Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2444 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

How do you approach your setup when making alignment changes? Do you first setup parallel to your target line and move the left or right foot back? And where should the shoulders be aligned?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by LSU_justin

How do you approach your setup when making alignment changes? Do you first setup parallel to your target line and move the left or right foot back? And where should the shoulders be aligned?

I typically set the face down (because I like to spot-align the face) and then I will set my body up to that.

Does that answer your question?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Great stuff Erik, when is the lefty version coming out?

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by newtogolf

Great stuff Erik, when is the lefty version coming out?

Send $10 and a self-addressed stamped envelope to....

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It would be worth $10 to get a ball flight diagram for left handed golfers.  I know much of it is just reverse, but sometimes it would just be nice to look at a diagram or read instruction books and not have to translate right = left and left = right every time.

Originally Posted by iacas

Send $10 and a self-addressed stamped envelope to....

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

I typically set the face down (because I like to spot-align the face) and then I will set my body up to that.

Does that answer your question?

I think I got it now, thanks.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Erik,

Thanks again for this.  I went back to basics with the driver and think I found my issue.  Your fundamentals listed above helped a lot.  Had a good range session and round with the driver.  Reviewed the Golf Evolution video, etc.

Can you also touch on the vertical adjustments, hitting the ball higher and lower?  I have been adjusting ball position a bit forward and trying to get weight more forward if I want to get a higher flight. But, I would rather have you sum it up correctly.  I believe you stated before that pros more often adjust the height of their shots than their shape.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have a question regarding GI clubs and Players clubs. if you hit the ball in the center of the club face shouldn't both GI and players clubs shape the ball just fine?

My Bag: Nike Vapor X
Driver: Diablo Octane Tour Project 7.0  X-Stiff
Woods: Callaway RAZR 3 wood Adilla NVS 65 g X-Stiff
Hybrids: Taylor Made Burner Superlaunch 3-18*, 4-21*, UST Mamiya Proforce V2 75
Irons: Maltby TE Forged 5-PW TrueTemper X-300
Wedges: Maltby Tricept 52*/6, 56*/10; 60*/6 TrueTemper S-400
Putter: Yes! Emma 37" Belly Putter 
Ball: NXT Tour


  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by MbolicGolf

I have a question regarding GI clubs and Players clubs. if you hit the ball in the center of the club face shouldn't both GI and players clubs shape the ball just fine?

Players irons, or GI irons, it's still works the same..... strike the ball with the center of the face, and the ball will start in the direction the face is pointing, and will curve relative to the face angle/path.  Where the GI irons differ is that off-center strikes will fly less off-line because GI heads are generally built around a higher MOI, or the ability to resist twisting about it's CoG.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by mvmac

Players irons, or GI irons, it's still works the same..... strike the ball with the center of the face, and the ball will start in the direction the face is pointing, and will curve relative to the face angle/path.  Where the GI irons differ is that off-center strikes will fly less off-line because GI heads are generally built around a higher MOI, or the ability to resist twisting about it's CoG.

In addition to what Mike said, the CG location can shift slightly for GI irons, and that will have a small impact on the work-ability of an iron. It's more to do with the trajectory (height) of a shot, though, and even then it's subtle, so don't worry about it on shaping shots sideways.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I love this post.  It's one of the best ever on this forum.

You mention going with a stock shot...what do you say to students who have a two way miss?  How do you get them to decide and or develop a stock shaping shot to go to?  And in these cases, do you encourage to groove in and shape the ball only one way for an extended period of time?

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X


Posted
Originally Posted by Deryck Griffith

I love this post.  It's one of the best ever on this forum.

You mention going with a stock shot...what do you say to students who have a two way miss?  How do you get them to decide and or develop a stock shaping shot to go to?  And in these cases, do you encourage to groove in and shape the ball only one way for an extended period of time?

This!  I've wondered about this too.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nice post, I've been shaping the ball a lot more this year and all I've used is the easy method of alignment. It's reliable and easy, and I've yet to find a shape of shot that I needed to hit that I could not using this method. I don't really understand the point of the more complicated methods. It's hard enough to get a consistent swing that will hit the ball straight, why throw in all those other ideas.

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Deryck Griffith

You mention going with a stock shot...what do you say to students who have a two way miss?  How do you get them to decide and or develop a stock shaping shot to go to?  And in these cases, do you encourage to groove in and shape the ball only one way for an extended period of time?

A two way miss isn't a playable shot. :) So I say "develop a pattern" to those people. A pattern doesn't have to be shots that all curve the same amount. Pushes and push-draws are part of the same pattern. Push-draws and pulls or push-draws and push-cuts are not the same pattern: http://thesandtrap.com/t/39974/shot-cones/

If someone has a two-way miss going on, they need to prioritize the pieces that allow them to have a pattern - even if the "pattern" isn't great. For example, a guy who swings into the ball pretty straight but doesn't always control the clubface (i.e. pull-draws and push-cuts) should decide to either push-cut everything or pull-draw everything on the golf course while slowly working towards a more ideal ball flight with his instructor.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deryck Griffith

You mention going with a stock shot...what do you say to students who have a two way miss?  How do you get them to decide and or develop a stock shaping shot to go to?  And in these cases, do you encourage to groove in and shape the ball only one way for an extended period of time?

A two way miss isn't a playable shot. :) So I say "develop a pattern" to those people. A pattern doesn't have to be shots that all curve the same amount. Pushes and push-draws are part of the same pattern. Push-draws and pulls or push-draws and push-cuts are not the same pattern: http://thesandtrap.com/t/39974/shot-cones/

If someone has a two-way miss going on, they need to prioritize the pieces that allow them to have a pattern - even if the "pattern" isn't great. For example, a guy who swings into the ball pretty straight but doesn't always control the clubface (i.e. pull-draws and push-cuts) should decide to either push-cut everything or pull-draw everything on the golf course while slowly working towards a more ideal ball flight with his instructor.

If the player is able to consistently get the ball to their intended target (distance and line) then that ball flight sounds pretty ideal to me.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

For example, a guy who swings into the ball pretty straight but doesn't always control the clubface (i.e. pull-draws and push-cuts) should decide to either push-cut everything or pull-draw everything on the golf course while slowly working towards a more ideal ball flight with his instructor.

Makes ALOT of sense!

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X


Note: This thread is 2444 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.