Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Does anyone know how much it actually costs to make a club these days?


Note: This thread is 3934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just found this article , and found it interesting and somewhat in line with what I estimated the costs given my limited engineering experience making consumer products.

It would be interesting to hear what everyone thinks a MP-69 costs to make versus a Callaway Apex MB or any of the cast clubs for that matter. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Well, it costs a lot to get the flow of the grain just right for the forging.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm not surprised. The same goes for any premium brand product. Still not as bad as the clothing industry, the labor costs for those $60 Nike polos is literally pennies.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I knew distribution and advertising was the majority of their expenses on clubs, but I didn't know by how much.

Note to self: Get into the golf business golf manufacturing business.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Is there a manufacturer that makes high quality clubs that doesn't spend all this money on tour player endorsements?

Tour Edge.

Or if you dont mind clone type designs, Gigagolf.


Posted
If people didn't pay it, they couldn't charge it.... Gotta love the free market.
  • Upvote 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If people didn't pay it, they couldn't charge it....

Gotta love the free market.


Agree  Like any product out there, as long as enough folks are willing to pay their inflated prices then the prices will keep going up.  I am as guilty as anyone for spending too much money on clubs.  I am now at the point where I look for used first or old generation (year before) new clubs and save half of what I would pay if it were a new release club.  There is no way a driver than came out last month is that much better than one that came out just a year ago.  Its marketing BS that these manufacturers thrive on.  If that were the case, I should be driving the ball over 400 yards now per what Taylormade and others have marketed with all of their driver releases over the years (each one should add 15-20 yards).


Posted

Is there a manufacturer that makes high quality clubs that doesn't spend all this money on tour player endorsements?

Just about any certified club-maker.  AND the clubs will be custom fitted to you.  AND you get exactly the configuration you want.

But they will not be cheaper than off the rack.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The raw materials aren't the only cost.  The huge casting and forging machinery is VERY expensive and maintenance intensive. Its all added in to the price.

  • Upvote 1

Posted
The raw materials aren't the only cost.  The huge casting and forging machinery is VERY expensive and maintenance intensive. Its all added in to the price.

The article had lots of figures, but had an underspecified model (left out key variables) in explaining the cost breakdowns.

You have research and development, and then you have the casting and forging expenditures.

Next, you have to time your manufacturing schedule so the new clubs hit the market at the right time.

As for the current arms race in golf gear, shorter product life cycles triggered this. But, it came at an expense. TaylorMade had a rough 2014, as did parent company Adidas.

  • Adidas had a very disappointing retailing year hawking World Cup-related merchandise.
  • Golf division TaylorMade upset a lot of the retailers by continuing to pump new club models into the market every few months. And, the flood of new  2014 TM stuff was late arriving in retail stores.
  • Dick's was tightly aligned with TaylorMade, but got caught with a backlog of TM merchandise. Dick's then fired some 500 in-store PGA pros to help make up for the shortfall. Dick's bought Golf Galaxy several years ago, and I can't tell how insulated GG is from the Dick's troubles.

As far as marketing goes : If you produce differentiated merchandise (upscale / special features), you spend advertising $$ to remind your current customers how wonderful your driver, or putter, are. You want them to buy more TM or Callaway clubs in 2016.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Also, all those machinery costs are included in the article's estimates of prodution costs of around $10 a club for most irons and wedges, $15 a club for higher end irons, $27-65 for titanium drivers, etc.  The truth is there are also lots of costs involved in marketing and selling these products, which account for much of their higher end price.

It is thus possible sometimes to still get good quailty, by buying some of the best of the lesser known brands, which often don't do lots of advertising, have staff players, or sell product through big retailers with high markup.  But you have to be careful and do a little research. Some cheap brands are certainly also more cheaply made.

But some smaller brands like Acer, Alpha, Gigagolf, Pinemeadow, seem to use decent quality components and manufacturing and have pretty good reputations amongst those who have actually tried them.  And for a little more money, there are also several quality component brands available only through independent clubfitters, which also aren't spending lots on marketing.


Note: This thread is 3934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.