Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5670 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am in the same boat as you, except I call myself an inconsistent ball striker. If you were great you would not be inconsistent. If your tale was one of "I normally hit the ball great, for ten years its been a solid 5 h/c, then something changed the last 2 months and I have been inconsistent" thats what I call a great ball striker who has hit a drought. It really seems to be more of you being dishonest then you being great, your jumping all over everyone who even remotely suggest your just getting lucky on your good shots. If 66.666666% of your shots are crappy, then you are not great by any stretch of the imagination. had the ratio been 2/3 good then it might be a different story.

09 Burner driver
3-pw Dci 962 irons
54-11 gw
Backstryke 2 Ball putter


  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I am guessing, primarily from what I see in your sig, that you could use some help with the mental game. In one of the books, there is a chapter called fire your caddie. If you had a caddie that told you how bad you are after every shot that was less than optimal, you would fire them. So, fire the caddie in your head that is telling you that you suck and hire one that helps you shake it off and focus on the next shot.

Actually I stay pretty postitive inwardly, I am a little sarcastic so I may make a few cracks at my own expense, however I really expect to hit a good shot everytime I set up. I pretty much play every shot with as much focus as the first and pretty much always finish no matter what. Although I did take a beating on a par three yesterday and decided it was best to not waste any more or one's time. :p

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am in the same boat as you, except I call myself an inconsistent ball striker. If you were great you would not be inconsistent. If your tale was one of "I normally hit the ball great, for ten years its been a solid 5 h/c, then something changed the last 2 months and I have been inconsistent" thats what I call a great ball striker who has hit a drought. It really seems to be more of you being dishonest then you being great, your jumping all over everyone who even remotely suggest your just getting lucky on your good shots. If 66.666666% of your shots are crappy, then you are not great by any stretch of the imagination. had the ratio been 2/3 good then it might be a different story.

Ok stacks04 you win. I guess I am optmistic that the great ball striking should be the norm for me. Like I told my wife, I have high standards set for myself, I am just not fulfilling that end of the deal.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I never was irrational, just aggravated that I can't seem to capture the consistency. I know what I do wrong when I do it generally, I just don't why when I am focused on doing everything right I still make dumb mistakes, costing me shots. I hope that I eventually get used to my new swing and start playing better.

hahahahahahhaha. people who don't believe in luck are hilarious.

that is the EXACT same thing as saying you don't believe in good fortune or bad fortune. thats what luck is. Someone who aims right at the flag but pull slices the ball all the way across the left side of the green off the right side. The ball proceeds to then bounce off a rock lying in the rough and pop up in the air, where it proceeds to roll in the hole. You are telling me that the hacker planned that shot? If so, you must be delusional. I've done my fair share of blackjack card counting. If you have been anywhere near that arena or anything else involving chance you will know fluctuations are as normal as mother nature herself and things usually will even out in the end. A blackjack card counter has to play for over 400 hours to have a 99.9% chance of doubling their starting bankroll. After a long enough period of time, things even out. The problem is, card counters have a 0.5-1% advantage at best, so evening out for them means coming out with 101% of the money they threw out on the table...the "action". I digress, but I'm just proving a point. Chance, luck, fortune...whatever. It exists. That's why I've nailed a 4iron 200y to 10ft before, but generally only hit my 4i 180. We can get lucky with perfect timing and contact. don't mean to be rude or anything, i just don't see how anyone can think luck does not play a role in fluctuation

Best 9 holes: 35 (Trilogy at Redmond Ridge, 3163y, Par 35/70, 70.0/131)
Best 18: [b]77[b] (Palm Valley CC, 6545y, 71.4/126)
Notable career achievement: I have NEVER four-putt.


Posted
Actually I stay pretty postitive inwardly, I am a little sarcastic so I may make a few cracks at my own expense, however I really expect to hit a good shot everytime I set up. I pretty much play every shot with as much focus as the first and pretty much always finish no matter what. Although I did take a beating on a par three yesterday and decided it was best to not waste any more or one's time. :p

The best advice I can offer is to enjoy the game for what it is, ups, downs, etc. Constantly assess your game and work on what needs work, but enjoy every minute of it.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
hahahahahahhaha. people who don't believe in luck are hilarious.

I do believe if I do everything right and all other elements far into place I am fortunate because of elements out of my control but those elements will be what they are no matter what.

I just believe what ever happens is because you have made it happen. Luck would require some outside influence to have things happen. Get it? You swung your club that way to get that outcome, whether you planned it or not. YOU controlled that club throught out the swing not some lucky fairie or lepracan. It only did what you told it to do. Just as cards are shuffled in the deck by a dealer, he put them there, each one whether he knew it or not. There is no way that one of the cards is going to be something else. When that card is drawn it will be the king of spades no matter what, drawn at that time. It doesn't matter if it sits there for two years. I say if a hacker makes a hole in one it is because he did all the right things at that moment, no pope or magician puts the ball in there. So IMHO, people like you are hilarious. Plus there should not be any relying on luck in card counting, it should be a skill.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The best advice I can offer is to enjoy the game for what it is, ups, downs, etc. Constantly assess your game and work on what needs work, but enjoy every minute of it.

I do need to enjoy it more, thanks for the input.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'd rather be short and consistent
i played a 6700 yard course last night and played like shit because i kept goin for greens in reg that are just absolutely unreachable for me consistently at that distance.
I was trying to stretch out 3 irons and it led to a very bad round.
Basically, swing easy, be consistent, whatever distances yuo're hitting it'll be more enjoyable

My Clubs:
Ping I3 + blade 3-pw
9.5 09 Burner with prolaunch red
Nickent 4dx driver
Taylormade Z tp 52, 56, 60
YES Carolyne putter


Posted
If you have to think about the things you need to get right then your handicap is pretty accurate at 20. Thats when you sort of know what to do but have fubdamental flaws you don't realize you have (flipping,tempo, etc) but because you occasionally "time" your flip or get the right temo you think you would be great once you can repeat it. Once you can swing without any swing thoughts and hit the ball solidly but not always in the right direction or with the right flight, then you will be "close". But bad shots 2/3 of the time is still hacker town no matter how good the 1/3 shot is. Get lessons to find the flaw that is causing the trouble because its certainly not that you are doing something slightly wrong. Ben hogan said he only hit 4 great shots a round, meaning he "slightly" mishit all of his other ones, how did he play so good if he didn't hit every shot perfect? He didn't have any fundamental flaws. Oh and btw being a pro golfer is far from being a golf pro, they usually have no clue how to analyze another swing as they are analyzing their own by feel and have no idea how your swing feels.

Driver: Ping g15 axivcore black stiff
3 wood: Cobra s9-1 f speed
Hybrids: 20* adams speedline classic round and 24*v1 peanut
Irons: Ping I5 5-pw
Wedges : cg14 50*,54* spin milled 58*Putter: Cameron newport detour


Posted
You think that a third of your shots are "pro calibre". Therin lies your problem. Complete and utter lack of a sense of reality.
The "pro calibre" shots you are hitting are not pro calibre. You don't have any idea what pros do, otherwise you wouldn't say it.
Scoring at golf is about how good your bad shots are, not how good your good shots are.
Everyone hits good shots every round, even ones that have a result that pros would be happy with. It doesn't make them "pro calibre".
Like so many weekend golfers, you think that you "could shoot in the 70s" despite any evidence to support it.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
You think that a third of your shots are "pro calibre". Therin lies your problem. Complete and utter lack of a sense of reality.

I feel like I should be able to shoot in the 70s at some point. I am disappointed that I don't shoot in the 80s every time out. I am realistic, I do hit very high quality shots at times that anyone would be happy with. I wouldn't be afraid to say they are pro like at times but overall I would say that I am nowhere near the talent of a pro. I don't know why or what you read to base your post on.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I I don't know why or what you read to base your post on.

Your words: "I have to play like I expect a pro caliber shot but 1 out of three end up that way and the occasional two or three in a row."

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
Your words:

That's just it, I didn't say I was a pro just that shots come out that way. There is not enough consistency but high quality shots happen often enough that I cannot determine or plan for the result.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
That's just it, I didn't say I was a pro just that shots come out that way. There is not enough consistency but high quality shots happen often enough that I cannot determine or plan for the result.

Two things:

a) I highly, highly doubt that your shots are pro quality. b) The shots you hit well are the anomalies. If you can accept b, you'll realize that you need to work on your game.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I can somewhat believe you to a point. I played Friday with a young kid, tough course, from the blues. He proceeded to shoot 14 pars and made them look very easy. The other four holes- three doubles and a triple. It sure didn't look like a 9 over round, but he just lost it on those holes. I'd call him an inconsistent great ball striker.

CARBITE Putter


Posted
practice your short game more than your long game, and practice smart with the time you give to long game.

and get lessons like the one guy said. you may have some move in your swing that requires perfect timing or something where you hit the ball great one time then shitty the next time.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
practice your short game more than your long game, and practice smart with the time you give to long game.

He didn't mention problems with the short game (not that I read anyway). But he probably does have some unnecessary move in his swing - many people do.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I can somewhat believe you to a point. I played Friday with a young kid, tough course, from the blues. He proceeded to shoot 14 pars and made them look very easy. The other four holes- three doubles and a triple. It sure didn't look like a 9 over round, but he just lost it on those holes. I'd call him an inconsistent great ball striker.

You seem to understand what I am saying. I guess I hit good shots a little more frequently than I stated. It is the little chunk shots in between good ones that nickel and dime me in a round. Often I will nail a drive, top the second and nail the green with the third. If I could just eliminate some of those miss hits, I would be in great shape.

practice your short game more than your long game, and practice smart with the time you give to long game.

I agree and I have been. I don't usually have a problem hitting the green, and miss hits with the short irons are rare but you always need short game practice to stay sharp. I have a new lob wedge and have been hitting a ton of balls with it but I need to be closer to the pin though.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5670 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.