Jump to content
Note: This thread is 2686 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I have a school project coming up where I have to write a 6 page proposal and then do a presentation on it. I thought it would be a good idea pick something golf/technology related so I am interested in it. I am sure everyone has thought of this but as far as I know no one has actually made anything like this yet.

Just wondering if you guys think this would be a good idea or if it is too cheesy/unrealistic?

Thanks for any input


What exactly is your idea? You can't put a GPS receiver in a Golf ball currently they are too big and need big batteries. Are you suggesting a way to track the ball's location with a GPS receiver?

It ain't bragging if you can do it.
 
Taylor Made Burner '09 8.5* UST Pro Force V2, Mizuno F-60 3 wood UST Pro Force V2, Mizuno MP-68 3-PW  S300, Bobby Jones Wedges S and L, Nike Ignite 001, Leupold GX-II


Yeah a way to track a golf ball on an LCD screen with a map of the course. It does not have to be possible right now but it can't be too far fetched. There are some pretty small GPS chips out there but they still require a power source and antenna.

A GPS wouldn't be feasible. It'd probably be technically possible to get a receiver, battery, and antenna in a golf-ball sized package, but it's going to be far too expensive and probably not mechanically robust enough to work when you start whacking it.

A more feasible approach is to put a passive microwave RFID tag in the ball. These can be manufactured pretty cheaply (well less than a dollar, though that is only true if they're made in extremely large numbers), and are very simple, so could probably be made to withstand the beating they'll take.

The trick is then finding a way to locate them. The obvious thing to do is to just have a reader that gives a hot/cold indication. Ranges for these will probably be in the 30 foot ballpark, so you'd have to know roughly where it was and then use a metal detector-like approach to find it. If you really want positioning, you'd have to lay out a large number of readers around the course and network them to track where the balls end up. This would be expensive, but not so expensive as to be completely absurd. A reader capable of doing this could be had for perhaps ~$100 (in principle, at least). That'd only tell you which reader it was near, though doing RFID + location is possible.

You could also put an active RFID in the ball, which would substantially boost the range, though you now need a battery in the ball. Presumably you'd have some magnetic one-time switch that you'd use to keep the battery off until you peel off the magnetic sticker on the ball. Otherwise the battery life is going to be dismal. Hmm, I guess you could use an inductive charger to recharge a battery in the ball also.

I don't think this is terribly feasible, but is probably moreso than embedding a GPS in the ball itself.

Edit: just saw M2Rs link, and that's sort of what I'm talking about in my last suggestion, pretty much. Turning the transmitter on after impact is clever. They're using a pretty simple system, though, which doesn't ID the ball. It's probably just a low-power RF transmitter with some other electronics inside, just barely qualifying as RFID (in my book). It works for the "metal detector" approach, but you'd need ID to do a mapping application. That wouldn't be much more difficult, though the range for reading the ID would be lower than the 50 meters they're claiming.

Also, of course, all this is illegal under the rules of golf...

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


GPS implants are being developed and RFID implants are available now, though their tranmitting distance is limited to about 30 feet. It's a cool idea but the technology isn't quite there yet. The transmitting distance you'd need for a golf ball would likely require a battery and antenna which would have to be capable of surviving the impact and compression of multiple club strikes.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Instead of GPS, why not consider something in the golf ball paint that is sun reactive (absorbs sunlight as an energy source) and gives off a weak signal that can be captured if you are within 50-100 feet. Given the photo voltic paint research being developed I bet it is at least theoretically possible, and probably cheaper than GPS which sounds like over kill to me.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


There are several models of (somewhat) wireless charging "pads' for smart phones. Could you consider a "pad" which would charge the batteries in your golf balls wireless before you hit the course? Perhaps a mobile version? A little out there, but like you said, not completely over the top.

 :macgregor: V Foil 8.5*    :tmade: Mid Rescue 16*  -- :wilsonstaff: RM  2 thru Wedge -- :vokey: 56/10  -- :scotty_cameron: Studio Design 2  & a  :srixon: Z Star 


  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

That product is what I described previously, a very simple passive RFID-type chip embedded in the ball, with a reader that gives hot/cold indications when you move / point it around.  Cute, neat, probably better (though much lower range) than an the active system that was linked to earlier.  Still against the rules, and not even approaching GPS in technology (don't be fooled by their "BPS" name for it, it's not a positioning system).

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


  • 6 years later...

I guess this and 'Genius' topics can be merged now. Seems impractical for on course use. But interesting idea.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2686 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure who said it first but I've seen it a lot. There's this "think box" vs "play box" theory. I've also seen it with a planning vs doing line on the ground. The idea is basically you stand away from the ball (a couple feet) and do your "think box". This is where you do your planning, your swing cues, your practice swings (if you believe in practice swings.) All of that is done in the "Think Box". Then you step into your "play box" address the ball and hit it. Sometimes it's done with a imaginary line on the ground. You do all of the think box stuff behind the line. Then once you cross the line you step up and hit it.  Here's Annika Sorenstam demonstrating the "Think box" and "Play box": So, Annika's time over the ball is really short. Because she did all of that other stuff not over the ball, but in her "Think box".  There are lots of variations on this theme. But I think you get the idea. 
    • I speak for myself. If I inventory my swing thoughts, swing tempo, optimum muscle tension and rehearse a swing before I take my address, then I pull the trigger reasonably quickly with usually acceptable results. Like a proper program download before deploying it. If I don't bother to by forgetting or just not caring, I am inclined to look for my cues while hovering over the ball after taking the address, while tension builds up and then I fire with a half ass program that is still buffering. I guess that's no better than rolling a dice. In other words, a good pre-shot routine does wonders. I am not advising folks to take 13 practice swings while the flowers wilt waiting for something to happen, but one or maybe two are reasonable and good for you. I am certain hitting half ass shitty shots and making double bogey takes longer than making a par.  My desire this year is to just that as I have not developed a habit taking a practice swing and as a result have tendency to freeze over the ball after address, that is counter productive for both time and result. I think that is what @saevel25 is talking about in the OP.      
    • Wordle 1,339 2/6 ⬜🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I think there's a difference between taking time over the ball and taking time to play a shot, at least IMO. One thing I've noticed in a few guys I play with who take a long time over the ball to pull the trigger, is that their backswing is really fast and I think it makes it harder to have a smooth rhythmic down swing. It's almost like they take so long to swing that when they do they speed to catch up. Doesn't lead to good golf IMO.
    • Wordle 1,339 3/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...