• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Shane Hansen

Xhot2 or Big Bertha...SLDR or JetSpeed

9 posts in this topic

I find it confusing today when you are looking for a driver, which one to go with.  I love Callaway drivers, however, it appears stats have both the Big Bertha and Xhot2 hit basically the same distance....then you have the fantastic TaylorMade SLDR and the Jetspeed, both which appear to have similar stats as well.  Has it really come to the point where there isn't anything technology wise that will separate drivers anymore?  It seems that if you normally drive a ball 250 yards with a driver, more than likely you can go into a golf store and buy a new driver and guess what...still 250 yards.  I am starting to wonder if it has just come down to looks now...and if that is the case are we going to see a price war?  I honestly hope so, I really don't know where this ($400.00) for a driver number came in as a standard, but it is a joke.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I think your right its a lot more about looks than performance. Im looking for a hybrid and saw a review of 4 of the new models. The reviewer got almost the exact same numbers with all 4 and basically said its all about looks and feel. As far as a new driver goes if I was you I'd look at last year's x hot its a really nice club very solid feel on off center hits. Im sure if you tested it against the new model you wouldn't see a big difference. Especially when its probably $150 cheaper.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I find it confusing today when you are looking for a driver, which one to go with.  I love Callaway drivers, however, it appears stats have both the Big Bertha and Xhot2 hit basically the same distance....then you have the fantastic TaylorMade SLDR and the Jetspeed, both which appear to have similar stats as well.  Has it really come to the point where there isn't anything technology wise that will separate drivers anymore?  It seems that if you normally drive a ball 250 yards with a driver, more than likely you can go into a golf store and buy a new driver and guess what...still 250 yards.  I am starting to wonder if it has just come down to looks now...and if that is the case are we going to see a price war?  I honestly hope so, I really don't know where this ($400.00) for a driver number came in as a standard, but it is a joke.

On the drivers you posted

SLDR, VERY LOW Spin, and low launch

Jetspeed, low spin, medium-low launch

xhot2, med-low spin, medium launch

Big Bertha, med-low spin, medium-low launch

Differences in launch might be 1-2 degrees giver or take. As for spin, I saw a drop of about 10% of spin from xHot 2 to Jetspeed, and another 10% down the the SLDR.

As for picking a driver, it certainly does come down to looks. It comes down to forgiveness. How much distance do you get on off center hits. For me it comes down to shaft options as well. Really which combination gives you confidence coupled with optimizing your launch conditions.

For me, I am going to the SLDR. I have a very HIGH ball speed. So I need a low spinning low launching driver. I can easily say I can loose 10-15 yards of distance if my rpm's go up by 500-600. Getting a higher launch with lower spin allows me to maximize my distance carry and roll.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The majority of "technology" in drivers nowadays I believe is focused around off-centre hits so you'll get less curvature and less distance lost if impact's not ideal. How it looks when addressing the ball though is of major importance as you'll be far happier and more confident looking down at a club head which suits your eye.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No driver is "hotter" than any other, everything is built to the limit. Drivers just have different characteristics for different golfers. Quick example when I was testing the Callaway Big Bertha drivers. With the Alpha I was launching it fine but wasn't spinning it enough. With the Big Bertha, different CoG location, my spin numbers were much better. So out of those two drivers, the BB went longer, wasn't any "hotter", just a better fit for my launch conditions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tests I have seen elsewhere but the SLDR on top for just about every swing speed, closely followed by the Ping G25 and believe it or not the Covert 2.0. Callaway seemed to be top dog in tests last year but seem to have dropped off in performance with the new models this year despite all the hoopla. Xhot 2 seems to be the hottest of the Cally offerings

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tests I have seen elsewhere but the SLDR on top for just about every swing speed, closely followed by the Ping G25 and believe it or not the Covert 2.0. Callaway seemed to be top dog in tests last year but seem to have dropped off in performance with the new models this year despite all the hoopla. Xhot 2 seems to be the hottest of the Cally offerings

Where did you see these tests?

Yeah moving the CoG closer to the face can pick up a little speed but gotta be careful you're launching the ball high enough, reason TMAG has the whole "Loft Up" campaign. Get a player hitting the SLDR swining 90mph with the same loft as his previous driver, could end up hitting it shorter.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tests I have seen elsewhere but the SLDR on top for just about every swing speed, closely followed by the Ping G25 and believe it or not the Covert 2.0. Callaway seemed to be top dog in tests last year but seem to have dropped off in performance with the new models this year despite all the hoopla. Xhot 2 seems to be the hottest of the Cally offerings

I've seen too many negative comments on the SLDR to believe it's on top for everyone. It may produce ball speed but high ball speed sprayed everywhere does not make a great driver for a particular golfer -- there is no panacea.

People react differently to shape and design. And for swings 90 and below, from most accounts, you will need 14 degrees of SLDR loft to get the ball going ...  and TM is coming out late with that loft. So those of us with "moderate" swing speeds can check it out.

I guess that's one of my issues with TM -- they say they're the latest and greatest, and sell drivers and fairways that the average golfer can't get in the air or hit consistently. For example, the SLDR, the RBZ fairways, to name a few. The RBZ fairways are fine off the tee, but the lower lofts belong in the hands of golfers with driver speeds above 95 mph and need to be cut down ... I think that's why you see the JetSpeed ... it's a fairway a regular Joe can possibly hit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah I get where you are coming from and I am not buying into the whole TM thing by any means. I am tossing up with the Ping G25, Covert VRS 2.0 or probably the X Hot 2. For no particular reason I have always steered clear of TM. Perhaps I like to have something slightly less common in my bag- they are just everywhere (aaghh, that likely why I am still having troubles getting my old original Machspeed out of my bag some 4 years on!). I like the comments the old MS gets- OMG that thing is ugly etc.... normally followed my WTF that thing is long... my you haven't missed many fairways today!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • This entirely depends on where you play. I play courses that usually have three groups and a couple of singles out per side, and I would say no, but then I get to an urban course, like Long. Island, or South Florida, and it's anger management time.  I like to watch my friends's shots, and compliment their successes, I take a couple practice swings if I am in an uneven lie, or whatever, but I am not going to spend time searching for extra balls while walking between shots, or sit and BS at the tee before shooting. For some reason I am always ready to hit first, honors or no, and I just don't get why people take so long there. As long as I can do the things I enjoy, like watching my shots and my friends shots, and take due care taking my shots and putting, I don't feel rushed, but three hours for a foursome means you have four serious golfers. My golfing is more social so that is unlikely to happen. I play with one guy who takes pace seriously, and we do fine.  If we want to pick up the pace of a group, we play best ball.
    • It would  be cool to see him get his card and do well, in this age of specialists from day 1, someone takes a different route and makes it.
    • Well, what if a feel for you produces a result for another that doesn't work at all? That is the problem of using feels in trying to describe what is going on. I am not you, you are not me, and we are not Mickey Wright.  Each golfer needs to find their own feel for what might produce the same movement. 
    • GOT, Walking Dead, and 13 Reasons Why.
    • It's not the powers that be. It's anybody who understands the golf swing and its mechanics. "feel" is never scientific nor does it provide any evidence. You don't agree with that? "Reasons to support the old school motion". Iacas has repeatedly stated he supports your appreciation for what you call 'Old School". He stated he's fine and even teaches the lifting of the lead heal if it allows one to gain better rotation. You seem to be trying to defend something and I'm not sure what it is you're defending. The rear leg does not retain its flex completely on the bs. You can have the 'feeling' all you want that it does. But it doesn't. Just like 'feeling' you keep your trail arm straight to help widen your swing. It's impossible to keep straight. Feeling it as being straight? Fine. I don't think you seem to understand that just because these 'old school' golfers SAID what they felt or did during a swing doesn't  represent WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DID. Mickey Wright can say she tried to get all her weight or 95% of it on her trail leg in the backswing. Fine. But she didn't. You can't possibly believe that if we put these "old school" golfers on pressure plates their readings would be vastly different than today's 'modern players'?  No one has said the old school motion was wrong. What has been stated, correctly by Iacas, is that what you're describing as what is being done by that swing is incorrect. Hell, you even just admitted your statement on weight shift was inaccurate.  So....what, again, is your point?
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon