Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4889 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Higgs Boson is the secret ingredient in the manufacture of Zolex. You heard it here first.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by zeg

That's the problem. It has nothing whatsoever to do with that, it's just the last integral piece of the Standard Model of particle physics to be observed. The "God Particle" nonsense is pure, unadulterated silliness.

It's an important particle, because according to the theory, interactions with it are what give mass to the other particles. It was hard to find because the theory had an unconstrained parameter: the mass of the Higgs. We've known for a long time it had to be massive, since otherwise it would have been found long ago, but until recently there wasn't really any particularly useful upper bound on that mass. It was not a forgone conclusion that even the LHC would find it.

Without the Higgs, we'd have a significant hole in our understanding of particle physics. This would be a big problem because the Standard Model is ridiculously accurate. It has made predictions that agree with later measurements to something absurd like 15 digits of precision. It's so good that it'd be crazy (but possible) for this part to be wrong. In some ways, it'd have been more exciting if it hadn't been found, because there'd be an obvious mystery to attack.

It's still premature to say that this mystery is solved, however. The results announced this week tell us that a new particle has been found, and it behaves as the Higgs boson is expected to behave in a few situations. There are other properties of the particle that need to be examined to see if it has all the expected properties that the Higgs boson should have: it's still a serious possibility that the theory was only approximately correct, and the new particle is not exactly a Higgs boson.

What you may notice from the above is that none of it has anything to do with whether God exists. The only thing that any of this would tell us about God is that, if he exists, he's very organized in his approach to the Universe, and maybe a bit of a math nerd. Even that's a reach, though, because maybe He just likes toying with us.

Thanks for that. So, the LHC was literally purposefully built for the Higgs? I also read that but thought it was probably incorrect. Surely they built it because it is expected to be used for other research purposes.

Another thing - and I could find out for myself, but maybe you have the answer readily available: does the Higgs actually have mass? I would've thought otherwise.

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

God will never be proven to exist by science.

Never say never, but yeah, that's not the foundation for the belief in His existence.


Posted
Originally Posted by Stretch

The Higgs Boson is the secret ingredient in the manufacture of Zolex. You heard it here first.

It's what's been missing from all the cheap Kool-aid rip-offs.


  • Moderator
Posted
Quote:
God will never be proven to exist by science.

Agreed.  Read the book, Contact by Carl Sagan.  He gives a very cool explanation why.  It was not in the movie.

With each discovery, like the Higgs Boson, will come new questions and new mysteries.  That is what is wonderful about science.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

God will never be proven to exist by science.


Of course not. You can't prove a fairy tale.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

Of course not. You can't prove a fairy tale.


Not how I meant it but I understand your position.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I find it amusing the Higgs  Boson particle thread was located directly above the Tom Cruise Scientology thread.

The Higgs discovery is VERY KOOL. But to be labelled the "God Particle" is a bit premature. The String Theory implies multiple dimensions. Now that's HUGELY KOOL. Perhaps God is hiding out in one of those dimension's ala Marvel's Gambit hero.

9* Geek No Brainer with red Stiff Gallofory shaft
15* R5 3 wood with Burner shaft
21* 24* Nike CPR hybrid Aldila by you shaft
5-pw Titleist 680 cb irons-SK Fiber graphite shafts
52*, 56*,60* Reid Lockhart Dual Bounce spinner shaftScotty Cameron Newport MidSlant with Tiger Shark GripTM LDP Red balls---used because I'm...


Posted

The original God Particle Theory states that all that is......is god.

That makes us all particles of god arguing whether or not we exist.....in multiple universes....at the same time.....taking both sides of the argument.

  • Upvote 2

"Quick Dorthy....the oil can!"


Posted
Originally Posted by The Tin Man

The original God Particle Theory states that all that is......is god.

That makes us all particles of god arguing whether or not we exist.....in multiple universes....at the same time.....taking both sides of the argument.

Ditto

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by The Tin Man

The original God Particle Theory states that all that is......is god.

That makes us all particles of god arguing whether or not we exist.....in multiple universes....at the same time.....taking both sides of the argument.



I love it .  Quantum Physics has an associated symmetry theory which supposes paired particle types. Matter/antimatter etc. I'm OK with dual multi dimensional philosophical thoughts. Whether its God or No God ....or Pepsi Vs Coke.

Special note.  I can not see a multi dimensional  view of Mountain Dew vs Mellow Yellow......gotta draw the line somewhere.

9* Geek No Brainer with red Stiff Gallofory shaft
15* R5 3 wood with Burner shaft
21* 24* Nike CPR hybrid Aldila by you shaft
5-pw Titleist 680 cb irons-SK Fiber graphite shafts
52*, 56*,60* Reid Lockhart Dual Bounce spinner shaftScotty Cameron Newport MidSlant with Tiger Shark GripTM LDP Red balls---used because I'm...


  • Moderator
Posted

I wonder what the CERN accelerator would do to a Pro V1.... or Tom Cruise.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by The Tin Man

The original God Particle Theory states that all that is......is god.

That makes us all particles of god arguing whether or not we exist.....in multiple universes....at the same time.....taking both sides of the argument.

Perfectly said. Domenic should read this.

dak4n6


Posted
Originally Posted by dak4n6

Perfectly said. Domenic should read this.


I know, right?

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

The best "Higgs Boson for Dummies" article I've read: http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/07/a-higgs-boson-qa/ .

Of course, that said, you still have to know what things like quarks and gluons are, so when I say "for dummies" I'm still excluding a lot of smart people who just don't know much about physics. :-P

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

Thanks for that. So, the LHC was literally purposefully built for the Higgs? I also read that but thought it was probably incorrect. Surely they built it because it is expected to be used for other research purposes.

Another thing - and I could find out for myself, but maybe you have the answer readily available: does the Higgs actually have mass? I would've thought otherwise.

To be founded for such a large international project, the scientific case is often a combinaison of

1/ measuring better what we know exists

2/ we think hypothesis (e.g. the Higgs for the LHC) is true and we can prove or disprove it

3/ We have hypotheses on what else could exist (for the LHC that would be a theory more fundamental that the Standard Model) and we can investigate

And yes, the Higgs bosons has a mass (around 125 times the mass of a proton if what was since is indeed the Higgs).


Posted
The best "Higgs Boson for Dummies" article I've read: [URL=http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/07/a-higgs-boson-qa/]http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/07/a-higgs-boson-qa/[/URL] . Of course, that said, you still have to know what things like quarks and gluons are, so when I say "for dummies" I'm still excluding a lot of smart people who just don't know much about physics. :-P

While being neither "up" nor "down" on this, there is a certain "charm" to it "all", albeit "strange". (I know I am scraping "bottom" on this....)

Titleist 915 9.5 w/GD AD-DI shaft Callaway Big Bertha Alpha 14 degree FW wood Ping Anser hybrid 19 degree Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4-pw or Callaway Apex Titleist Vokey SM5 50, 54, 58, (62) Edel E3 Putter ES14 launch monitor ARCCOS

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4889 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
    • Wordle 1,630 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good job!  I struggled with this for some reason. Wordle 1,630 5/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,630 3/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.