Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


sungho_kr

Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1629
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      817


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, iacas said:

 

Tiger's driving and approach shot game is a huge part of why I think Tiger at his best > Jack at his best. Even Jack agrees with that.

Where are you getting that? No.  Actually Jack doesn't agree. What you said is completely false. Jack was charitable and said there is little difference in iron play. Jack has said he was better driver on multiple occasions.   I can't believe you won't even concede driving. That much I think you would get most Tiger cultists to agree on. The stats are pretty clear on driving. Jack was a better driver (long and straight) in his FORTIES than prime Tiger.

 

Edited by Fidelio
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Prime Tiger I think was a better wedge/short iron player than Jack. He hit the ball closer to the hole more often. Mid-iron and long-iron...BOTH incredible at this part of the game. Maybe slight edge on long irons to Jack and slight edge on mid-irons to Tiger. 

Jack was definitely a lot more consistent with the driver. Way more accurate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


41 minutes ago, iacas said:

 

Against weaker/shallower fields.

.

Nope. Even when you adjust for field strength. It should have been obvious that's meant. Jack still more consistent.

Here is an article that was well researched (though I disagree on the interpretation of many of his stats) looking at Augusta that concludes Tiger has the edge in the the prime years. But also points out 

http://www.golfwrx.com/126704/tiger-vs-jack-a-definitive-answer/

"Also, it shows that Jack would hypothetically finish in the top-10 and top-2 more consistently than Tiger, when compared to the 17-year averages. It does prove, however, that Tiger shot lower scores than Jack on a more frequent basis (because he shot lower than 277 five times compared to Jack’s three)."

Edited by Fidelio
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
48 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Where are you getting that? No.  Actually Jack doesn't agree. What you said is completely false.

From interviewing him nearly every year for the past decade plus.

And thus, not false at all.

48 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

The stats are pretty clear on driving. Jack was a better driver (long and straight) in his FORTIES than prime Tiger.

You can't make statements like that, because Jack played different courses, with different length holes, different size greens, different fairway widths, hit the ball shorter (on average) than Tiger, and played against other very different people (which is relevant when you want to cite a ranking position).

48 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

That much I think you would get most Tiger cultists to agree on.

Oy. Right to the name-calling. I'm tapping out at that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, iacas said:

From interviewing him nearly every year for the past decade plus.

Oy. Right to the name-calling. I'm tapping out at that.

I certainly did not call you a name and there is nothing inappropriate  about the way I phrased that sentence. It certainly doesn't debase discourse in any way.

For some reason I can't find those quotes where he says Tiger was a better driver and iron player. I have no problem finding quotes with Jack saying otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
52 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

I certainly did not call you a name and there is nothing inappropriate  about the way I phrased that sentence. It certainly doesn't debase discourse in any way.

For some reason I can't find those quotes where he says Tiger was a better driver and iron player. I have no problem finding quotes with Jack saying otherwise.

You’re calling posters who disagree with you, “cultists”. that is name calling.  Please refrain from this in your posts. 

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

You’re calling posters who disagree with you, “cultists”.

Nope. I didn't actually. Never happened.

Edited by Fidelio
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I wasn't referring to anyone in particular, just the Tiger lovers in general. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough Dr.

 

See Fidelio this is what's in store for you by picking Jack over Tiger around here.

Now I get gigged for being a troll. -5 points whatever that means and who knows why? I'd bet my views on Jack over Tiger doesn't have a thing to do with it. :hmm::whistle:I guess I have to give up my keys to the executive bathroom now. I bet the special senior's parking place is on hold too.

 

Fidelio just avoid this thread. Just a sayin'

Live from the doghouse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, sheepdog said:

I wasn't referring to anyone in particular, just the Tiger lovers in general. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough Dr.

 

See Fidelio this is what's in store for you by picking Jack over Tiger around here.

Now I get gigged for being a troll. -5 points whatever that means and who knows why? I'd bet my views on Jack over Tiger doesn't have a thing to do with it. :hmm::whistle:I guess I have to give up my keys to the executive bathroom now. I bet the special senior's parking place is on hold too.

 

Fidelio just avoid this thread. Just a sayin'

 

I got no problem with anyone siding with Jack in this thing. His career is amazing. Even if the fields are not as deep as what Tiger faced, 37 finishes in the Top 2 in majors is just INSANE stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
1 minute ago, sheepdog said:

I wasn't referring to anyone in particular, just the Tiger lovers in general. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough Dr.

 

See Fidelio this is what's in store for you by picking Jack over Tiger around here.

Now I get gigged for being a troll. -5 points whatever that means and who knows why? I'd bet my views on Jack over Tiger doesn't have a thing to do with it. :hmm::whistle:I guess I have to give up my keys to the executive bathroom now. I bet the special senior's parking place is on hold too.

 

Fidelio just avoid this thread. Just a sayin'

Stop whining. You received a warning for trolling. Grow up.  

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, Fidelio said:

Where are you getting that? No.  Actually Jack doesn't agree. What you said is completely false. Jack was charitable and said there is little difference in iron play. Jack has said he was better driver on multiple occasions.   I can't believe you won't even concede driving. That much I think you would get most Tiger cultists to agree on. The stats are pretty clear on driving. Jack was a better driver (long and straight) in his FORTIES than prime Tiger.

 

I think the technical term for your denial is a lie.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, turtleback said:

I think the technical term for your denial is a lie.

"You’re calling posters who disagree with you, “cultists”"

My post is not calling people who disagree with me cultists and it is not referring to any specific person.

Apology accepted for calling me a liar. Instead of calling you dishonest, I'll just make the assumption you didn't spend the 30 seconds to look through the posts.

Edited by Fidelio
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, Fidelio said:

"You’re calling posters who disagree with you, “cultists”"

My post is not calling people who disagree with me cultists and it is not referring to any specific person.

Apology accepted for calling me a liar. Instead of calling you dishonest, I'll just make the assumption you didn't spend the 30 seconds to look through the posts.

We aren't stupid around here.  We don't care what your definition of is is, and we are pretty good at recognizing sophistry.

We've had lots of drive-bys come through with your attitude and it rarely ends well.  I hope you'll be different.  But 10 posts into your time here and it isn't going well.  And, frankly, you seem determined to make it not go well.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

:offtopic:

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...