Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for the suggestion Mike. I will start working on that.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Here is some video from my last range session. I start with 3/4 swings then swing about 60% then move to full speed. I am working on @mvmac suggestions of flattening the shaft between A4 and A5.

Some stills

This is a comparison of the 3/4 swing versus an older swing

The 60% swing (pretty close to the 3/4 swing)

The full swing versus the 3/4 swing (Not bad, getting very close)

  • Upvote 1

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  mchepp said:
Here is some video from my last range session. I start with 3/4 swings then swing about 60% then move to full speed. I am working on @mvmac suggestions of flattening the shaft between A4 and A5. Some stills This is a comparison of the 3/4 swing versus an older swing [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/92889/] [/URL] The 60% swing (pretty close to the 3/4 swing) [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/92890/] [/URL] The full swing versus the 3/4 swing (Not bad, getting very close) [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/92891/] [/URL]

Wow, this is pretty cool. I have a few questions that I hope you don't mind answering. 1) What software do you use to be able to watch the video in slow motion and be able to take still shots and draw lines? 2) Where can I get more information about the A1, A2, etc. positions? 3) What device do you use to record yourself? How many fps? Thanks!

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  RFKFREAK said:

Wow, this is pretty cool. I have a few questions that I hope you don't mind answering.

1) What software do you use to be able to watch the video in slow motion and be able to take still shots and draw lines?

2) Where can I get more information about the A1, A2, etc. positions?

3) What device do you use to record yourself? How many fps?

Thanks!

1) I have a Casio that does 120 fps and 240 fps. For Windows 7 users and I thin Vista, any media player + Snipping Tool (Built in with windows). VLC media player has a capture screen shot. Quicktime might as well. Though I like quick time for clipping videos. Though you'll need to buy quick time to get the good features. I think 60 fps is the minimum required for adequate viewing of the golf swing. I think there are a few other free golf swing softwares out there as well.

2) http://thesandtrap.com/a/big-list-of-golf-terminology

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  RFKFREAK said:

1) What software do you use to be able to watch the video in slow motion and be able to take still shots and draw lines?

Kinda written down the middle of the screenshots:

A N A L Y Z R G O L F . C O M

:-)

I know the creator and developer. He's a good guy. I hear 2.0 is coming along swimmingly.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  iacas said:

Quote:

Originally Posted by RFKFREAK

1) What software do you use to be able to watch the video in slow motion and be able to take still shots and draw lines?

Kinda written down the middle of the screenshots:

A N A L Y Z R G O L F . C O M

I know the creator and developer. He's a good guy. I hear 2.0 is coming along swimmingly.

I really should consider not posting around my bedtime or in the morning when I wake up since by brain is functioning during those times. :doh:

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This camera is the Casio FC-100. Mine has been beat to hell. Dropped a couple of times, blew over in the wind once on the tri-pod and therefore it malfunctions. So I am looking for an upgrade. I would like to get the FH-25 in the Casio line, but not sure if I want to spend that much on a camera that needs to be so rugged. I might slip back to the FH-20 in order to get a better price.

The FC-100 shoots at 210fps. The drawback is I cannot set manual exposure so in the full swings you can see that the head gets blurry. I would recommend not skimping as I did originally and getting one that has manual exposure.

As Erik mentioned analyzer is really good. You need a Mac but like a Mac it is easy to use and understand. I used to use V1 but it was confusing didn't work well on Mac at all. I am interested to see what 2.0 holds for us.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  mchepp said:
This camera is the Casio FC-100. Mine has been beat to hell. Dropped a couple of times, blew over in the wind once on the tri-pod and therefore it malfunctions. So I am looking for an upgrade. I would like to get the FH-25 in the Casio line, but not sure if I want to spend that much on a camera that needs to be so rugged. I might slip back to the FH-20 in order to get a better price. The FC-100 shoots at 210fps. The drawback is I cannot set manual exposure so in the full swings you can see that the head gets blurry. I would recommend not skimping as I did originally and getting one that has manual exposure. As Erik mentioned analyzer is really good. You need a Mac but like a Mac it is easy to use and understand. I used to use V1 but it was confusing didn't work well on Mac at all. I am interested to see what 2.0 holds for us.

Wow, looks like the Casio FH-20 runs about $1,000. Def out of my price range.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  mchepp said:
Here is some video from my last range session. I start with 3/4 swings then swing about 60% then move to full speed. I am working on @mvmac suggestions of flattening the shaft between A4 and A5.

The full swing versus the 3/4 swing (Not bad, getting very close)

It was the right thing at the time, but now please stop as you're "there" already and have possibly gone too far. Left arm shifting out slightly is fine, but the left picture is WAY better than the right picture above.

@david_wedzik and I filmed a video for you today and it should demonstrate a few things for you.

To others: note that this is particular to what @mchepp is doing right now, and what he needs to work on next. This is individualized information, not for mass consumption or "use" in your own swing, or your buddy's swing, etc.

Basically, the top left image is causing the other issues (the other three panels):

Why?

We know - from our own studies as well as what we've confirmed from various biomechanists, etc. - once a club is "going" in a certain direction at about A5, it's going to keep going in that direction. You're now laying the shaft down from 4 to 5, but at 5 it has to kick out or else you'd miss the golf ball.

Illustrated (somewhat):

You:

How others manage to "do it" - going from across the line and/or steep to laying the shaft down "through" A5.

You can't (or shouldn't want to) lay the shaft down more because you're already fine. You're on plane right now - to shallow it out further means to make yet another compensation (kicking the club HARD around the corner) in order to hit the golf ball.

Grant doesn't do it very much:

Consequently he looks normal in the finish:

Your hands pull in HARD because otherwise you're going to shank, miss the golf ball to the outside, etc. You can't "long arc" it from there. You'd have to somehow quickly send your hands out when you're already in the process of "burying the handle."

Here's the video:

You can like this just fine, and if you want to swing like this, that's okay too, but you're going to have to be content to hit your 7-iron 145 yards or so, and your finish will continue to look bad unless you add in some other compensation (tipping your head back to help keep the path OUTward as long as possible, etc.).

What I'd do from here? It's in the video, but basically, get to 4, and then rip down as you go forward and long arc it and hit your finish. Stop worrying about 3 to 4 to 5. Your left arm is fine, the shaft is fine, just start ripping the ball, feeling good extension on the finish. It'll get rid of the pulls, cuts, and the "cramped" look you've got at A7 through 9. JUMP like a motherbleeper. EXTEND. SPEED.

TL;DR version: You're now too shallow at A5, so the clubhead (sweetspot) has to kick out HARD, which leads to the cramped look at A7-A9. Move on to focusing on speed and extension.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  iacas said:

What I'd do from here? It's in the video, but basically, get to 4, and then rip down as you go forward and long arc it and hit your finish. Stop worrying about 3 to 4 to 5. Your left arm is fine, the shaft is fine, just start ripping the ball, feeling good extension on the finish. It'll get rid of the pulls, cuts, and the "cramped" look you've got at A7 through 9. JUMP like a motherbleeper. EXTEND. SPEED.

@mchepp , since you like Mac ;-)

Like this

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Swinging at 75 percent trying to work on the extension piece.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  mchepp said:
Swinging at 75 percent trying to work on the extension piece.

Looking much gooder! :-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Still working on the extension pieces. Developed a wicked pull hook so it makes golf a little tough but it helps me to stay on the range a bit more to work on the extension piece. Occasionally I will hit a beautiful high shot that makes all the work worth it.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  mchepp said:

Still working on the extension pieces. Developed a wicked pull hook so it makes golf a little tough but it helps me to stay on the range a bit more to work on the extension piece. Occasionally I will hit a beautiful high shot that makes all the work worth it.

Those swings look much improved Mike.

So most shots are pull hooking, irons and driver?

On the swings that you feel like you did a good job of thrusting/extending, do they still pull hook?

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  mchepp said:

Swinging at 75 percent trying to work on the extension piece.

What I'd like to know is..have one pf those balls bouncing off the wall, ever come back and hit you..?

BTW, your latest vid, swing looks good.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Hammer 4 said:

What I'd like to know is..have one pf those balls bouncing off the wall, ever come back and hit you..?

BTW, your latest vid, swing looks good.

Very often!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Almost 2-3 a practice session. Sometimes right in the head. Once I get one I will post it of me trying to get out of the way. Watching myself in slow motion trying to get the hell out of the way give me a new respect for hockey goalies.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • No, where the Rules of Golf do not provide a definition, the common definition is used. A ball in the fairway versus the rough is not a significant breach, as a player would not choose to be in the fairway over the rough for a two-stroke penalty.
    • Erik and Dave,  Thank you very much for taking the time to answer this. As always, appreciate your many posts and insights.  Though the term is not defined in the rules of golf, apparently rules officials are taught that "significant advantage" has a rules-specific definition different than the common meaning of that term.  That has not been my understanding of how the rules work, but will go forward with this new information.      Thanks, Reid 
    • Day 303 - 2025-07-30 Practiced downtown before lessons and then played… seven holes (skipped to 12, played to 18). Backswing feel, didn't worry about the downswing.
    • Unless I'm grossly misreading something, or you're not saying what you mean to be saying… I can't be more clear about this: no, it isn't. There are zero trained rules officials who would say something like that. We're given some examples in rules classes. For example: A hits her ball into a yellow penalty area. Because the ball hit the far bank and rolled back in, she mistakenly drops on the green side of the PA and plays out the hole when she should have dropped behind the PA and still had to play over it successfully. That's significant enough to warrant a DQ if it's not corrected. No, they can't. You're not getting it right here and you're way more knowledgeable than the average golfer. I don't agree. The text of that post from the USGA is (my additional quick comments are in black): You've hit the nail on the head that there is some subjectivity inherent to the definition of serious breach: the Committee must make a judgment on whether the player has gained a significant advantage which means different Committees might Rule differently in similar circumstances. Because there are an infinite amount of possible infractions, it is not possible to have a definitive line of what is and is not a serious breach.  None of the following are 100% binding but are examples of general thoughts/examples from various Rules experts that lead in the right direction: - Is two strokes enough? If you told the player he could play from the wrong place but he'd have to take two penalty strokes and he'd rather do that than play from the right place - you've got a serious breach. (Almost nobody would take two strokes to play from the fairway instead of the rough. Heck, if they could drop back in the fairway with one stroke under the Unplayable rule, that would be a better option. Fairway vs. rough with all else being roughly the same is almost never going to be a serious breach.) -A few years back (so old Rules but similar process), JB Holmes was determined to have committed a serious breach of playing from a wrong place when he played from FARTHER away than he was supposed to because the new position allowed him to reach a par-5 green with his next stroke where the correct location required a punch out. Talked about that one earlier. -Most officials would think it would have to be a very specific set of circumstances to get to a serious breach on the putting green if the right place is also on the putting green. -Historically playing from outside a bunker when you were supposed to play from inside the bunker was a serious breach (if significantly better than stroke and distance would've been), but that's not guaranteed and given the available option to get out of a bunker now would again need to be a specific set of circumstances. Overall, a serious breach needs to be something so significant that the Committee feels it cannot accept the player's score when played from that position - even with a two-stroke penalty. We realize many would like a "this is, this isn't" kind of list, but that's not how this Rule works as the Definition itself makes the Committee weigh a number of factors that are different in each situation in order to reach the conclusion.
    • Day 12: Got to play 18. Hit the ball pretty good. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...