Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
keller19xc

Feel in putters

19 posts in this topic

When I talk about feel Im talking about the sound and the actual feel in the hands when the face insert hits the ball. I am currently using the spider ghost, I really enjoy the technology on getting the face more square at impact, it has helped tremendously 4-8 footers are no problem. The feel however is horrendous even when I use prov1's a very soft ball. I'm looking at an odyssey #9 as I understand this may not be as easy to get the face square at impact, but the feel is amazing, I also have very good distance control with it as I don't with my spider. (tried it at a local golf store) So do I sacrifice a square club face for good distance control and great feel-or do I do vice versa? Thanks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Thats really a question of personal preference.  Personally, I prefer having the feel of a blade over the stability of a mallet.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Thats really a question of personal preference.  Personally, I prefer having the feel of a blade over the stability of a mallet.

Yes!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying it's harder but I compare my spider and the odyssey side by side and I tended to pull/push more putts than I would with my spider
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying it's harder but I compare my spider and the odyssey side by side and I tended to pull/push more putts than I would with my spider

yeah, it's obvious that the spider would be more square and stable at impact. A higher MOI will cause this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Went from the Spyder to #9 last season.. Hard to get used to but overall better putting. Feel is like butter. Now in playing the Nike method core.. Feels like a dream.. Only had 14 putts today. Pretty nice.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by indyvai

Why do you think the #9 is harder to square at impact?


By its very nature, the #9 is going to have more face rotation.  Thats one of the nice things about a bigger mallet: less face rotation, so theres more stability throughout the stroke and more stability at impact.

Ive dabbled with a few of them and did hit some very straight putts but I personally have problems with distance control with them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I found a odyssey #9 on Craigslist for 40 good condition, going to get it. If I don't like it it's not like it's going to be a huge loss
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By its very nature, the #9 is going to have more face rotation.  Thats one of the nice things about a bigger mallet: less face rotation, so theres more stability throughout the stroke and more stability at impact. Ive dabbled with a few of them and did hit some very straight putts but I personally have problems with distance control with them.

By it's nature it's a putter, and doesn't rotate by itself. Weighting is feel, and as the OP noted, he's more consistent with something more face balanced. Mallet and moi aside, I'd try a face balanced blade or close to for a comparison...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well putting is all about feel and confidence. You don't get that with the spider.

However if you take the odyssey you struggle with good contact. In both cases

you pretty much no holing any putts. but if your distance control is better with the

odyssey you pretty much take out the 3 putt zone and that helps also.

So my advise go with the odyssey and try to improve your putting stroke.

by doing some drills on the putting green --> putt 2 tee's just outside your putter head on 9 footers and make some strokes, after a while your stroke will be straighter and better

( altho i don't feel the same way about the feel about the TM putters )

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems higher MOI putters are the new big thing these days.  Odyssey just released  "The Tank", TM, the Daddy Long Legs and Adam Scott won The Masters with Scotty Cameron's new Futura X Prototype.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by TMBridgestone

yeah, it's obvious that the spider would be more square and stable at impact. A higher MOI will cause this.

Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

By its very nature, the #9 is going to have more face rotation.  Thats one of the nice things about a bigger mallet: less face rotation, so theres more stability throughout the stroke and more stability at impact.

Ive dabbled with a few of them and did hit some very straight putts but I personally have problems with distance control with them.

Though I get that you both mean well, please stop buying into the age-old crap about how "toe hang" causes lots of face rotation and how "face balanced" putters are better for a less arcing stroke (and thus less face rotation).

Toe weighting would actually discourage rotation - the toe would lag behind during the backswing, and again during the downswing, slowing rotation while a face-balanced putter would be the easiest to rotate.

But it really comes down to what a player wants to feel. Do they want to feel the weight of the toe, or not?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Though I get that you both mean well, please stop buying into the age-old crap about how "toe hang" causes lots of face rotation and how "face balanced" putters are better for a less arcing stroke (and thus less face rotation). Toe weighting would actually discourage rotation - the toe would lag behind during the backswing, and again during the downswing, slowing rotation while a face-balanced putter would be the easiest to rotate. But it really comes down to what a player wants to feel. Do they want to feel the weight of the toe, or not?

Good to know!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by keller19xc

When I talk about feel Im talking about the sound and the actual feel in the hands when the face insert hits the ball.

I am currently using the spider ghost, I really enjoy the technology on getting the face more square at impact, it has helped tremendously

4-8 footers are no problem. The feel however is horrendous even when I use prov1's a very soft ball.

I'm looking at an odyssey #9 as I understand this may not be as easy to get the face square at impact, but the feel is amazing, I also have very good distance control with it as I don't with my spider. (tried it at a local golf store)

So do I sacrifice a square club face for good distance control and great feel-or do I do vice versa?

Thanks

What's more important, good feel or holing putts?  For 99.9% of players (and I'd wager that the percentage is probably higher than that) making putts is going to trump feel.  My putter has an odd feel to to it, but I make a lot of short putts (and I lag long putts better too) that I missed with my Odyssey.  I wouldn't let my putter go for anything in the world.  The Spider is a nice putter, and when TM came out with the original model several years ago I'd have probably bought one despite the ridiculous price (my putter was built for under $90) if I hadn't already had one which is dependable for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What's more important, good feel or holing putts?  For 99.9% of players (and I'd wager that the percentage is probably higher than that) making putts is going to trump feel.  My putter has an odd feel to to it, but I make a lot of short putts (and I lag long putts better too) that I missed with my Odyssey.  I wouldn't let my putter go for anything in the world.  The Spider is a nice putter, and when TM came out with the original model several years ago I'd have probably bought one despite the ridiculous price (my putter was built for under $90) if I hadn't already had one which is dependable for me.

Totally agree holing putts is a lot of fun and I don't really notice the feel when I make a good putt, I just focus on the speed and line, maybe I'm over thinking it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a long time I used light putters and did not putt very well. I decided to try an Odyssey Dart belly putter, but did not like it either. So I cut down the belly putter to 34" length. I was concerned about the swingweight, as the head weighs 400 grams (most putters heads for standard length are around 350 grams). Well, it's the best putter I've ever had, not only in terms of direction, but most importantly, in terms of distance control. I'm putting better than ever.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use an old Ping Anser 2 patent pending putter. I've tried putters with inserts, but I always come back to the Ping. I find that putters with inserts mute the feel.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • He said, doesn't experience with the driver (bulge ref.) Just mid/long irons.   I think, I would look at the divot on these to see if they are more out to in, longer and deeper than normal past the ball. An extra 'compressed' in to out impact with closed to club path face can do all that you have described.
    • Simple answer: the polls are always volatile in the period between the conventions. McCain jumped ahead in the polls at this time in 2008, but it evaporated once the data caught up to what happened at the Democratic convention. No need for the left to panic, no need for the right to get cocky.
    • I feel for you.  Here in northeastern Colorado, all of our water comes from wells, 200 feet and deeper.  And even drilling a well is a hit or miss proposition, and a really good well will only pump about 10 gallons a minute - most farmers are tickled when they get 6, the average is less than that.  Crops are not irrigated, farmers grow dryland wheat, corn and millet, with a few fields of commercial sunflowers. We average 1.25" of precipitation per month all year. Most of that comes in May-July, but even then it's less than 2.5" each month (with 4 days left in July, I've only emptied about 1.8" of water from our rain gauge this month, and I doubt that we will hit our 2.3" average for July).  Also, most of our rain comes in bunches called thunderstorms - we rarely get a soaking rain like you do farther east.  Humidity is low, most days under 35% and can be below 15%, so any moisture that is in or on the ground is sucked up quickly.  We do most of our lawn and golf course watering at night so it has time to soak in before the sun comes up.   On my home course, the water hazard ponds are reservoirs for watering the course, and they can be several feet lower in the fall because of the draw down.  They are fed by an irrigation ditch from water stored in the mountains west of Denver, and water rights are divvied out by one's place on the water rights seniority list.  When supplies are low, the lower part of the list gets cut off.  One private club a few years back had only enough water for the tees and greens - the fairways dried out to the point where the cracks would swallow a ball.  There was only dead grass and weeds mowed short.  They survived that year and and spent a good bit of money to renegotiate their water rights, but it took a couple of years for the course to recover.
    • If you looked at the polls for Trump he didn't see his boost till after the RNC convention. Also, the link you posted is to a prediction not a poll. Basically they are using 3000 to guess who will win in November. This isn't a poll on who they would vote for now.   So, Twitchy dot com misinterpreted the USC website.  The guy who has a track record for being highly accurate in predictions still has Hillary's chance of winning at 60% http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#plus  
    • The hack is huge deal. The apparent connection with the Russian government that stands to benefit greatly from the proposed foreign policy of a presidential candidate, whose credit line happens to run straight through Moscow, seems too substantial to dismiss. 65 percent of Americans have a negative opinion of Russia; one consequence of having an old, white voting base is that they remember the Cold War. The Dems should keep digging at this story; it may be their strongest weapon to attack Trump's credibility with working-class white voters.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Erg
      Erg
      (49 years old)
    2. irishmike27
      irishmike27
      (37 years old)
    3. Tutenharman
      Tutenharman
      (27 years old)
  • Blog Entries