Jump to content
IGNORED

Rory Mcilroy: More Talent than Tiger?


Note: This thread is 4809 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts


Originally Posted by turtleback

The lengths people will go to in order to minimize Tiger's accomplishments.  So when Jack played he had more great players he had to beat, and then Tiger only had a few great players who could challenge him and now that Tiger has been down for a couple of years there are more great players.  So before and after Tiger's dominance there were more great players but during Tiger's dominance there was magically a dearth of great players to compete with him..  Uh huh.

Sheesh!!  Doesn't it ever occur to you that it was precisely Tiger's UNPRECEDENTED dominance that accounts for this?


I am a Tiger fan. Massive Tiger fan. I wrote something after that but it sounded crap so I deleted it. Anyway, Tiger played perhaps the greatest that anyone has ever played the game in that period(other than maybe driving accuracy). To be honest I think Rory's swing is way too timing dependent. He hits a lot of bad drives and misses left more often than right. I think Tiger is more talented than Rory, but my point was that I believe the field strength today is stronger than it was 10-15 years ago. There were undoubtedly some of the best players back in 2000 playing, but I think now the ability of the average tour player is much stronger than 15 years ago, and even in Jack's era(only a handful of guys really were a match back then). Therefore my point is, It will be harder for Rory to get 14 majors simply because more guys are challenging for majors than yesteryear.



Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Took a piss  Just let us know when you want to start learning Cockney rhyming slang! ;-)

So you can be a 'piss taker', 'taking the piss' or 'took the piss' :-)

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x




Originally Posted by michaeljames92

I am a Tiger fan. Massive Tiger fan. I wrote something after that but it sounded crap so I deleted it. Anyway, Tiger played perhaps the greatest that anyone has ever played the game in that period(other than maybe driving accuracy). To be honest I think Rory's swing is way too timing dependent. He hits a lot of bad drives and misses left more often than right. I think Tiger is more talented than Rory, but my point was that I believe the field strength today is stronger than it was 10-15 years ago. There were undoubtedly some of the best players back in 2000 playing, but I think now the ability of the average tour player is much stronger than 15 years ago, and even in Jack's era(only a handful of guys really were a match back then). Therefore my point is, It will be harder for Rory to get 14 majors simply because more guys are challenging for majors than yesteryear.

So you can be a 'piss taker', 'taking the piss' or 'took the piss' :-)

I would love to see Tiger from 2000 playing in today's fields.

I still think he would obliterate them.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter




Originally Posted by Kieran123

I still think he would obliterate them.



For sure. Luke, Rory and Co. are great players, but cannot be compared to Tiger in 2000. No golfer dead or alive can imho.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill




Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Took a piss  Just let us know when you want to start learning Cockney rhyming slang! ;-)


Crikey! I am so daft when it comes to this stuff. Perhaps I should gen up a little bit.




Originally Posted by shades9323

Crikey! I am so daft when it comes to this stuff. Perhaps I should gen up a little bit.


By jingoes, ya better rattle ya dags and get on it and you'll be good as gold....home n hosed. Right now your two sammies short of a picnic

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter




Originally Posted by Kieran123

By jingoes, ya better rattle ya dags and get on it and you'll be good as gold....home n hosed. Right now your two sammies short of a picnic



I think your extracting the urine now!




Originally Posted by Kieran123

By jingoes, ya better rattle ya dags and get on it and you'll be good as gold....home n hosed. Right now your two sammies short of a picnic



Well Bob's your uncle! I am booking a flight across the pond for some full immersion training!


This thread is really pissing me off now!

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill




Originally Posted by Kieran123

Quote:

Originally Posted by michaeljames92

I am a Tiger fan. Massive Tiger fan. I wrote something after that but it sounded crap so I deleted it. Anyway, Tiger played perhaps the greatest that anyone has ever played the game in that period(other than maybe driving accuracy). To be honest I think Rory's swing is way too timing dependent. He hits a lot of bad drives and misses left more often than right. I think Tiger is more talented than Rory, but my point was that I believe the field strength today is stronger than it was 10-15 years ago. There were undoubtedly some of the best players back in 2000 playing, but I think now the ability of the average tour player is much stronger than 15 years ago, and even in Jack's era(only a handful of guys really were a match back then). Therefore my point is, It will be harder for Rory to get 14 majors simply because more guys are challenging for majors than yesteryear.

So you can be a 'piss taker', 'taking the piss' or 'took the piss' :-)

I would love to see Tiger from 2000 playing in today's fields.

I still think he would obliterate them.


He very well might, including a hobbled 2011 Tiger of course.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.




Originally Posted by VOX

I think you will find that 85 is higher than 81



I think you'll find Tiger never shot 85 in a major championship.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill




Originally Posted by VOX

1995 US Open at Shinnicock 74-85 WD



He WD on the 5th hole of the second round. You got the 74 correct.

  • Upvote 1

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Wasn't the original context for this was various players' high score tally for a FINAL round in a major?

Originally Posted by VOX

1995 US Open at Shinnicock 74-85 WD






Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Took a piss  Just let us know when you want to start learning Cockney rhyming slang! ;-)

There wasn't a "dearth of great players to compete with him", he was simply miles better than the great players ranked 2-15. They were still great, but compared to Tiger's awesomeness they looked average. In my opinion, Jack was better than the other great players of his era but the difference was not as big as that of Tiger from his rivals.


Yes.  That was exactly the point I was making.  Those who try to elevate Jack vis a vis Tiger on the basis that Jack had tougher competition are delusional.  And Jack himself pretty much implied that in his 1996 autobiography that I have quoted from elsewhere.

I will also add that in all but maybe 2 years (1998 and 2004) in the 1997 through 2008 period Tiger was clearly the best player in the game.  There are not that many individual years during Jack's prime when he was clearly the best player.  He was always in the top 2 or 3, but not clearly #1.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by Kieran123

I would love to see Tiger from 2000 playing in today's fields.

I still think he would obliterate them.


I won't be surprised if that is exactly what we see in 2012.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

In golf talent is always defined as having a pretty swing that goes for miles. For some reason being able to sink 10 foot putts 20% more often than the average PGA pro doesn't count as being talented. But driving 10% farther does. The first will win you more tournaments though.

Originally Posted by boogielicious

The only reason people use "talent" in a comparison is to provoke discussion or cause controversy.  No one ever defines what "Talent" means.  They just state, "so and so is more talented".  We here is every year in every sport.  The Dallas Cowboys have the most talent in the NFL.  Man U is the most talented Football team in Europe.  The Miami Heat with LeBron is the most talented team in the NBA.

What is the measurement?  It is never objectively defined.  We're all just supposed to know what "talent" is.

For golf, is it swing speed, accuracy, putting, short game stats, long game stats, etc.?  It's not defined by the person making the comparison, so it provokes discussion and controversy.

Rory is an excellent golfer at a young age and has won a bunch so far.  Tiger is older, was an excellent golfer at a young age, won a lot and is still winning.

In Massachusetts speak, "they are both Wicked Talented!!"




Anyone who can't see that Rory McIlroy is the most "naturally gifted" player in the last decade is not looking hard enough.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Note: This thread is 4809 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 140 - 2025-02-17 Got to GE pretty early. Few lessons and then a GEARS visit with a guy. Pelvis work, go figure. Put down two mats later with a carpet stay thing, and hit some balls before heading home.
    • If you own a Stack radar…
    • If you own a Stack radar (for now, it's limited to Stack radar only), and want to work on your wedge game… it turns out that wedge distances are 99% correlated to ball speed. So, with a small radar, you can practice your wedge game easily in a gamified way.
    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...