Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
iacas

"Tour Tempo" by John Novosel

Note: This thread is 1451 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

161 posts / 92093 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

One thing that some people miss is that the beeps are NOT supposed to be on exactly the 3:1 ratios. People keep trying to equate it to music and test the timing, but they forget that the timing is supposed to included the human reaction time. As described fairly well in the book, Novosel's original attempts at doing this resulted in the wrong timing when the player actually swings the club. The time interval between the first and second beeps takes into account the reaction time for the body to start moving after the brain registers the first beep, and similarly for the time to react after hearing the second beep. And then the third beep should coincide with impact (no extra reaction time built in to the timing). As Novocel repeatedly says in the book, don't anticipate the beeps - react to them. If one does that and uses this method properly, the

I read the book quite carefully. I still think it's a waltz that they are concealing. You've got to feel the beat. Plus you could argue that musicians HAVE to anticipate the beats to an extent, or you're late (yes i am a musician in case you were wondering

. Also by making it more complicated, you are bound to add tension and doubt, just what you don't want in your golf swing. Better off singing the blue danube as has been alluded to, at the best tempo for you. (btw that's a great commercial.. absolutely fabulous)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a basic waltz.

a waltz counts 1..2..3..1..2..3..etc.

tour tempo is : start back on 1, start down on 3, hit on 1
so it is 3 counts up, 1 count down to impact. you are traveling to the top of your swing through 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a basic waltz.

I almost replied saying this is incorrect, but I see what you are saying. The CD, though, clearly has the beats going with a 4/4 time signature. If you take what you said and combine it with the CD, you end up with a sort of 3 over 4 counting. Might confuse some people who read in the book where it says start downswing after hearing the 2nd beep (that beep actually being the 3rd beat in a 4/4 measure).

1..2..3..1..2..3..1..2..3 1..2..3..4..1..2..3..4..1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. I think you see what I'm saying. I'm a drummer and I'm used to counting weird time signatures so it seems normal to me to count it as a waltz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, I'm a drummer too! That's probably why this tour tempo is kind of tough for me to implement. I end up anticipating every beat in an attempt to lock into the tempo. I'm not reacting to the beats. I'm trying to "play drums" with the notes. The club is my drum stick and the ball is the snare drum. (IE: hitting at the ball = not good )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, ALL the songs, beeps, etc are to a 2:1 ratio in Tour Tempo. It was a real turn off to buy the book, read it, put the mp3 on the player, start listening to them, and within a few seconds realize they were in a 2:1 ratio. It really doesn't take a degree in music to realize that.

Wow, this thread has really went down the tube. Who cares if the beats are 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, or f'ing 500:1. Getting the swing thoughts out and just reacting to the tempo will improve your ballstriking IF and ONLY IF you have decent fundamentals. Judging by your handicap, you are better served going to see a PGA professional.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost replied saying this is incorrect, but I see what you are saying. The CD, though, clearly has the beats going with a 4/4 time signature. If you take what you said and combine it with the CD, you end up with a sort of 3 over 4 counting. Might confuse some people who read in the book where it says start downswing after hearing the 2nd beep (that beep actually being the 3rd beat in a 4/4 measure).

Exactly my point.. then why not just have it in 3 ?????!!!!

I guess that would make it too easy.. then all we'd have to do is hum a waltz ?? !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, this thread has really went down the tube. Who cares if the beats are 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, or f'ing 500:1. Getting the swing thoughts out and just reacting to the tempo will improve your ballstriking IF and ONLY IF you have decent fundamentals. Judging by your handicap, you are better served going to see a PGA professional.

"The 10 handicap doth protest too much, methinks." - Shakespeare

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

seems like a bit of controversy with what the count actually is.....as for myself, I have experienced a great deal of improvement from using the tones while practicing. I still have had to tweak parts of my swing but the correct tempo has made a big difference for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A marvelous book with one problem. He talks about 3:1 ratios, but the recordings he gives us to work with are based on 2:1 ratios.

Example: 24-8 Pre-Shot recording. There are three tones in this recording. The first tone is when the swing starts, so it does not mark the elapse of any time. The second tone represents the top of the backwing, and the third tone, impact.

If you count out the beats in a musical way, you will find that the ratio established is not 3:1 but 2:1. That is, it is two beats from the first tone to the second, and one beat from the second tone to the third. Half note up, quarter note down.

I don’t know how this squares with his video evidence, but the “music” cannot be argued against. Novosel created a series of 2:1 recordings.

And that’s all right. That’s the correct ratio. You can find mention of this ratio in golf instruction books going back to the 40s. This ratio is not a new discovery. Novosel just make it explicit and gave us a useful vehicle for putting it into our swing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This book is the real deal. I played several rounds of golf listening to the 24/8 tempo on a portable MP3 player and can sum up the experience with 2 words: Long & Straight. It had the most dramatic effect on my driving. It is amazing how many swing flaws go away when your tempo is good.

Unfortunately as I got used to the tones, I started to anticipate them and my swing could get jerky. This would sometimes lead me to come "over the top" and spin the ball out to the right.

I don't use the tones anymore but incorporated what I learned from them into my current swing. To prevent swinging "over the top" I transition into my downswing slower and smoother and then accelerate through impact. This has been working very well. My tempo feels slower now than 24/8 but the good results are still coming. The Tour Tempo book was worth the low price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how I found my ideal tempo. I have a wind-up metronome which I set at 126, which closely matches 27/9. Count four ticks as you swing. Tick 1 corresponds to the first tone of the Pre-Shot sound track, tick 3 corresponds to the second tone, and tick 4 corresponds to the third tone.

Play the metronome as you hit balls and match your swing to the ticks. All you have to do is watch the ball flight. After having hit a few balls at MM=126, move the setting to 132 and hit more balls. Keep moving the setting to faster speeds until you find the speed at which the balls just take off like a rocket and go dead straight. Believe me, you'll find it. That's YOUR tempo.

The metronome equivalents of the Novosel tempos are 27/9=124.5, 24/8=140, 21/7=160. There's lots of room between each one, so play with the metronome to find YOUR tempo instead of getting locked into one of these three.

Incidentally, the 2:1 (not 3:1) swing rhythm is not Novosel's discovery. I have read about it in instruction books that came out in the 1950s. Most instruction books wave their hand at tempo and end up wasting four pages telling us nothing useful, which means the author doesn't really understand the concept. Novosel is the first person who told us explicitly how to build it into our swing. My hat is off to him.

When my swing goes south during a round, the first thing I check is rhythm and tempo, and that almost always sets things right again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's put it this way - if Charles Barkley read the book, practiced the tones, and kept them in his head during a round, his swing would be fixed in 5 minutes. No Golf Channel mini-series, no "best coach in the world" Hank Haney, and he would never regress. And I'm 100% sure of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I haven't read the book or gotten the CDs, but I went out playing today on an executive Par 3 course and shot 3 over on 9 holes. I read probably the first 5 pages of this post and basically did 1.2.3.4 with 3 beginning my downswing. I was spot on with my irons when doing this. Occasionally, I forgot to do the count and ended up having bad shots. I was 1 under through 3. Shot bogey, birdie, birdie, par, par, bogey, dougle, par, and bogey. I believe the tempo really helped. Going to go get the book and CDs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found it just didn't help me much, but I think I need to take a second read and really delve into the material to start getting it.

You need to have fairly solid fundamentals to maximize what the tempo training can do. If you have some good fundamentals in place, here are some recommendations on how to get some good, great, and unbelievable results. DO NOT anticipate the beeps, just react to them. I fall into this trap often. Also your trasitions in response to the beeps has to be smooth. A jerky response to the beeps will destroy the swing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh... I dunno man. This seemed really weird. Let me start at the beginning.

The book. I read it last night. It feels like 90% of the read is him reselling you that tempo is uber important. I know that already. I already bought the book. You dont have to continue to sell it throughout the whole book. That annoyed me a little.
Then the practicing. granted im at work trying to match the tempo in the audio with a thin flourescent light bulb in my hand. I forgot to bring a club to work. So MAYBE it wont feel stupid with a club in my hand and grass in front of me. But I dont know. It feels really weird as of right now and jsut doesnt feel like its going to work. I know im anticipating , but I feel liek theres not enough time between the 3rd beep and the next 1 beep.. I dont know. I guess I need to believe it more and work on it more. My HCP was in the teens years ago and is over 20 now so.

When i started I said this tempo backswing feels slow. Maybe my tempo while practice swinging is ok already. Like everyone my practice swings are always perfect. but I know for a fact when i get in front of that stupid little white sphere one of my first thoughts is LOW and Slow takeaway. I think that just sets my nerves up to get scared when I do reach the top of my swing and start my usual casting.. So I dunno. Its not all i thoguht it was going to be and I came on here to leave this cuz im a little pissed but lets see after I really give it some time if it can help me.

I was fully expecting to turn it on and see how far off my swing was and be able to correct it and be super stoked but I was kinda dead on..

Can anyone tell me how they helped stop anticipating the tones?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1451 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I have my monthly lesson scheduled for tomorrow. My ballstriking has really improved over the last 6 weeks so I am satisfied with how I am progressing with the full swing. Contact is consistently near the center of the face and inside the grooves, but strike location does vary day to day; some days are center, some days are more toward toe, some days are more toward the heel. But I seem to have eliminated extreme variation in strike location. Thin shots happen more often than fat shots, but both of those misses are infrequent. That said, I still have a lot work to do. Since adding a grip check to my pre-shot routine, I haven't hit any snap hooks. My ball flight on good shots is generally straight and high with a slight draw. Occasionally I will hit a cut, which starts on target and fades a bit right, maybe losing a little distance (0.5-1 club), but goes where I am aimed. My main miss right now is a block out to the right, especially off the tee with 4 iron - 3W. Doesn't seem to happen with driver or 6 iron-LW, and doesn't seem to happen on approach shots. In my last round this directly cost me 5 penalty strokes, and this doesn't account for negative strokes gained from being in a bad position approaching the green. I would guess I might be losing another 1-2 strokes from being out of position on the right when the ball stays in play. My initial thought is that this is a path issue, but I don't know mechanically what I am doing to cause my path to be too far in>out on some swings. There's also a possibility that I am hitting the ball where I am aligned, and I just suck at alignment sometimes. If I can get out for a twilight round before my lesson I am going to bring an alignment stick and use it to align myself on tee shots to see if this is a problem. Notes for tomorrow's lesson: What am I doing when I hit a big block out to the right? Most of the time it happens on tee shots, rarely on approach shots. Usually happens with 4/5-irons, 3h and 3W, but not recently with driver, and almost never with 6i-LW. Might have the same priority piece as last lesson, which is to continue working on hip/core turn. In the last month, I've made some progress in hips getting more open at impact, but not sure if I'm all the way where I should be. Need some tips on uphill lag putts. Struggling to get a feel for the right speed. For downhill putts, I give myself a mental target short of the hole, and this works really well for me (usually end up lagging within 2-3 feet). For uphill putts, if I give myself a mental target slightly past the hole, I end up hitting it past the hole. Could be I just need to calibrate my mental target better, or maybe I need a different method.
    • I'd be curious what you think if you go for it.  Prior to this year, and doing that kind of research, I'd played Titleist Velocity that I could find used for about 50 cents a ball.  This year, after doing the research, particularly on the benefits of the urethane cover, i tried the Pro V1x.  Still used, but quite a step up to about $1.65 a ball for prior year's model.  The difference around the green is crazy. Pitch shots from 50 - 100 yards in stop on a dime, and chipping around the green with high lofted clubs gets almost no roll.  I still remember my first round of the year with the new ball, and i had a chip from just a few feet off the green with a 54 degree wedge, and it checked up and stopped after just a few feet of roll.  My buddy and I looked at each other both with that WTF look.  I don't really notice too much difference off the tee, putting, or on longer approach shots.  But there is just so much more control around the green, and don't think ill be going back to Velocity any time soon.
    • @bkuehn1952, First off, congrats for finishing the composite challenge. That has got to be a really good feeling, knowing that on a miracle day, you could shoot 18 under par (or better), even if it's on a combination of courses and not just a single one.  Now, for the kicker, you have no idea how close I came to beat you by a few hours. Yesterday afternoon, I was not even thinking about this when I got onto #14, pushed my drive a bit right, ended on the hillside of a bunker and missed the green (by maybe 3 yards) short and right. A nice semi-high chip to the right of the pin, which checked nicely and started rolling gently to the left towards the hole ended up being right in line with the cup and about 1.5" short! Not even one more f***ing rotation!! 😜 So no luck for me, but I already had holed out a chip for birdie earlier in the round, and generally my chipping was really on point that day, with many tap-ins pars after only getting 2 GIRs for the whole round. Ups and downs they say.  That, it was. Again, kudos on your success. Now focus on finishing the home course. 👍
    • Agree. Bad comparison. They’re more different than similar.
    • Good stuff. I hadn't seen this. Time for me to go to lostgolfballs and buy a massive bucket of something better than the Srixon Soft Feel I've been playing. Not really sure why I went for them in particular. They have 120 mint graded K Sigs for $90...might jump on that.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 65ross
      65ross
      (71 years old)
    2. Billsy
      Billsy
      (52 years old)
    3. Casey 5-Strokes
      Casey 5-Strokes
      (43 years old)
    4. djfajt71
      djfajt71
      (49 years old)
    5. golden_boar
      golden_boar
      (61 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...