Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Dan Jenkins On Tiger Beating "Nobodies"


Note: This thread is 3843 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

Jenkins isn't making any sense. Even if a guy like Bob May finishes runner-up, Tiger still beat name players because they were in the field. Sergio, Phil, Furyk, Vijay, Adam Scott, Davis Love, Ernie, Lee Westwood, Duval, Graeme McDowell, Padraig.

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2015/5/20/dan-jenkins-on-tiger-beating-nobodies.html

Quote:

From the Q&A;, talking about Jordan Spieth:

Incidentally, there’s much more talent at the top (and the bottom) than there was during Tiger’s peak years. Tiger beat a lot of nobodies to win most of his majors.

Yeah, there was Phil [Mickelson] and [Ernie] Els around, in and out, but go back and look who was second to him in those majors and tell me where they are now.

Did we take Tiger Woods’ dominance for granted, and will he catch Jack Nicklaus’ record for majors?

I never took Tiger’s dominance for granted. The media loved him because he was golf’s only rock star, only dynasty, and people like dynasties in any sport. People also like to see dynasties crash and burn. Every golfer hits a wall eventually. Tiger has hit his, in more ways than one. He’s lost his game and putting stroke and his head. It happens. And I’ve only seen one player lose it all and come back. That was [Ben] Hogan, who damn near died in the car wreck. He came back and won six more majors. Tiger seems more confused about it than anyone I’ve ever covered. Maybe that’s partly because it came so easy for him in the beginning....

Shackelford added

Quote:
And this is where I would differ from Dan: the course and setup means as much as the competition. Tiger won at an Augusta National seemingly rigged to stop him from winning annually. He won at a Torrey Pines playing much firmer and faster than he was used to (and which Phil Mickelson has struggled on post-redo). And he won at the Old Course against some pretty stout leaderboards.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

All I've heard is that Tiger did not grant Jenkins a one on one interview several years ago, and it's been sour grapes ever since...

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I just ignore any pieces that are basically complaints or negativity regarding Woods. Saves a lot of time.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
All I've heard is that Tiger did not grant Jenkins a one on one interview several years ago, and it's been sour grapes ever since...

This is all I've ever heard too.

His comments are lacking in logic, especially given that this was someone who covered golf since the days of the pharaohs .

The current situation of players Tiger beat in his prime has nothing to the quality of competition they offered back then. Situations happen that may have knocked them off their game. Are we to say David Duval was a terrible player in those days because he's no longer making it on tour?

Just seems like another piece where you insert Wood's name to get some attention.

Nike Covert 2.0 10.5* with Fujikura Motore F3 Stiff Flex
Nike Covert 2.0 3 Wood 15* Kuro Kage X-stiff 71g
Nike Covert 2.0 21* 3 hybrid Kuro Kage X-stiff 85g
Nike VR Pro Combo CB 4--PW
Nike VR Pro forged 50, 56, 58
Scotty Cameron Newport 2.5


Posted
I'm not going to click the article and give him a view, but it sounds like Dan Jenkins said something so monumentally stupid that even Geoff Shackelford could come across as reasonable and/or intelligent in response. That's not easy to do. A sampling of runners up from Tiger's major victories: Tom Kite, Sergio Garcia, Ernie Els (twice in 2000), Miguel Angel Jimenez, David Duval, Phil Mickelson, Retief Goosen, Colin Montgomerie A sampling of runners up from Tiger's WGC victories: Phil Mickelson, Miguel Angel Jimenez, Justin Leonard, Jim Furyk, Retief Goosen, David Toms, Vijay Singh, Stuart Appleby, John Daly, Stewart Cink, Adam Scott, Ian Poulter, Steve Stricker, Keegan Bradley, Henrik Stenson

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think the old man is confused.  Tiger came back twice (in my count) to win lot of tournaments.  The third comeback is unlikely.

As for Tiger beating nobodies in his peak days, that's a bit harsh.  Conversely, there have been no dominant player since Tiger's peak years and anybody (even a nobody) has a good shot at winning a major.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Jacks competition made tigers look like HS players. Tiger is washed up now. Rory is the "next Jack".

Yeah all those club pros were tough competition for Jack ;-)

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah all those club pros were tough competition for Jack


Owweee, that was a bitch-slap...

:-$

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Right "Club pros" like Arnie Lee Hale Player Casper weiskop watson trevino and many more. Tiggy had Phil and Ernie in their waning years. No contest Now with Speith McIlroy and a few young guns tiger can't compete

Posted
I'm not going to click the article and give him a view, but it sounds like Dan Jenkins said something so monumentally stupid that even Geoff Shackelford could come across as reasonable and/or intelligent in response. That's not easy to do. A sampling of runners up from Tiger's major victories: Tom Kite, Sergio Garcia, Ernie Els (twice in 2000), Miguel Angel Jimenez, David Duval, Phil Mickelson, Retief Goosen, Colin Montgomerie A sampling of runners up from Tiger's WGC victories: Phil Mickelson, Miguel Angel Jimenez, Justin Leonard, Jim Furyk, Retief Goosen, David Toms, Vijay Singh, Stuart Appleby, John Daly, Stewart Cink, Adam Scott, Ian Poulter, Steve Stricker, Keegan Bradley, Henrik Stenson

All weak players....... Jack had to beat multi opponents that have multi major wins


Posted

It may be true, the competition is stiffer now, better players, maybe... but we have Tiger to thank for that.

I'm not sure why it matters though, does this make Tiger lesser? nope, so why say it?


Posted

Right "Club pros" like Arnie Lee Hale Player Casper weiskop watson trevino and many more. Tiggy had Phil and Ernie in their waning years. No contest

Now with Speith McIlroy and a few young guns tiger can't compete

Jack has acknowledged that the overall competition Tiger faced was tougher than what he faced.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Maybe Dan Jenkins' articles get published because there aren't any good writers around willing to write about golf...

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Dan Jenkins has less credibility than half the posters on this site..........his opinion is worthless right now and, quite frankly, I haven't read a "decent" Dan Jenkins article in years...

All that said........"Dead Solid Perfect" was a great read

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


Note: This thread is 3843 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.