Jump to content
IGNORED

My personal humorous "It's not me" camparison, ProV1 vs Prov1x


Note: This thread is 4870 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I played the New ProV1x for the 3rd time in a full round. Being a 12 Handicapper, I knew Exactly how to hit this quality distance ball. With winds gusting at 32mph here in San Antonio, I shot a perfect score of 88 on a par 72. I knew that my excellent chipping and putting after missing 12 of 18 greens in regulation helped me to obtain that score with the Pro V1x. The Pro V1x performed perfectly as said on the outside of the box.

I figured my Superior skills would be better suited for the higher spin rate ProV1. So today I played the ProV1. I used my perfect and superior techniques to zip my club through the ball to create the spin that the outside of the ProV1 box told me about. Unlike yesterday, I made sure that I looked up early on nearly every chip and approach shot to make sure that I could see this ball perform the way the box said it would. I was immensely disappointed. It had a tendency to skirt across the greens and get hit with the blade of my clubs. Why would Titleist they design a ball that would do that???

Judging by the inferior characteristics of the ProV1, I would recommend the ProV1x to anyone looking to upgrade the quality of their golf ball. I appreciate you taking the time to read my totally scientific and expert analysis of the ProV1 v.s ProV1x comparison. I Thank You all in advance for accepting my expert analysis as fact. I assure you that the 28 shares in Titliest that I own has nothing to do with my recommendations.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Cute. Well written also!  :)

Are you serious about the V1 spinning less though? I came to the opposite conclusion. Just curious!

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's SAGolfLuvr's light hearted humor.  When you read it carefully, SAGolfLuvr tells you he skulled his shots with Prov V1.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

WMiller, Yukari is 100% correct. I am NOT serious about the ProV1 spinning less than the ProV1x. I believe that the ProV1 DOES spin more than the ProV1x, however, I could not produce that result. Of course, in the spirit of this thread, I blame this on "equipment malfunction" :-)  The seasoned golfer will pick out my flaws in my post and CORRECTLY point out that my technique is the true problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ah... Missed that part. Maybe because I was laughing too hard? Still enjoyed the post though.

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think you need some new irons.  I heard next year's TaylorMade SGI line will detect that you've pulled your head up and extend by up to two inches in a split second, guaranteeing consistent, fat contact.

  • Upvote 2

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Zeg, I really Love today's new technology and I Thank You very much for informing me about next year's TaylorMade Irons. After researching the irons you spoke of, I agree that Consistently Fat shots as a result of TaylorMade's 2012 new line of anti-skulling technology irons (SGI obviously stands for Sorry Golf Improved) is exactly what I need to make the ProV1 perform perfectly. It would be so nice if TaylorMade made this new line of irons available by Father's Day. *sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by zeg

I think you need some new irons.  I heard next year's TaylorMade SGI line will detect that you've pulled your head up and extend by up to two inches in a split second, guaranteeing consistent, fat contact.


This.

I'd also recommend swapping your glove out for one of these - http://keeperglove.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fingersave-goalkeeper-glove.jpg

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I thought you were being serious until about halfway through when I realised you were taking the piss

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


WMiller, Yukari is 100% correct. I am NOT serious about the ProV1 spinning less than the ProV1x. I believe that the ProV1 DOES spin more than the ProV1x, however, I could not produce that result. Of course, in the spirit of this thread, I blame this on "equipment malfunction" :-)  The seasoned golfer will pick out my flaws in my post and CORRECTLY point out that my technique is the true problem.

Definitely the ball's fault. Anything that's different between your best game ever and any other given game is probably to blame for you not playing that same exact best game. For example, for me recently it was using a different brand of sunblock. It was causing these crazy hooks that couldn't be tamed. I gave that worthless stuff a 1/2 start rating in the equipment reviews. Now I'm convinced that if you're not spending $20/lb on sunblock you'll get crappy quality.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by B-Con

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGolfLuvr

WMiller, Yukari is 100% correct. I am NOT serious about the ProV1 spinning less than the ProV1x. I believe that the ProV1 DOES spin more than the ProV1x, however, I could not produce that result. Of course, in the spirit of this thread, I blame this on "equipment malfunction" :-)  The seasoned golfer will pick out my flaws in my post and CORRECTLY point out that my technique is the true problem.

Definitely the ball's fault. Anything that's different between your best game ever and any other given game is probably to blame for you not playing that same exact best game.

For example, for me recently it was using a different brand of sunblock. It was causing these crazy hooks that couldn't be tamed. I gave that worthless stuff a 1/2 start rating in the equipment reviews. Now I'm convinced that if you're not spending $20/lb on sunblock you'll get crappy quality.



I'm not sure the < $20/lb sunscreen is approved for sale in Canada.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites






I'm not sure the < $20/lb sunscreen is approved for sale in Canada.



You're right, I meant oz. We were looking at allergy-sensitive sunscreen recently and I was surprised that you could pay $20/oz for sunscreen. I remembered the number but botched the units... :roll:

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4870 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Eh. Do your hips back when they swivel like he demonstrates? Or do they tend to go forward as they rotate?
    • Uh, that's not what happened. I'm highly dubious about how your results would work going forward, you showed nothing about your setup, etc. I trust the physics (your 3 dB over a meter is off substantially) and sound engineers over claimed "good" results.
    • I actually really like the video. I feel like it speaks to my own issues of hip movement (lunge towards the ball). I think he also presents a very good and detailed explanation of the why from biomechanical perspective, not forcing the clubs in position and instead let it work a proper planar path by providing it space (hip swivel) the most efficient way. As far as tech speak/catch phrases etc., that some may not like, it doesn't bother me and even necessary. For eg., the spiral line sounds like it is the same thing as a kinematic chain, but directionally specific along with the set of muscles joints it engages. If the club is not dynamically aligned to the 'spiral line' it will force other compensation like locking joints, etc. That's simple logic, and from my perspective not brought up enough. Good stuff.
    • Thanks! it was a fun experiment and I hope is going to be useful for people that like to go down the rabbit hole like i do but can't afford a launch monitor or even a cheap speed meter. Of course I'm glad the results were positive, even better than I spected, but it is funny to see that only you took the time to post after the results were given, the only one in the thread that was open minded about the idea. The other posters that daily brought down the idea without proper arguments or proof, disappeared after been confronted with actual data. Maybe they are testing this by themselves and are in shock that they are getting the same results as me!     
    • It would certainly be a good thing if more people would at least give walking the course a chance, but "great crime" is awfully melodramatic.  On the Faxon end, I think he's probably just speculating that these guys might be new to golf. That position when teeing up the ball normally suggests that. It shouldn't be too much of a surprise that newbies would be riders. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...