Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4862 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

At over $7 per ball these things better come with a remote control.  My game isn't good enough to risk losing one at that price.  I am holding off playing the Callaway Hex Black Tours I just got at $27.30 / dozen because I am still working on some swing changes and don't want to lose any.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

They're so expensive Mizuno doesn't even mention them on their website.

nike.gif  VR-S Covert 10.5*

nike.gif  SQ2 15*

  Idea Black Hybrid, 19*

mizuno.gif  MP54, 4-PW

vokey.gif SM 50*, 54*, 58*

nike.gif  Method 001

nike.gif  RZN One


Posted
Originally Posted by colin007

Do any tour players even use those?

I doubt it..just one of those obnoxiously expensive ultra high end products for the japanese golf market.


Posted

Not with my game I wouldn't.  Even if they were the best balls ever I still shoot in the 80s or 90s and a ball, no matter how good, won't magically change that to make me the player that I was 20 years ago.


Posted

I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted

"If money wasn't a problem", I'm not so sure I wouldn't have the same basic equipment I have right now.  I would probably have the latest equipment, but I wouldn't necessarily change just to change.  I would for sure try out everything new, if it improved my game or felt better I would have it, but I would not have the latest just because it's the latest.  I would probably have a couple sets of irons also, I love forged blades, so I would have a set of Mizuno, Titliest, Miura, Taylormade and whatever else caught my fancy!

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Posted

I love my setup right now.  If money weren't a problem I might bet a brand new set of wedges, 50˚, 54˚, 60˚.  But probably I'd use all my new free money and play much more often and at much nicer courses than I can afford right now!

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'd buy this

Driver - Cobra S3 9.5* - Mitsubishi Rayon JavlnFX M7 
Fwy - Titleist 904F 18*
Irons - Mizuno MP-14
Wedges - Cleveland 588 54*, Ping Tour 58*
Putter - Ping D66 (iWi)

 


Posted
I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

Gold paint and shiny things are not indications of "quality". There is no difference in quality between JDM stuff and what is available elsewhere. As for "outperforming", again, that is nonsense. Please give one example.

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
The cost of equipment is such a small % of what I spend on golf over the life of that equipment, that the cost of that equipment doesn't even enter into my decision of what to buy. Don't misunderstand, I'm not wealthy, but if a $400 driver lasts me 5 years at 80 rounds per year, my cost is only $1 per round. If the driver I really want costs $600, I'm not going to balk at spending an extra 50 cents per round to get it......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

What Shorty says:

Originally Posted by Shorty

Gold paint and shiny things are not indications of "quality".

There is no difference in quality between JDM stuff and what is available elsewhere.

As for "outperforming", again, that is nonsense. Please give one example.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by pixel5

I'd buy this

I was not aware that Batman played golf.  Where does he put the clubs?

If money wasn't an object, the only think I think I'd definitely get is Edel wedges and putter.

Oh, and I'd find out how much Mike or Erik would need for a retainer so I could have them on-call as a "concierge" instructor.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

If money weren't a problem I'd have a house in Florida, California, Bandon, Ireland, etc...

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by nevets88

If money weren't a problem I'd have a house in Florida, California, Bandon, Ireland, etc...

I always say that too, and then I remind myself that if money wasn't a problem I could also just stay in the most luxurious hotels in all of the vacation spots, so I think we'd just go for a house in Cali and an apt. in Manhattan.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by David in FL

The cost of equipment is such a small % of what I spend on golf over the life of that equipment, that the cost of that equipment doesn't even enter into my decision of what to buy.

Don't misunderstand, I'm not wealthy, but if a $400 driver lasts me 5 years at 80 rounds per year, my cost is only $1 per round. If the driver I really want costs $600, I'm not going to balk at spending an extra 50 cents per round to get it......

If money was no object I'd have one gamer set, one game improvement set (similar but easier to hit), and I'd be using them on courses around the world, rather than thinking about them sitting in the back of my car and writing about them on the internet.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

Thank you GaijinGolfer..please stick to the topic..yes, I know you guys would get a Gulfstream 6, Piaget Emperador Temple, latest version of the Veyron..blah..blah..blah..but stick to golf..show me something.


Note: This thread is 4862 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.