Jump to content
IGNORED

The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)


Jonnydanger81
Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
I don't understand how Dan can't afford instruction, I mean I would think 1 hour a week would be enough until he gets his index down low. So what does an average 1 hour session run? $100? So he can't afford $400 a month?

Golf is expensive. Green fees, range time, short game fees, regripping, tournament entry fees, transportation, balls, health club I think, etc... $400/month for a guy who's living on savings and barely any income. That's a lot of money. Despite his visibility, I doubt he's pulling in much income.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So his plan is to be a PGA player and he doesn't have $400 a month for lessons ........


On of the many paradoxes with this plan. :no:

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So his plan is to be a PGA player and he doesn't have $400 a month for lessons ........

Purely speculation on my part, but my guess is that he assumed that by the halfway point, he would have drummed up enough sponsorship interest to sustain the second half of the plan.

Clearly, that is not happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Purely speculation on my part, but my guess is that he assumed that by the halfway point, he would have drummed up enough sponsorship interest to sustain the second half of the plan. Clearly, that is not happening.

I still don't get how he can't come up with money for lessons, I'm sure any instructor would help him out with 10 mins here and there for a reasonable price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
On of the many paradoxes with this plan.

I didn't expect him to make the tour - I think some people didn't either. But I hoped he would realize his full potential. Obviously, I think he could do better.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't expect him to make the tour - I think some people didn't either. But I hoped he would realize his full potential. Obviously, I think he could do better.


I @pullfade ontact with Dan really shed a lot of light upon what is going on and reaffirms what some of us where saying is happening, Dan obviously lacks talent that's a given that will prevent him from being on even a mini tour let alone the PGA, he also is failing in how to improve by his reluctance to do the work that has to be done even if it means taking a couple steps backwards and staying off the course in order to get improvement to happen again. I think Dan feels like he's made significant improvements over the years and doesn't want to admit the swing he has right now is not very good and that he's at the end of the road with it. I think one thing his plan shows is no matter how  many hours you put in if the practice your doing is wrong then your just wasting time. I seriously doubt he's going to reach the 10,000 hours the lack of funds and little to no improvement he's seeing  will probably force him to give up.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
It's the old got a kink in the swing. Spend lots of time working with it, grove it so you can work with it, feels comfortable because you're not altering the swing that much. Versus get rid of the kink, feel uncomfortable, but remove the lower ceiling the kink puts you under. Both take a long time, but the latter requires change, which puts some people off.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I @pullfade having actual contact with Dan really shed a lot of light upon what is going on and reaffirms what some of us where saying is happening, Dan obviously lacks talent that's a given that will prevent him from being on even a mini tour let alone the PGA, he also is failing in how to improve by his reluctance to do the work that has to be done even if it means taking a couple steps backwards and staying off the course in order to get improvement to happen again. I think Dan feels like he's made significant improvements over the years and doesn't want to admit the swing he has right now is not very good and that he's at the end of the road with it. I think one thing his plan shows is no matter how  many hours you put in if the practice your doing is wrong then your just wasting time. I seriously doubt he's going to reach the 10,000 hours the lack of funds and little to no improvement he's seeing  will probably force him to give up.

Gee, I didn't need this plan to tell me this. :-$

On a serious note, about a year ago I hit anywhere from a hundred to a few hundred balls per day, and got pretty much nowhere. After seeing Mike and Dana a few times starting 9 months ago, the more I practice the better my shots. Now, if I hit anywhere from 100 to 400 balls per day, I feel invigorated after practice and not tired and worn out.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Gee, I didn't need this plan to tell me this.

On a serious note, about a year ago I hit anywhere from a hundred to a few hundred balls per day, and got pretty much nowhere. After seeing Mike and Dana a few times starting 9 months ago, the more I practice the better my shots. Now, if I hit anywhere from 100 to 400 balls per day, I feel invigorated after practice and not tired and worn out.

Yeah, I've started practicing about 2-3 hours a day. And I only hit like 25-30 balls in that time frame.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, I've started practicing about 2-3 hours a day. And I only hit like 25-30 balls in that time frame.

At one point, it took me a minute to get setup correctly. I would seemingly stand at setup for 40 seconds or even more at address. It would have taken an hour or more to hit 25 balls. I got the time down to 10-15 seconds, so I hit more balls. At the net, I don't move that much and I place the ball in the exact same position. The thing that takes the most time is drinking water or other beer like liquids. 2-3 hours seems a long time to hit 25 to 30 balls, do you take more than one practice swing?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Gee, I didn't need this plan to tell me this.

On a serious note, about a year ago I hit anywhere from a hundred to a few hundred balls per day, and got pretty much nowhere. After seeing Mike and Dana a few times starting 9 months ago, the more I practice the better my shots. Now, if I hit anywhere from 100 to 400 balls per day, I feel invigorated after practice and not tired and worn out.

I know that, it just puts a more obvious light upon it, what really struck me was there didn't really seem to be very much if any thorough research done prior to starting the journey, he basically began with a beginners mind set and that was more than obvious by spending hundreds of hours hitting 1 foot putts, it's like someone wanting to learn to be a power hitter in baseball bunting a baseball for the first 3 months completely useless practice. As far as the cost of instruction there are many ways to get help, one obviously is here with a swing thread video another would probably be through Oregon golf association probably has multiple FREE clinics throughout the summer that he could attend and get help. Right now Dan has too many basic things going wrong with his swing that if he had more than one experienced set of eyes to help would probably not cause problems but I get the impression Dan thinks he's got something going and he doesn't want too much advice though probably most of it is good.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2-3 hours seems a long time to hit 25 to 30 balls, do you take more than one practice swing?

Yeah, depending on how I feel, I probably take 5-10 slow backswings and a couple slow follow-throughs to emphasize what I'm working on. Between that and making sure I address every shot like I'm on the course and hitting a ball that counts...takes time. Haha.

That and video taping most of the shots and watching back to make sure I'm not regressing and continuing to do what I need to do.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, depending on how I feel, I probably take 5-10 slow backswings and a couple slow follow-throughs to emphasize what I'm working on. Between that and making sure I address every shot like I'm on the course and hitting a ball that counts...takes time. Haha. That and video taping most of the shots and watching back to make sure I'm not regressing and continuing to do what I need to do.

Yeah, filming takes a long time. It's a necessary evil to get better. ;-)

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Yeah, filming takes a long time. It's a necessary evil to get better.

It's not the act of videoing yourself that's time consuming. Setting up the tripod and camera and moving it from dtl and fo positions are pretty easy and quick - it's how much time you take to look at your video post swing and the time trying figure out what you did right and wrong and what to do to fix the wrong. And if you write notes on swings, that's even longer.

I also edit my videos on location, so cutting out the beginning and end, it takes awhile for my camera to finish the trim. I go back to the stall and work on my pieces w/o a ball while the camera trims. If my camera trimmed videos in the blink of an eye, that would probably cut 1/4 -1/3rd of the time I'm at the range. Currently, 60 balls, I'm on the range for about 2-3 hours.

I wish my Casio had a trim feature that lets you choose the beginning and end portion to trim in one go. Right now it's just beginning, end or middle.

I tried all sorts of ways of videoing myself. Taking only the last 10 swings. Taking every swing. Taking 3-5 swings in one video. Taking a couple of swings with video then a couple without. What works for me is to video about 1/2 my swings in one session, depending what I'm working on dtl or fo or both. When the camera is trimming, I use that time to do mirror work without the mirror. Also, I find it useful to have a library of swings on the smartphone and lesson videos as well. That way, you can do a side by side between the LCD on your camera and your smartphone.

There's really an art to using the camera effectively imho. And it varies for each person I would think. This is the kind of stuff I was hoping to read in his blog. And I haven't even talked about ISO, shutter speed, video tech aspects.

We have such amazing tech in our pockets. I think some people take it for granted.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's not the act of videoing yourself that's time consuming. Setting up the tripod and camera and moving it from dtl and fo positions are pretty easy and quick - it's how much time you take to look at your video post swing and the time trying figure out what you did right and wrong and what to do to fix the wrong. And if you write notes on swings, that's even longer.

I also edit my videos on location, so cutting out the beginning and end, it takes awhile for my camera to finish the trim. I go back to the stall and work on my pieces w/o a ball while the camera trims. If my camera trimmed videos in the blink of an eye, that would probably cut 1/4 -1/3rd of the time I'm at the range. Currently, 60 balls, I'm on the range for about 2-3 hours.

I wish my Casio had a trim feature that lets you choose the beginning and end portion to trim in one go. Right now it's just beginning, end or middle.

I tried all sorts of ways of videoing myself. Taking only the last 10 swings. Taking every swing. Taking 3-5 swings in one video. Taking a couple of swings with video then a couple without. What works for me is to video about 1/2 my swings in one session, depending what I'm working on dtl or fo or both. When the camera is trimming, I use that time to do mirror work without the mirror. Also, I find it useful to have a library of swings on the smartphone and lesson videos as well. That way, you can do a side by side between the LCD on your camera and your smartphone.

There's really an art to using the camera effectively imho. And it varies for each person I would think. This is the kind of stuff I was hoping to read in his blog.

Couldn't agree more. I'll watch the same swing back 3 or 4 times. Once I'll focus on what my head is doing, then my hips, then my shoulders, then the club...etc.,

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Also, I video swings without a ball, exaggerate or emphasize the priority piece. That sucks up time as well. Those I just erase or leave unedited. I have terrible god awful what I think is happening versus what's really happening FARS - feel ain't real syndrome and this really helps.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Also, I video swings without a ball, exaggerate or emphasize the priority piece. That sucks up time as well. Those I just erase or leave unedited. I have terrible god awful what I think is happening versus what's really happening FARS - feel ain't real syndrome and this really helps.

Ah...see, I can't do that. I know my brain and body work differently when the ball is there, so I might as well keep it in place. Exaggeration and emphasis on priority pieces though...definitely.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • And pull their mouth away when they hit stronger notes. Mics can only take so much sound pressure. Every mic is different too. As I stated above, there are many variables to account for to even remotely have a chance to use sound to measure velocity. It would have to be in an extremely controlled environment with calibrated sound and metering devices. In addition, the swing must be absolutely repeatable as would the contact.  There is no possible way to use the dB meter on my iPhone to accomplish this. It’s not rational to think you could. It’s not even that good at measuring the sound level of my amps accurately. Even reorienting it by 45 degrees changes the level.
    • I know there are a lot of people on the site with science and engineering backgrounds here so @p1n9183 is getting a lot of questions about how this theory would even work, but I’m going to ask the obvious one here… why? Like what is the purpose if you already have a speed radar, even if such a thing as you proposed was feasible?
    • It might be at some distances, but none are realistic. For example, if I put a microphone 2.5m away from a sound source and another 3.5m away, the fall-off there is only about 3 (2.98 I think), but your sound would have to be incredibly loud. A microphone that picks up an 80 dB sound at 1 millimeter will only pick up about 12 dB at 2.5 meters (and it's still only 20 dB at 1m from an 80 dB sound source). I also don't think swinging a club generates a very loud sound, and sounds that can injure your hearing require 85 dB or so. In other words… You need to generate (at the source) an ear-injuring level of sound with your club, and if the microphone is as little as one foot away, that 85 dB is already down to ~43.5 dB. It's almost half of what it was. Swing 14" away with the same 85 dB swing instead of 12" and the same swing will read 42 dB. Sound attenuation is subject to similar laws like light fall-off because it radiates, so it diminishes in the inverse square: I have also talked to some sound engineers, and they've laughed and said that unless you were controlling EVERY aspect of this, including: temperature distance of max clubhead speed from the microphone angle (both axes) to the microphone clubface orientation (a face open or closed will change the frequency) location of the max clubhead speed (reaching peak speed at the same exact place) everything in the vicinity, including the shoes and clothes you're wearing, the surface you're on, etc. ideally with all of them producing virtually no noise even when moving. You'd have to control all of those to within very small margins. Even just the doppler effect is going to dramatically change your input. No. No, you need to realize how wrong you've gotten all of this. See above about the doppler effect. Unless you're a swing robot, you're not going to generate the max speed at the same exact location every time. Tell me, @p1n9183, why do you think recording artists (singers) put their mouths so damn close to the microphone?
    • Digging deeper... you can use the frequency of the woosh also.  It is possible to measure the speed of an object using the noise it generates when passing through a decibel reader,  but with some limitations and considerations. The method relies on the relationship between the frequency of the sound emitted by the moving object and its speed.  When an object moves at a constant speed, it generates sound with a characteristic frequency, known as the "Doppler frequency." The frequency of the sound emitted by the object can be related to its speed using the formula: f = (v / c) * f0 where: - f: frequency of the emitted sound - v: object speed - 😄 speed of sound (approximately 343 m/s in air at standard temperature and pressure) - f0: frequency of the sound emitted when the object is at rest Having "C" been constant, and "f0" been unknown but equal for both swings you only need to compare the frequency of  each swing to know how much faster or slower is a swing over the other.  
    • As I told you before, the sound attenuation is 3 db at 1 meter (38").  At 7" (your example) is a wooping 1 db less, for an 80db 7 iron is under 1% error. I know for sure that my PRGR is not that accurate, even my skytrak isn't that accurate. For a FREE unit seams to be promising if you can't afford a speed meter.   Again, you are swinging in the same spot, over and over again in the same session. Phone position is the same , background sound is the same, environment is the same. The only difference is the peak sound you produce when you whoosh the club.     You need to do a lot better to discharge an idea.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...