Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1074 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I invented the S&T! I mean this only half in jest. I actually stumbled on the major aspects of S&T through my own bumblings over many years. Let me explain..

25 yrs ago I started this weird game with a pretty natural swing. I kept my right elbow stuck to my ribs during takeaway and hit a consistent fade that would sometimes turn into a bannana slice (from standing up/pulling off). Played this way pretty casually and contentedly for maybe 10 yrs (once a month kind of golfer).  Then, I started getting more serious, and made the BIG mistake of soliciting swing advice from the likes of Golf Digest.  All kinds of garbage was going into my head, one piece of which was that you should move your weight back onto you right leg during the backswing, and then shift back forward to hit. Ack.

I spent the next 5 yrs thinning, fatting, pushing, and pulling. I couldn't figure it out. Why was I getting worse when I was getting all this great professional advice??  Then, I clearly remember one day out at a local course. I had spent the first 6 holes or so hitting almost literally EVERY shot fat. I was getting really despondent, and had just chunked an 80 yd sand wedge. Then, in a fit of desperation, I figured if I am always hitting 1 or 2 inches behind the ball, I'm just goint to FORCE myself to set up 1 or 2 inches ahead of my normal position (I mean with the ball in its regular position in my stance, but with my CG and head shifted forward). I dropped another ball, and pured my wedge. I played the rest of that round close to par in a dream state. What an epiphany! It felt really strange with more weight on my front leg, but I couldn't argue with the results. I went home and cancelled my Golf Digest subscription.

For the next couple years I had to reinforce this concept, as I kept drifting back to my old swing, and it took me that long to really become convinced that this was the way for me. Then, one day I'm watching GC and I see a commerial for a revolutionary new swing approach and these guys are calling it 'Stack and Tilt', and I see some vids of this new swing, and I was like, 'Hey, I invented that!'. Actually, it was good validation for me that I wasn't some weird golf abberation.  Since then, I have incorporated a 'Still Head' into my weight forward technique, and I'm humming along nicely. I can crush drives and shape shots, and most of all I love the feel of a pured 3 iron blade.

Long live the S&T!

dak4n6


Posted

My TPI swing and fitness analysis last summer included a diagnostic lesson from a PGA pro (pro A for this post). Pro A uses Stack & Tilt himself, and teaches it to a majority of his students.

I have the Golf Digest Six Steps to Stack & Tilt from 2010. On video my swing looks similar to Stack & Tilt, except I need work on Step 3 : Hands In , and Step 6 : Butt Forward. I like the efficiency of the "weight forward" setup.

I was pretty sure I wanted to commit to Stack & Tilt, until...

I met Pro B at a January Golf Expo. He gave me a complementary lesson in February, and was able to point out two subtle swing flaws that were hurting my consistency. He seems to be pretty savvy in comparing swing systems. He's aware of the basics of Stack & Tilt, but fears it would lead to "reverse pivot" problems for many golfers.

So, how much danger is there of "reverse pivot" creeping into a Stack & Tilt swing? If RP is a potential problem, what should an S&T player do to prevent it?

I'll likely go with S&T if I can resolve this RP issue.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted


Originally Posted by WUTiger

My TPI swing and fitness analysis last summer included a diagnostic lesson from a PGA pro (pro A for this post). Pro A uses Stack & Tilt himself, and teaches it to a majority of his students.

I have the Golf Digest Six Steps to Stack & Tilt from 2010. On video my swing looks similar to Stack & Tilt, except I need work on Step 3: Hands In, and Step 6: Butt Forward. I like the efficiency of the "weight forward" setup.

I was pretty sure I wanted to commit to Stack & Tilt, until...

I met Pro B at a January Golf Expo. He gave me a complementary lesson in February, and was able to point out two subtle swing flaws that were hurting my consistency. He seems to be pretty savvy in comparing swing systems. He's aware of the basics of Stack & Tilt, but fears it would lead to "reverse pivot" problems for many golfers.

So, how much danger is there of "reverse pivot" creeping into a Stack & Tilt swing? If RP is a potential problem, what should an S&T player do to prevent it?

I'll likely go with S&T if I can resolve this RP issue.



A reverse pivot would be the weight moving back, away from the target on the downswing.  S&T is centered on the backswing and weight moves forward on the downswing.  IMO actually tough to have a reverse pivot, even the poorest players have some weight forward.  Good thread for you to check out http://thesandtrap.com/t/45926/right-and-wrong-weight-shift-in-s-t

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
One of the main aspects of S&T is to prevent weight from being too far back. Anyone who thinks it will lead to a reverse pivot obviously don't know a lot about the system. It can of course happen, but not more so than with other teaching methods. I would claim that the chance of a reverse pivot is far less with S&T than the more "traditional" ways to teach the swing. If anything, there is a larger risk that you get body parts moving too far forward.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Zeph

One of the main aspects of S&T is to prevent weight from being too far back. Anyone who thinks it will lead to a reverse pivot obviously don't know a lot about the system. It can of course happen, but not more so than with other teaching methods. I would claim that the chance of a reverse pivot is far less with S&T than the more "traditional" ways to teach the swing.

If anything, there is a larger risk that you get body parts moving too far forward.


Yes. I'd seriously question "Pro B" who seems to believe that you actually move your weight forward (likely because he doesn't understand with the left tilt) on the backswing.

Weight stays centered, then moves forward.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Wish me luck! going this afternoon to play my first 9 trying S&T.; Never have had a proper swing, so hoping this will help me hack less..will report back after my 1/2 round.


Posted

Felt really good! I made much better contact, much more consistent. Still duffed a few, but I am still trying to self learn this.


Posted


Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

I started with the book, look at stackandtiltgolfswing.com, look at vids posted here, and go to youtube to find Bennett and Plummer -- but read the book several times. You pick up more detail each time as you read and do, read and do.



I started the book and I gotta it is renewing my interest in trying S&T again (more seriously this time).

I realize now that there is a lot of stuff I did wrong last time.


Posted


Originally Posted by I-league

I started the book and I gotta it is renewing my interest in trying S&T; again (more seriously this time).

I realize now that there is a lot of stuff I did wrong last time.



Keep at it. It took me two tries and a year or two in between before I believed in it. Take my advice and sign up for lessons with Evolvr to really help you get the most out of it. You won't regret it.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


  • Moderator
Posted


Originally Posted by I-league

I started the book and I gotta it is renewing my interest in trying S&T again (more seriously this time).

I realize now that there is a lot of stuff I did wrong last time.


I would recommend keeping it simple.  Read it and learn but don't try to change everything you do.  I guarantee you already have S&T "pieces" in your swing.  Figure out what your priority is and go from there.  "Priorities and Drills" and "Fixing Common Faults" are good chapters to help you with that.



Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Keep at it. It took me two tries and a year or two in between before I believed in it. Take my advice and sign up for lessons with Evolvr to really help you get the most out of it. You won't regret it.

Thanks!

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I had an encouraging session at the range today.

I am half way through the S&T book. Today I focused mainly on "weight forward" and "shoulder down" and got good results. I hit a lot of good shots and was drawing the ball nicely. More importantly I was consistent and had very few mishits.

When I tried to make it a bit more complicated (adding "hands in", focusing on spine tilt and hip slides) I became a lot less consistent.

I'm gonna continue with the book and try to really understand it. On the range/course though I think I am gonna take it really slow and keep it simple as recomended above.


Posted

Over the weekend I had by far the best range session of my life and it's all because of Stack and Tilt. I'm not yet able to draw the ball with my irons, but I was hitting the ball straight and I'll take that to the course anytime. I was hitting baby draws with my driver but only after I closed the face. (I have an adjustable driver) Before I closed the face I was hitting straight shots with the occasional push. One thing I found interesting is that I noticed I got really crisp ball first contact playing all my irons in the middle of my stance. Everything from wedges down to 5 iron. Before I played my 5,6, and 7 irons 2 balls ahead of center and I would strike the ground first just a tad. I don't know if this was just a one day thing or if I should continue to play the ball like that for my irons but only time will tell. But Im sold on Stack and Tilt!

Ron :nike: GOLF Embracing my Angry Black Male :mad:


Posted

Oh, this is available on iTunes. Might have to make this my first book on my iPad.


Posted

am i the only one that thinks this swing method is tough.....i have a hard time with keeping my weight on the left, the shoulder turn and when i keep arms on the body i cut across it.....am i just missing the whole idea and need to read the book again?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by outlaw1984

am i the only one that thinks this swing method is tough.....i have a hard time with keeping my weight on the left, the shoulder turn and when i keep arms on the body i cut across it.....am i just missing the whole idea and need to read the book again?


Have you had a look at your swing on video?

You might feel like you're making the moves as per the book, but chances are you're not and a video is a good way to see what you're actually doing, rather than what you feel you're doing.


Posted

I use an interlocking grip, and tend to be a bit on the firmer side.  I tried the "bird in the hand" thing, it wasn't enough.  The closest thing I can relate my grip pressure to, is picking up my travel mug full of coffee (with three fingers).  Enough to keep it from slipping, but not enough to lock the wrist.  I also swing hard though, so it's probably why I hold on a little tighter.


Note: This thread is 1074 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.