• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
albatross

New Graphic on NBC Telecasts

89 posts in this topic

The one where it tells me what shot the guy is on.  So completely annoying.  If you tell me he's putting for birdie on a par 4, you don't need to also show me an additional graphic that indicates that it's his 3rd shot.  Showing me it's his first shot when he's standing on the tee is ridiculous overkill.  I know it's a small thing, but it's really irritating.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I disagree. I think it's great. When the player is not on the green they never say "for birdie" or "for par," etc, they just say "fourth shot," so it's nice to know what it means. If they're playing courses I'm really familiar with, and I'm watching exclusively, then yeah, it's not going to add anything. But when I'm only half paying attention, and flipping back and forth to basketball, it's quite helpful.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's o.k...what I wish they would do is put up a graphic on the yardage left, and what club they are using. I know that the club They use doesn't relate to which club most of us would use, still would like them to show it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I disagree. I think it's great. When the player is not on the green they never say "for birdie" or "for par," etc, they just say "fourth shot," so it's nice to know what it means. If they're playing courses I'm really familiar with, and I'm watching exclusively, then yeah, it's not going to add anything.

But when I'm only half paying attention, and flipping back and forth to basketball, it's quite helpful.

It's fine if you think it's great, but your explanation is incorrect.  I watched all day today and every time the graphics come up it says, for example:

8th Hole

Par 4

For Birdie

1 2 3 4

And if they are hitting from the fairway, it already says Par 4, second shot, so why do I need an additional graphic with the number 2 highlighted?  Knowing Par and that it's their second shot, tells you everything you need to know.  What does the new graphic tell you that isn't already on the screen?

So it's definitely redundant.  And on the tee?  I realize that they could be re-teeing and hitting 3, but in those cases they always put 3rd shot on the screen.  Was talking to some golf buddies about it, and it annoys them too.  You're certainly entitled to love it though. I was just pointing out that it's certainly redundant.

A picture of the graphic and some funny comments about it's stupidity on this site:

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind it, there are times when I don't know what shot they are on in relation to par (not very often) and it helps. Def no harm having more information up...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fine if you think it's great, but your explanation is incorrect.  I watched all day today and every time the graphics come up it says, for example: 8th Hole Par 4 For Birdie 1 2 3 4 So it's definitely redundant.  And on the tee?  I realize that they could be re-teeing and hitting 3, but in those cases they always put 3rd shot on the screen.  Was talking to some golf buddies about it, and it annoys them too.  You're certainly entitled to love it though. I was just pointing out that it's certainly redundant.   A picture of the graphic and some funny comments about it's stupidity on this site: [URL=http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html]http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html[/URL]

I think they made it redundant like that so that you don't have to use the new numbers. I didn't love the new graphic, but it didn't bother me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's fine if you think it's great, but your explanation is incorrect.  I watched all day today and every time the graphics come up it says, for example:

8th Hole

Par 4

For Birdie

1 2 3 4

And if they are hitting from the fairway, it already says Par 4, second shot, so why do I need an additional graphic with the number 2 highlighted?  Knowing Par and that it's their second shot, tells you everything you need to know.  What does the new graphic tell you that isn't already on the screen?

So it's definitely redundant.  And on the tee?  I realize that they could be re-teeing and hitting 3, but in those cases they always put 3rd shot on the screen.  Was talking to some golf buddies about it, and it annoys them too.  You're certainly entitled to love it though. I was just pointing out that it's certainly redundant.

A picture of the graphic and some funny comments about it's stupidity on this site:

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html

I'm not going to swear to it (because I wasn't paying super close attention, nor is it on right now) but I'm pretty sure I'm right.  When they are on the green, you are absolutely right - it'll show that it's the third shot AND say "for birdie," so, yes, in those cases it is absolutely redundant.

But I've watched a lot of golf over the years, and been frustrated multiple times before (albeit for only a minute or two) because if the guy is chipping from off the green the graphic doesn't say "for birdie," it says "3rd shot."  Without the "1 2 3 4" I don't really know what they're shooting for.  Yes, I acknowledge that it could still be redundant because the announcer may say "for birdie" but I'm not always listening to the tournament with volume, or even when I am, it's hectic around here and I'm not always hearing them.

It's not taking the place of anything else, so its not hurting anything, and there are certainly occasions where it's helpful.  That's how I see it.

And even if it were reduntant 100% of the time, I'd argue it's still helpful for those of us who aren't quite as focused.  For example, knowing that their short birdie putt is on a par 5  versus a par 3 makes it slightly less meaningful.

More information, to me, is usually a good thing. :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think they could have used that space for something useful instead of something redundant.

More information is not always better. It slows down recognition of the information that is there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think they could have used that space for something useful instead of something redundant.

More information is not always better. It slows down recognition of the information that is there.

Agree to disagree ... I like it.

Another example:  LPGA has a drivable par 4 right now (#16).  Girl makes the green and the graphic says "for eagle," but ends up in greenside bunker and it just says "2nd shot."  Without the numbers, I'd look up and likely think that girl in bunker missed the green on a par 3.  With numbers, there is no doubt.  So it appears as though its redundant info, but it's really not.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Agree to disagree ... I like it.

Cop-out. I raise the point that more information is not always better, and you cop out with the equivalent of plugging your ears and humming. It's redundant information 90% of the time. Any time the par of the hole is listed, it's redundant when they say "2nd shot" or "for eagle."

You can keep liking it, but if you're just gonna ignore valid points, why post? You like it and you've made up your mind.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Cop-out. I raise the point that more information is not always better, and you cop out with the equivalent of plugging your ears and humming. It's redundant information 90% of the time. Any time the par of the hole is listed, it's redundant when they say "2nd shot" or "for eagle."

You can keep liking it, but if you're just gonna ignore valid points, why post? You like it and you've made up your mind.

I'm not plugging my ears and humming ... I'm explaining why I think it's a good thing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not plugging my ears and humming ... I'm explaining why I think it's a good thing.

More information is not always a good thing, particularly when it's almost always redundant. They have a word for that: clutter. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

More information is not always a good thing, particularly when it's almost always redundant. They have a word for that: clutter. :)

Yes, I respect your opinion on that and I agree that many people will see that its redundant and not like it.  I'm simply not one of those people. :-P So far, it doesn't bother me, and I see some situations where it provides me info I didn't have in the past. :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, I respect your opinion on that and I agree that many people will see that its redundant and not like it.  I'm simply not one of those people.    So far, it doesn't bother me, and I see some situations where it provides me info I didn't have in the past.

That's fine.

I think it's stupid. :) I'd rather they use that space for something else, like GIR rank for the player for the year, odds of holing the putt, etc.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, I respect your opinion on that and I agree that many people will see that its redundant and not like it.  I'm simply not one of those people.    So far, it doesn't bother me, and I see some situations where it provides me info I didn't have in the past.

No one can argue with you about whether or not you like it. If you like it, that's fine.  However, you're wrong when you keep saying that it's information you didn't have in the past.  NBC and CBS coverage always show, as part of the pre-shot graphic, the par for the hole and the shot the player is currently hitting, so you aren't getting any new information.

If you flip to the golf randomly in the past, you quickly know that it's a Par 4 and the old graphic has always said 2nd shot.  The new graphic we've been discussing gives you absolutely ZERO new information.  That's the problem a lot of people have with it. You can like it all you want, but it's just a repeat of what's already been part of the pre-shot graphic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine. I think it's stupid. :) I'd rather they use that space for something else, like GIR rank for the player for the year, odds of holing the putt, etc.

I'd be cool with that ... Although it takes up a small amount of space so I imagine they could do both. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

it's repetitive. i agree with the above - more useful statistics should be integrated into broadcasts. the golf channel/nbc used to use aimpoint putting lines on greens. it'd be neat if they'd show that along with hole out percentages from the person putting vs the field. it seems like they've stopped using the aimpoint line altogether, which is unfortunate - it's difficult to get a good idea of the slope of a green on tv, and i thought it always added great perspective. same with the protracer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like it. They should use that space to show what position the player is in and how many strokes back from the leader. For example: "T5. 5 strokes back."
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I still remember my first couple of rounds playing strokeplay from the backtees on my home course. Because I went down to under hcp 15 I had to play in cat1 group, before that I only played Stableford from the medal tees. First couple of times 100+ scores as a hcp 14. I even got so fed up with this strokeplay, I picked up a couple of times. It took me two handfull of rounds to get used to it. later I played as a single digit player twice a strokeplay tournament on a nice but to me unknown course and scored both times 103. This year I will play it for the third time, to break that record. Strokeplay, no esc will get into his head. I would bet on it.
    • Obviously keeping your left leg flexed longer is the key.  For me, the problem has been straightening the right leg, but in theory any straightening that lifts you away from the ball is not good. What I have started doing is not flexing my knees that much when setting up.  They are not locked, but they are pretty straight.  I've never done this before but it has helped to keep me balanced and not do the lift-down-lift move.  My head doesn't move as much and I can lift my left heel on the backswing without lifting my upper body.  I also feel that I'm not fighting as much to get to the left side.  I'm getting more consistent contact and it seems to be easier on my body. I have no idea if it will help you at all and I'm just throwing it out in case you can't use a drill to fix your issue. John  
    • Hi guys been having trouble with my account or I wouldn't be so spotty... Anyways I been looking to upgrade my entire bag and am slowly but surely. I just ordered my new irons 716 AP1 and can't be more excited. I was just wondering what you guys thought on how hard it's going to be to adjust to them coming from TM Burner plus irons. I'm sure they will be a half to a full club longer due the stronger lofts, but how much more forgiving could they be. I really hope the long irons will be a tad bit easier to hit than mine currently are. Thanks for any and all feedback and remember the goal is to keep it in the short grass lol 
    • I love grilling steaks. I've cooked them caveman style right on the charcoal, a grate over my chimney starter, reverse sear, 700* grill, you name it I've done it. I haven't tried the sous vide method yet, but it's similar to a reverse sear in the oven then 30 seconds on a hot grill grate. My favorite cut is a big 3lb cowboy ribeye. I'll eat a filet at a steakhouse, but the ribeye is king when I'm grilling at home. 
    • 5/24:  Another rainy day (and my yard is soaked), so kept it light, and indoors.  Looks good to play tomorrow, finally, though.
      5 mins. wall drill indoors, no club; focus on keeping backside into wall through impact
      A couple of mins. in front of mirror; focused on checkups for setup position, then at each position through impact
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon