Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5620 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Why wouldn't he expect it? They've been in bunkers all week.

Off topic. What the hell is with all that trash on the course? Cmon people, you're supposed to be fans of the game, how about showing some repect for the course?

Rant over.
my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Fer chrissakes, it's not like his ball landed in someone's sand castle, foot print, etc. He had a good lie. All he had to do was not ground his club. He might have done that if he had read the rules sheet, which made it clear.

I'll disagree with you here. He was the only player that was

caught and penalized this week. I'm willing to be there may have been a number of similar infractions during the tournament that weren't caught by cameras.

Driver: VRS 9.5 degrees

Fairway Wood: 13 degrees
Hybrid: A3 19 degrees

Irons: i20's  Yellow dot

Wedges: Vokey's 52, 56 & 60

Putter: 2 ball

Ball: Penta; ProV


Posted
Hole, sand, grounded club, penalty. The rules are simple and when in doubt ask.

Driver: Nike Ignite 10.5 w/ Fujikura Motore F1
2H: King Cobra
4H: Nickent 4DX
5H: Adams A3
6I 7I 8I 9I PW: Mizuno mp-57Wedges: Mizuno MP T-10 50, 54, 58 Ball: random


Posted
Erik, at least read my posts before you respond to them. I said over and over that Dustin should have been penalized. Go back and read them. Don't respond by saying I thought he shouldn't be penalized when I said the opposite 4 times. I said he should clearly have been penalized and that he should have read the rule sheet.

I really can't believe you're making the argument "where are they supposed to stand?" NOT IN A HAZARD. This is one point that it seems only you are arguing. Faldo, Fehrety, Nobilo, all guys that know more golf than you and I have all said today that the big mistake the PGA and course officials made was allowing patrons to stand in an area deemed a hazard. Go back and listen to the Dan Patrick show this morning and the interview with David Feherty. He just said this morning that there were many areas on the course with patches of sand and dirt that were not hazards and that guys were grounding their clubs in them. My point is again if that's the case, if you remove all of those people from the hazard, it becomes obvious that it was a bunker. Bottom line, Dustin or his caddy should have asked. But he wouldn't have needed to if he could actually see the hazard that was obstructed by hundreds of people.

The PGA got the call right. They also got it wrong by allowing patrons to stand in a hazard. If there isn't a place to stand, then don't let anyone stand there. Pretty simple. Think of some of the areas you can't stand at Augusta for example. You don't see patrons in the bunkers on 12 at Augusta because they "have no where to stand." You watch the action from where you can stand without impeding on the course. Ridiculous argument.

Posted
I have a question for you folks.

There were many errant drives over the four days at the bunker-infested Whistling Straits, and some of them ended up in tightly-packed spectator areas. Just like DJ's drive on 18 in round four.

BUT, none of them was subject to anything like the same, up-close camera coverage that Johnson's was.

Could there be any players who, on reflection, think that they MIGHT have done exactly the same thing as Johnson at some point during the tournament?

Posted
Off topic. What the hell is with all that trash on the course? Cmon people, you're supposed to be fans of the game, how about showing some repect for the course?

I think one of the stupid spectators throwing the trash everywhere should have informed johnson that he was standing in a bunker..lol

THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
David Ferhety said he couldnt tell if it were a bunker, or a area that spectators had been standing on all week. He said the absence of any lips made him wonder because the course has such a sandy base.

Posted

Here's the question I have - where was DJ's ball, exactly, in the bunker. From the pictures posted above and having watched the replay several times, the area that is marked with a circle in the pictures above is not where his ball was. From what I can tell, here is my interpretation:



The red circle is where I think his ball was and the blue line is what I would call the margin of the bunker. It almost looked like his ball was in about a 1x1 foot area that was sand pushed outside the bunker (kid building a sand castle? who knows).

If that area is deemed inside the bunker, no doubt it is a penalty, but I think it was much more vague than that.

Titleist 910D3 8.5* Aldila RIP
Titleist 910F 13.5* Diamana Kai'li
Nickent 4DX 20* and 24*
Tour Preferred 5-PW
52.08, 56.14, 60.04 Titleist Vokey

Odyssey Metal-X #9 Putter

Pro V1x


Posted
David Ferhety said he couldnt tell if it were a bunker, or a area that spectators had been standing on all week. He said the absence of any lips made him wonder because the course has such a sandy base.

If you're referring to this morning, he said a lot more than that. He definitely said that he saw players hitting off of other sandy portions of the course that were not hazards. I just listened to it. Go back and listen. It doesn't make an excuse for Johnson but it's another good reason to not have patrons standing in the bunker.


  • Administrator
Posted


Nantz calls it a bunker. The GolfTrax or whatever clearly shows it going into a bunker. It was a bunker. It's not opinion, folks.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
When DJ got to his ball and grounded his club and then pointed I thought he had called the penalty on himself or was going to get an official. I was like OMG, then I was just hoping it was a waste area. When they questioned it I thought he is done...two strokes.

Once his ball was in the bunker (or even if it was in the rough), the marshalls should have moved the spectators back. I thought the tunnel was just ridiculous and when the caddy went into the crowd I joked that he was trying to protect himself just in case DJ skanked one.

The PGA guy really stressed that the #1 rule was there are no waste areas for the tourney, and I felt that Feherty should have known that as he was stirring everyone up.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
I see you guys saying that the fans shouldn't have been in the bunker with him. How is that any different than when a player hits it off line into the rough and people are just feet away from them there?

Posted
I see you guys saying that the fans shouldn't have been in the bunker with him. How is that any different than when a player hits it off line into the rough and people are just feet away from them there?

Yes, because the rough is not a hazard.

My Tools of Ignorance:

Driver: Ping I20 9.5*
Woods/Hybrids: Cobra AMP 3W and 3 HY

Irons: Cobra AMP 4-GW

Wedges: Callaway Forged Copper 56* and 60*

Putters: Scotty Cameron  35" (Several of the flow neck blade variety)

Ball: Bridgestone B330-RX and Srixon Z-Star

Bag: Nike Performance Carry


Posted
I see you guys saying that the fans shouldn't have been in the bunker with him. How is that any different than when a player hits it off line into the rough and people are just feet away from them there?

If you're talking about an area that is deemed only as rough, it's much different. The bunker is a hazard that has margins that are hard to see with hundreds of people around it. "Rough" is a general term and it can or can't be part of a hazard depending on the course.


Posted
I see you guys saying that the fans shouldn't have been in the bunker with him. How is that any different than when a player hits it off line into the rough and people are just feet away from them there?

I think that they were too close even if he was in the rough.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
The rules were posted and extra emphasis was given to the bunker situation on the course. DJ or his Caddie should have asked for some clarity when the ball landed where it did. It is unfortunate that it played out like that though.
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 2009 FW: Adams Tight Lies 3w Irons: Bridgestone Precept Tour Premium EC603 3-PW Wedges: Cleveland DW/SW Adams LW Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG Marxman

Note: This thread is 5620 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.