Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Does a fade have to go shorter than a draw?


Note: This thread is 4152 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Started working on hitting cuts when I need them, for both tee shots and pins that call for them, and to scrub a little distance off when I'm between clubs.  I've always heard that fades don't travel as far as draws, however I hit a cut 3w today that I swear traveled as far if not further than some of the draws I've hit on that particular hole.  That being said, I also hit a cut 9i that came up about 8 yards shorter than my stock draw usually does on the same par 3.

Any thoughts?


Posted
All things being equal, they typically will. If a fairway slopes down hill left to right, a fade may roll more than the draw since the fade is going with the slope and the draw would be going against the slope. But there are no absolutes.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted

Comparing a push draw to a pull fade, the pull fade should go farther because the club has less effective loft due to the clubface being closed.

Too many variables to say if one has a distance advantage over another.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Absolutely not. They result from exactly the same swing dynamics, simply mirror images of each other. The reason that most people believe otherwise is that the "fade" that they're generally exposed to is a weak slice caused by a much greater delta between club face and swing path than what they generally see from what are usually better players hitting stronger, slighter draws. The laws of ball flight don't care whether the ball is going right or left....
  • Upvote 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This makes sense to me. The fade I play now is waaaaay different than the one I (unintentionally) hit when I was a 25+. Ball starts 5 yards left of the target and drops to right. Exact opposite of a well hit draw. Last thing I want is the ball swooping 20 yds across the sky.

Posted

David is right.  Another thing that often contributes to the difference in distance (particular for myself) is that when I hook the ball, my club head is more closed than a straight shot, or a slight fade.  So I've delofted the club.  An example from the club I play most often:

Short Par 3, only 100 yards, Pin was in middle back both the last two rounds

Round 1--Hit SW, drew it and hooked it, ball flight was lower, spin was less, one bounce over back right of green

Round 2--Hit SW, blocked it just a touch, cut it a touch, ball was very high (club face too open, as opposed to too closed), ball landed front left off green.

Made par both times, though. :-)

"Witty golf quote."


Posted
My longest drives used to always be draws. Now my longest drives are from relatively straight (as far as the eye can judge it) to a very slight fade. I used to even get pretty decent distance when a draw crossed over into what I would call a hook. Seems like anymore when I hit one of those it's going nowhere. Almost a blessing in disguise though because often my hooks now don't go far enough to get in trouble (but that doesn't stop me from hating them just the same). ;-) My main nemisis since the first day I ever picked up a golf club was the hook. Never was a slicer.

Posted
This makes sense to me. The fade I play now is waaaaay different than[quote name="MS256" url="/t/76435/does-a-fade-have-to-go-shorter-than-a-draw#post_1037303"]My longest drives used to always be draws. Now my longest drives are from relatively straight (as far as the eye can judge it) to a very slight fade. I used to even get pretty decent distance when a draw crossed over into what I would call a hook. Seems like anymore when I hit one of those it's going nowhere. Almost a blessing in disguise though because often my hooks now don't go far enough to get in trouble (but that doesn't stop me from hating them just the same). ;-) My main nemisis since the first day I ever picked up a golf club was the hook. Never was a slicer.[/quote] Lucky man (and probably 1 in 100). I started off slicing. As I got better my miss became a hook, which no question gets me in more trouble than any slice ever did. However, I hated the slice so bad that to this day nothing pisses me off more than seeing a ball go right, even though it's always a block now, not a slice. Still ruins a round.

Posted

These answers are cracking me up.

Simply put, yes a fade is typically shorter than a draw.

However your phrase "have to" throws everything off and is soliciting the funky comments...nothing is absolute...

but think about this, are you asking for just carry distance?  or run out distance too?  If the conditions are soft, a high fade with driver may go long...

but on a firm and fast day a draw will run out much longer typically..

  • Upvote 1

Posted

However your phrase "have to" throws everything off and is soliciting the funky comments...nothing is absolute...

True.

"Witty golf quote."


Posted

A fade is a ball that curves to the right, a draw is a ball that curves to the left. Without more information, one can't say a whole lot. You can hit a low fade and a high draw. There is no general rule that applies.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Lucky man (and probably 1 in 100). I started off slicing. As I got better my miss became a hook, which no question gets me in more trouble than any slice ever did. However, I hated the slice so bad that to this day nothing pisses me off more than seeing a ball go right, even though it's always a block now, not a slice. Still ruins a round.

Hmmm. No I wouldn't say lucky. Cursed comes to mind first. ;-)

I hate hooks with a passion, and I still hit way too many of them.

You can talk to a fade but a hook won't listen. :-D


  • Administrator
Posted
These answers are cracking me up.

Simply put, yes a fade is typically shorter than a draw.

However your phrase "have to" throws everything off and is soliciting the funky comments...nothing is absolute...

but think about this, are you asking for just carry distance?  or run out distance too?  If the conditions are soft, a high fade with driver may go long...

but on a firm and fast day a draw will run out much longer typically..

Unfortunately this is the type of answer that's common in these kinds of discussions.

Draws tend to go farther because people tend to hit them with less loft. But that's nowhere near a guarantee.

Consider the clubface to be a flat object with a given amount of loft. Does it really matter - does the ball even care - whether the clubface is moving 3° to the left or 3° to the right during impact if the clubhead speed, centeredness of strike, and loft are the same?

No. They'd go the exact same distance.

Another reason fades tend to go shorter: people are already pulling their elbows apart in swinging left. In swinging out to the right a bit, they extend their arms, generating a bit more clubhead speed.

Lots of "tends to…" but no guarantees.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Unfortunately this is the typo of answer that's common in these kinds of discussions.

Draws tend to go farther because people tend to hit them with less loft. But that's nowhere near a guarantee.

Consider the clubface to be a flat object with a given amount of loft. Does it really matter - does the ball even care - whether the clubface is moving 3° to the left or 3° to the right during impact if the clubhead speed, centeredness of strike, and loft are the same?

No. They'd go the exact same distance.

Another reason fades tend to go shorter: people are already pulling their elbows apart in swinging left. In swinging out to the right a bit, they extend their arms, generating a bit more clubhead speed.

Lots of "tends to…" but no guarantees.

Thanks Erik.  Regarding the elbows coming apart, my guess is that that's a flaw in the swing, not something naturally happens when swinging a bit out to in.  The main reason I posted this question is because I noticed on well struck fades I wasn't loosing distance. After trial and error on the range, I've found that best fades I can hit are the ones where I pretty much make the exact same swing I do when I hit a draw; only differences are 1) I line up left of the target, and 2) I hold off my release.  I still try to get full extension through the swing.  The ones that end up starting on a line right of the one I intended, and curving too far right of the target, are the ones where I don't trust the path and end up pulling my arms in and in essence bailing on the swing.  Those are shorter, no question.


Posted

Typically a 'fade' would be shorter than a draw, as it will land softer and roll less.  However I know for certain that a power fade could go as far a draw.  If you want to hit a big slider with a fade shape then you can seriously bomb it out there.

also depending on the lie of the hole fairway a fade may be the correct shot for the ball to go further.


Posted
What's the difference between a fade a power fade. Don't you want to hit all fades powerfully...

A "power fade" is a well-aimed slice that ends up in the fairway.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
A high arching fade (cut) to a protected pin is a beautiful thing. For me to produce a fade, I have to "hold off" my swing at the end whereas for a draw, I ripping through the follow through. Haven't done any swing monitoring, but I imagine the swing speed for the fade is less. If you naturally fade, this may not be the case. Then there are always those quacking duck hooks that end up 2 fairways over. :-D

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Note: This thread is 4152 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.