Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Curious.....So...Why is a slice so easy to hit?


Note: This thread is 3708 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
We all know the golf swing is incredible intricate. The difference if 1/4" can mean dozens of yards. So I would like to hear (read) from you biomechanics junkies, why is slicing so easy and natural? I can hit a slice with and iron or especially a driver any time I want. So why is it so hard to get the clubface square?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I'll take a quick stab at it and then if I change my answer upon further reflection (pretty busy string of days here, so it may be awhile), I'll do so.

Because the ball is "out there" and "down there."

The ball is out away from us, so I think a lot of people swing "out there" to try to hit the ball early in the downswing. This is also exacerbated because the ball is "down there" and people are not used to swinging along the ground to chop at something on the ground - they're used to swinging down at it, like you would to chop a piece of wood sitting on a low stump.

The target line doesn't help either - people want to get the club "out" to the target line quickly.


Another thought: people when they first learn the game tend to leave the face open and hit shots way right. The instinct is to then swing left (even though start line is governed more by face, "path is instinctual").


In other words, it's instinctual to swing out and then down. Whether because of the first reason or the second.

P.S. A lot of girls play with heavier clubs, and for them it almost seems like the opposite: it almost seems like the heavier club means they can't throw it out quite as much from the top, so the club drops behind them and they jump to generate speed, both (heavy club which falls behind them in transition, jumping which stalls body pivot) of which help the path be OUTward quite a bit.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
lazy or slow wrists....

Well, I can slice it like a red ninja with either slow, lazy or solid. But the phenomenon is that we all hear and read that 90% or more of golfers slice the ball. Why? Why don't the majority of amateurs hook, or why not baby draw? Why isn't the natural tendency a square club face?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Because coming over the top feels right, it's natural, inside-out is just another part of the swing that is an act of faith- faith that swinging like that will send the ball straight, not to the right.


  • Moderator
Posted
Because the ball is "out there" and "down there."

The ball is out away from us, so I think a lot of people swing "out there" to try to hit the ball early in the downswing. This is also exacerbated because the ball is "down there" and people are not used to swinging along the ground to chop at something on the ground - they're used to swinging down at it, like you would to chop a piece of wood sitting on a low stump.

The target line doesn't help either - people want to get the club "out" to the target line quickly.

Good post. Yeah in order to get the club on the ball, an OTT swing makes sense (instinctually) to get the club "out" and "down there". It's just an attempt to try and get low point forward.

lazy or slow wrists....

If anything a slicer has "active" wrists. They're flipping the heck out of it on the downswing.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Good post. Yeah in order to get the club on the ball, an OTT swing makes sense (instinctually) to get the club "out" and "down there". It's just an attempt to try and get low point forward.

Try not to speak to much in terms of being on plane.

Do you think that feeling is systemic from the trend that more amateurs do not create enough depth with the hands in the backswing leading to the clubhead being under the so called plane?

From that position, if the mass of the clubhead is below the plane is it just a natural move to send that mass up and outward at the top of the swing? From A4.5 the only place the mass of the club can go is donward and inward.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Our pivot point is too far back. I think of it as running out of reach with my arms. Meaning, even if we have an in to out path and successfully hit the ball first and then the ground (good contact), we can still fail to continue the intended swing path those couple of inches past the ball. The club head starts back inward before contact.

It's another reason why getting weight forward helps improve the swing path.

In case you couldn't tell, I don't know squat about biomechanics. But that's my theory.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Great question! Love the feed back as well. For me it is easy to stay behind the ball, and swing with my arms ... which seems to promote an over OTT / outside/in swing ... believe me, I have nailed my share of roof tops! Admittedly I have gotten better thanks to the help here and Evolvr, but it is easier for me to slice than hit it straight'ish ... seems to be my default swing.

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Do you think that feeling is systemic from the trend that more amateurs do not create enough depth with the hands in the backswing leading to the clubhead being under the so called plane?

From that position, if the mass of the clubhead is below the plane is it just a natural move to send that mass up and outward at the top of the swing? From A4.5 the only place the mass of the club can go is donward and inward.

Right that can definitely be part of it and they don't create the depth because they don't turn. Rotating your body on an inclined angle is kind of "unnatural".

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've wondered about this relative to Bubba W. Did 'what felt natural' possibly tap into a grooved biomechanical thing for marginally less effortful swing speed but you have to flight it lower to reap the carry & roll benefits?

Or is it just that it works because he is lefty and that shape works for the majority of doglegs?

Kevin


Posted
Strange thing here: bear in mind I'm left handed. Back when I chopped wood or used a machete in Africa, I could stand much like a golf stance and swing an axe with a blade only about 2mm wide and hit my target pretty squarely every time. I didn't twist the blade and graze off the wood, root, I didn't hit the ground before the wood, root....square blade every time. Left arm back, rotate shoulders, right shoulder under chin....and bam! square hit. Then I take a golf club with a larger blade, and it's like I'm physically challenged. Golf is hard.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Strange thing here: bear in mind I'm left handed. Back when I chopped wood or used a machete in Africa, I could stand much like a golf stance and swing an axe with a blade only about 2mm wide and hit my target pretty squarely every time. I didn't twist the blade and graze off the wood, root, I didn't hit the ground before the wood, root....square blade every time. Left arm back, rotate shoulders, right shoulder under chin....and bam! square hit. Then I take a golf club with a larger blade, and it's like I'm physically challenged. Golf is hard.

That is strange to me as well. I'm a lefthander too, playing righthanded, I was taught to pull down with my left hand, "toll the bell", never had a huge natural issue not shifting weight or hitting early, which is what I equate to slicing. Maybe the axe was heavy and you weren't trying to swing it too quickly so your natural athletic ability just took over?

Steve

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah I've tried to really do that "left arm down" move. It usually leads to me hitting a glorious shank. Problem is my shanks can be either due to a closed face coming inside out, or a wide open from outside in. They both feel the same.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah I've tried to really do that "left arm down" move. It usually leads to me hitting a glorious shank. Problem is my shanks can be either due to a closed face coming inside out, or a wide open from outside in. They both feel the same.

Other than drinking heavily, I don't have anything else. It'll come to you, probably something really basic that you'll slap yourself for when you figure it out. Hang in there.

Steve

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would narrow it down to the right shoulder. You want to bring it forward. Swing an axe or a punch or hammer a nail and it internally rotates inward. We're  so used to using it to apply force even when you open a door especially  those fire doors in office complexes.

So it's  a very natural movement. In golf that right shoulder needs to be delayed. It will internally rotate eventually but it ruins swing plane from the top. Much like the movements mentioned  above the right arm is going to work across the body and in the golf swing the slice has already started outside so the only way for the club to go is inside on the follow through.

"Repetition is the chariot of genius"

Driver: BENROSS VX PROTO 10.5
Woods: BENROSS QUAD SPEED FAIRWAY 15"
Hybrids:BENROSS 3G 17" BENROSSV5 Escape 20"
Irons: :wilson: DEEP RED Fluid Feel  4-SW
Putter: BENROSS PURE RED
Balls: :wilsonstaff:  Ti DNA


Posted

Most people who play golf have played other sports they pick it up and overpower the swing resulting in all upper body. This tends to cause an over aggressive move that cuts across the ball 98% of the time resulting in all sorts of wild misses mostly slices.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

That is strange to me as well. I'm a lefthander too, playing righthanded, I was taught to pull down with my left hand, "toll the bell", never had a huge natural issue not shifting weight or hitting early, which is what I equate to slicing. Maybe the axe was heavy and you weren't trying to swing it too quickly so your natural athletic ability just took over?

 

I'm on board with that insight. We know it takes 'effort' to swing the club, but it doesn't really get heavy until late in the swing (or once we've let it drop behind us). It's an epee or foil, not a broadsword.

Kevin


Note: This thread is 3708 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.