Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5242 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
For my mist (which I already pretty much had sitting around for another purpose) I excluded Tom Morris, Old and Young, Simply because who were they playing? In fact, the only guy before WWI that I included is Vardon. 1. Nicklaus 2. Woods 3. Hogan 4. Jones 5. Nelson 6. Hagan 7. Player 8. Snead 9. Palmer 10. Watson 11. Sarazen 12. Trevino 13. Ballesteros 14. Thompson 15. Vardon It's probably flawed, but I think it's at least half-decent.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

anyone else get the feeling that arnold palmer is/was overrated?  Like how is he > Tom Watson aside from "impact" on the game and being popular to the masses?

I mean hes borderline top 10 to me if you just go by accomplishments(although to his credit 62 tour wins is impressive).  To me Watson and Player have to be > Palmer.


Posted
Originally Posted by deasy55

People should really rate Young Tom Morris higher. He basically changed the way golf was played before dying at 24. He basically invented the sandwedge and was the first to use backspin.

On the first hole of the 1870 British Open he recorded a 3 on a 578 yard hole. That must have been about a par 6-7 in those days (no par back then).


He died two decades before the first US Open, and two decades before even the Open Championship was held outside of Scotland. The game wasn't even in its infancy then; golf was still incubating in its Scottish womb. Young Tom's fate parallels that of Jim Creighton, baseball's first star player, who died in 1862 at age 21, over a decade before the first major league was founded. He might have been the best ever, but he died young before his sport could reach mass appeal.

For another golfer who died well before he could make his full impact on the game, there's Tony Lema. Tony won 12 tournaments in four years, including the 1964 British Open at St. Andrews, then died in a plane crash at age 32 as his fame was reaching the level of Palmer and Nicklaus. Lema, who grew up poor in a family that worked in Oakland's shipyards, was Lee Trevino immediately before Trevino came to prominence, and it's hard to say how those two players would have co-existed.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted
Originally Posted by laconic517

anyone else get the feeling that arnold palmer is/was overrated?  Like how is he > Tom Watson aside from "impact" on the game and being popular to the masses?

I mean hes borderline top 10 to me if you just go by accomplishments(although to his credit 62 tour wins is impressive).  To me Watson and Player have to be > Palmer.

My theory on Palmer: Hogan, Nelson, and Snead dominated professional golf from the late 1930s until the early 1950s. By the mid-1950s, Nelson had already retired, while Hogan and Snead (well into their forties) were in decline. Unfortunately, there was no immediate successor to to the trio's place at the top of the game: the generation of players who should have been reaching their primes then lost their late teens and early twenties serving in World War II, and the PGA Tour had already banished Bobby Locke, probably the world's best player at that point, for being too good. The list of major champions during that period resembles a roster of forgetability: Chandler Harper, Jim Turnesa, Walter Burkemo, Ed Furgol, Chick Harbert, Jack Fleck, Doug Ford, Jackie Burke, Dick Mayer, Jay and Lionel Hebert, Tommy Bolt, Dow Finsterwald, Art Wall, Bob Rosburg. The only person with a record resembling that of an elite player was Cary Middlecoff (40 wins, 3 majors), and he was a freaking dentist! This period coincided with the rise of television, and none of those guys were going to be the face of a new medium.

When Arnold Palmer came into prominence, he was young, handsome, charismatic, and way better than everyone else on the American tour at that time. He was the right player at exactly the right time, when golf was in dire need of a television star. That said, Jack Nicklaus blew Palmer out of the water after turning professional, Nicklaus and Gary Player had much longer careers as championship-caliber players, and Peter Thomson, likely his greatest contemporary, rarely played in America. All together, I would not rate Palmer above either the two who came before him (Hogan, Snead) or the two who came after him (Nicklaus, Player).

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

I think most people have Palmer in the right spot, just behind Player, and just ahead of Watson.  Can't ignore the extra 23 victories, and factor in that during his prime years he had to contend with young Jack (maybe the best young golfer ever besides young Tiger).  I've got no argument with most of the lists, I just don't put Bobby Jones nearly as high as most people.  Outstanding golfer, one of the best of his generation, but length of his career and level of competition he faced simply don't measure up to the others on my list.  I see some people underrating Player a bit-could just be that his personality rubs some people the wrong way.

Originally Posted by laconic517

anyone else get the feeling that arnold palmer is/was overrated?  Like how is he > Tom Watson aside from "impact" on the game and being popular to the masses?

I mean hes borderline top 10 to me if you just go by accomplishments(although to his credit 62 tour wins is impressive).  To me Watson and Player have to be > Palmer.




Posted

Here's my list.

  1. Jack Nicklaus
  2. Tiger Woods
  3. Ben Hogan
  4. Sam Snead
  5. Gary Player
  6. Arnold Palmer
  7. Walter Hagen
  8. Tom Watson
  9. Byron Nelson
  10. Seve Ballesteros
  11. Lee Trevino
  12. Bobby Jones
  13. Gene Sarazen
  14. Nick Faldo
  15. Phil Mickelson

Originally Posted by iacas

16.  McIlroy

Joking on the last one...


Pretty funny... but interesting.  Of all the young stars we have right now he could be the one (or one of the ones) that will someday be mentioned on a list like this

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by max power

I think most people have Palmer in the right spot, just behind Player, and just ahead of Watson.  Can't ignore the extra 23 victories, and factor in that during his prime years he had to contend with young Jack (maybe the best young golfer ever besides young Tiger).  I've got no argument with most of the lists, I just don't put Bobby Jones nearly as high as most people.  Outstanding golfer, one of the best of his generation, but length of his career and level of competition he faced simply don't measure up to the others on my list.  I see some people underrating Player a bit-could just be that his personality rubs some people the wrong way.


Watson played with Nicklaus during Jack's prime.   Not to mention Watson came within a slightly smaller bounce of winning the british open at 59.  I dont see how Palmer can be ahead of him.  He has more majors than Palmer and basically the 2nd half of his career was a waste due to bad putting.  IMO he competed longer against far tougher competition and has a better major championship resume than Palmer.  Palmer's only advantage is in the number of tour victories, but again, the puttting woes are probably to blame for that.


Posted



Watson played with Nicklaus during Jack's prime.   Not to mention Watson came within a slightly smaller bounce of winning the british open at 59.  I dont see how Palmer can be ahead of him.  He has more majors than Palmer and basically the 2nd half of his career was a waste due to bad putting.  IMO he competed longer against far tougher competition and has a better major championship resume than Palmer.  Palmer's only advantage is in the number of tour victories, but again, the puttting woes are probably to blame for that.




Watson was the last "great" player to emerge before the rest of the baby boomer generation reached full maturity, and supplied the professional ranks with so many great players that it would be hard for any of them to win a lot of majors over the next twenty years. Tom was great enough to be Jack's equal during his early prime as Jack was in his late prime, then had several years when he and Seve were on equal footing ahead of everybody else. Tom didn't lose much to the field frok the mid-80s on (he stopped making as many putts), but the years 1947-1960 produced so many outstanding players that it was enough to turn him into a player who frequently contended but never won again.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


  • Administrator
Posted

I'm tellin' ya, guys. You're all forgetting Billy Casper. Just me and my man uttexas have him on our lists.

Haterz gonna hate! ;-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

BTW, even though she couldn't beat the men head to head, any list of great golfers that doesn't include Annika Sorenstam is flawed to me.


I disagree with this.  The issue is the list of the 15 greatest golfers of all time.  Annika is not better than anyone on that list, nor is she better than anyone on a reasonable list of the 100 greatest golfers of all time.  To get Annika on a list you would have to restrict it to the greatest women golfers of all time.  When you are talking about the greatest of all time it necessarily has to be in competition t the very highest level.  That is why no one makes the list on the basis of their performance as an amateur nor as a senior.  Likewise, no woman should make the list unless one establishes an outstanding record playing at the highest level.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

I'm tellin' ya, guys. You're all forgetting Billy Casper. Just me and my man uttexas have him on our lists.

Haterz gonna hate! ;-)


I agree with you.  I had a brain fart and left him off but I just went back and added him in.  I find it more useful to categorize players rather than rank them.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nah i'm happy with my list

Originally Posted by iacas

I'm tellin' ya, guys. You're all forgetting Billy Casper. Just me and my man uttexas have him on our lists.

Haterz gonna hate! ;-)




Posted

problem I have with everyone's top three is if you give Hogan and Woods the longevity that Nicklaus had I think they both pass his record.  In Hogan's case you have to wonder what he would have done if he played in four majors a year.  I agree those guys are the top three, but the order is debatable.


Posted

well, this is based mostly on personal preference, though of course some of these guys are obviously top of the pile... (not necessarily in any order, just a general "top 15"):

1. jack nicklaus

2. ben hogan

3. sam snead

4. byron nelson

5. lee trevino

6. tiger woods

7. arnold palmer

8. billy casper

9. rory mcilroy (i know, a bit soon, but i really think that kid's the future)

10. fred couples (that swing may not have won many majors, but it sure is beautiful)

11. bobby jones

12. lorena ochoa (do we have to keep these as men-only?)

13. annika sorenstam (...see above)

14. julius boros (a lot of people think nicklaus's win at 46 was the oldest age to win a major, but boros has that honor, winning the PGA at 48)

15. gene sarazen (mr albatross, not to mention he invented the modern sand wedge)


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

I'm tellin' ya, guys. You're all forgetting Billy Casper. Just me and my man uttexas have him on our lists.

Haterz gonna hate! ;-)



i didn't forget him.  :D  one of the best putters ever, i think.


Posted


Originally Posted by mirv

well, this is based mostly on personal preference, though of course some of these guys are obviously top of the pile... (not necessarily in any order, just a general "top 15"):

1. jack nicklaus

2. ben hogan

3. sam snead

4. byron nelson

5. lee trevino

6. tiger woods

7. arnold palmer

8. billy casper

9. rory mcilroy (i know, a bit soon, but i really think that kid's the future)

10. fred couples (that swing may not have won many majors, but it sure is beautiful)

11. bobby jones

12. lorena ochoa (do we have to keep these as men-only?)

13. annika sorenstam (...see above)

14. julius boros (a lot of people think nicklaus's win at 46 was the oldest age to win a major, but boros has that honor, winning the PGA at 48)

15. gene sarazen (mr albatross, not to mention he invented the modern sand wedge)


Respectfully, I must say that this list seems almost as bad as the video.  I also find it hard to believe it's in no particular order, since Jack is on top.  It definitely looks like you have McIlroy in the top 10 and Woods not in the top 5.  And Couples?  Based on his swing?

Brandon

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

well, nicklaus of course springs to mind right off the bat since he still stands as the best ever, as far as major victories go.  the rest were simply as i thought of them.  and couples fell into the "personal preference" category.  i love watching fred and totally envy his tempo and swing.  he can hit the ball a mile, he seems like a pretty down to earth nice guy, so he's in my personal top 15 favorite golfers, yes.


Posted

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5242 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.