Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Do you know what"proper sequence of kinetic linkage" means?


Note: This thread is 6143 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
It never ceases to amaze me how the "fraternity" of golf teachers and instructors speak their own language. How many of you know what "the proper sequence of kinetic linkage" really means? Does your swing have it?

Guess what? I will not tell you until I see some answers, and will tell you if they are correct. It is a simple, well-known concept, and guess what----it works!!

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


Posted
If I may take an uneducated guess:

I think it means that the swing sequence should be:

backswing:
hands -> arms -> shoulder -> torso -> hips

downswing:
hips -> torso -> shoulder -> arms -> hands

In my Tour Combo Bag:

Driver: Superquad 9.5°
5W: 2008 Burner 18°
3H: Idea Pro Gold 20°4H: 2008 Burner Rescue 22°Irons: MP52 R300 5-PWedges: Vokey SM 50.08, 54.11, 58.04, 60.11Putter: Itsy Bitsy SpiderBall: TP Red


Posted
If an instructor is using overly cumbersome language to get his/her point accross.....then it's not an instructor that I'm gonna watch anyway. I realize that there are not many Harvy Pennicks left....but it doesn't have to be a freaking physics lecture either.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
It's the body's ability to create power from energy transfer.

The hips to torso, torso to arms, arms to hands and hands to club.

  • Administrator
Posted
It never ceases to amaze me how the "fraternity" of golf teachers and instructors speak their own language. How many of you know what "the proper sequence of kinetic linkage" really means? Does your swing have it?

I know what it means, but what's the point of this post? To try to elevate yourself as someone who knows the definition of a term? "I know and you don't?"

A good golf teacher likely never has to think of this term, even if they apply the principle, and should almost NEVER have to utter the term to a student.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
TGM terminology, see Homer Kelly's book 'The Golfing Machine'.

It has to do with the release sequence of the four 'accumulators'.

Posted
It's the body's ability to create power from energy transfer.

You are right, but you left out the downswing "trigger":

As you reach the top of the backswing, slam your forward heel to the ground, and initiate the downswing with the legs, followed by the hips, torso, arms, etc. If you are flexible enough to not lift the forward heel, without going into a reverse pivot, then think of the legs being the initiators anyway.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


Posted
I know what it means, but what's the point of this post? To try to elevate yourself as someone who knows the definition of a term? "I know and you don't?"

You are right and I never use that term with my students or "proper sequential motion". Instead, I tell them that the legs lead the downswing, and let them think of that one simple thought, so the upper body stays quiet until it is needed at impact.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


Posted
TGM terminology, see Homer Kelly's book 'The Golfing Machine'.

Homer Kelly's book messed up Bobby Clampbett, and anyone else whom I know that has tried to apply it. Engineers make terrible golfers. Dancers make great golfers. Keep the game simple and natural--"One, two, three" for good rhythm and balance. Just like Slammin' Sammy Snead used to say.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


Posted
It's the body's ability to create power from energy transfer.

Good answer, but I will make it simpler: initiate the downswing with the legs, and let everything else follow their lead.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


Posted
It never ceases to amaze me how the "fraternity" of golf teachers and instructors speak their own language. How many of you know what "the proper sequence of kinetic linkage" really means? Does your swing have it?

I am fairly intellectual by nature, but really, any instructor who would use that type of lanquage is trying to impress others not educate them. I could envision a teacher, maybe in 9th grade physics class speaking that way trying and keep the boys attention, thats about it. Kinetic and linkage is probably an inapprpriate use of the work Kinetic at best.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
Sounds like gobbledy-gook to me. Any "instructor" who uses language like that needs a good slap!

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
You are right, but you left out the downswing "trigger":

I like to see that the feet stay flat on the ground until after impact but that doesn't mean that there isn't pressure on the front foot in the downswing. Its has to start from the ground up. Some players may feel their feet start the transition down so the 'triggers' are personal feelings.

Most players do not need to hear this scientific explanation because that isn't their preferred learning style. A lawyer might not want to hear it, but an engineer might need to hear it to really understand it. The info provided by the Kvest and golf-zenolink Dot Com are great tools to give players this info but only if it really applies. BTW... how did TGM mess up BC? He went from one of the world's best Swingers to one of the world's best Hitters. I'd rather watch his action than most guys we see on Sunday afternoon.

Posted
Engineers make terrible golfers.

So that's why I stink? Hey, now I have an excuse!

"You can foment revolution or you can cure your slice - life is too short for both" David Owen

WITB*: 2010 winter edition

Driver: AyrtimeFW/hybrid: Distance Master Pro Steel 5w, 7w, 27* hybridIrons: Powerplay 5000 hybrids (6i-SW)Wedge: SMT Durometer 55 degPutter: Z/I Omega mallet*as soon...


Posted
I like to see that the feet stay flat on the ground until after impact but that doesn't mean that there isn't pressure on the front foot in the downswing. Its has to start from the ground up. Some players may feel their feet start the transition down so the 'triggers' are personal feelings.

As I understand it, Bobby Clampbett started to think too much during his swing, trying to follow the detailed analysis in "The Golfing Machine". When he won the United States Amateur and was labeled "cannot miss" for the PGA Tour, he had a smooth, natural swing, and he had great potential. That was never fulfilled, and he became a broadcaster instead. I do not want to misuse the phrase "paralysis by analysis" but that does seem to fit what happened to him.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


Note: This thread is 6143 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.