Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6008 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am interesting in hearing what people really look for in a golf course, meaning what do you like? I'm seeing more and more lately that people truly have very different things that make them tick when it comes to a course.

Being from South Florida, I enjoy undulation and texture to a course merely because you don't see much of that down here. This is one of the flattest places in the world.

Some people look for good greens
Some people like lush fairways
Some people like a challenge

and on and on.

Give me the top three things you look for when evaluating a course.

Me:

1) Condition: Fairways, Tees, and Greens have grass. Not necessarily green.
2) Undulation or Elevation change: Nothing drastic, but enough to create some texture.
3) Fair but Challenging design

This is not about clubhouses or anything else, just the course. Thank you!

In my bag:

Driver: SQ 9.5, Graphite Stiff Shaft
3 Wood: Diablo 13 degree, Stiff Shaft
2 Hybrid: SQ 18 degree, Steel Stiff ShaftIrons: MP-30, 3-PWSW: 56* Vokey Copper spin-milledFW 52* VokeyFlat Stick Zing 2Ball: Pro V1x


Posted

Soft greens that are maintained (few blemishes from old ball marks).
Cute beer cart girls.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Cute beer cart girls.

That's what I'm talking about!

In my bag:

Driver: SQ 9.5, Graphite Stiff Shaft
3 Wood: Diablo 13 degree, Stiff Shaft
2 Hybrid: SQ 18 degree, Steel Stiff ShaftIrons: MP-30, 3-PWSW: 56* Vokey Copper spin-milledFW 52* VokeyFlat Stick Zing 2Ball: Pro V1x


Posted
The 3 things I look for and judge a course on are the following:

1). Fair design - the biggest pet peeves on courses for me are too many blind shots and too many fairways with so much side-hill slope that the ball runs into bad spots. I do not mind a couple of either of these, but hate when courses do not reward good shots or, even worse, punish good shots. I like a challenge, but find it demoralizing when I have hit a good shot only to have it roll into trouble because of side hill.

2). Well maintained fairways with consistent grass. I would prefer bent grass fairways, but as long as they are well maintained and the grass is consistent condition, length and texture through the course I don't have a problem with it.

3). General course maintenance - I'm referring to the course simply being well taken care of. Good tee boxes, well maintained bunkers (with actual 'sand' and not gravel and greens that roll smoothly and are consistent speedwise from one to the next.

BONUS: Pace of play, greens without crazy undulations, layup areas on long/difficult holes, visually attractive and a fair challenge for players of all levels, attractive cart girls, nice clubhouse.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

  • Moderator
Posted
1) Condition. My biggest thing is the greens. I like a good fast green that rolls true.

2) Challenging. I like a course with undulation and some descent rough. I like the courses that penalize you for bad shots and rewards you for good ones.

3) Beer cart girl has to be HOT!!! LOL...okay not a must but for sure a plus!

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm going to go with, in no particular order:
1) Some freeking space. I hate playing courses that are crammed into too little acreage. I don't mind a few tight holes but I like to see some tee shots that leave some room for error once in a while.

2) Interesting holes. I can't stand a course with all BLAH holes. I like something I will remember. Courses I have only played once have given me some great memories just because I was so excited standing on a tee box and surveying a really unique hole.

3) Conditions. I hate playing the Munis I am forced to play in Westchester, so when I get a course with some decent conditions it makes it all the more enjoyable.
Bag: Flight SS
Driver: 10.5* r5 draw with Pro Launch blue 65 Stiff
Irons: CCi Forged 3i-pw
Wedges: 56* CG12 black pearl and 60* low bounce RTG 900
Putter: i-Series Anser 35"Ball: e5+Tee: Zero FrictionGlove: FootJoy WeatherSofRangefinder: MedalistShoes: Sp-6 II, Adidas 360Scores this year:92 91...

Posted
1. course conditions are at the top of the list... the layout can be horrendous... but a well maintained course more than makes up for it most of the time
2. price has to match the worth of the course... ive played expensive courses that werent worth the price... and ive played el cheapo courses that were pristine...
3. food... hot beer cart chicks... great food... good cooks... that definately is a plus
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing

Posted
Well maintained greens and decent fairways. Those are my biggest concerns.
What's In My Stand Bag...
Driver: R9 TP 9.5*
3W: R9 15*
Hybrid: Rescue Dual TP 2H 16*
Irons 3-P: MP-62Wedges: Vokey 52* & 58*Putter: 34" Newport StudioBall: Pro V1x

Posted
It's all about course condition for me. Fairways, greens, bunkers, and rough should all be well maintained.

After that, an interesting, challenging course but one that doesn't have to rely on sillines holes for the challenge. I also prefer a course that doesn't rely solely on length for the challenge. If a course has to be played from 7,000+ yds for it to play to a respectable rating/slope, then it probably isn't going to be very interesting.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I seem to differ from most who have posted because I value an interesting design much more than perfect conditions.

Chalk it up to the "Augusta Syndrome," or whatever, our culture seems to gravitate to the pretty, without regard for substance.

Three things that make for an interesting golf course to me:

- OPTIONS
Challenges are presented in the form of a risk/reward scenario vs. the "do-or-die" penal/heroic design. I prefer courses that don't continually dictate the type of shot required, rather allowing the golfer to craft the shot that seems appropriate or offers the better chance of success, for example - courses that allow a run up vs. demanding an exclusive aerial approach.

- VARIETY
A mix of holes of that differ in length and orientation as to the prevailing wind. Uphill and downhill. Bend to the right, bend to the left. Large greens and small greens. Greens with contour and character. A good course should make you use all of the clubs in your bag (cliche, I know...)

- LAYOUT AND ROUTING
A walkable, core golf course without housing intrusion is preferred over the real estate development layouts that wind their way between the houses and are practically cart mandatory. A course that makes good use of the natural features of the land vs. one that has been forced into the setting with a bulldozer. A course that has a natural ebb and flow of challenging and easier holes. I also enjoy quirk and eccentricity over rote predictability.


I will make one nod to conditioning and that is that I prefer firm and fast to soft and slow. I would much rather play a scruffy but interesting course than a boring layout with perfect conditions.

Posted
I am really attracted to tight parkland layouts that force you to think and shape your ball around the course. Nice conditions are an obvious plus.

Monster Tour 10.5* w/ Redboard 63
FP400f 14.5* w/ GD YSQ
Idea Pro 18* w/ VS Proto 80s
MP FLi-Hi 21 w/ S300
CG1 BP w/ PX 6.0 SM 54.11 SM 60.08 Sophia 33"


Posted
1.conditioning of greens have to roll true i hate my ball bouncing off line
2.all holes have differant themes dont like to see the same thing over and over
3.the more challenging the better

Posted
in no particular order...

A tee box that plays 6000-6300 yards

I prefer old style parkland design over the TPC look, an authentic Scottish/ British links style would be excellent as well

Not too difficult, no forced carries of 200 yards over a lake, I prefer a slope in the 113-128 range

Walking allowed is a MUST and the course should have reasonably short walks between holes

As little views of houses as possible, a course surrounded on four sides is fine, each hole surrounded by houses is not

Price: walking 18 on a weekday $15-$25

Condition: I grew up on a public muni, condition isn't that big a deal to me. If the only things watered are the tees and greens, that's fine.

Variety of holes and no more than two in a row going in the same direction is a plus

in the bag...

Driver: MX560
3W/5W: Tight Lies
3i-pw: Pi-7gw/sw: Tom Watsonputter: Bulls Eye bag: Ozoneball: / home: Lake of the Woods @ www.golfthelake.com


Posted
I seem to differ from most who have posted because I value an interesting design much more than perfect conditions.

Great post.

In my bag:

Driver: SQ 9.5, Graphite Stiff Shaft
3 Wood: Diablo 13 degree, Stiff Shaft
2 Hybrid: SQ 18 degree, Steel Stiff ShaftIrons: MP-30, 3-PWSW: 56* Vokey Copper spin-milledFW 52* VokeyFlat Stick Zing 2Ball: Pro V1x


Posted
1. Greens cannot be bumpy and must roll fast,i will not play a course that has bumpy and slow greens.
2. I like tightly mowed fairways and bunkers must have good sand,if anything
like concrete i stay away.
3. I like courses where you are punished for errant shots or which leaves a bit of a challenge to get up and down.

aeroburner tp 10.5 stiff
superfast tp 2.0 3 wood stiff
Halo 25 and taylormade tp 19 degree hybrids
miura cb 202 and wedge
tp 52* wedge, tp 56* taylormade spider mallet putter


Posted
1) Good pace of play
2) Elevations, water challenging
3) Big Greens
Posted
1) Well kept landscaping, overall just not in "bad" condition
2) Elevation changes, water, sand, trees
3) Natural setting - not just jammed into a square plain.


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Grass and a cup

What's In The Bag?

Driver - FT-i 10° Neutral Graphite Stiff
Fairway Metal - N/A
Irons - X-20 3-9 Std Steel Wedges - X-20 PW, AW, SW Std Steel Putter - White Hot XG #1 35" Bag - Ball - Loco


Note: This thread is 6008 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.