Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Masters: Whose Shot was Better from the Pine Straw? Bubba or Phil


Note: This thread is 4972 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Who's Masters Shot was Better from the Pine Straw?

    • Phil 4th Round 13th Hole, 2nd Shot, 2010 Masters
      31
    • Bubba 2nd Playoff Hole, 10th Hole, 2nd Shot, 2012 Masters
      62


Recommended Posts

Posted


Originally Posted by jamo

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Tiger fanboys sticking up for Phil? Has the world gone mad?

Phil two putted after his shot and made a birdie. Bubba two putted and made a par. Worst case scenario Bubba doesn't hit the green and has a chance to get up and down for par. Miss the par putt and the playoff goes an extra hole. Bubba had nothing to lose and he hits shots like that routinely every round, but like Phil he hit it during an exciting and significant moment, just maybe slightly more exciting and significant due to the playoff.

Bubba had something to lose. It was far from a forgone conclusion that Louis was going to hit so (relatively) poor of a chip.



Worst case Bubba's left with the same up and down attempt as Louis. Bubba's been pushing the course boundaries since forever (according to Tiger who used to routinely play practice rounds with Bubba) and Phil has a long list of great shots on his resume. They're great shotmakers. Personally I think his pitch on that par 5 (#15 or 13?) on Saturday was more gutsy.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

Worst case Bubba's left with the same up and down attempt as Louis. Bubba's been pushing the course boundaries since forever (according to Tiger who used to routinely play practice rounds with Bubba) and Phil has a long list of great shots on his resume. They're great shotmakers. Personally I think his pitch on that par 5 (#15 or 13?) on Saturday was more gutsy.



Bubba was in the woods. Worst case he hits a tree & the ball caroms deeper into the woods & he loses The Masters.


Posted


Originally Posted by zipazoid

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Worst case Bubba's left with the same up and down attempt as Louis. Bubba's been pushing the course boundaries since forever (according to Tiger who used to routinely play practice rounds with Bubba) and Phil has a long list of great shots on his resume. They're great shotmakers. Personally I think his pitch on that par 5 (#15 or 13?) on Saturday was more gutsy.

Bubba was in the woods. Worst case he hits a tree & the ball caroms deeper into the woods & he loses The Masters.



Pretty sure you know what I mean. Phil was close enough to larger trees that worst case he hits the ball directly off the trunk so it bounces back off both him and his equipment. Or maybe it hits him right in the eye while he breaks an iron shaft which then pierces his jugular. OMG - Phil might have pulled off the riskiest maneuver in the history of sporting events.

Since we're picking nits, your signature is wrong. Clearly not every hole ends with a putt.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

Pretty sure you know what I mean. Phil was close enough to larger trees that worst case he hits the ball directly off the trunk so it bounces back off both him and his equipment. Or maybe it hits him right in the eye while he breaks an iron shaft which then pierces his jugular. OMG - Phil might have pulled off the riskiest maneuver in the history of sporting events.

Since we're picking nits, your signature is wrong. Clearly not every hole ends with a putt.



Enough of them do to warrant practicing short putts consistently. But since you want to go there, I'll change it to be technically correct.

I don't see it as a nit-pick. Phil had two trees in front of him with a pretty large gap - the odds of hitting one of them were slim....he even said as much. Bubba was in the woods. Big difference.


Posted


Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

OK, we get your point. You think Bubba's shot was better. Now stop trying to force YOUR opinion on others. We don't give a frog's fat arse what you think.

Sure you don't need to go and have  alie down? You still seem a little upset that some here doubt your ability to walk onto Augusta and comfortably shoot a score better than 10% of the Masters field.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted


Originally Posted by zipazoid

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Pretty sure you know what I mean. Phil was close enough to larger trees that worst case he hits the ball directly off the trunk so it bounces back off both him and his equipment. Or maybe it hits him right in the eye while he breaks an iron shaft which then pierces his jugular. OMG - Phil might have pulled off the riskiest maneuver in the history of sporting events.

Since we're picking nits, your signature is wrong. Clearly not every hole ends with a putt.

Enough of them do to warrant practicing short putts consistently. But since you want to go there, I'll change it to be technically correct.

I don't see it as a nit-pick. Phil had two trees in front of him with a pretty large gap - the odds of hitting one of them were slim....he even said as much. Bubba was in the woods. Big difference.



They were both in the woods and from the video on page one it looks to me like Bubba's margin of error is very similar to Phil's. To me there is not a big difference.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Never mind who hit the better shot , the real question we should be asking is how did Bubba's wild drive into deep woods end up in such a lovely lie ?  Bear in mind those first on the scene were " patrons " almost certainly 100% wanting a US win and no cameras or officials at that point. The Yanks will do anything to get the right result and I remain deeply suspicious.

Never mind who shot JFK - who helped Bubba ?


Posted


Originally Posted by shalor

Never mind who hit the better shot , the real question we should be asking is how did Bubba's wild drive into deep woods end up in such a lovely lie ?  Bear in mind those first on the scene were " patrons " almost certainly 100% wanting a US win and no cameras or officials at that point. The Yanks will do anything to get the right result and I remain deeply suspicious.

Never mind who shot JFK - who helped Bubba ?


Huh? A lovely lie? It was on hardpan where the patrons walk, so it wasn't gonna be on the pine straw there anyways.

Oh boy, trying to start conspiracy theories in a golf tournament. Inredible what some people will think.

btw, you an Oostie fan?

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha 10.5* 

3WD:  Callaway Big Bertha 15* / X2 Hot H4 Hybrid
Irons:  Callaway Apex 4-PW Project X 5.5 shafts

Wedges: Callaway MackDaddy 2  52/58
Putter: Odyessey Metal X Milled 1


Posted

It was a lovely lie compared to what was all around which was simply unplayable. I believe Peter Alliss voiced some scepticism. I am not so much a Ooosthuizen fan as a fan of fair play , more than can be said for many of our American friends - remember the war on the shore and the treatment Monty used to get.


Posted

Gotta go with the Bubba.

And, my friend heard from a friend's neighbor's brother-in-law that his sister knew the dude who lives next to the guy who teed Bubba's ball up for him on the hardpan so an American could win. All he would say is that the guy worked for the government.

Just sayin'.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

They were both in the woods and from the video on page one it looks to me like Bubba's margin of error is very similar to Phil's. To me there is not a big difference.


You from the city or something? Two trees does not constitute woods.


Posted


Originally Posted by zipazoid

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

They were both in the woods and from the video on page one it looks to me like Bubba's margin of error is very similar to Phil's. To me there is not a big difference.

You from the city or something? Two trees does not constitute woods.


I'm a lifelong hacker and would never call having a clean lie and unobstructed swing being in the woods, so perhaps I actually thing neither player was "in the woods". One guy was stymied and one had tree trouble on his followthrough. Maybe they were both equally routine and mundane or awesome and exciting shots depending on who you pull for.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by mchepp

Absolutely agree. Forget trees on Phil's shot, just consider the distance and that he had to clear the ravine. Bubba's was with a 52 degree wedge. Yes it had to hook but that seems to be Bubba's specialty.

Since when was Rae's Creek a "ravine"?

Phil's shot was a stock six iron. No obstructions. A clear shot.

Very dramatic and a great shot, but....

P.S to a mod - Can we please change the "who's" to "whose" in the thread title?


  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

This is Rae's Creek.

_44544091_raescreek416x300.jpg

This is a ravine.

420px-3GrandeRavineGregoryViel.jpg

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted


Originally Posted by camper6

Bubba's shot was to win the Masters.

That trumps any other shot.

It wasn't to win the Masters. If Louie gets up and down they go to another hole. Remember, Bubba 2 putted for par and Oosthuizen bogied.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

They both sounded quite pounded.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Note: This thread is 4972 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.