Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Myth of Maintaining Your Address Flex in the Rear Knee


Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

An instructor Dave, Erik James and I know and like, Brendan Kennedy gave a lesson to a neuro-surgeon yesterday. This is what he told Brendan regarding wear and tear on the spine...."the spine is made to bend, flex, and extend...the most stress placed on the discs/vertebrae occurs when rotation is combined with flexion...straightening the trail leg and extending the spine help to increase range of motion and relieve stress on the segments"

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

On The Golf Fix, Michael Breed was addressing rear leg flex.  He pointed to Yani Tseng, who maintains a lot of flex in her trail leg and said he prefers maintaining back knee flex.  Then on his practice swings, it was apparent that he did not maintain knee flex and then went into a drill to keep the rear leg flexed.  But without the training aid, a box, it was clear that he does not maintain his own knee flex.


  • Moderator
Posted


Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

On The Golf Fix, Michael Breed was addressing rear leg flex.  He pointed to Yani Tseng, who maintains a lot of flex in her trail leg and said he prefers maintaining back knee flex.  Then on his practice swings, it was apparent that he did not maintain knee flex and then went into a drill to keep the rear leg flexed.  But without the training aid, a box, it was clear that he does not maintain his own knee flex.

Thanks for sharing.  She's got a great swing btw, most women should try and copy what she does.

Back to what you said.  Try to make a full turn keeping the right knee flexed in it's address position.  You can't, maybe turn the hips 25-30*?

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by mvmac

Thanks for sharing.  She's got a great swing btw, most women should try and copy what she does.

Back to what you said.  Try to make a full turn keeping the right knee flexed in it's address position.  You can't, maybe turn the hips 25-30*?



In his example, he said in order to turn the hips while keeping the rear leg flexed, you must rotate the knee.  I tried what he was talking about, and it felt completely unrealistic to try, and would seem to induce stress on the rear knee on the backswing.

As soon as the box wasn't behind his trail leg, you can clearly see that he straightens his rear leg on his backswing.  So what he thinks he's doing and teaching is not what he's actually doing.


  • 4 months later...
Posted

You've just been waiting to show off those shoes!

Originally Posted by mvmac

Here's a good pic

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Originally posted by mvmac:

Elk definitely has a swing we all should emulate. Sweetest swinger in the game. Plus great style.


  • 2 months later...
Posted

mvmac,

Great pic showing the lose of flexion in the backswing. I notice Elk has his right foot square to the target line, while his left foot is flared open quite significantly. Is this something that you would recommend? Would you have a player flare both feet out if they were having trouble turning? I would love to hear your thoughts on these set-up differences. Thanks.

Driver - Titleist 913D2 10.5* 3 Wood - Tour Edge Exotics XCG 3 15* Hybrid - Ping G20 20* Hybrid - Ping G20 23* Irons - Ping i20 5-PW KBS Tour Wedges - Titleist Vokey SM4 50* 54* 58* Putter - Tom Slighter Snubnose


  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by Jhwarren

mvmac,

Great pic showing the lose of flexion in the backswing. I notice Elk has his right foot square to the target line, while his left foot is flared open quite significantly. Is this something that you would recommend? Would you have a player flare both feet out if they were having trouble turning? I would love to hear your thoughts on these set-up differences. Thanks.

Elk does have right foot flare, about 15 degrees.  I would absolutely recommend flaring both feet, max 25 degrees in the right foot, max 35 degrees in the left foot.  Yes it will help the hips and shoulder turn and help get the weight forward on the downswing because it gives the left knee room to flex forward.

Elk and Arnold Palmer

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hey mvmac,

I was hoping that you could help me something regarding the flexion in the rear knee. I am helping a buddy of mine to get a little better at this great game. He is very athletic and has made tremendous progress. My question is that he has this big dip during his backswing. I have attached a picture to better illustrate what I am talking about. He maintains a large amount of flexion in his rear knee. Could this big dip be caused by maintaining the flexion or do I need to look elsewhere?

Driver - Titleist 913D2 10.5* 3 Wood - Tour Edge Exotics XCG 3 15* Hybrid - Ping G20 20* Hybrid - Ping G20 23* Irons - Ping i20 5-PW KBS Tour Wedges - Titleist Vokey SM4 50* 54* 58* Putter - Tom Slighter Snubnose


  • Administrator
Posted

In addition to that, he's very rigid at setup too. Look for the "setup" thread in this section of the forum as well, JH.

(In other words, the change in his head height is a product of two things: 1) yes, it goes down a bit because of his trail knee, but 2) it starts too high with too rigid a setup, too flat a back, etc.)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Hmm. Did someone drug me, dress me in new clothes and make me hit balls at some range I've never seen before? :-\ That swing looked suspiciously similar to mine. Flat back, check. Back knee flex, check. Head drop, check.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

In addition to that, he's very rigid at setup too. Look for the "setup" thread in this section of the forum as well, JH.

(In other words, the change in his head height is a product of two things: 1) yes, it goes down a bit because of his trail knee, but 2) it starts too high with too rigid a setup, too flat a back, etc.)

Awesome. Thanks for the response iacas. Great advice, as always.

Originally Posted by Zeph

Hmm. Did someone drug me, dress me in new clothes and make me hit balls at some range I've never seen before?

That swing looked suspiciously similar to mine. Flat back, check. Back knee flex, check. Head drop, check.

Hahahahahaha. That would be quite an expensive endeavor to transport you from Norway to Washington DC.

Driver - Titleist 913D2 10.5* 3 Wood - Tour Edge Exotics XCG 3 15* Hybrid - Ping G20 20* Hybrid - Ping G20 23* Irons - Ping i20 5-PW KBS Tour Wedges - Titleist Vokey SM4 50* 54* 58* Putter - Tom Slighter Snubnose


  • 2 months later...
Posted
Watching some LPGA this morning while waiting for the real golf to start ;-) and I noticed that what seems to be the vast majority of the ladies maintain a ton of flexion in their trail leg. Is this a contributing factor in their general lack of distance?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

Watching some LPGA this morning while waiting for the real golf to start and I noticed that what seems to be the vast majority of the ladies maintain a ton of flexion in their trail leg. Is this a contributing factor in their general lack of distance?

A small part of it is that, but the vast majority of them just spin their hips out and add side-tilt on the downswing. That's a bigger reason why they don't hit it as far as they could. See Paula Creamer and Natalie Gulbis for good examples of that. Mostly though, I think a lot of those girls are just really, really flexible. Yani keeps more flex in the back knee than anyone I can think of. But she still smashes it. She has a different downswing move than Creamer and Gulbis though.

I'm definitely not saying to not lose some back knee flex on the backswing though  because a few people can do it Honestly, Yani might end up playing better if Gary Gilchrist let her straighten her back knee more on the backswing, but who really knows.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by JetFan1983

A small part of it is that, but the vast majority of them just spin their hips out and add side-tilt on the downswing. That's a bigger reason why they don't hit it as far as they could. See Paula Creamer and Natalie Gulbis for good examples of that. Mostly though, I think a lot of those girls are just really, really flexible. Yani keeps more flex in the back knee than anyone I can think of. But she still smashes it. She has a different downswing move than Creamer and Gulbis though.

The right knee decreasing in flex would help some players to keep the arms from lifting on the back swing and maybe keep the head more steady.  Your standard LPGA swing is to keep the right knee flexed, shift the head right, spin the hips on the down swing with the long followthrough with the right shoulder forward.  Yep, Yani does the downswing differently than most and reason she smashes it, like you said JF, doesn't just spin out of it and hang back to create axis tilt.

Good comparison pics, Michelle Wie was longer when she was 14 and playing with Ernie Els.  Look at the spin move and where the weight is compared to Yani.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 610 - 2026-06-03 Got some work in between lessons today. Rare late day, teaching until 7:30pm.
    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.