus driver was waiting until the bus was full before he took off. Wouldn't be very efficient to leave 30 open seats.


Posted

Whatever it is, I vote Lauren Thompson...

WITB:
 
 Fast 10 10.5* Driver  |  adams.gif Fast 10 15* 3 Wood  |  adams.gif Idea V3 19* Hybrid  |  titleist.gif 710 AP1 4-GW  |    55* and 60* Wedges  |  Lajosi KLP7J Putter


Posted

ok just watched the state of the game show last night.

BC make an ass out of himself and i also realized that i have been a bit harsh on nick faldo because he seems like a nice person...

But i think i have figured out what i cant stand about Chamblee, Johnny Miller, and Faldo some of the time, along with a lot of these other analysts.

1) They talk as if the players and the coaches have no idea what they are doing.

2) They talk as if they know better than the players and the coaches.

3) They are predominantly negative when critiquing the players.

Now keep in mind that these are the best players in the world, not junior players.  They should understand that there is a reason that players and coaches decide to do certain things in certain ways.  They should not try to spend their credibility points on trying to showcase how smart they think they are or what they know.  And most of all it would be 1000 percent more useful for anybody watching to be shown all the good and correct things the players do as opposed to the reletively few mistakes they make in a game that is definately not easy to be played perfectly.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 6 months later...
Posted

I find myself being bored to death with a lot of golf announcers stating the obvious. I agree that BC can be overly negative and condescending when referencing other players that have had more success than he has, that being said: I have no problem with Chamblee because even though i might not always agree with his opinion, I respect the fact that he always has one that he stands by and believes in it. Thats better than nothing, makes for good TV.


Posted

TGC is a wasteland Monday to Wednesday and during any pre/post game.

The Natalie Gulbis show at least had ... well, you know.

In my bag ... 12 year old Balvenie DoubleWood


Posted

I personally like Brandel Chamblee and his commentaries.  But I can see how he might upset a few people at times because like Johnny Miller he speaks the truth as he sees it.  Ss to his golfing abilities, I agree with earlier comments that anyone able to get their PGA card and even manage to win one tournament is someone that knows more than I about the game.

Butch


Posted

I agree with you as well about BC having golf credentials and knowing more about the game than I do.  What I'm not sure about is how much of his commentary is based on his knowledge of the game versus wanting to be a controversial figure that garners coverage by other media outlets and threads in golf forums.

Originally Posted by ghalfaire

I personally like Brandel Chamblee and his commentaries.  But I can see how he might upset a few people at times because like Johnny Miller he speaks the truth as he sees it.  Ss to his golfing abilities, I agree with earlier comments that anyone able to get their PGA card and even manage to win one tournament is someone that knows more than I about the game.



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted



I'd hazard a guess that we don't have even the foggiest idea how much we don't about golf at the PGA Tour level.

Whether Chamblee has a self-promotion agenda isn't even debatable. They all do. The players, commentators, caddies, sponsors, the PGA Tour, The Golf Channel - all of them. So much so that it's just par for the course.

Regarding his trashing of the Foley / Woods experiment: now that it's obvious he wasn't wrong, shouldn't people be apologizing to him rather than continuing to trash him?

Originally Posted by newtogolf

I agree with you as well about BC having golf credentials and knowing more about the game than I do.  What I'm not sure about is how much of his commentary is based on his knowledge of the game versus wanting to be a controversial figure that garners coverage by other media outlets and threads in golf forums.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Regarding his trashing of the Foley / Woods experiment: now that it's obvious he wasn't wrong, shouldn't people be apologizing to him rather than continuing to trash him?


Yeah... that's not obvious at all. The guy's played like ten rounds all year.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

Yeah... that's not obvious at all. The guy's played like ten rounds all year.



Sorry, but it is (to me). I hope I'm wrong.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

But as others have stated in other threads, being good at something doesn't qualify one to teach. It wouldn't be much of a stretch to say it doesn't qualify one to analyze does it? I can make up my own mind/opinion with regards to a player or tournament. I do not need a has-been bespeaking the obvious. But it does make fodder for the golf boards.

And I don't buy the 'best in the world' comment about the pga players either. They are just the best ones with position or money that managed to get there. With some money I could flood the tour with my players, just like the Koreans did to the LPGA tour. But I digress...

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 


Posted

I am sure he is trying to be interesting and keep his job but not sure he is trying to be controversial.  I don't know him personally but just what I see on TV.  Somehow he doesn't come across as self serving to me, but rather just being open about his opinions and letting the chips fall where they will.  But he is an interesting fellow in any case and has an interesting history.

Originally Posted by newtogolf

I agree with you as well about BC having golf credentials and knowing more about the game than I do.  What I'm not sure about is how much of his commentary is based on his knowledge of the game versus wanting to be a controversial figure that garners coverage by other media outlets and threads in golf forums.



Butch


Note: This thread is 5240 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.