Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)


Note: This thread is 3013 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

 

I believe the correct way of saying it would be, "I am the least qualified person to be here, because I have a habit of ignoring sane advice and I gave up for nearly 6 months before this because I wasn't progressing how I wanted to and it was becoming obvious."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, nevets88 said:

 

"I'm the most differently qualified person to be here?"

I don't think he could be more of an asshat.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Anyone here understand Finnish?

I ran the paragraph below through GT, it did an ok job, but I wonder what exactly the bit about 5 coaches is about.

Oppimisen ytimessä: Dan McLaughlin ja Jean Côté

At the heart of learning: Dan McLaughlin and Jean Côté

Quote

- Yritin oppia yhtä swingin vaihetta viisi kuukautta erään valmentajan kanssa. Sitten kävin tapaamassa toista valmentajaa, joka katsoi lyöntejäni pitkään sanomatta sanaakaan. Viimein hän käski muuttaa yhtä pientä osaa asennossani ja näytti kädellään kuinka se tehdään. Oivalsin saman tien mistä oli kysymys. Kyse ei olut siitä että yksi koutsi olisi ollut toista parempi, mutta toisen kanssa kommunikoimme samalla kielellä.

- I tried to learn as the swing phase of five months with a coach. Then I went to meet another coach, who took shots for a long time without saying a word. Finally he told me to change one small part of asennossani and showed with his hand how it's done. I realized right away what was going on. It is the beer that one of the coach would have been better than the other, but with the other we communicate in the same language.

http://www.sport.fi/uutiset/uutinen/oppimisen-ytimessa-dan-mclaughlin-ja-jean-cote

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Anyone here understand Finnish?

I ran the paragraph below through GT, it did an ok job, but I wonder what exactly the bit about 5 coaches is about.

 

He's saying that retrospectively thinking he would learn much more if he had 5 coaches and he could take the best of their advice and sort of blend it to his game and progress.

  • Upvote 1

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, B-F-G said:

He's saying that retrospectively thinking he would learn much more if he had 5 coaches and he could take the best of their advice and sort of blend it to his game and progress.

Thanks. That sounds dangerous. Maybe it'll work if you take lessons from 5 instructors who teach "similarly", "in the same ballpark", yes, we know how much there is disagreement among instructors, but 5 who have similar backgrounds might be trying to fix the same piece in different ways. But you can get  conflicting information from 5 different guys. Dan Plan has hit on a perennial problem. How do you find a good pro? A question better suited for others with more experience and knowledge to answer.

If you get one guy telling you to only putt for 1/2 year and another guy saying that's poppycock, what do you do?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The only way I can see having five coaches being helpful is to have some setup like a:

  • Full Swing Coach
  • Short Game Coach
  • Putting Coach
  • Strength and Fitness Coach
  • Mental Coach

 

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Thanks. That sounds dangerous. Maybe it'll work if you take lessons from 5 instructors who teach "similarly", "in the same ballpark", yes, we know how much there is disagreement among instructors, but 5 who have similar backgrounds might be trying to fix the same piece in different ways. But you can get  conflicting information from 5 different guys. Dan Plan has hit on a perennial problem. How do you find a good pro? A question better suited for others with more experience and knowledge to answer.

If you get one guy telling you to only putt for 1/2 year and another guy saying that's poppycock, what do you do?

I guess I read it a different way. I read it like he should have gone out and found different opinions and decided on his own what was the best way to proceed. I think this is a better route than he took. Because he may within those 5 people found someone smart to listen to, which could have changed his trajectory completely. The route he took was find a professional with a nice resume and do what he said unquestionably. 

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not sure this has been posted yet:

http://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/golfcom-podcast-dan-mclaughlin-dan-plan-and-10000-hours-golf

(a followup from a previous interview)

Quote

"I think getting down to like a 6 or 7 was, I’d say, relatively easy," Dan says. "It’s not easy, but when you’re doing it kinda full-time it’s not as difficult as you would imagine. But then going from that 6 to scratch probably takes about four times as much time as going from a 15 to a 6. And from a scratch on…every stroke can be very difficult to chip off."

Can be difficult? You think? Careful out on that limb. An interesting comment:

5657497c4610d_ScreenShot2015-11-26at1.03

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 11/26/2015, 1:03:59, RandallT said:

Not sure this has been posted yet:

http://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/golfcom-podcast-dan-mclaughlin-dan-plan-and-10000-hours-golf

(a followup from a previous interview)

Can be difficult? You think? Careful out on that limb. An interesting comment:

5657497c4610d_ScreenShot2015-11-26at1.03

Haha, fess up, which one of you guys is Da'Neil Olsen. :-$

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, RFKFREAK said:

Haha, fess up, which one of you guys is Da'Neil Olsen. :-$

Probably Shorty! 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
14 minutes ago, collapse said:

Lihu...........handicaps are generally not based on tournament play....Tiger Woods shot 84....Michelle Wie was on her way to an 88 before dropping out a few years ago.

He shot a few scores in the mid to high 80s. Every one of them a tournament score. He has never shot below mid-80s in a tournament.

The OP already appears to be roughly the same handicap as Dan by some estimations on this site based upon Dan's poor performance when known to be playing by the ROG.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, Lihu said:

He shot a few scores in the mid to high 80s. Every one of them a tournament score. He has never shot below mid-80s in a tournament.

The OP already appears to be roughly the same handicap as Dan by some estimations on this site based upon Dan's poor performance when known to be playing by the ROG.

His handicap was apparently 2 or 3 ....if there is proof otherwise,then we would like to see it.Unless you are challenging the HC system and how millions of golfers record theirs,I can only think Dan's was as legitimate as anyone else's.

Note: I do not answer direct questions or points raised against my untested and unproven theories, have no history of teaching anyone, and post essentially the same nonsense in everyone's Member Swing threads.


Posted
Just now, collapse said:

His handicap was apparently 2 or 3 ....if there is proof otherwise,then we would like to see it.Unless you are challenging the HC system and how millions of golfers record theirs,I can only think Dan's was as legitimate as anyone else's.

Just go and read his tournament blogs, no point arguing with me. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, Lihu said:

Just go and read his tournament blogs, no point arguing with me. . .

Please post the quote where it is said his HC was falsely recorded....thanks

Note: I do not answer direct questions or points raised against my untested and unproven theories, have no history of teaching anyone, and post essentially the same nonsense in everyone's Member Swing threads.


  • Moderator
Posted
48 minutes ago, collapse said:

It's always best if you have proof that Dan is not being honest.

Not saying dishonest, but results on home course and tournament are different.

https://twitter.com/thedanplan/status/458011317509431297

http://www.ghintpp.com/OregonGA/TPPOnlineScoring/ResultsStroke.aspx?ID=372

http://www.ghintpp.com/OregonGA/TPPOnlineScoring/StrokeCard.aspx?id=356&pid=21723

Screen Shot 2015-12-14 at 10.28.31 AM.png

Screen Shot 2015-12-14 at 10.29.35 AM.png

Screen Shot 2015-12-14 at 10.36.02 AM.png

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Lihu said:

A specific golfer's development is too chaotic to predict with any certainty. There are even cases of people who played for years, then suddenly they started to improve rapidly when they finally got it.

It's variable, but by and large within a limited range unless there's a major injury or something. I agree breakthroughs happen, but usually what that does is just put the player back on / re-establish an earlier rapid progress part of their own learning curve when it's more typical that at long hours invested the learning curve tends to flatten with the doubling time.. It's on the scale of thousands of hours invested in learning where the progress curve really shows itself and those variable wobbles actually get fairly well in line with the long-term track. On that scale, recovery from 'forgetting' setbacks tend to return to the original progress track.

 

Quote

Your calculations probably work very well when you take data from 1000 golfers and average their development graphs.

That would only be instructive if they had achieved the same benchmarks in the same time. Or it would only be showing the 'typical' time for average golfers to reach a certain HCP level, which more talented golfers will almost definitely beat. The individual slope - time to a level is very significant. I suspect part of Zach Johnson's long-term success story is that he was a relatively late starter to the game and/or had invested much less total time developing his game than his college peers at that stage in their lives, but as he invested more time and kept improving, many of them stood relatively 'still' in progress and so he eventually surpassed them. That said, I believe individual's can definitely have big breakthroughs and big setbacks that establish new curves, I just don't think the new slope will be hugely different from their established long-term progress.

 

Quote

 

 

1 hour ago, Pretzel said:

If you believe what he tells us you're rather gullible, but it's an off topic point.

OT, but actually the same relationship that indicates you have plus potential tracks even better with Dan's HCP vs hours progress. His progress track is quite believable and follows the expected relationship quite well across multiple years.

I have no reason to doubt you, but your progress in the past year is pretty steep given your accumulated hours - though still plausible. You might have the potential to be +3 at 10,000 hours and +4 at 20,000 hours, though such players are rare. The next few years will be telling if you slow down more rapidly than expected or not.

I do agree with you, though, that Dan did not educate himself as he should have for his attempt.

 

1 hour ago, collapse said:

It's always best if you have proof that Dan is not being honest.

OT, but I agree. I expect Dan has been honest about his scores.

 

59 minutes ago, Lihu said:

his tournament scores were in the mid to high 80s. What this states is than when he is under a more controlled rule playing condition he shoots 15 stokes higher. No one who can break par by the rules and normally shoot 3 over would shoot high 80s in a tournament.

OT, but the course rating for the tournament setup matters a great deal. Score to par varies for the same golfer by upwards of 10 shots for an 'easy' course vs. a 'brutal' course. For a high course rating like 76, a 3 HCP would average ~ 80, a 5 HCP would average ~ 82, and a 7 HCP would average ~ 85.

I would expect Dan's low rounds relative to par happened on easier courses. Plus he may play poorly under pressure and significantly better on very familiar courses where he knows the subtleties. If he was lying, why would he fabricate a personal progress track that indicates he won't reach his goal? I personally see no reason to accuse him of cheating.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
5 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

You need to separate HC from tournament play.....the Dan plan was focused on HC....I see nothing that says he didn't follow the HC system of tabulating his ,making him a 2 or 3.

Note: I do not answer direct questions or points raised against my untested and unproven theories, have no history of teaching anyone, and post essentially the same nonsense in everyone's Member Swing threads.


Note: This thread is 3013 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.