Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

To Move or Not Move the Head in the Golf Swing


Note: This thread is 2006 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Probably some suggestive downward pressure being applied to the top of her head too. Wink, wink.

It's the old "Arnoldian slip."

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't think you will be able to hit solid golf shots if you are consciously thinking about keeping your head "still."  I think it helps to keep your chin up, so you have plenty of room to turn your left (right for lefties) shoulder under your chin.  I've seen players who move their head quite a bit, but they move in consistently which still allows them to be consistent ball strikers.


  • Moderator
Posted
I don't think you will be able to hit solid golf shots if you are consciously thinking about keeping your head "still."  I think it helps to keep your chin up, so you have plenty of room to turn your left (right for lefties) shoulder under your chin.  I've seen players who move their head quite a bit, but they move in consistently which still allows them to be consistent ball strikers.

I agree that to work on a Steady Head piece, actually focusing on the head isn't the best idea.  However  advising "chin up" makes it hard for golfers to view the ball out of the center of their eyes and leads to shoulder turns that are too level.  Head moves, contact becomes more erratic.  Having the chin down allows the shoulders to turn steeper, at about a right angle to their address inclination.  Result is a steady head and better low point control.

More on that here

http://thesandtrap.com/t/56069/good-golf-posture

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't think you will be able to hit solid golf shots if you are consciously thinking about keeping your head "still."  I think it helps to keep your chin up, so you have plenty of room to turn your left (right for lefties) shoulder under your chin.  I've seen players who move their head quite a bit, but they move in consistently which still allows them to be consistent ball strikers.

When you are playing golf on the course I don't think they are advocating concentrating solely on keeping your head still.  This is something that you continually work to improve in your lessons and range sessions.  Do the drills on the range and play golf on the course.  I think that if you consistently worked on keeping a "steady" head, not a "still" head you will find yourself rotating your shoulders more efficiently and striking the ball more consistently.

Jeff

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by DanHolterhaus

I don't think you will be able to hit solid golf shots if you are consciously thinking about keeping your head "still."  I think it helps to keep your chin up, so you have plenty of room to turn your left (right for lefties) shoulder under your chin.  I've seen players who move their head quite a bit, but they move in consistently which still allows them to be consistent ball strikers.

I agree that to work on a Steady Head piece, actually focusing on the head isn't the best idea.  However  advising "chin up" makes it hard for golfers to view the ball out of the center of their eyes and leads to shoulder turns that are too level.  Head moves, contact becomes more erratic.  Having the chin down allows the shoulders to turn steeper, at about a right angle to their address inclination.  Result is a steady head and better low point control.

More on that here

http://thesandtrap.com/t/56069/good-golf-posture

Agreed. When I first started working on maintaing a steady head I focused on keeping it still, total disaster. For me the key to a steady head is 1) left shoulder down 2) letting the trail leg straighten a bit so your hips can turn on an incline. If I do that the head stays relatively still without any direct effort.

This is one of my all time favorite threads on here: http://thesandtrap.com/t/54540/a-centered-pivot

Really helped me a lot.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree that to work on a Steady Head piece, actually focusing on the head isn't the best idea.  However  advising "chin up" makes it hard for golfers to view the ball out of the center of their eyes and leads to shoulder turns that are too level.  Head moves, contact becomes more erratic.  Having the chin down allows the shoulders to turn steeper, at about a right angle to their address inclination.  Result is a steady head and better low point control.

More on that here

http://thesandtrap.com/t/56069/good-golf-posture

The price I pay for "chin up" is a slice. Again, thanks, Mike, for the coaching that helped me get rid of this and improve so many other things.

For me, the main key has been to try to keep the head steady and tilted comfortably back a bit all the way from the setup, back swing and through impact. The club head travels a much shorter distance, but when I make contact with the ball it feels really solid.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Agreed. When I first started working on maintaing a steady head I focused on keeping it still, total disaster. For me the key to a steady head is 1) left shoulder down 2) letting the trail leg straighten a bit so your hips can turn on an incline. If I do that the head stays relatively still without any direct effort.

This is one of my all time favorite threads on here: http://thesandtrap.com/t/54540/a-centered-pivot

Really helped me a lot.

Awesome, great to hear.  Yeah it's not rocket science, what you just said was centered pivot 101, probably more than most instructors know.  If the knees don't change flex, going to be tough for the golfer to side bend and extend enough to stay centered.

Just saw this yesterday, Jay Haas

The price I pay for "chin up" is a slice. Again, thanks, Mike, for the coaching that helped me get rid of this and improve so many other things.

For me, the main key has been to try to keep the head steady and tilted comfortably back a bit all the way from the setup, back swing and through impact. The club head travels a much shorter distance, but when I make contact with the ball it feels really solid.

Yes "chin up" when walking down the fairway, not when hitting shots :beer:

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A steady head is my most important key, imo, because if I move my head, about 85% or more times, I will hit a lousy shot when I move my head, and in my case, it could be up or down.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 months later...
Posted

It depends on one's school of thought.  I've had some instructors tell me they believe keeping the head still is a bad thing, while others say the opposite.  However, while watching the professionals on television, if the background consists of stationary objects such as trees or spectators and the like (i.e. not the sky), any movement of this kind can be detected by a shift in their head position relative to the background - this is called parallax.  Davis Love III's head doesn't so much as budge throughout much the swing while others do indeed move their head.


  • Moderator
Posted
It depends on one's school of thought.  I've had some instructors tell me they believe keeping the head still is a bad thing, while others say the opposite.  However, while watching the professionals on television, if the background consists of stationary objects such as trees or spectators and the like (i.e. not the sky), any movement of this kind can be detected by a shift in their head position relative to the background - this is called parallax.  Davis Love III's head doesn't so much as budge throughout much the swing while others do indeed move their head.

I agree you don't want to keep the head "still" as in not moving. Key #1 is relatively steady head and we're basically concerned with keeping the lateral translation of the head to a minimum. The head will rotate, even lower a bit towards the end of the backswing/beginning of the downswing.

Key #1 from this thread

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Your back swing should be a turn. If you turn, your head shouldn't move anywhere. Turn, then lift your hands to complete your back swing.

Hi welcome to the site. I agree that you turn on the backswing, but there are other elements to make sure the head is steady. I can just turn and move my head two feet to the right.

More on what needs to be done to ensure a steady head, also if you do this, there isn't a need to lift the arms.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks for the welcome. I've actually read this site for a while just never joined.

Okay people, here's the thing with the head: the movement of the head only matters because it is a signal your body is moving laterally. Nobody strains their neck to jerk their head around, it's the body that is controlling the head. So stop moving off the ball laterally and just turn your body around your head. In the above video, the guy in the black is simply turning and tilting his spine forward toward the ball, which is moving his head toward the ball also, but which is harder to see from this angle. Stand up and do it right now; turn your shoulders, then lower your left shoulder and raise your right shoulder. If you follow this guy's advice, your spine will have the tendency to snap back to its original position on the downswing and cause different problems for you.


  • Administrator
Posted

In the above video, the guy in the black is simply turning and tilting his spine forward toward the ball, which is moving his head toward the ball also, but which is harder to see from this angle.

My head does not move towards the ball when I make a backswing. It may in the video above slightly, but that's because I'm just making backswings exaggerating a few things slightly on a video.

Stand up and do it right now; turn your shoulders, then lower your left shoulder and raise your right shoulder. If you follow this guy's advice, your spine will have the tendency to snap back to its original position on the downswing and cause different problems for you.

I don't know what all that means, but I disagree that making a centered pivot will "cause problems." Please clarify.

The instruction above and elsewhere is simply geared towards teaching people how to make a relatively centered pivot with a relatively steady head as a reference point, and we're primarily concerned with lateral (to/fro the target), with the most "allowable movement" vertically.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 years later...
Posted

I have held my head still for  30 years of golf. I know have two known and good pros who allow me to move the head. One directly tells me to not restrict head the other tells me to bump the hips and ignores may head sway to the front. I gain 2 clubs on launch monitor.

Keeping the head still makes me turn in a barrel, keeps me from bumping left and  costs me yardage. Right knee goes out right elbow stuck behind, right heel lifts early, legs don't cross in back view.

Holding the head in one position forcefully can very much restrict your swing.

 


Posted
On 7/23/2016 at 2:18 AM, Peter_b said:

I have held my head still for  30 years of golf. I know have two known and good pros who allow me to move the head. One directly tells me to not restrict head the other tells me to bump the hips and ignores may head sway to the front. I gain 2 clubs on launch monitor.

Keeping the head still makes me turn in a barrel, keeps me from bumping left and  costs me yardage. Right knee goes out right elbow stuck behind, right heel lifts early, legs don't cross in back view.

Holding the head in one position forcefully can very much restrict your swing.

 

No one is saying to do what's in bold above. And if keeping a relatively steady head is so "restrictive", why would most of the top players in the world do it?

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well the head of the pros looks quite steady in the horizontal movement. I just want to emphasize that swing in a barrel and steady head can harm your swing especially if your swing is already good. 


  • 2 months later...
Note: This thread is 2006 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.