Jump to content
IGNORED

Who do you think is the best ball striker of all time? Why?


boil3rmak3r
Note: This thread is 4073 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I am biased toward Hogan as I've studied him a bit.  He wasn't a big guy (5'8" 145 lbs), but could hit the ball a long way.  He once won 3 tournaments in a row and hit a combined 214 of 216 GIR's in those 3 tournaments.  Has anyone else in history done this?

I've seen replays of the matchup between him and Snead in the 60's on Shell's Wonderful World of Golf.  Hogan made it look so easy hitting 14 of 14 fairways and 18 of 18 greens en route to beating Snead.  After the round, Snead played it off by saying that Hogan actually practiced for the match while Snead just looked at it as a casual round.  I thought that was funny...

If Hogan would have been a better putter (nothing to do with ball striking) and if he didn't have his horrific automobile accident, who knows how much more he could have accomplished...

I hear people claim that Tiger is the best ball striker.  I think that's laughable.  He may very well be ther best all around golfer of all time, but definitlely not the best ball striker.  Give him 1950's equipment and his shot dispersions would be even worse than they are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I loved the way Greg Norman swung the club, I don't know if he was the greatest ball stiker of all time but I loved the way he just went for it. That swing was totally balls out and kitchen sink. A bit OT but in Australia he was a god, he played sport like we think sport should be played.

Taking the above advice may lead to destruction of your golf game. Laughing at it may reduce stress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Please define what you mean by "ball striker".  Nicklaus won 17 Majors and 72 Tournaments.  He had to be one of the best.  Snead won the most tournaments. He had to be great.  Maybe if we could find the stats for all time fairway and GIR, we could see who was the best in those terms.  Tiger is pretty good too considering his 14 Majors and 74 Tournaments.  If you include all short game shots, then really, really good.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

His shot dispersions would be a lot better. Mainly because the ball would be flying 50+ yards shorter.

You would have to define what you mean by "best". When he was on, Johnny Miller was crazy good with his approach irons for example. But that on period wasn't super long. Mac O'Grady also did some crazy ball striking (to go along with being insane ). And of course there is always Moe Norman.

Originally Posted by boil3rmak3r

I hear people claim that Tiger is the best ball striker.  I think that's laughable.  He may very well be ther best all around golfer of all time, but definitlely not the best ball striker.  Give him 1950's equipment and his shot dispersions would be even worse than they are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm voting Hogan, no shock there.  Many of the books I've read claim Hogan would have set many more golf records had he; not lost so many years to the war, become seriously injured in a car accident and spent more time working with his putter.  I can only imagine how good a ball striker he would be with the equipment they use today.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Mo Norman. He was like a machine when hitting the ball. Same way every time, no practice swings, just smooth stroke and he could put the ball where he wanted it to go.

In my  bag:

Driver, Callaway Diablo Edge Tour 9.5 stiff

3, 5 woods: Callaway Diablo Edge Tour 15,18 degrees Stiff

2 hybrid: Callaway Diable Edge Tour 18 degrees R (out when the 5 wood is in)

3,6 hybrids: Callaway Diablo Edge 21 S and 30 degrees R

4,5 hybrids: Callaway Razr X HL 24 and 27 degrees Stiff

7-AW irons: Callaway Razr HL graphite R shafts 

SW 54 Callaway X Series Jaws CC Slate Fujikura Graphite Stiff

Putter: Odessey White Ice 1 Blade Putter. 

Ball...looking for any ball that hates water, sand, long grass, and getting lost in the woods. 

I can't find any, so forced to use ones that seem to love all the above. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
Originally Posted by newtogolf

I'm voting Hogan, no shock there.  Many of the books I've read claim Hogan would have set many more golf records had he; not lost so many years to the war, become seriously injured in a car accident and spent more time working with his putter.  I can only imagine how good a ball striker he would be with the equipment they use today.

I just wish there was better video of the players from that generation.  We know they were good, but just imaging how cool it would be to see them in HD.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The good news is that Hogan wrote a book with excellent illustrations.

I won't comment on who the best ball striker ever was.  In the same way that it isn't fair to compare today's great team sport athletes to the greats of generations past, the game is ever changing.

It isn't fair to compare players that never played directly against each other.  Norman, Nicklaus, Snead, Hogan, Hagen, Casper, etc.  were ALL great golfers.  Just as Mickelson, Woods, etc. are great golfers today.

The point that I am trying to make is that Ben Hogan was in my opinion the best student of the game, he broke down the swing the first time when nobody else did, he wrote a book that years later (today) is still recommended as an excellent way to learn the proper way to swing a golf club.  So he might not have had the natural talent that Bubba Watson (never taken a lesson) has, but he made up for it with a GREAT work ethic, and a fundamental understanding of how to create great golf shots.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hunter Mahan

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bobby Locke was undoubtedly one of the finest strikers and indeed golfers. He was unorthodox, in that he hooked every shot about 50 yards in the air. When he won the Open Championship at St. Andrews in 1957, he aimed at Tom Morris's shop at the 18th, WAY to the right of target, and put the ball to 12 inches!

A South African,  he was leading money winner in the USA on the PGA tour in 1947, so the American pros got together and had him banned!!!!  He then  decided to play in Britain, and he won countless tournaments including FOUR British Open Championships.  I saw him give an exhibition once, and he proved he could hit absolutely any shot----high fade, low fade, high hook, low hook, or straight shot! He was an absolute magician.

He has been forgotten in America, because of the jealousy of the American pros, who did not like him taking what they considered to be "their" money!!  After he left the USA, he invited Sam Snead to play in South Africa, and they played 18 matches against each other.  Locke won 17, and the other one was halved!!

Close behind Locke  would be Peter Thomson, then Lee Trevino, Dai Rees, Jack NIcklaus and Peter Alliss.   However, I have to say that the absolutely BEST striker I have ever seen (and I played in several British Opens, as well as British, French and other European Amateur Championships) was a man few have heard of----T.H.T. (Tom) Fairbairn, an English pro who won many British tourneys in the 1950s and 1960s.  He was simply unbelievably good, and no description can convey the sound of a drive or long iron shot of his----"crisp" does not begin to sum it up. Every single shot seemed to come out of the exact sweet spot, and iron shots never showed a trace of being mishit or misaligned. I think there have been many golfers who have been exceptional strikers, producing wondrous ball flights, but of whom we have never heard because they were not necessarily successful competitively, for whatever reason.  Some simply couldn't be bothered, and some just did not like competition. I played several rounds with a young man in Germany who hit fabulous, towering, drawing fairway woods, and one irons, and hardly ever hit a poor shot, but who was so dedicated to his profession,  he gave up golf at an early age!!  Many are the reasons for lack of competitive success,  especially in the past. When I was good enough to be a pro in the late 1950s and the 1960s, there was absolutely NO money in pro golf, and anyone with a professional career (I'm a retired doctor) didn't even consider being a pro. Indeed, turning pro was rather akin to becoming a street sweeper in Britain, at least!!  Even in the US, little money was made, except by the most successful, like Casper, Palmer, Nicklaus, Player, Weiskopf et al.  As Arnie has pointed out, in those days, you had to win, and win often, to make a good living---the also-rans were poor!

Nowadays, any player on the PGA or European Tour is rich, without ever having to win a tournament, far less the multiple wins of the likes of Palmer and co.

Sorry to ramble on, but I'm reminiscing, as we're currently snow-bound here, near the highest town in Britain-----hope I haven't bored you guys too much, and let's hope for a good summer!!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by boil3rmak3r

I hear people claim that Tiger is the best ball striker.  I think that's laughable.  He may very well be ther best all around golfer of all time, but definitlely not the best ball striker.  Give him 1950's equipment and his shot dispersions would be even worse than they are now.

I am not so sure you are right about this. In 1998-2000 Tiger was a really good ballstriker. He was an outstanding driver of the ball, very long and very accurate. He also went after a lot of flags. This means when he missed he may have missed the green but it was because he was firing at flags. GIR is not always the best of stats to look at.

I just find it hard to believe that someone who won the US Open by 15 shots was not an awesome ballstriker.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree. Hunter has the complete ball striking skill set that is rarely seen on tour.

I am sure if we had everyone of Hogan's (or anyone really) rounds on tape, we could also find some lovely shots.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kieran123

Hunter Mahan

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by HighlandLaird

As Arnie has pointed out, in those days, you had to win, and win often, to make a good living---the also-rans were poor!

Nowadays, any player on the PGA or European Tour is rich, without ever having to win a tournament, far less the multiple wins of the likes of Palmer and co.

IMO there is also a lot more competition now to get that level than there was in those days. I think one of the reasons that there was a select group back then that dominated was because the fields did not have the depth of talent that exists now. A lot of athletes consider golf a possible avenue for professional competition which I am not sure was true back then.

I am not sure about all time but all of the analysts seem to agree that Westwood is one of the best ball strikers on tour and has been for a decade so maybe he should be considered?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I suspect that the guys from history were much better ball strikers. They simply had to be, balata balls and old fashioned blades and persimmon heads, sweet spots were way way smaller compared to the oversize metal drivers and even the latest types of blades.

If you missed the sweet spot the ball wasn't going anywhere, the clubs and balls are so much more forgiving now - though not if you use the hosel!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Moe Norman.  End of thread. :-D

There was a recent thread asking why more people haven't tried to emulate Moe. As well as Norman struck the ball, it is interesting that we haven't seen more professionals who modeled their swing like him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Wansteadimp

I suspect that the guys from history were much better ball strikers. They simply had to be, balata balls and old fashioned blades and persimmon heads, sweet spots were way way smaller compared to the oversize metal drivers and even the latest types of blades.

If you missed the sweet spot the ball wasn't going anywhere, the clubs and balls are so much more forgiving now - though not if you use the hosel!

correct me if I am wrong, but as the equipment has changed, so to have the courses and the scores correct?  I am fairly certain that is the case for amateurs.  Pros it might be slightly less noticeable.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I understand your argument, but Hogan played blades where as today a good percentage of pro's use GI irons (Ping G series, cavity backs, etc)  Even the muscle backs of today are more forgiving than the blades of Hogan's era.  Eliminating distance from the equation, I don't think many will dispute that hybrids and more forgiving irons have made it easier for the pro's today to be good ball strikers.

Originally Posted by clearwaterms

correct me if I am wrong, but as the equipment has changed, so to have the courses and the scores correct?  I am fairly certain that is the case for amateurs.  Pros it might be slightly less noticeable.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4073 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
    • I get trying to limit relief to the fairway, but how many roots do you typically find in the fairway? Our local rule allows for relief from roots & rocks anywhere on the course (that is in play). My home course has quite a few 100 year old oaks that separate the fairways. Lift and move the ball no closer to the hole. None of us want to damage clubs.
    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...