Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Smart Phone GPS Now Not Allowed?


Note: This thread is 4010 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Actually I've been told the GX-4 is not legal regardless of the faceplate.  The fact the device has the ability to measure slope makes it's illegal to use for handicap or tournament use.  If that ruling has changed recently I'm not aware of it.

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

Exactly. In fact, a good example of this is the GX-IV itself: It slope feature can only be enabled with the easily visible yellow faceplate. If the faceplate is not on, the device has been ruled legal. The capability of measuring slope still exists. The capability of accessing it does not. This is exactly the same as a phone that has a compass, level, or anything else of that nature, that does not have a user-interface available to access that info.

Side to Erik: I care about this as little as you do, I'm sure - this is merely an intellectual exercise until/unless there is a definitive, unified, published stance on the issue by the rules bodies.



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by newtogolf

Actually I've been told the GX-4 is not legal regardless of the faceplate.  The fact the device has the ability to measure slope makes it's illegal to use for handicap or tournament use.  If that ruling has changed recently I'm not aware of it.


If true, I stand corrected. I just remember there being a big deal about the yellow faceplate making it legal, but maybe that was just what Leopold *wanted* to happen. :-) At any rate, my (and Zeg's) point still stands: By Erik's reasoning, all GPS devices are illegal since they inherently have a compass and/or altitude measuring capability, even if there is no way to access that info by the user.

Bill


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by zeg

This creates something of a problem. Any GPS-capable device can be used as a compass: it cannot make a static determination of direction, but it's quite common to assume that a moving user is carrying the GPS in the viewing orientation and use their velocity to determine the orientation of the device.

Furthermore, a device with a microphone can often be used as an anemometer by listening to the wind whistle in the mic. It's not very accurate, but quite certainly could be used to approximately measure the wind speed.

And if you're MacGyver you can probably fashion a crude compass from your beer can tab and your 6-iron, but the point is that those devices don't "measure" the wind speed or direction nor do they measure which way they're pointing. The microphone "measures" (records, senses, etc.) audio and the GPS chip measures (calculates, derives, etc.) your location.

So no, I reject that.


Originally Posted by sacm3bill

If true, I stand corrected. I just remember there being a big deal about the yellow faceplate making it legal, but maybe that was just what Leopold *wanted* to happen. :-) At any rate, my (and Zeg's) point still stands: By Erik's reasoning, all GPS devices are illegal since they inherently have a compass and/or altitude measuring capability, even if there is no way to access that info by the user.

You stand corrected then. And the yellow one "enabled" slope. It was the silver one Leupold hoped would be legal.

And in short, GPS doesn't measure direction (nor does a microphone measure wind speed/direction).

I'm out. Fo realz this time. ;) Maybe. Hopefully.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


No it isn't measuring. It is looking up the data. AFAIK it would be legal to have a book that says 6 paces from the big tree is at 100 ft and do similiar stuff at the green. This just automating the process. With a laser range finder you can locate your position very accurately on the course using simple geometry.

Here is something else to think about. Would accessing the internet be a violation of 8-1 Advice if you receive any prohibited information? Sure sounds like it to me.

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

Hmm, I still disagree. By measuring location you are measuring altitude, given you have a database that associates one with the other. (And allowed GPS apps don't give you the altitude measurement.)

In contrast, you are not measuring weather at your location by accessing data that was measured somewhere else.




Posted



Originally Posted by zeg

This creates something of a problem. Any GPS-capable device can be used as a compass: it cannot make a static determination of direction, but it's quite common to assume that a moving user is carrying the GPS in the viewing orientation and use their velocity to determine the orientation of the device.

Furthermore, a device with a microphone can often be used as an anemometer by listening to the wind whistle in the mic. It's not very accurate, but quite certainly could be used to approximately measure the wind speed.

It's probably possible to measure the temperature at least crudely using some of these devices as well, even if there's not a specifically-designed thermometer component in the hardware.

So if you really want to get down to that level, it'd be hard to say that any PDA or smart phone could possibly be legal. The hardware in any of them is capable of making illegal measurements. If that's their intent, there are easier ways to accomplish that. It seems much more likely to me that "features" is being offered as an alternative description of an "application" in that phrase. I.e., a user-accessible mode that actually makes the measurement and displays the result. A piece of hardware without software support installed doesn't strike me as matching the sense of "feature" in that sentence.


Now wait a minute.  I think you are correct that any GPS device can be used as a compass.  Well what technology do the standalone rangefinders use?  GPS technology.  Which intrinsically contains the hardware to be used as a compass.  And since hardware can be a feature, I think you have just outlawed the standalone rangefinders, since they have the hardware
that can be used as a compass.

I also wonder about those lasers with the slope feature.  When you buy one that doesn't have that feature did the company really redesign the unit altogether?  Or did they disable the hardware so there is no way to  turn on the slope feature.  And of the latter, then the hardware is still there. And since hardware is a feature they would also have to be outlawed.

But let's talk about the compass feature.  Is there actually a measurement of the magnetic pole?  Or is the direction inferred from GPS signals, i.e.looked up.  Because I am pretty sure that it is legal to carry a map of the course with you and to, before the round, draw a little arrow pointing North.  From that you can tell directions pretty accurately from point on the course.  So how is knowing which way is North, or that the direction from the ball location to the green is SouthWest prohibited information in the first place?

One thing in all of this is clear.  The ruling bodies in golf are maintaining their perfect record of doing a terrible job in adjusting to new technologies.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

And if you're MacGyver you can probably fashion a crude compass from your beer can tab and your 6-iron, but the point is that those devices don't "measure" the wind speed or direction nor do they measure which way they're pointing. The microphone "measures" (records, senses, etc.) audio and the GPS chip measures (calculates, derives, etc.) your location.

So no, I reject that.


Don't be dismissive---this isn't remotely absurd. A friend of mine deployed a weather station on Mt. Everest that was built on a microphone wind sensor. The microphone is more of a measurement of wind than a network-based weather app is a "measurement" of weather. Even a spinner anemometer doesn't measure wind, it measures the speed of a rotating vane (and, actually, it only counts ticks when a blade breaks an optical signal path).

For that matter, a GPS receiver doesn't even measure position, it measures relative time delays between satellites. Converting microphone noise into an estimate of wind speed is far more direct than the GPS location calculation (trust me on this one, my first job was GPS receiver development).


Originally Posted by turtleback

Now wait a minute.  I think you are correct that any GPS device can be used as a compass.  Well what technology do the standalone rangefinders use?  GPS technology.  Which intrinsically contains the hardware to be used as a compass.  And since hardware can be a feature, I think you have just outlawed the standalone rangefinders, since they have the hardware

that can be used as a compass.

True, and essentially all do this either with a magnetic compass or with the velocity-inferred method. However, the rule as written only applies the ambiguous language to smartphone or PDAs. Stand-alone distance-measuring-devices don't seem to be subject to the same abstract restriction (assuming that, in fact, the smartphones are). While it'd be possible to "root" your GPS and install firmware that could enable a readout of compass heading, at that point I"m going to agree with Erik's "MacGuyver" characterization.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted


Originally Posted by Rulesman

This from the Equipment Standards Dept of the R&A; following an enquiry some time ago by a national rules official colleague from elsewhere in Europe.

I refer to your email below, which has been under consideration and I regret the delayed response.

Please be advised that we are in agreement with the position you have taken – i.e. reference to a general weather forecast would be permissible, but the measurement of actual conditions such as wind or temperature would not be permitted.

Pay attention to the words I bolded. A weather forecast is a prediction calculated by meteorologist. Measured wind speed and direction is no forecast, it is actual and accurate data. Getting this kind of data is not allowed even though a player is not measuring it himself. Any other interpretation would be beyond imagination. It would just be circumventing a Rule if it was allowed.

Again, the basic principle is that a player is entitled to all data that existed before his round commenced.


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by zeg

Don't be dismissive---this isn't remotely absurd.

Compasses measure magnetic fields.

Anemometers and vanes measure wind speed and direction.

But okay, let's ban all smart phones because they have microphones and can "measure" wind speed. It's fine by me, but good luck to you with that one.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Quote:

True, and essentially all do this either with a magnetic compass or with the velocity-inferred method. However, the rule as written only applies the ambiguous language to smartphone or PDAs. Stand-alone distance-measuring-devices don't seem to be subject to the same abstract restriction (assuming that, in fact, the smartphones are). While it'd be possible to "root" your GPS and install firmware that could enable a readout of compass heading, at that point I"m going to agree with Erik's "MacGuyver" characterization.



That is interesting because I was also (seriously) thinking my standalone GPS might be in violation.  I have one that can also function as a traffic GPS and a media player.  Which means I can put a golf instruction video on it.  In fact I HAVE golf instruction videos on it.  Now I would never access them during a round, but would their mere existence make the device non-conforming?  But if the ruling only applies to smartphones and PDAs then am I safe?

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by turtleback

That is interesting because I was also (seriously) thinking my standalone GPS might be in violation.  I have one that can also function as a traffic GPS and a media player.  Which means I can put a golf instruction video on it.  In fact I HAVE golf instruction videos on it.  Now I would never access them during a round, but would their mere existence make the device non-conforming?  But if the ruling only applies to smartphones and PDAs then am I safe?


You can carry an instruction book around with you on the golf course. Or notes from your coach. Or pictures with notes on them showing you something about your golf swing.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

You can carry an instruction book around with you on the golf course. Or notes from your coach. Or pictures with notes on them showing you something about your golf swing.



Precisely, provided they were created before the round commenced. Any note from your coach (or anyone else except your partner or caddie) during your round or comment of your swing on that round would be a breach of R 8-1.

And here's the whole point. Any data created during your round is a no-no for you to use if it fulfills the definition of Advice. The nature of application is irrelevant.


Posted

Just a couple of quick notes on the compass discussion.  Any GPS can be used as a general compass so long as you are moving.  Older GPS systems (if anyone hunts, think of the older Garmin Rino GPS/Radios) calculate the output for a digital compass in this way, which is why you have to be moving for them to give you an accurate reading.  I used one this past November during a hunting trip and have to say it was kind of a PITA to deal with.  However, newer systems (and this includes the iPhones 3GS and later) have chips in them that enable them to output compass information while standing still.  I don't know the specifics of how they work, but I believe it has something to do with measuring RF signal strength when compared to information from the accelerometers within the phone that help it determine where it is on the X and Y axis.  Here's a link to some of the more technical stuff:

http://www.quora.com/iPhone/How-does-the-compass-on-the-iPhone-work


  • Administrator
Posted

Yes, the compass on the iPhone isn't using the GPS. It's using magnetic fields, not timing information from satellites.

Originally Posted by jwrussell

Just a couple of quick notes on the compass discussion.  Any GPS can be used as a general compass so long as you are moving.  Older GPS systems (if anyone hunts, think of the older Garmin Rino GPS/Radios) calculate the output for a digital compass in this way, which is why you have to be moving for them to give you an accurate reading.  I used one this past November during a hunting trip and have to say it was kind of a PITA to deal with.  However, newer systems (and this includes the iPhones 3GS and later) have chips in them that enable them to output compass information while standing still.  I don't know the specifics of how they work, but I believe it has something to do with measuring RF signal strength when compared to information from the accelerometers within the phone that help it determine where it is on the X and Y axis.  Here's a link to some of the more technical stuff:

http://www.quora.com/iPhone/How-does-the-compass-on-the-iPhone-work



Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

You can carry an instruction book around with you on the golf course. Or notes from your coach. Or pictures with notes on them showing you something about your golf swing.


Thanks, I hadn't realized that.

I also have Tour Tempo* audio files on it that I use when practicing.  Would that cause me a problem?  I am pretty sure it would be a violation for me to listen to them while playing.  So is it a violation for them to even be on the device when I am playing even if I don't listen to them?

* in case you aren't familiar with this it is tones that you use to modify the tempo of your swing to certain supposedly optimum tempos.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Rulesman

1) Correct

2) No, unless the device has a DMD and you use it.



Well, that is the point, it is a standalone GPS rangefinder that is also a media player.  But it is not a smartphone or PDA.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

1) Not totally correct - according to the rule you could listen while walking or driving in between holes.  The purpose of the rule is to prevent a golfer from using the audio device and headphones to block out external noise or for timing purposes while playing.

2) Doesn't matter if the device has a DMD on it.  Nothing in the rule states what content can or cannot be loaded on the device it has to do with "prolonged" listening during a round.  Listening to Tour Tempo throughout the round and while you're actually swinging would be a violation of the rule.  Listening to it while driving to your next hole is legal based on my understanding.

Originally Posted by Rulesman

1) Correct. See http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Decision-14/#14-3/17

2) No, unless the device has a DMD and you use it.



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4010 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.