Jump to content
IGNORED

Tiger's sand shot into bunker face


joekelly
Note: This thread is 4286 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

On the final day, 6th hole, Tiger hit a ball into a greenside bunker and the ball lay less than a foot from the steep and terraced face. I was watching and as he played the shot  i saw the ball pop up and come within 6 inches of clearing the face. I really believed he missed getting out by only 3 inches.  I cannot find a replay on UTube. My friend says the ball was no where near the  top of the face, maybe only 2 feet up the 4 foot slope. What did you see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The first shot was not really close to get out, your friend is right. The second shot missed getting out cleanly by a few inches, hit the lip and flew left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It wasn't even close. The ball initially hit the face less than halfway up. It ricocheted reasonable high but it was coming back towards Tiger at that point.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by jamo

It wasn't even close. The ball initially hit the face less than halfway up. It ricocheted reasonable high but it was coming back towards Tiger at that point.

Yep, and he knew it immediately as he danced a jig (appropriate given the event) to get out of the way so it wouldn't hit him.

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5*| Rad Tour 18.5*  | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Zwick

The first shot was not really close to get out, your friend is right. The second shot missed getting out cleanly by a few inches, hit the lip and flew left.

flew right*, but yes, Zwick is about spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by CollegeGolfer

flew right*, but yes, Zwick is about spot on.


Yep. He was 2-3 inches short of having a makeable bogey putt. That's golf.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


And to my understanding he did not expect it to get out anyway on the first try, just to get into better place without declaring unplayable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Graeme McDowel had the exact same shot when he got to that hole (nearly identical!). Graeme was much smarter in the way he played his shot though. He simply turned around and hit his ball into the middle of the bunker giving himself a very makeable sand shot (he missed, but had a tap in left). Of course had Tiger made his first attempt out, it would have been another miracle shot that he has become famous for!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by reedf

Graeme McDowel had the exact same shot when he got to that hole (nearly identical!). Graeme was much smarter in the way he played his shot though. He simply turned around and hit his ball into the middle of the bunker giving himself a very makeable sand shot (he missed, but had a tap in left). Of course had Tiger made his first attempt out, it would have been another miracle shot that he has become famous for!

IIRC, Graeme's first spot in the bunker was more similar to Tiger's second.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by reedf

Graeme McDowel had the exact same shot when he got to that hole (nearly identical!). Graeme was much smarter in the way he played his shot though. He simply turned around and hit his ball into the middle of the bunker giving himself a very makeable sand shot (he missed, but had a tap in left). Of course had Tiger made his first attempt out, it would have been another miracle shot that he has become famous for!


They were not even close to the same shot. Im a huge Gmac fan, but Tiger had the harder shot, by far. Its too bad that one hole killed his chance at winning. Had he par'd that hole, it would have been a much different sunday I think.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How about the stance Tiger had for his second bunker shot!  I've seen some weird stances from those deep European bunkers but that was unreal.  Too bad he made triple.

What's in my Micro Lite Bag:

Driver: RocketBallz Tour 9
3 Wood: V Steel 15 degree
3-PW: 762 DCIGW: CG 12 52 degree

SW/LW: spin milled 56/11, 60/7

Putter: 2 Ball 35"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by ApocG10

They were not even close to the same shot. Im a huge Gmac fan, but Tiger had the harder shot, by far. Its too bad that one hole killed his chance at winning. Had he par'd that hole, it would have been a much different sunday I think.

Originally Posted by zeg

IIRC, Graeme's first spot in the bunker was more similar to Tiger's second.

Yeah, I guess I was watching a different match or something, GMAC's shot was clearly 2 feet left of tigers and at least 1/2 inch further from the wall! Tiger did make his shot much harder though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by BMac0223

How about the stance Tiger had for his second bunker shot!  I've seen some weird stances from those deep European bunkers but that was unreal.  Too bad he made triple.

Anyone who says golfer aren't athletes needs to try that stance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by reedf

Yeah, I guess I was watching a different match or something, GMAC's shot was clearly 2 feet left of tigers and at least 1/2 inch further from the wall! Tiger did make his shot much harder though.

Like I said, Graeme's first was about the same as Tiger's second, and in quite a different position than Tiger's first.

Would chipping or taking a drop have been a better play for Tiger? Evidently so for the first shot.

Maybe for the second. Remember, he did get it out onto the green. I don't know that you can hold his 3-putt up as evidence that he should have taken his medicine. It's hard to argue that a long putt is much worse than another shot out of that bunker.

But this all reeks of Monday morning quarterbacking.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by zeg

Like I said, Graeme's first was about the same as Tiger's second, and in quite a different position than Tiger's first.

Dude! I know the camera angles are different but Tiger and GMAC are damn near standing in the same footprints facing opposite directions. Use the irregularities on the bunker face as a reference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by reedf

Dude! I know the camera angles are different but Tiger and GMAC are damn near standing in the same footprints facing opposite directions. Use the irregularities on the bunker face as a reference.


You are perhaps right that they're standing in the same place. That can be a pretty substantial difference in those bunkers, though, and McDowell's looks quite a bit closer to the edge (not "quite a bit" as in "feet," but "quite a bit" in a case where 6 inches can make a real difference).

The location of Tiger's second shot relative to the wall looks a lot more similar to Graeme's, regardless of the absolute position. If Graeme tries Tiger's first, because of the bunker wall he's aiming at the neighboring bunker, not at the left side of the green. He didn't really have the option to attempt a shot toward the green, IMO.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


[URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/56928/] [/URL]

To me, those pictures make it look like Grame's was in the middle of Tiger's two shots, though substantially closer to Tiger's second. . Separate the wall of the bunker into two parts: the jagged-looking part on the right and the smooth part on the left. Tiger's first shot is from the right side of the jagged part, his second is from the right side of the smooth part, and Graeme's is from the left side of the jagged part. I don't think I realized initially how different the camera angle was for Graeme's shot.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That 2nd sand shot from Tiger - the stance (or lack thereof) was insane.  I'm surprised he even tried that shot.  Amazing that he was able to get it out.  But the thing I'm surprised is that Tiger went on record by stating that he intentionally tried to richochet the ball off the face of the bunker - and hoped it would bounce right.  But the ball bounced left - and nearly hit him.

Here is my question... Why would Tiger attempt to ricochet the ball of the face of the bunker - and not simply take an unplayable lie?  Then with the unplayable, drop further back in the bunker so that he could get the ball up and out?  He was already making the assumption that it was going to take him two strokes to get the ball onto the green.

Tiger's Thought Process

Shot 1 - Ricochet out to the right.

Shot 2 - Pitch/Chip from the grass onto the green (potentially hole out)

Shot 3 - Putt.

Unplayable Thought Process

Shot 1 - Unplayable lie (one stroke penalty, two club lengths for relief - or as far back between the hole and point of unplayable - but the drop must be made inside the bunker)

Shot 2 - Bunker shot

Shot 3 - Putt

Was Tiger afraid of a burried lie after the drop?  Is this why he didn't take the unplayable? From the looks - he was very lucky to even walk away with a triple the way he played the hole.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4286 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • It seems like too much work for me. I'm actually surprised at myself for spending as much time on this as I already have. Shot Scope tells me my shots to finish with a 7i is 0.1 better than with my 50 or 55 so I'm just going to go with it. Actually, I tend to be the complete opposite. I've never faced a shot I'm convinced I can't hit. It leads to great heroics and complete flops. Conservative for me might just be someone else's normal.
    • Tell me you've not seen Bill play without telling me you've not seen Bill play? 😄 Just teasing @billchao. 😄 
    • And like Matt said, and I have hinted at… it's ONE ROUND. Because you have to get hot. Better players than him failed to get through. And… Peaked too soon, perhaps. He could also get injured, get surpassed, lose interest or lose his game… Again, if I trusted y'all to uphold the bet, and if the bet wasn't basically a 15-year proposition… I'd bet y'all. The odds are against him, and heavily so. So… he didn't qualify, and he's playing on a sponsor's exemption. Jordan Spieth was 16 years old when he tied for 16th in a PGA Tour event… and I realize that mentioning Jordan Spieth (who has obviously had a lot of success) seems to argue against my point, but Spieth is the exception and he did better at only a year older than this fella. The odds are strongly against him.
    • He shot -5 with a bogey on the last hole. Those Monday Q events are seriously tough to get through. Lots of very very good players play in those, including normally a fair few tour players who've lost their cards, including past winners. It is a small sample size, but he also just broke one of Tiger's records (youngest ever to be ranked one in AJGA if memory serves). He's the best 15 year old in the world at the moment. He's also pretty small and skinny - if he grows and fills out a bit and gets stronger, he could be a serious force to be reckoned with. He may of course also go off the boil and struggle or his swing may not last his growth or something, so it's not like he's odds on to make it or anything like that. I think it will be interesting to see how he progresses and if (big if granted) he progresses well, then he will be quite the prospect.
    • At a basic level, you can take those strokes gained numbers and if you know what the baseline strokes to hole out is from each distance, you can figure out how many strokes on average you will take to hole out from any given spot on the golf course. Then you can take that shot zone thing from shotscope and put it down there and see what the average is for each club and each target you choose. That's not exactly trivial to do though even with a computer, so the strategy guides (like LSW) use rules of thumb to make those decisions easier for you to make on the fly. Most of the time you'll come up with the optimal strategy and on the odd occasion when you don't, the strategy you come up with will be pretty darn close to optimal. If you're anything like me, then you'll probably wind up being a little too conservative with both club choice and target. Fear of penalty strokes can make you play suboptimally. Basically it's a bad idea to base your strategy on a shot that might pop up less than 1 in 20 times. If you happen to hit that shot, then today just isn't your day, but the 19 times you don't, you'll be in that much better of a spot.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...