Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had been going for years to a grass hitting range ,and noticed alot of inconsistency in ball flight , including some shanks .  They use the generic range balls , with the red stripe around the ball . The last few practices , I've been going to a different range , which uses better balls , probably recycled " B' grade brand balls . I notice my ball flight is much more consistent   there . Coincidence or can the practice ball have that much effect ?


Posted

My drives pull-slice with range balls and I can only laugh it off because they pull-fade with new balls on course.  Other clubs seem consistent.  You'll of course notice DC (distance control) on range balls because they drop quicker.


Posted
Originally Posted by TJBam

My drives pull-slice with range balls and I can only laugh it off because they pull-fade with new balls on course.  Other clubs seem consistent.  You'll of course notice DC (distance control) on range balls because they drop quicker.

That's interesting. I've noticed that typically the reverse is true. Most range balls are low spin balls, and many of them have been used for so long, there isn't much left in the way of dimples. This usually equates to lower spin and less hook or slice. It also equates to less hang time as you mentioned, due to less back spin.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by 460CompMark

i try to stay away from the range

Solid strategy for improvement.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

That's interesting. I've noticed that typically the reverse is true. Most range balls are low spin balls, and many of them have been used for so long, there isn't much left in the way of dimples. This usually equates to lower spin and less hook or slice. It also equates to less hang time as you mentioned, due to less back spin.

It's a mystery to me.  I would've thought the same thing.  Facts is facts though.


Posted

Range balls and range turf conditions are usually so bad I only use ranges I know have decent balls. Even then it's more to warm up if I don't have time to stretch before I get to the course. I do most of my practice at home hitting into a net with the balls I use to play. For me the range is more of a distraction than it's worth. Too many young guys repeatedly commenting about how "far" their anemic shots fly to get any serious work done. I spend more time at the chipping greens at my home course. When I finish there I'll take a longer club and take practice swings a few minutes before we tee off.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I find the range adequate for general exercises, but I don't let specific distance or ball flight concern me other than severe hooks/slices etc. and the general starting direction of my shots. I am also looking for the way the ball feels coming off the club for contact. For those purposes and also considering the limitations of my skills, the range is adequate.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Dave2512

Range balls and range turf conditions are usually so bad I only use ranges I know have decent balls.

Me, too.   One range I know use balls until balls lose all their dimples.   Luckily, my local range updates their balls regularly.   They also throw out any other balls (different brand range balls, used regular balls) that get mixed in.   The problem with this range is their distance marker.   All their markers are incorrect by 5 - 15 yards.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

That's interesting. I've noticed that typically the reverse is true. Most range balls are low spin balls, and many of them have been used for so long, there isn't much left in the way of dimples. This usually equates to lower spin and less hook or slice. It also equates to less hang time as you mentioned, due to less back spin.

Originally Posted by TJBam

It's a mystery to me.  I would've thought the same thing.  Facts is facts though.

I like it when facts and science have a little tug-o-war.  Always makes for a good battle.

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted
Originally Posted by iceman777

I had been going for years to a grass hitting range ,and noticed alot of inconsistency in ball flight , including some shanks .  They use the generic range balls , with the red stripe around the ball . The last few practices , I've been going to a different range , which uses better balls , probably recycled " B' grade brand balls . I notice my ball flight is much more consistent   there . Coincidence or can the practice ball have that much effect ?

I doubt if a bad range ball is causing that.


Posted
[QUOTE name="iceman777" url="/t/69035/range-balls-and-ball-flight#post_878786"] I had been going for years to a grass hitting range ,and noticed alot of inconsistency in ball flight , [U] [COLOR=FF0000]including some shanks .[/COLOR] [/U]  They use the generic range balls , with the red stripe around the ball . The last few practices , I've been going to a different range , which uses better balls , probably recycled " B' grade brand balls . I notice my ball flight is much more consistent   there . Coincidence or can the practice ball have that much effect ?   [/QUOTE]

Yeah, I don't think that was caused by the range balls...

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by bplewis24

I like it when facts and science have a little tug-o-war.  Always makes for a good battle.

LOL....

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm lucky that my local range cycles new balls regularly, so you don't get those "chalk balls" or smoothies. Out of a normal large bucket of 110 balls, there might be 6 or 8 with a minor cut or dimple from a club, pipe or something. I'll dump in 20-25 at a time into the trough and try to separate them by quality. There's always non-range balls in the lot- from Titlelist's to Pinnacles (today, there were a bunch of Srixons- almost new). They get put to the side to be used once I'm all warmed up. The worst conditioned are used in the beginning to get things started. I NEVER use them for distance control, but for general ball striking and flight path, with the newer balls giving the best feedback for the various shots.

Posted
Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

Yeah, I don't think that was caused by the range balls...

C'mon dude.  He hit a shank on a range ball.  Thems just the facts.

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted
[QUOTE name="geauxforbroke" url="/t/69035/range-balls-and-ball-flight#post_878939"] Yeah, I don't think that was caused by the range balls...[/QUOTE] C'mon dude.  He hit a shank on a range ball.  Thems just the facts. a2_wink.gif

Can't argue with that.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If I hit shank after shank on the range it's because I am distracted by a guy next to me flailing away at balls like he's trying to slay a TRex. All that grunting and heavy breathing is downright weird.

  • Upvote 2

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.