• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
albatross

New Graphic on NBC Telecasts

89 posts in this topic

The one where it tells me what shot the guy is on.  So completely annoying.  If you tell me he's putting for birdie on a par 4, you don't need to also show me an additional graphic that indicates that it's his 3rd shot.  Showing me it's his first shot when he's standing on the tee is ridiculous overkill.  I know it's a small thing, but it's really irritating.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I disagree. I think it's great. When the player is not on the green they never say "for birdie" or "for par," etc, they just say "fourth shot," so it's nice to know what it means. If they're playing courses I'm really familiar with, and I'm watching exclusively, then yeah, it's not going to add anything. But when I'm only half paying attention, and flipping back and forth to basketball, it's quite helpful.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's o.k...what I wish they would do is put up a graphic on the yardage left, and what club they are using. I know that the club They use doesn't relate to which club most of us would use, still would like them to show it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I disagree. I think it's great. When the player is not on the green they never say "for birdie" or "for par," etc, they just say "fourth shot," so it's nice to know what it means. If they're playing courses I'm really familiar with, and I'm watching exclusively, then yeah, it's not going to add anything.

But when I'm only half paying attention, and flipping back and forth to basketball, it's quite helpful.

It's fine if you think it's great, but your explanation is incorrect.  I watched all day today and every time the graphics come up it says, for example:

8th Hole

Par 4

For Birdie

1 2 3 4

And if they are hitting from the fairway, it already says Par 4, second shot, so why do I need an additional graphic with the number 2 highlighted?  Knowing Par and that it's their second shot, tells you everything you need to know.  What does the new graphic tell you that isn't already on the screen?

So it's definitely redundant.  And on the tee?  I realize that they could be re-teeing and hitting 3, but in those cases they always put 3rd shot on the screen.  Was talking to some golf buddies about it, and it annoys them too.  You're certainly entitled to love it though. I was just pointing out that it's certainly redundant.

A picture of the graphic and some funny comments about it's stupidity on this site:

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind it, there are times when I don't know what shot they are on in relation to par (not very often) and it helps. Def no harm having more information up...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fine if you think it's great, but your explanation is incorrect.  I watched all day today and every time the graphics come up it says, for example: 8th Hole Par 4 For Birdie 1 2 3 4 So it's definitely redundant.  And on the tee?  I realize that they could be re-teeing and hitting 3, but in those cases they always put 3rd shot on the screen.  Was talking to some golf buddies about it, and it annoys them too.  You're certainly entitled to love it though. I was just pointing out that it's certainly redundant.   A picture of the graphic and some funny comments about it's stupidity on this site: [URL=http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html]http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html[/URL]

I think they made it redundant like that so that you don't have to use the new numbers. I didn't love the new graphic, but it didn't bother me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's fine if you think it's great, but your explanation is incorrect.  I watched all day today and every time the graphics come up it says, for example:

8th Hole

Par 4

For Birdie

1 2 3 4

And if they are hitting from the fairway, it already says Par 4, second shot, so why do I need an additional graphic with the number 2 highlighted?  Knowing Par and that it's their second shot, tells you everything you need to know.  What does the new graphic tell you that isn't already on the screen?

So it's definitely redundant.  And on the tee?  I realize that they could be re-teeing and hitting 3, but in those cases they always put 3rd shot on the screen.  Was talking to some golf buddies about it, and it annoys them too.  You're certainly entitled to love it though. I was just pointing out that it's certainly redundant.

A picture of the graphic and some funny comments about it's stupidity on this site:

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2014/3/22/new-golf-graphicwhat-do-you-think.html

I'm not going to swear to it (because I wasn't paying super close attention, nor is it on right now) but I'm pretty sure I'm right.  When they are on the green, you are absolutely right - it'll show that it's the third shot AND say "for birdie," so, yes, in those cases it is absolutely redundant.

But I've watched a lot of golf over the years, and been frustrated multiple times before (albeit for only a minute or two) because if the guy is chipping from off the green the graphic doesn't say "for birdie," it says "3rd shot."  Without the "1 2 3 4" I don't really know what they're shooting for.  Yes, I acknowledge that it could still be redundant because the announcer may say "for birdie" but I'm not always listening to the tournament with volume, or even when I am, it's hectic around here and I'm not always hearing them.

It's not taking the place of anything else, so its not hurting anything, and there are certainly occasions where it's helpful.  That's how I see it.

And even if it were reduntant 100% of the time, I'd argue it's still helpful for those of us who aren't quite as focused.  For example, knowing that their short birdie putt is on a par 5  versus a par 3 makes it slightly less meaningful.

More information, to me, is usually a good thing. :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think they could have used that space for something useful instead of something redundant.

More information is not always better. It slows down recognition of the information that is there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think they could have used that space for something useful instead of something redundant.

More information is not always better. It slows down recognition of the information that is there.

Agree to disagree ... I like it.

Another example:  LPGA has a drivable par 4 right now (#16).  Girl makes the green and the graphic says "for eagle," but ends up in greenside bunker and it just says "2nd shot."  Without the numbers, I'd look up and likely think that girl in bunker missed the green on a par 3.  With numbers, there is no doubt.  So it appears as though its redundant info, but it's really not.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Agree to disagree ... I like it.

Cop-out. I raise the point that more information is not always better, and you cop out with the equivalent of plugging your ears and humming. It's redundant information 90% of the time. Any time the par of the hole is listed, it's redundant when they say "2nd shot" or "for eagle."

You can keep liking it, but if you're just gonna ignore valid points, why post? You like it and you've made up your mind.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Cop-out. I raise the point that more information is not always better, and you cop out with the equivalent of plugging your ears and humming. It's redundant information 90% of the time. Any time the par of the hole is listed, it's redundant when they say "2nd shot" or "for eagle."

You can keep liking it, but if you're just gonna ignore valid points, why post? You like it and you've made up your mind.

I'm not plugging my ears and humming ... I'm explaining why I think it's a good thing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not plugging my ears and humming ... I'm explaining why I think it's a good thing.

More information is not always a good thing, particularly when it's almost always redundant. They have a word for that: clutter. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

More information is not always a good thing, particularly when it's almost always redundant. They have a word for that: clutter. :)

Yes, I respect your opinion on that and I agree that many people will see that its redundant and not like it.  I'm simply not one of those people. :-P So far, it doesn't bother me, and I see some situations where it provides me info I didn't have in the past. :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, I respect your opinion on that and I agree that many people will see that its redundant and not like it.  I'm simply not one of those people.    So far, it doesn't bother me, and I see some situations where it provides me info I didn't have in the past.

That's fine.

I think it's stupid. :) I'd rather they use that space for something else, like GIR rank for the player for the year, odds of holing the putt, etc.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, I respect your opinion on that and I agree that many people will see that its redundant and not like it.  I'm simply not one of those people.    So far, it doesn't bother me, and I see some situations where it provides me info I didn't have in the past.

No one can argue with you about whether or not you like it. If you like it, that's fine.  However, you're wrong when you keep saying that it's information you didn't have in the past.  NBC and CBS coverage always show, as part of the pre-shot graphic, the par for the hole and the shot the player is currently hitting, so you aren't getting any new information.

If you flip to the golf randomly in the past, you quickly know that it's a Par 4 and the old graphic has always said 2nd shot.  The new graphic we've been discussing gives you absolutely ZERO new information.  That's the problem a lot of people have with it. You can like it all you want, but it's just a repeat of what's already been part of the pre-shot graphic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine. I think it's stupid. :) I'd rather they use that space for something else, like GIR rank for the player for the year, odds of holing the putt, etc.

I'd be cool with that ... Although it takes up a small amount of space so I imagine they could do both. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

it's repetitive. i agree with the above - more useful statistics should be integrated into broadcasts. the golf channel/nbc used to use aimpoint putting lines on greens. it'd be neat if they'd show that along with hole out percentages from the person putting vs the field. it seems like they've stopped using the aimpoint line altogether, which is unfortunate - it's difficult to get a good idea of the slope of a green on tv, and i thought it always added great perspective. same with the protracer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like it. They should use that space to show what position the player is in and how many strokes back from the leader. For example: "T5. 5 strokes back."
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • It looks like the same scenario as DJ and Wattel in the open. Proximity of the golfer on the ground deforms the ground and it rolls off the blades of grass it was perched on. I think it's a bad penalty, because it's essentially random, though much more likely on very fast & sloped greens.
    • I liked Chappell as a possible pick early in the playoffs. He's a solid ballstriker with good length and the original 8 were a little thin there. If his putting has come alive during the playoffs (he's 'found' something) and his birdie average has bumped up then he would be a solid pick IMO. I think he'd be more of a contributor in fourball than foursomes with relatively weaker putting / short game than guys already on the team. Berger seems to have the most balanced game of the remaining pick options. McGirt and Woodland wouldn't be bad picks either. Justin Thomas may be a good 'chemistry' pick, but his stats for the year seem like he's got a very 'hit or miss' style of game. Maybe he was saving it for the end of the season, though? Moore would be an okay pick, but I expect he's a little short for Hazeltine (ballstriking is not his strength) and the squad already has Sneds and Zach. Duf wouldn't be a bad pick either if his game is on form and his putting has warmed up a bit.
    • On the penalty assessed to Justin Thomas, this will lead all golfers to mark their ball before putting anything but a tap in.  If he marks the ball and the places the ball back down, the ball probably won't move as it did.  With millions on the line, a player needs to mark the ball and inspect the putting surface.  Just a bad rule in my opinion but the ruling was correct.  Guilty until proven innocent.
    • If it is a municipal (city owned) course there may be no support from the city to maintain it beyond the absolute minimum. Truth is, cities have budgets and there is no money appropriated to improve it.  It really is a vicious circle.  Poorer conditions result in fewer rounds being played.  Costs out weigh revenue, rates are raised so even fewer people play the course and that results in less revenue.  It becomes an anchor on the city budget and easy prey for an investor.  So many muni courses have disappeared. John
    • After reading all these stories of how rarely it has happened to you guys I feel like an absolute menace on the golf course.   First time I ever hit into a group in front of me it was a blind approach into the green.  I drove my cart to the top of the hill to get a line on the flag.  One guy was getting his ball out of the hole and another guy was carrying the flag back to the hole.  I figured that by the time I got back to my ball they would be gone.  I lined up my shot, took several practice swings, checked my line again, and then blasted a beautiful, high, straight shot over the hill, right on line at the flag.  Pulled back up the hill and saw they were still putting.  Went up to apologise, and they congratulated me on a great shot.  He said it clipped the brim of his hat as he was tapping in and checked up a foot from the cup.  They also insisted that I play thru. Second time I did it on that course I sliced my drive two fairways over and hit into a cart on the move up the cart path. It rattled around in the cart and they both dove out of the cart for cover. Happened a few times on my home course too.  Several holes have blind drives and approaches due to all the hills in East Tennessee.  When play is slow you inevitably catch someone in a blind spot.  I got stuck behind a slow group one day and had to wait for ever shot from the 4th hole on.  By the 6th a young twosome had caught up to my group because of the slow play in front of us.  By the back nine they started getting impatient and driving onto us.  On hole 14 the preferred shot is to hit 170-200 yard layup from the tee to leave a 130-160 yard uphill shot into a blind green.  I was about 150 yards out waiting on the green to clear when they teed off.  Their ball rolled right up to my feet.  I turned around angry and hit their ball right back at them.  I was so ticked I blasted my 150 yard club at least 200 yards back at them flying over their head and into the woods behind the tees.  Didn't see them anymore that day.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dresilved
      Dresilved
      (51 years old)
    2. kpetrina
      kpetrina
      (24 years old)
    3. Luana
      Luana
      (38 years old)
  • Blog Entries