Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4943 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Watching the tour players hit, it's almost like they appear to shank their shots because they come off the face so far left of right. Of course they're hitting that shot purposefully and I've wondered why. Is it to account for wind? Have a better roll up on the green, accounting for the slopes of the green, to get an easier putt? It's clear when they're shaping for a dogleg, or tree, or because they're in a tough situation trying to get out. But when they have a clear and direct shot to the pin, why do they shape the shot so often? What's the core benefit?

Driver: TaylorMade SuperFast 2.0 -- 10.5* Woods: TaylorMade SuperFast 2.0 -- 3w 15*, 5w 18* Hybrid: TaylorMade Burner SuperFast 2.0 Rescue -- 4h 21* Irons: TaylorMade Burner Plus -- 5-AW Wedges: TaylorMade RAC -- 56.12, 60.07 Putter: TaylorMade Spider Ghost -- 35" Ball: It's complicated.


Posted
I'm pretty sure that's just the camera angle.
  • Upvote 1

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's a push draw, plus the fact that the camera is rarely squared up, and their feet aren't always lined straight up with the target.

A push draw is a good shape power wise, since it requires an in to out swing. Most pros will use that as their stock shot because hitting it dead straight invites 2 misses, where having one miss helps them strategize around it.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

the camera angle often plays an important role in how far a ball looks pushed/pulled. from right behind the player, the balls aren't swooping as much as the cameras make them out to be:

edit: protracer/shot tracker also confirm this.


Posted
Some players hit big curves, but what you see on TV is just a result of the camera angle. You see perhaps a 3-4 in front of the player. Even with a ball starting 10º right of the alignment, we are talking a bout a difference of a foot.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Definitely just the camera distorting it.  If you watch when they put those "tracer" shots up, a vast majority of the time (Bubba excluded) most pros draws and fades are pretty darn subtle.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes I agree.

But does anyone know why exactly how the camera does this? Is there any explination of how the camera works? I always wondered....

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha 10.5* 

3WD:  Callaway Big Bertha 15* / X2 Hot H4 Hybrid
Irons:  Callaway Apex 4-PW Project X 5.5 shafts

Wedges: Callaway MackDaddy 2  52/58
Putter: Odyessey Metal X Milled 1


Posted

When I first started watching golf like 15 years ago I always thought they shanked every shot, it sure looks like it.

Going to a tournament and watching them hit in person is awesome and you really get to see their ball flight.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
Originally Posted by Motley01

Yes I agree.

But does anyone know why exactly how the camera does this? Is there any explination of how the camera works? I always wondered....

I'm going to venture a guess that it's either a depth of field thing, or maybe something to do with the shape of the lens, or a combination of both.  The camera is pretty close to the players and the ball is traveling over 100 miles an hour away from the camera, if its not a dead straight low tiger stinger its going off the edge of that 2D screen pretty darn quick.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Players don't like cameras directly behind them.  The camera positioned behind them and to the side make the ball appear to jump right.  Occasionally a player will set up on a side of the tee box where the camera is directly behind them and you get to see the true flight of the ball on tv.  Cool when it happens.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Perhaps it's because, even though the camera shot is somewhat to the side, the mind interprets the data AS IF the shot was from directly behind the player - usually there isn't much visual information along the early flight path to allow for proper interpretation.  Ergo, the apparent track of the ball is to the right (a push) - because this would indeed be the case if the shot had in fact been from directly behind.

Anyone buying that?

At any rate I agree about the illusion, it's very common.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted
Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

It's a push draw, plus the fact that the camera is rarely squared up, and their feet aren't always lined straight up with the target.

A push draw is a good shape power wise, since it requires an in to out swing. Most pros will use that as their stock shot because hitting it dead straight invites 2 misses, where having one miss helps them strategize around it.

This is the correct reasoning.  Push draws also create topspin causing a nice bounce after the ball hits the ground.


Posted
Originally Posted by Matthew Astel

This is the correct reasoning.  Push draws also create topspin causing a nice bounce after the ball hits the ground.

This is a common misconception: topspin would cause negative lift, causing the ball to plummet into the ladie's tee. It's impossible to actually create topspin with a normal club, either a putter off a tee with a very positive AoA or a skulled driver is the only way to add topspin, unless you're playing a video game. Believe me it's not a desirable shot.

A draw is considered longer because swinging on an in to out swing path is the best, most efficient means of generating power. Look at a field goal kicker in football or a backhand throw in frisbee and you see them turn their hips and torsos and whip their arms (or kicking leg) out with extension. A fade, on the other hand, can't utilize all that power efficiently because you need to route the club back towards yourself after going off plane.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

This is a common misconception: topspin would cause negative lift, causing the ball to plummet into the ladie's tee.

Have you noticed the current titleist commercial that shows this?  There is a ball coming right at you in slow motion that a guy just hit of the tee and it looks like a beautiful ball flight except its got forward spin.  Cracks me up every time.

EDIT:  Draws tend to roll further than fades because they have less backspin due to less loft on the club at impact.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

EDIT:  Draws tend to roll further than fades because they have less backspin due to less loft on the club at impact.

Eh. A push-draw would be hit with more loft than a pull-fade.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Eh. A push-draw would be hit with more loft than a pull-fade.

Oh.  I was not aware of that. (um, obviously.)  I guess that's what I get for trying to talk out of my behind.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The "draw goes farther than fade, but fade lands softer" thing probably stems from people hitting pull-draws and push-fades. Hit with the same conditions, a fade flies just as far as a draw and a draw lands just as soft (or flies just as high). The ball doesn't care which angle the axis of rotation is, it only knows the laws of physics.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I still struggle with this optical illusion. It's hard to gauge the line of a shot from the initial angle because so often it looks like it's headed way out into right field, only to later hear / see that they hit a pull draw or something.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Note: This thread is 4943 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.