Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/24/2023 at 6:39 PM, billchao said:

Short game has gotten pretty decent since watching the Rick Shiels video and realizing I was opening the clubface the wrong way. I’ve also kind of simplified my short game by having just a couple of basic motions and varying my club selection based on the situation. I have a basic chip motion I can use with all of my wedges and even into the mid-irons. I have a basic pitch that for my 60°, 55°, 50°, and PW depending on how far I want to fly the ball and how much room for roll I have. Then obviously slight speed variations in between depending on what I want the ball to do, but given a choice I prefer to make the smaller swing and use a lower lofted club and just let the ball roll towards the hole over flying it most of the way. It does lead to some mistakes in shot selection but it’s not like I wasn’t making those mistakes before using predominantly the one wedge for all shots. Execution is easier this way and I’m getting consistently better.

Except for bunkers, though. They are still the bane of my existence.

I neglected in keeping up my basic short game motions - 1/2, 3/4, Pitches, chitches and chips. Kinda false confidence of having them 'in the bag'. Looking back, the confidence waned and affected the long game confidence too. 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Did some actual swing work today. Wanted to work on the flat to steep move and the logical fix for that is to do the exact opposite, so I took the club back ridiculously steep and shallowed it out in transition:

 

I liked what I saw with the club shaft there, but not so much with the clubface. Definitely closed in the early backswing. Ok, so tweaked that a bit after reviewing those videos:

 

I'm pretty happy with that. Spent the better part of an hour just doing this. I feel like I can take this feel to the course pretty easily.

 

7 hours ago, GolfLug said:

I neglected in keeping up my basic short game motions - 1/2, 3/4, Pitches, chitches and chips. Kinda false confidence of having them 'in the bag'. Looking back, the confidence waned and affected the long game confidence too. 

Yea I go through these cycles where I'll make an adjustment and do well for a couple of rounds and then completely stop focusing on it which causes me to lose it. You'd think I'd learn by now but I'm pretty dense, apparently.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Moderator
Posted

Saving this here because it’s important. I need to actively feel the release 2 and 3 because I tend to drag the handle. Feels like I’m bowing the right hand like I’m flipping at it. Very important not to roll the wrists over. Clubface points at me at A7.

Also the chest turn thing really resonates with me because I found that I start my short game shots by pulling the club back, hands moving right along the sagittal plane. Kind of explains why I struggle to find the ground consistently. Actually “chest turn” might be in this second video. Doesn’t matter where I heard it I guess.

This one was pretty good for me, too. The Pelz system has stopped working for me for a while. Again, not finding a consistent swing bottom. This is just setup and turn which I found surprisingly easy and hit the ball really cleanly. Weight left and pivot over that. Need to dial in my distances once I get the motion down because I was hitting them longer than I expected today, then adjusting by trying to take something off the swing and hitting it shorter than I wanted.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I mentioned that I was struggling with my partial wedges and shots 50-100 yards. Really inconsistent swing bottom and contact: fat and thin shots. The second video from the post above really helped clean up contact tremendously.

Here are my SG:A stats from a couple of weeks ago (hdcp benchmark is 10):

IMG_4174.jpeg

The proximity stats are equally as stupid:

IMG_4175.jpeg

I made the adjustment last Saturday, but learned fairly quickly that my distances were way off. A product of accidentally hitting the ball out of the sweet spot possibly, or simply that changing to a different wedge technique resulted in slightly different distances than I’m used to. The end result was that I was hitting everything long and taking too much off when trying to adjust for it mid-round. So while the improvement didn’t really reflect in the SG:A stats, it did show more in the proximity stats:

IMG_4171.jpeg
 

IMG_4176.jpeg

On Sunday, I tried to really focus on the distance control, accepting that my new “3/4” swing was about 8-10 yards longer than my old one and then dialing it down by choking down on the grip. That ended up working out well:

IMG_4172.jpeg

 

IMG_4177.jpeg

I put 6/6 shots on the green from 50-100 yards. That seems to be pretty good.

What can I learn from one or two rounds in isolation? Probably nothing, tbh. I do know that my contact has gotten much better. The only 3/4 wedge shot that I missed with was a GW attempt on #2 that I hit just slightly fat, so even that was an improvement. Again, small sample size. I’ll stick with it and keep monitoring things going forward.

We’re not going to talk about my game inside of 50 yards, though. I’m currently playing like a 5 with the worst short game and putting ever or a 25 with the best long game ever. How that’s even possible in the same person is beyond my comprehension, but I guess I just like to be different 😜

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
59 minutes ago, billchao said:

What can I learn from one or two rounds in isolation? Probably nothing, tbh.

I'm not sure that's true. ...It looks like progress. 

The challenge comes in maintaining that progress... or better yet, building upon it. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
56 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I'm not sure that's true. ...It looks like progress. 

The challenge comes in maintaining that progress... or better yet, building upon it. 

I’m mostly hesitant to call it more than what it is at the moment, which is a single round in which I hit a bunch of really good approach shots. It could be progress for sure, but maybe I was just “on it” that day. On the flip side, my putting on Sunday was worse than usual, even by my standards. It was just an off day (for me) there.

I could have a setback this weekend. I’ve played this game long enough to know that much.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, billchao said:

I’m mostly hesitant to call it more than what it is at the moment, which is a single round in which I hit a bunch of really good approach shots. It could be progress for sure, but maybe I was just “on it” that day. On the flip side, my putting on Sunday was worse than usual, even by my standards. It was just an off day (for me) there.

I could have a setback this weekend. I’ve played this game long enough to know that much.

How's the grass? If it is still wintery  super dormant/wet, you should not underestimate how much it screws up even very well settled short game players. Don't get into overanalyzing of SG data. Not yet. Stick to your mechanics. 

Edited by GolfLug

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, GolfLug said:

How's the grass? If it is still wintery  super dormant/wet, you should not underestimate how much it screws up even very well settled short game players. Don't get into overanalyzing of SG data. Not yet. Stick to your mechanics. 

I haven’t played a dry round in over a month, when the ground was still frozen. It has rained every week in March and not in small amounts. We’ve had over 3” of rain in the past 72 hours.

I’m not overanalyzing my data. I just had some time to kill.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, billchao said:

I haven’t played a dry round in over a month, when the ground was still frozen. It has rained every week in March and not in small amounts. We’ve had over 3” of rain in the past 72 hours.

Yah.

1 hour ago, billchao said:

I’m not overanalyzing my data.

Maybe that came out a bit wrong. Resulting distance and proximity can be misleading indicators of your strike mechanics off dormant/wet grass and muddy soaked ground. Ball takes off funny especially if you have downward strike (good). Distance variability is going to be very high. I putt from 15 yards out unless I absolutely have to use a wedge and use a low bounce wedge just for winter and my mechanics become overly picky. Every short shot is a hit and hope till the grass comes back and mud becomes soil again. Just sayin. 

Simon sez, this is your year.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
15 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

this is your year

I say that every year.

But so did Cubs fans 😜

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Funny 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

It looks like improvement to me as well. For sure something to build on.  I'm curious to see more updates on it.

I actually went out in the yard after watching the videos you posted and tried the techniques. They felt really good and consistent. I would have to take it to the range and see with some longer shots but I liked it.

 

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I probably should have watched this video months ago. As @GolfLug pointed out, the turf conditions have been a problem. This helps explain why I haven’t really been consistent with a standard pitch (release 2) shot and have been resorting to using what I like to call a lofted chip (release 1) technique pretty much everywhere. I thought I was limiting myself by relying on only the one method but it seems that it’s ok.

I also think I have to get out of the mindset that there’s a “correct shot” to hit in any given situation and then fail to execute it for whatever reason and just go with whatever shot I’m confident in that I can hit reasonably well. Like if I’m short-sided with a bunker to carry I need to stop trying to hit a high flop near the pin and just chip it out 10’ past the hole because the latter still leaves me putting if I fail to execute it.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
6 hours ago, billchao said:

I probably should have watched this video months ago. As @GolfLug pointed out, the turf conditions have been a problem. This helps explain why I haven’t really been consistent with a standard pitch (release 2) shot and have been resorting to using what I like to call a lofted chip (release 1) technique pretty much everywhere. I thought I was limiting myself by relying on only the one method but it seems that it’s ok.

I also think I have to get out of the mindset that there’s a “correct shot” to hit in any given situation and then fail to execute it for whatever reason and just go with whatever shot I’m confident in that I can hit reasonably well. Like if I’m short-sided with a bunker to carry I need to stop trying to hit a high flop near the pin and just chip it out 10’ past the hole because the latter still leaves me putting if I fail to execute it.

I’ve been using the technique Erik taught us last year for most short game shots this year. The ground has been uneven and it seems to get the best results.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
11 hours ago, boogielicious said:

I’ve been using the technique Erik taught us last year for most short game shots this year. The ground has been uneven and it seems to get the best results.

The ground is so soft, I have been having trouble with hitting basic pitch shots fat. I have been playing a lot but I don’t really have the time to work on it so I have to go with whatever works best for now, and that’s the release one shot.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
19 hours ago, billchao said:

I probably should have watched this video months ago. As @GolfLug pointed out, the turf conditions have been a problem. This helps explain why I haven’t really been consistent with a standard pitch (release 2) shot and have been resorting to using what I like to call a lofted chip (release 1) technique pretty much everywhere. I thought I was limiting myself by relying on only the one method but it seems that it’s ok.

I also think I have to get out of the mindset that there’s a “correct shot” to hit in any given situation and then fail to execute it for whatever reason and just go with whatever shot I’m confident in that I can hit reasonably well. Like if I’m short-sided with a bunker to carry I need to stop trying to hit a high flop near the pin and just chip it out 10’ past the hole because the latter still leaves me putting if I fail to execute it.

I have been watching his videos since the first one you posted. I have only tried it in the yard so far but it feels really good. I saw another where Rick Shiels had a lesson with him. It explained a lot as well.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
39 minutes ago, TN94z said:

I have been watching his videos since the first one you posted. I have only tried it in the yard so far but it feels really good. I saw another where Rick Shiels had a lesson with him. It explained a lot as well.

We have a topic on that one:

It was actually @iacas who pointed me to Dan Grieve’s videos. I mentioned it to him at some point that I was having trouble with the short game and he told me to go watch them. Then I completely forgot about it and they popped up on my YT feed.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Moderator
Posted

Went to a PING fitting day today. Going to be ordering a G430 Max 3w with a 75g x-stiff shaft at 5w length and a 3h. I forget what my fitter did with the shaft on that but she told me she’s going to email the club the specs of everything.

The 3w combination we found pretty quickly. As for the hybrid, we tried a bunch of different head and shaft combinations for that distance with mixed results. Then she handed me the 3h and I took three swings with it and knew it was the one.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Moderator
Posted

IMG_4261.jpeg

My short game is no longer a dumpster fire. It’s bordering on being the best part of my game at this point. I still need to stay out of the bunkers but I’m starting to hit shots to makeable distances (if only I could putt).

IMG_4262.jpeg

I’ve pretty much gotten the three releases down. My feels for the releases:

  1. Drive the handle forward. I haven’t used this one too much lately.
  2. Left hand pulls the club. This is my standard motion.
  3. Right hand pushes the club. I use this occasionally for flop shots.

I’m still in the process of learning how the ball reacts on the green with different shots so there’s plenty of room for improvement. The contact is clean so I’ll be able to dial it in with experience. The most important thing is to slow my tempo down. Way down. I need to bring the club back slowly so that momentum doesn’t put the clubhead in weird places. Not trying to create lag around the greens.

Full swing has kind of fallen off but I haven’t practiced much lately. I’ll probably try to get some time in before the Ohio outing.

  • Thumbs Up 4

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
    • Day 68: Quick work with some foam balls. Trying to combine not making my right leg into a pole with slightly earlier weight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.